#77
Date and Place: 9 Sivan 5667 (1907), Yafo
Recipient: Rav Shem Tov Geffen – kabbalist, philosopher, mathematician, and friend of Rav Kook, who had recently made aliya and was living in or near Yafo.
Body: I have received your letter, and most of what you wrote is in line with my thinking.
Regarding your program [of incorporating secular studies into a yeshiva setting], I certainly have a great desire to increase the light of general studies among the elite few, who are special in their Torah and their fear of Heaven, especially those who live in the Holy Land.
Our main goal should be to have true, full-fledged Torah scholars, as in previous times. In order to have the broadest level of da’at Torah (Torah-based or Torah-inspired wisdom) it is necessary to possess all important types of knowledge, including medumah (ed. note – I do not know how to translate that word in this context). Therefore, it is necessary to show the path forward for future Torah leaders as to how to use every discipline of knowledge in order to embellish the reach of the Torah.
For this purpose, it would be worthwhile to establish a program of studies with a short explanation of the content of every discipline (among those that are not well known among the masses) and to demonstrate how they can be used regarding certain Torah disciplines. In that way, the general knowledge can broaden and clarify the Torah approach.
In truth, the completeness of a person’s humanity is good and desired in and of itself (which makes much of the secular knowledge valuable in its own right). However, we should not be embarrassed by the guidance of our great Torah leaders from time immemorial, who possessed all the areas of wisdom but as “maid servants and kitchen staff” in relation to the Torah. Only when we have done this can we say that our scholars are truly the Wise Men of Israel.
However, since the separation between elements of wisdom has come into the world, the matters [of incorporating intrinsically useful wisdom] have taken on a foreign form. When other elements of impure ethics make their way into these disciplines, then the dangers are inestimable.
Therefore, we very much need to support the ancient rule that all elements of wisdom are included in the Torah, when referring to Torah in its true and broad meaning. Therefore, it is necessary to have all of the wisdoms in order to understand and broaden the Torah.
For this purpose, I plan to set the cornerstone for the Otzar Chayim (lit., the storehouse of life – this was the name of the yeshiva that Rav Kook would open in Yafo in 1909) for the nation of Hashem, who are His legacy. If you are inclined to be of assistance in this ambitious project, with the great wisdom you possess, the thesis I have set out for you can serve as a guide. If you would be so kind as to expand the program you sent me or to form another one, based on the characteristics we have discussed, it would be of great help for our activities with G-d’s help. [Ed. note – apparently, he did help Rav Kook in the establishment of Otzar Chayim.]
Friday, December 30, 2022
Thursday, December 29, 2022
The Yishai Fleisher Israel Podcast: Truth Two Power
SEASON 2022 EPISODE 51: Yishai and Malkah Fleisher celebrate the incoming Israeli government and pray for its success. Ben Bresky on the life and times of Rabbi Chaim Drukman. And Rav Mike Feuer on Joseph's ascension to the throne of Egypt and the ability to re-see a dark reality through a Godly lens.
How can such a little light push away so much darkness?
by Rav Binny Freedman
Some time ago, my brother shared with me the following story:
Yuli Edelstein the speaker of the Knesset, was visiting a small school in Beitar Illit (Le’tzion Be’Rinah) and shared the following story:
On Dec 19, 1984, Edelstein was sentenced by a Russian Tribunal, to three years of hard labor in Siberia. Technically the crime listed on the charge sheet was possession of narcotics, but the real reason was the fact that the Russians had caught him teaching Hebrew.
“That day in court”, Edelstein recalled, “was after three solid months of being imprisoned in an isolation cell in Moscow’s infamous Chistopol prison.”
“I was taken straight from my prison cell to the court and found it full of Russian military and security personnel, who had clearly filled the court room to ensure there was no room for any of my supporters; only my wife and mother managed to get into the courtroom to hear the sentencing.”
After the sentencing, the twenty-six-year-old Edelstein was immediately surrounded by Russian security personnel. On his way out of the court room he managed to stick his head through the ring of security and had a moment to say something to his wife, whom he most probably would not see again for at least three years, if ever. He had not seen his wife for three months; what would he say to her? What one sentence was he driven to share with her? What was the question he asked her?
“Tonya! What candle is it?”
The security personnel who overheard him must have thought he had lost his mind; after all, he had just heard he was sentenced to three years of hard labor…. Years later his wife would share with him that at first she thought the same thing. So again, he yelled: “what candle is it today?”
Then she got it: so she yelled back: Tonight we light the second candle of Chanukah!”
He had been in an isolation cell for three months but when the Judge read the sentence and announced the date, he realized it might be Chanukah; as it turned out he was sentenced on the first day of Chanukah in 1984.
That night, no longer in an isolation cell, but in the cell of sentenced prisoners, he managed to get hold of a couple of matches. And on the second night of Chanukah, Yuli Edelstein, son of two Russian assimilated Jews, who had come full circle back to Judaism, lit the Chanukah lights with two matches, standing in front of the barred window of his cell.
Reciting the blessings over the miracles Hashem (G-d) had performed for the Jewish people so many years ago, he held the matches until the flames burnt down to his fingertips.
As he explained to the school children with whom he was speaking: “It may have been the shortest candle lighting in Jewish history, lasting only a few seconds, but that little bit of light for me, pushed away an enormous amount of darkness.”
How can such a little light push away so much darkness?
Natan Sharansky, arguably the most famous Soviet Jewish prisoner of conscience, was imprisoned for many years and became a symbol of the movement to free Soviet Jewry in the 1970’s and 80’s I was there with the thousands of supporters who came to welcome him home to Israel when he was freed in 1986, and will never forget the moment he proclaimed, holding high his new Israeli identity card, “Am Yisrael Chai” Israel yet lives!“ .
I actually once had the privilege of sitting next to Natan Sharansky at a dinner and had the opportunity to ask him whether he still bore any malice towards his Russian tormentors. His response, which remains with me, was that they were just doing their job, and he was too busy getting on with his life to hold on to any anger; amazing….
This week’s portion Vayigash, actually tells the story of one of the most incredible such moments in human history: Yosef's rapprochement with his estranged brothers.
Incredibly twenty-two years after they threw him in a pit and sold him as a slave, and despite all he had endured, Yosef seems to bear no malice towards his brothers and forgives them with tears in his eyes…. (Bereisheet 45:1-9). Indeed, this is the first instance in the Torah of one person’s actual, real forgiveness of another.
It is not the first time we sense forgiveness; G-d ultimately forgives Adam and Chava, commutes Kayin's sentence and so on, but then G-d does not really forgive, because everything is really part of
G-d’s plan to begin with, and G-d is the source of all reality, so for G-d, there is really nothing to forgive.
And while there are instances of rapprochement in the Torah, we did not seem to see forgiveness. Avraham avoids a conflict with his nephew Lot (ibid. 13: 5-14) and they “separate”, but Avraham never gets angry and there does not seem anything to let go of.
And when Esav and his long-estranged brother Yaakov finally meet again, so many years after Yaakov ‘stole’ the blessings from his older brother, it does not seem Esau ever actually forgives Yaakov. The topic does not even come up in their conversation (ibid. 33:1-17), and there too, either because Yaakov makes himself subservient to his older brother, or because he bribes him, or perhaps because mystically he overcomes him, they too separate. Indeed, the fact that they go their separate ways seems more about Esav having let go than about Yaakov being forgiven.
But with Yosef, there is no avoiding the topic. When Yosef finally reveals himself, the brothers cannot speak; they are clearly terrified.
And if there ever was a person who had the right to be angry, it was Yosef. After all, his brothers robbed him of his youth; he was taken from the father he loved, not to mention his beloved younger brother Binyamin, forced to grow up without his older brother. They stole twenty-two years of his life! And they did not just leave; they threw him in a pit; he was sold as a slave; and he ended up again in the lime pits and slave prisons of ancient Egypt; we cannot even begin to imagine the suffering Yosef must have endured.
And yet, finally given the opportunity to confront his tormentors he not only seems to have no anger and bear then no grudge, he actually understands how terrified they must be and wants to comfort them! And he not only seems to forgive them, he wants to help them! He immediately offers them a place to live, guarantees their sustenance and sets in motion the plan to bring Yaakov and Binyamin down to Egypt under his protection.
What is the secret to such magnanimity?
In order to understand forgiveness, we first need to understand the anger and the sense of being wronged that necessitates forgiveness in the first place.
Anger is all about expectations. I become angry because I feel I deserve better; I expect to be treated better, and I am upset because I am not sufficiently appreciated. Notice how many times the letter I appears in this sentence; read it again:
I become angry because I feel I deserve better; I expect to be treated better, and I am upset because Iam not sufficiently appreciated. Anger, essentially all about me; and Judaism teaches that the way to correct such a character imbalance is that in truth it’s not supposed to be about me; it’s about something so much bigger than me; it’s about the image of G-d in everyone around me; it’s about seeing Hashem in everything, and recognizing life is not all about me.
And that is exactly what Yosef does. He does not see himself as the center of the story, nor even the brothers; we are all characters in a much larger narrative.
“For G-d has sent me before you to provide sustenance…” (ibid. 45:5); if there is a much bigger picture and we are just part of a larger production, then we don’t really have expectations; we have reactions. We are forced to wonder what Hashem’s plan really is, and why we find ourselves in such situations. Life becomes less about what someone else has done to me, and more about why G-d is giving me such challenges….
Which leads to the second aspect of forgiveness. Many years ago a very special friend (Rabbi Danny Beller z”l ) pointed out in a lecture I heard him share that to be forgiving, is really to be for giving; it’s all about wanting to give rather than to take.
In fact, the Hebrew word for love, ahava, really means to give (le’havi is to bring…) because love is all about giving, as opposed to lust which is all about taking. That’s why when you love someone, they are your partner, but when you lust someone they become an object. That’s also why love grows, and lust wanes….
If you love someone and only want to give them, seeing them as more at the center of things than you, then it’s easy to let go of the anger and be more about giving.
And the more you see Hashem as the center of reality and the person you love as so clearly created in Hashem’s image, the more ridiculous it becomes to get angry….
Often, we don’t realize that anger is really not about the other person; I’ve met people who are holding on to anger for people that have been dead for twenty years!
So it’s not about the other person; they could care less that we are still angry; to quote another line I recall from Rabbi Beller z”l: Forgiveness is an absolute refusal to live in a state of ill will. And the healthiest thing we can do with anger is simply to let it go. And we do that by recognizing that whatever made me angry in the first place is really a gift from Hashem.
Incidentally that is the difference between just letting go, as Esau does, and the forgiveness of Yosef. Letting go still leaves us apart which is part of why Esau and Yaakov go their separate ways (ibid. 33:16-17). Whereas real forgiveness based on love, brings us together, as with Yosef and his brothers. Certainly, we could use a lot more of that….
Shabbat Shalom from Jerusalem.
Some time ago, my brother shared with me the following story:
Yuli Edelstein the speaker of the Knesset, was visiting a small school in Beitar Illit (Le’tzion Be’Rinah) and shared the following story:
On Dec 19, 1984, Edelstein was sentenced by a Russian Tribunal, to three years of hard labor in Siberia. Technically the crime listed on the charge sheet was possession of narcotics, but the real reason was the fact that the Russians had caught him teaching Hebrew.
“That day in court”, Edelstein recalled, “was after three solid months of being imprisoned in an isolation cell in Moscow’s infamous Chistopol prison.”
“I was taken straight from my prison cell to the court and found it full of Russian military and security personnel, who had clearly filled the court room to ensure there was no room for any of my supporters; only my wife and mother managed to get into the courtroom to hear the sentencing.”
After the sentencing, the twenty-six-year-old Edelstein was immediately surrounded by Russian security personnel. On his way out of the court room he managed to stick his head through the ring of security and had a moment to say something to his wife, whom he most probably would not see again for at least three years, if ever. He had not seen his wife for three months; what would he say to her? What one sentence was he driven to share with her? What was the question he asked her?
“Tonya! What candle is it?”
The security personnel who overheard him must have thought he had lost his mind; after all, he had just heard he was sentenced to three years of hard labor…. Years later his wife would share with him that at first she thought the same thing. So again, he yelled: “what candle is it today?”
Then she got it: so she yelled back: Tonight we light the second candle of Chanukah!”
He had been in an isolation cell for three months but when the Judge read the sentence and announced the date, he realized it might be Chanukah; as it turned out he was sentenced on the first day of Chanukah in 1984.
That night, no longer in an isolation cell, but in the cell of sentenced prisoners, he managed to get hold of a couple of matches. And on the second night of Chanukah, Yuli Edelstein, son of two Russian assimilated Jews, who had come full circle back to Judaism, lit the Chanukah lights with two matches, standing in front of the barred window of his cell.
Reciting the blessings over the miracles Hashem (G-d) had performed for the Jewish people so many years ago, he held the matches until the flames burnt down to his fingertips.
As he explained to the school children with whom he was speaking: “It may have been the shortest candle lighting in Jewish history, lasting only a few seconds, but that little bit of light for me, pushed away an enormous amount of darkness.”
How can such a little light push away so much darkness?
Natan Sharansky, arguably the most famous Soviet Jewish prisoner of conscience, was imprisoned for many years and became a symbol of the movement to free Soviet Jewry in the 1970’s and 80’s I was there with the thousands of supporters who came to welcome him home to Israel when he was freed in 1986, and will never forget the moment he proclaimed, holding high his new Israeli identity card, “Am Yisrael Chai” Israel yet lives!“ .
I actually once had the privilege of sitting next to Natan Sharansky at a dinner and had the opportunity to ask him whether he still bore any malice towards his Russian tormentors. His response, which remains with me, was that they were just doing their job, and he was too busy getting on with his life to hold on to any anger; amazing….
This week’s portion Vayigash, actually tells the story of one of the most incredible such moments in human history: Yosef's rapprochement with his estranged brothers.
Incredibly twenty-two years after they threw him in a pit and sold him as a slave, and despite all he had endured, Yosef seems to bear no malice towards his brothers and forgives them with tears in his eyes…. (Bereisheet 45:1-9). Indeed, this is the first instance in the Torah of one person’s actual, real forgiveness of another.
It is not the first time we sense forgiveness; G-d ultimately forgives Adam and Chava, commutes Kayin's sentence and so on, but then G-d does not really forgive, because everything is really part of
G-d’s plan to begin with, and G-d is the source of all reality, so for G-d, there is really nothing to forgive.
And while there are instances of rapprochement in the Torah, we did not seem to see forgiveness. Avraham avoids a conflict with his nephew Lot (ibid. 13: 5-14) and they “separate”, but Avraham never gets angry and there does not seem anything to let go of.
And when Esav and his long-estranged brother Yaakov finally meet again, so many years after Yaakov ‘stole’ the blessings from his older brother, it does not seem Esau ever actually forgives Yaakov. The topic does not even come up in their conversation (ibid. 33:1-17), and there too, either because Yaakov makes himself subservient to his older brother, or because he bribes him, or perhaps because mystically he overcomes him, they too separate. Indeed, the fact that they go their separate ways seems more about Esav having let go than about Yaakov being forgiven.
But with Yosef, there is no avoiding the topic. When Yosef finally reveals himself, the brothers cannot speak; they are clearly terrified.
And if there ever was a person who had the right to be angry, it was Yosef. After all, his brothers robbed him of his youth; he was taken from the father he loved, not to mention his beloved younger brother Binyamin, forced to grow up without his older brother. They stole twenty-two years of his life! And they did not just leave; they threw him in a pit; he was sold as a slave; and he ended up again in the lime pits and slave prisons of ancient Egypt; we cannot even begin to imagine the suffering Yosef must have endured.
And yet, finally given the opportunity to confront his tormentors he not only seems to have no anger and bear then no grudge, he actually understands how terrified they must be and wants to comfort them! And he not only seems to forgive them, he wants to help them! He immediately offers them a place to live, guarantees their sustenance and sets in motion the plan to bring Yaakov and Binyamin down to Egypt under his protection.
What is the secret to such magnanimity?
In order to understand forgiveness, we first need to understand the anger and the sense of being wronged that necessitates forgiveness in the first place.
Anger is all about expectations. I become angry because I feel I deserve better; I expect to be treated better, and I am upset because I am not sufficiently appreciated. Notice how many times the letter I appears in this sentence; read it again:
I become angry because I feel I deserve better; I expect to be treated better, and I am upset because Iam not sufficiently appreciated. Anger, essentially all about me; and Judaism teaches that the way to correct such a character imbalance is that in truth it’s not supposed to be about me; it’s about something so much bigger than me; it’s about the image of G-d in everyone around me; it’s about seeing Hashem in everything, and recognizing life is not all about me.
And that is exactly what Yosef does. He does not see himself as the center of the story, nor even the brothers; we are all characters in a much larger narrative.
“For G-d has sent me before you to provide sustenance…” (ibid. 45:5); if there is a much bigger picture and we are just part of a larger production, then we don’t really have expectations; we have reactions. We are forced to wonder what Hashem’s plan really is, and why we find ourselves in such situations. Life becomes less about what someone else has done to me, and more about why G-d is giving me such challenges….
Which leads to the second aspect of forgiveness. Many years ago a very special friend (Rabbi Danny Beller z”l ) pointed out in a lecture I heard him share that to be forgiving, is really to be for giving; it’s all about wanting to give rather than to take.
In fact, the Hebrew word for love, ahava, really means to give (le’havi is to bring…) because love is all about giving, as opposed to lust which is all about taking. That’s why when you love someone, they are your partner, but when you lust someone they become an object. That’s also why love grows, and lust wanes….
If you love someone and only want to give them, seeing them as more at the center of things than you, then it’s easy to let go of the anger and be more about giving.
And the more you see Hashem as the center of reality and the person you love as so clearly created in Hashem’s image, the more ridiculous it becomes to get angry….
Often, we don’t realize that anger is really not about the other person; I’ve met people who are holding on to anger for people that have been dead for twenty years!
So it’s not about the other person; they could care less that we are still angry; to quote another line I recall from Rabbi Beller z”l: Forgiveness is an absolute refusal to live in a state of ill will. And the healthiest thing we can do with anger is simply to let it go. And we do that by recognizing that whatever made me angry in the first place is really a gift from Hashem.
Incidentally that is the difference between just letting go, as Esau does, and the forgiveness of Yosef. Letting go still leaves us apart which is part of why Esau and Yaakov go their separate ways (ibid. 33:16-17). Whereas real forgiveness based on love, brings us together, as with Yosef and his brothers. Certainly, we could use a lot more of that….
Shabbat Shalom from Jerusalem.
Israel Is for Real
BS”D
Tehilim (Psalms) 22;28-29:
כח) יִזְכְּרוּ וְיָשֻׁבוּ אֶל ה’ כָּל אַפְסֵי אָרֶץ וְיִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לְפָנֶיךָ כָּל מִשְׁפְּחוֹת גּוֹיִם:
כט) כִּי לַה’ הַמְּלוּכָה וּמֹשֵׁל בַּגּוֹיִם:
28 All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord,
and all the families of the nations shall worship before Him.
29 For dominion belongs to HaShem, and He rules over the nations.
Paro’s Dreams
There are two biblical episodes of formidable gentile rulers whose dreams were interpreted by a Jew.
The first one is in last week’s parasha, Miketz, when the Egyptian Paro (Pharaoh) experienced two consecutive dreams.
In the first dream, he was standing on/by the Nile, when out of the river emerged seven healthy, fat cows, followed by seven sickly and gaunt ones which devoured the seven healthy cows. Another dream followed. Seven ears of healthy wheat were growing on a single stalk, followed by seven other ears of thin and scorched wheat which devoured the seven full ears.
After 12 years of imprisonment, Yosef is brought before Paro to interpret the dreams. He informs Paro that despite the differences, both dreams share the same interpretation. HaShem has begun seven years of agricultural prosperity that will be followed by seven years of devastating famine.
The apparent object of the dreams in Egyptian history was to inform Paro that he would be the savior of the nation through his wisdom in choosing a talented assistant. Together with their agricultural knowledge and managerial skills, Paro and Yosef would save the nation and millions of people even from foreign lands.
Right or wrong? Wrong!
The actual purpose of the dreams was to serve as a message from HaShem to Yosef that now had begun the first of three exiles that the Jewish nation would have to undergo: descending to Egypt, experiencing hundreds of years of servitude that would eventually result in the miraculous exodus, receiving the Torah on Mount Sinai, and returning home as the masters of the Holy Land.
Nevuchadnezzer’s Dream
Chapter two of the Book of Daniel relates that Nevuchadnezzer, King of Babylon and the destroyer of the first Holy Temple, had a dream, the details of which he could not recall on awakening.
He summoned his advisors and ordered them to remind him of the details of the dream and its interpretation. They responded that their expertise was limited to the interpretation of dreams but not to knowing their details. The king was unimpressed and repeated his threat to “reveal, interpret or die”.
Daniel prayed to HaShem for salvation and, that night, the dream and its meaning were revealed to him. In the morning, he came before the King and said as follows:
In your Majesty’s dream, you saw an enormous, dazzling statue, awesome in appearance. Its head was of pure gold, its chest and arms of silver, its belly and thighs bronze, its legs of iron, and its feet partly of iron and partly of baked clay. Then, suddenly, a rock struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay. The iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver and the gold were all broken “like chaff on a threshing floor in the summer”. The wind swept them away without leaving a trace, but the rock that struck the statue became a huge mountain and filled the whole earth (Daniel 2:31-35).
The King was spellbound by the words of Daniel, the Jew, who continued:
The statue represents a series of kingdoms, each less glorious than its predecessor, as indicated by the decreasing value of the metals. Daniel identified Nebuchadnezzar as the head of gold, stating that HaShem had given him much power (Daniel 2:37-38).
The subsequent kingdoms to arise would be incrementally inferior to Babylon. However, Daniel did not detail who the following kingdoms would be.
Over time, our biblical commentators filled in the omitted details. After Nevuchadnezzer, King of Babylon, would come Persia and Medes, followed by the bronze stomach of Greece, then Rome (the iron thigh), with the fifth mixture of iron and clay representing the Christian and Islamic nations. At that time, the Jewish nation – the rock – will smash them all to bits, paving the way for the final earthly international kingdom of the Jews in Eretz Yisrael.
Conclusion:
The major thrust of Paro’s dreams dealt with the initial formulation of individual Jews into nationhood. The major thrust of Nevuchadnezzer’s dream dealt with the climax of world history when the Jewish nation will outlive all of its arrogant, evil, atheistic enemies, who in the words of Daniel “will be reduced like chaff on a threshing floor”.
Now when the major emperors of history focus on the extraordinary Jewish nation, the compelling conclusion is that the world’s raison d’être – the reason for which the Creator brought this world into being – is because of the holy Jewish nation.
And indeed,
28 All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord,
and all the families of the nations shall worship before Him.
29 For dominion belongs to HaShem, and He rules over the nations.
The Cyclone Bomb
Last week I wrote:
“What was I thinking of at that moment (when Argentina won the Mondial?). I was pondering the earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, landslides, tsunamis and other preternatural calamities that, in the words of the Gemara, would be occurring in every country that has stadiums and arenas while our Holy Temple remains destroyed.
In the U’ne’tana Tokef liturgy of Yom Kippur, we are faced with the frightening question about who will die and who will live, who by fire and who by water. I wonder who will suffer the agony of earthquakes, the displacement of millions of people from their homes and the unleased energies inherent in our planet?
The reasons for unnatural meteorological and geological occurrences in our time are: 1- Homosexuality, 2- The destroyed and desolate Temple Mount at a time when there is an abundance of theaters and arenas around the world (e.g., Qatar spent 250 billion dollars on hosting the Mondial).”
However, I never expected it to happen so fast.
Across the United States, a “cyclone bomb” storm has downed power lines, littered highways with piles of cars in deadly accidents and led to mass flight cancelations. The storm was nearly unprecedented in its scope, stretching from the Great Lakes near Canada to the Rio Grande along the border with Mexico. About 60% of the U.S. population faced some sort of winter weather advisory or warning. Temperatures plummeted below normal from east of the Rocky Mountains to the Appalachians, the National Weather Service said. The storm pummeling large swaths of the United States and Canada is what forecasters call a “Cyclone Bomb”.
A front of cold air moved down from the Arctic, sending temperatures plunging. Temperatures dropped by more than 20 degrees Fahrenheit (11 degrees Celsius) in just a few hours. Wind chill temperatures reached dangerous lows far below zero, enough to cause frostbite within minutes. In parts of the Plains, the wind chill could dip to minus 70 degrees.
Why only the U.S., when so many other nations have their stadiums and arenas?
The U.S. government is the major obstacle preventing Israel’s return to our long-lost biblical lands. The U.S. policy of “evenhandedness” between the Arab murderers and the Jewish State prohibits us from building and expanding in our Biblical lands of Judea and Samaria, including limiting building even in our new-ancient capitol of Yerushalayim.
Summary:
1) It is a fundamental postulate brought in many Jewish sources that the world was created and is maintained for the HaShem-Jewish nation relationship.
2) The future of humanity is dependent on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of this relationship.
3) The great moments in human history have all been concerned in one way or another with the Jewish nation or with individual Jews.
4) The overriding responsibility of the Jews in this generation – for our welfare and for the welfare of humanity – is NATION BUILDING and the restoration of a holy Jewish nation in Eretz Yisrael based on the Torah.
Shabbat Shalom,
Nachman Kahana.
Copyright © 5783/2022 Nachman Kahana
Parashat Va’yi’gash 5783
by HaRav Nachman Kahana
by HaRav Nachman Kahana
Tehilim (Psalms) 22;28-29:
כח) יִזְכְּרוּ וְיָשֻׁבוּ אֶל ה’ כָּל אַפְסֵי אָרֶץ וְיִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לְפָנֶיךָ כָּל מִשְׁפְּחוֹת גּוֹיִם:
כט) כִּי לַה’ הַמְּלוּכָה וּמֹשֵׁל בַּגּוֹיִם:
28 All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord,
and all the families of the nations shall worship before Him.
29 For dominion belongs to HaShem, and He rules over the nations.
Paro’s Dreams
There are two biblical episodes of formidable gentile rulers whose dreams were interpreted by a Jew.
The first one is in last week’s parasha, Miketz, when the Egyptian Paro (Pharaoh) experienced two consecutive dreams.
In the first dream, he was standing on/by the Nile, when out of the river emerged seven healthy, fat cows, followed by seven sickly and gaunt ones which devoured the seven healthy cows. Another dream followed. Seven ears of healthy wheat were growing on a single stalk, followed by seven other ears of thin and scorched wheat which devoured the seven full ears.
After 12 years of imprisonment, Yosef is brought before Paro to interpret the dreams. He informs Paro that despite the differences, both dreams share the same interpretation. HaShem has begun seven years of agricultural prosperity that will be followed by seven years of devastating famine.
The apparent object of the dreams in Egyptian history was to inform Paro that he would be the savior of the nation through his wisdom in choosing a talented assistant. Together with their agricultural knowledge and managerial skills, Paro and Yosef would save the nation and millions of people even from foreign lands.
Right or wrong? Wrong!
The actual purpose of the dreams was to serve as a message from HaShem to Yosef that now had begun the first of three exiles that the Jewish nation would have to undergo: descending to Egypt, experiencing hundreds of years of servitude that would eventually result in the miraculous exodus, receiving the Torah on Mount Sinai, and returning home as the masters of the Holy Land.
Nevuchadnezzer’s Dream
Chapter two of the Book of Daniel relates that Nevuchadnezzer, King of Babylon and the destroyer of the first Holy Temple, had a dream, the details of which he could not recall on awakening.
He summoned his advisors and ordered them to remind him of the details of the dream and its interpretation. They responded that their expertise was limited to the interpretation of dreams but not to knowing their details. The king was unimpressed and repeated his threat to “reveal, interpret or die”.
Daniel prayed to HaShem for salvation and, that night, the dream and its meaning were revealed to him. In the morning, he came before the King and said as follows:
In your Majesty’s dream, you saw an enormous, dazzling statue, awesome in appearance. Its head was of pure gold, its chest and arms of silver, its belly and thighs bronze, its legs of iron, and its feet partly of iron and partly of baked clay. Then, suddenly, a rock struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay. The iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver and the gold were all broken “like chaff on a threshing floor in the summer”. The wind swept them away without leaving a trace, but the rock that struck the statue became a huge mountain and filled the whole earth (Daniel 2:31-35).
The King was spellbound by the words of Daniel, the Jew, who continued:
The statue represents a series of kingdoms, each less glorious than its predecessor, as indicated by the decreasing value of the metals. Daniel identified Nebuchadnezzar as the head of gold, stating that HaShem had given him much power (Daniel 2:37-38).
The subsequent kingdoms to arise would be incrementally inferior to Babylon. However, Daniel did not detail who the following kingdoms would be.
Over time, our biblical commentators filled in the omitted details. After Nevuchadnezzer, King of Babylon, would come Persia and Medes, followed by the bronze stomach of Greece, then Rome (the iron thigh), with the fifth mixture of iron and clay representing the Christian and Islamic nations. At that time, the Jewish nation – the rock – will smash them all to bits, paving the way for the final earthly international kingdom of the Jews in Eretz Yisrael.
Conclusion:
The major thrust of Paro’s dreams dealt with the initial formulation of individual Jews into nationhood. The major thrust of Nevuchadnezzer’s dream dealt with the climax of world history when the Jewish nation will outlive all of its arrogant, evil, atheistic enemies, who in the words of Daniel “will be reduced like chaff on a threshing floor”.
Now when the major emperors of history focus on the extraordinary Jewish nation, the compelling conclusion is that the world’s raison d’être – the reason for which the Creator brought this world into being – is because of the holy Jewish nation.
And indeed,
28 All the ends of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord,
and all the families of the nations shall worship before Him.
29 For dominion belongs to HaShem, and He rules over the nations.
The Cyclone Bomb
Last week I wrote:
“What was I thinking of at that moment (when Argentina won the Mondial?). I was pondering the earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, landslides, tsunamis and other preternatural calamities that, in the words of the Gemara, would be occurring in every country that has stadiums and arenas while our Holy Temple remains destroyed.
In the U’ne’tana Tokef liturgy of Yom Kippur, we are faced with the frightening question about who will die and who will live, who by fire and who by water. I wonder who will suffer the agony of earthquakes, the displacement of millions of people from their homes and the unleased energies inherent in our planet?
The reasons for unnatural meteorological and geological occurrences in our time are: 1- Homosexuality, 2- The destroyed and desolate Temple Mount at a time when there is an abundance of theaters and arenas around the world (e.g., Qatar spent 250 billion dollars on hosting the Mondial).”
However, I never expected it to happen so fast.
Across the United States, a “cyclone bomb” storm has downed power lines, littered highways with piles of cars in deadly accidents and led to mass flight cancelations. The storm was nearly unprecedented in its scope, stretching from the Great Lakes near Canada to the Rio Grande along the border with Mexico. About 60% of the U.S. population faced some sort of winter weather advisory or warning. Temperatures plummeted below normal from east of the Rocky Mountains to the Appalachians, the National Weather Service said. The storm pummeling large swaths of the United States and Canada is what forecasters call a “Cyclone Bomb”.
A front of cold air moved down from the Arctic, sending temperatures plunging. Temperatures dropped by more than 20 degrees Fahrenheit (11 degrees Celsius) in just a few hours. Wind chill temperatures reached dangerous lows far below zero, enough to cause frostbite within minutes. In parts of the Plains, the wind chill could dip to minus 70 degrees.
Why only the U.S., when so many other nations have their stadiums and arenas?
The U.S. government is the major obstacle preventing Israel’s return to our long-lost biblical lands. The U.S. policy of “evenhandedness” between the Arab murderers and the Jewish State prohibits us from building and expanding in our Biblical lands of Judea and Samaria, including limiting building even in our new-ancient capitol of Yerushalayim.
Summary:
1) It is a fundamental postulate brought in many Jewish sources that the world was created and is maintained for the HaShem-Jewish nation relationship.
2) The future of humanity is dependent on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of this relationship.
3) The great moments in human history have all been concerned in one way or another with the Jewish nation or with individual Jews.
4) The overriding responsibility of the Jews in this generation – for our welfare and for the welfare of humanity – is NATION BUILDING and the restoration of a holy Jewish nation in Eretz Yisrael based on the Torah.
Shabbat Shalom,
Nachman Kahana.
Copyright © 5783/2022 Nachman Kahana
Lessons of Asarah b’Teves
by Rabbi Pinchas Winston
Friday Night
SOME TIME AGO during the first Persian Gulf War, a major American magazine interviewed Saddam Hussein. Curious, I read the article and was surprised to read a few things. First, I was really surprised to read that Hussein believed he was the reincarnation of Nebuchadnezzar. I mean, where did he get that idea from? Second, I was amazed that the Iraqis observe Asarah b’Teves as well. The “only” difference is that while we’re fasting and saying Selichos, they are celebrating what we are mourning.
I guess I shouldn’t be so surprised. I just sort of thought that everyone has since done teshuvah, and that Nebuchadnezzar’s war against the Jews is today considered a blemish on Babylonian history by modern day Iraqis. Silly, isn’t it, especially since Hussein dreamed of leading the Arab world against Israel today. Clearly nothing has changed over the thousands of years since the original Asarah b’Teves.
Some Israelis recently found this out as well after trying to cover the soccer games in Dubai. They looked at themselves, being completely secular, as reporters from just another country. They expected to be treated as equals, but were not. At least one reporter had to leave early afraid for his life.
True, Dubai is an Arab country. The surprising thing is how many Jews travel there, especially Israelis, because it is a popular destination point for many other people around the world. So why shouldn’t it also be for Jews as well, especially since there is a Chabad House there and you can get good kosher food, albeit for a price?
A friend of mine once traveled to Germany and took a tour of a concentration camp. He wasn’t religious yet, but he felt an obligation to “visit” one and see what it was like. He joined a tour that included some gentiles as well. Later that night after the sobering tour, he and some of the others went to a pub and had a bit too much to drink. People got drunk, and as the Gemora warns, when “wine” goes in, secrets go out.”
To my friend’s shock, one of the young men with whom he was drinking blurted out, “It’s too bad Hitler didn’t finish the job!”
Stunned, he just sat there somewhat inebriated but sober enough to know what he heard. As he contemplated what to do next, the Jewish star he had been wearing inside his shirt popped out in plain view. Talk about Divine Providence! Realizing at that point that no one had realized he was Jewish, but that everyone now knew that he was, he stood up, took his beer stein, and hit the guy across the face with it. A brawl ensued, but he was able to crawl out of the bar without a scratch. He had learned that night that as hard as he had tried to blend in with the gentile world, it was like trying to get oil to combine with water.
That is a lesson of Asarah b’Teves. It doesn’t just commemorate the breach in the walls that led to the destruction of the First Temple. It reminds us that a Jew is a Jew is a Jew, no matter how much a Jew may try to prove otherwise.
And many do try and prove otherwise. But though they do a good job of convincing themselves, they never really convince the gentiles. Just because anti-Semitism is an ancient hatred doesn’t mean it isn’t a current problem, and will remain so until God eliminates the yetzer hara once and for all.
Shabbos Day
WE HAVE FINALLY reached the climax of the Yosef story—again. This is the parsha with the big reveal when Yosef, to stave off a threat of war, took off his “mask” and told his brothers who had really been giving them the runaround.
Can’t you just see it?
Yosef: Guess what guys, it’s me, Yosef, your long-lost brother!
Brothers: (Big collective gasp, followed by along stunned silence.)
Yosef: Hey, it’s okay! Everything is just fine! There’s no evil viceroy. Just me masquerading as one. You can all relax now because it’s really just one big, happy family reunion!
Brothers: (More stunned silence while they process all that just happened, and the 180 degree turn from jitters to joy.)
Yosef, realizing that it is too much for them to take in: So we’re good now, right?
And if you were the one in Yosef’s brothers’ sandals, how would you have reacted? If it was me, probably my relief would have evolved into anger, as I began to consider all that my brother had just put me through to take his revenge. That is probably how it would have looked to me at the time.
Sure, we the readers thousands of years later, can afford to justify Yosef’s actions and smooth over his brothers’ and father’s reaction. We’re taking in the story from thousands of years and miles away, told to us briefly and devoid of much emotion. But had we been there in the heat of the moment, what would we have thought then? How would we have reacted then?
We are led to believe that Yosef’s brothers just took the whole thing in stride, at least once they recovered from the shock, or perhaps because of the shock. No one seems to have said what we might have expected them to say,
“What? Are you kidding? Are you out of your mind? Do you know what you caused us, and our father, over the last 22 years, and especially the last year with all your shenanigans? Yes, we acted similarly to you, but when did two wrongs make a right? In fact, we came here to right our wrong, only to find out that you were doing the same to us, and in an even scarier manner! What’s the matter with you?! If you had just told us who you were in the beginning, we would have apologized profusely and avoided all the subterfuge and suffering!”
And they would have had a point. So why didn’t they?
Shalosh Seudot
MAKING A GOOD impression is usually a good thing if you want to be remembered. The more we are impressed by something, the longer it stays with us, which can be a bad thing if you’d rather forget about it. Last week I heard about something that so disturbed me that it left an impression on me that is preventing me from forgetting about it.
Yosef could have simply made up with his brothers from the start and everything would have been easily fixed…and then forgotten over the generations. But regarding the story we read over the last few parshios, we still take it to heart....
The miraculous military victory of the Chashmonaim over the Greeks would have saved the day, and then got lost among all the miraculous military victories over history. But oil burning for seven extra days? That leaves a lasting impression throughout the generations that we still feel to this day.
Had it just been between Yosef and his brothers, then they would have had a real complaint against him and reason to resent him. But they came to realize the historical significance of what had happened between them, and understood that Yosef was making sure it left a lasting impression on all of Jewish history. As we say in Hallel, “The stone the builders despised became the cornerstone.” That has been true about many Jewish leaders, and about the Jewish people among the nations of the world.
You can drive down the same street for years and barely ever notice what’s on both sides of it. But get a flat tire and have to change it on that street, and all of a sudden you will notice and remember things from that point onward. Every time you drive by the spot your brain will tell you, “That’s where we had to change the flat…” The more precarious the situation, the greater an impression it will make on you.
When I was teenager, my family drove down from Toronto to Vermont via Montreal. Just outside Montreal, we hit a major snow storm…and got a flat tire. Ever try and change a tire on a busy highway in a blizzard? Even worse, the spare tire was in the back under all the luggage. We had to remove everything in the snow to get to the tire.
Fortunately, we were traveling with friends who helped us and amazingly we got the job done. But what an experience. I can see it clear as day some 50 years later. Clearly it left quite the impression on me. We all have stories like this that make the same point.
Ain Od Milvado, Part 32
THIS IS WHY God told us, “You have been shown, in order to know that God, He is God; there is none else besides Him (Devarim 4:35). What is the emphasis on being shown, as if it makes a difference what we see or not? If God says believe in Me, you have to believe in Him either way.
It’s the same idea. The Sinai Experience was not just to give us Torah, but to impress us. No one else has claimed to have had a similar national experience because you can’t make up the claim if it can’t be verified, at least to the first couple of generations after it occurred. No one would buy it.
But built into Creation is the idea of a roshem—impression. When things happen, they not only impact history, they imprint it, creating a spiritual pattern that can repeat itself in physical history. The Avos understood this and used it to their spiritual advantage, and God uses it to ours. Ain od Milvado is not just a national concept. It is a national experience imprinted on our hearts.
The Pri Tzaddik says that this is why Moshe Rabbeinu insisted on bringing the tablets down, even though he had planned to break them. He knew that there was a huge difference between being told what they lost than actually seeing what they could have had, and lost. The vision of the tablets left an inedible mark on the “heart” of the nation that keeps us Jewish to this day.
It may sound too mystical for some, but that is why we tend to hook into something we can’t quite explain each time that we light the Menorah. It feels as if we’re plugging into something powerful and transcendent beyond our own personal experiences.
For Saddam Hussein, his dreams of Nebuchadnezzar grandeur were just wishful thinking that did him in in the end. For the Jewish people, Asarah b’Teves is a roshem that becomes activated on the day itself, which is why the Jewish people are still here today. And so is the story of Yosef and his brothers, helping us to better understand what we’ve been trying to rectify to finish off history, and bring redemption.
SOME TIME AGO during the first Persian Gulf War, a major American magazine interviewed Saddam Hussein. Curious, I read the article and was surprised to read a few things. First, I was really surprised to read that Hussein believed he was the reincarnation of Nebuchadnezzar. I mean, where did he get that idea from? Second, I was amazed that the Iraqis observe Asarah b’Teves as well. The “only” difference is that while we’re fasting and saying Selichos, they are celebrating what we are mourning.
I guess I shouldn’t be so surprised. I just sort of thought that everyone has since done teshuvah, and that Nebuchadnezzar’s war against the Jews is today considered a blemish on Babylonian history by modern day Iraqis. Silly, isn’t it, especially since Hussein dreamed of leading the Arab world against Israel today. Clearly nothing has changed over the thousands of years since the original Asarah b’Teves.
Some Israelis recently found this out as well after trying to cover the soccer games in Dubai. They looked at themselves, being completely secular, as reporters from just another country. They expected to be treated as equals, but were not. At least one reporter had to leave early afraid for his life.
True, Dubai is an Arab country. The surprising thing is how many Jews travel there, especially Israelis, because it is a popular destination point for many other people around the world. So why shouldn’t it also be for Jews as well, especially since there is a Chabad House there and you can get good kosher food, albeit for a price?
A friend of mine once traveled to Germany and took a tour of a concentration camp. He wasn’t religious yet, but he felt an obligation to “visit” one and see what it was like. He joined a tour that included some gentiles as well. Later that night after the sobering tour, he and some of the others went to a pub and had a bit too much to drink. People got drunk, and as the Gemora warns, when “wine” goes in, secrets go out.”
To my friend’s shock, one of the young men with whom he was drinking blurted out, “It’s too bad Hitler didn’t finish the job!”
Stunned, he just sat there somewhat inebriated but sober enough to know what he heard. As he contemplated what to do next, the Jewish star he had been wearing inside his shirt popped out in plain view. Talk about Divine Providence! Realizing at that point that no one had realized he was Jewish, but that everyone now knew that he was, he stood up, took his beer stein, and hit the guy across the face with it. A brawl ensued, but he was able to crawl out of the bar without a scratch. He had learned that night that as hard as he had tried to blend in with the gentile world, it was like trying to get oil to combine with water.
That is a lesson of Asarah b’Teves. It doesn’t just commemorate the breach in the walls that led to the destruction of the First Temple. It reminds us that a Jew is a Jew is a Jew, no matter how much a Jew may try to prove otherwise.
And many do try and prove otherwise. But though they do a good job of convincing themselves, they never really convince the gentiles. Just because anti-Semitism is an ancient hatred doesn’t mean it isn’t a current problem, and will remain so until God eliminates the yetzer hara once and for all.
Shabbos Day
WE HAVE FINALLY reached the climax of the Yosef story—again. This is the parsha with the big reveal when Yosef, to stave off a threat of war, took off his “mask” and told his brothers who had really been giving them the runaround.
Can’t you just see it?
Yosef: Guess what guys, it’s me, Yosef, your long-lost brother!
Brothers: (Big collective gasp, followed by along stunned silence.)
Yosef: Hey, it’s okay! Everything is just fine! There’s no evil viceroy. Just me masquerading as one. You can all relax now because it’s really just one big, happy family reunion!
Brothers: (More stunned silence while they process all that just happened, and the 180 degree turn from jitters to joy.)
Yosef, realizing that it is too much for them to take in: So we’re good now, right?
And if you were the one in Yosef’s brothers’ sandals, how would you have reacted? If it was me, probably my relief would have evolved into anger, as I began to consider all that my brother had just put me through to take his revenge. That is probably how it would have looked to me at the time.
Sure, we the readers thousands of years later, can afford to justify Yosef’s actions and smooth over his brothers’ and father’s reaction. We’re taking in the story from thousands of years and miles away, told to us briefly and devoid of much emotion. But had we been there in the heat of the moment, what would we have thought then? How would we have reacted then?
We are led to believe that Yosef’s brothers just took the whole thing in stride, at least once they recovered from the shock, or perhaps because of the shock. No one seems to have said what we might have expected them to say,
“What? Are you kidding? Are you out of your mind? Do you know what you caused us, and our father, over the last 22 years, and especially the last year with all your shenanigans? Yes, we acted similarly to you, but when did two wrongs make a right? In fact, we came here to right our wrong, only to find out that you were doing the same to us, and in an even scarier manner! What’s the matter with you?! If you had just told us who you were in the beginning, we would have apologized profusely and avoided all the subterfuge and suffering!”
And they would have had a point. So why didn’t they?
Shalosh Seudot
MAKING A GOOD impression is usually a good thing if you want to be remembered. The more we are impressed by something, the longer it stays with us, which can be a bad thing if you’d rather forget about it. Last week I heard about something that so disturbed me that it left an impression on me that is preventing me from forgetting about it.
Yosef could have simply made up with his brothers from the start and everything would have been easily fixed…and then forgotten over the generations. But regarding the story we read over the last few parshios, we still take it to heart....
The miraculous military victory of the Chashmonaim over the Greeks would have saved the day, and then got lost among all the miraculous military victories over history. But oil burning for seven extra days? That leaves a lasting impression throughout the generations that we still feel to this day.
Had it just been between Yosef and his brothers, then they would have had a real complaint against him and reason to resent him. But they came to realize the historical significance of what had happened between them, and understood that Yosef was making sure it left a lasting impression on all of Jewish history. As we say in Hallel, “The stone the builders despised became the cornerstone.” That has been true about many Jewish leaders, and about the Jewish people among the nations of the world.
You can drive down the same street for years and barely ever notice what’s on both sides of it. But get a flat tire and have to change it on that street, and all of a sudden you will notice and remember things from that point onward. Every time you drive by the spot your brain will tell you, “That’s where we had to change the flat…” The more precarious the situation, the greater an impression it will make on you.
When I was teenager, my family drove down from Toronto to Vermont via Montreal. Just outside Montreal, we hit a major snow storm…and got a flat tire. Ever try and change a tire on a busy highway in a blizzard? Even worse, the spare tire was in the back under all the luggage. We had to remove everything in the snow to get to the tire.
Fortunately, we were traveling with friends who helped us and amazingly we got the job done. But what an experience. I can see it clear as day some 50 years later. Clearly it left quite the impression on me. We all have stories like this that make the same point.
Ain Od Milvado, Part 32
THIS IS WHY God told us, “You have been shown, in order to know that God, He is God; there is none else besides Him (Devarim 4:35). What is the emphasis on being shown, as if it makes a difference what we see or not? If God says believe in Me, you have to believe in Him either way.
It’s the same idea. The Sinai Experience was not just to give us Torah, but to impress us. No one else has claimed to have had a similar national experience because you can’t make up the claim if it can’t be verified, at least to the first couple of generations after it occurred. No one would buy it.
But built into Creation is the idea of a roshem—impression. When things happen, they not only impact history, they imprint it, creating a spiritual pattern that can repeat itself in physical history. The Avos understood this and used it to their spiritual advantage, and God uses it to ours. Ain od Milvado is not just a national concept. It is a national experience imprinted on our hearts.
The Pri Tzaddik says that this is why Moshe Rabbeinu insisted on bringing the tablets down, even though he had planned to break them. He knew that there was a huge difference between being told what they lost than actually seeing what they could have had, and lost. The vision of the tablets left an inedible mark on the “heart” of the nation that keeps us Jewish to this day.
It may sound too mystical for some, but that is why we tend to hook into something we can’t quite explain each time that we light the Menorah. It feels as if we’re plugging into something powerful and transcendent beyond our own personal experiences.
For Saddam Hussein, his dreams of Nebuchadnezzar grandeur were just wishful thinking that did him in in the end. For the Jewish people, Asarah b’Teves is a roshem that becomes activated on the day itself, which is why the Jewish people are still here today. And so is the story of Yosef and his brothers, helping us to better understand what we’ve been trying to rectify to finish off history, and bring redemption.
Mashiach ben Yosef and Mashiach ben Dovid
by HaRav Dov Begon
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir
There is a Jewish tradition that we bless the bride and groom under the chuppah with the blessing of the Matriarchs: “The L-rd make the woman that is come into your house like Rochel and like Leah, which two did build the house of Israel” (Rut 4:11).
How did these two build the house of Israel? From Rochel emerged Yosef and from Leah emerged Dovid HaMelech, and from those two, in turn, shall emerge Mashiach ben Yosef and Mashiach ben Dovid.
Through Mashiach ben Yosef shall be revealed the nationhood of the Jewish People (Rav Avraham Yitzchak Kook, Orot 160), while through Mashiach ben Dovid “shall be revealed the climax of nationhood, the longing to unite all mankind into one family, and for them all to proclaim G-d’s name” (Orot, ibid.).
These two Meshichim will ultimately be united together, as the Prophet Yechezkeil said:
“Thus says the L-rd G-d: ‘Behold, I will take the tree of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his companions; and I will put them unto him together with the stick of Yehuda, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in My hand” (Yechezkeil 37:19).
And when shall we be privileged to unite the two Meshichim? In the time of the ingathering of the exiles: “Thus says the L-rd G-d: ‘Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, whither they are gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land. I will make them one nation in the land, upon the mountains of Israel, and one king shall be king to them all; and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms anymore at all” (ibid., 37:21-22).
Today, how fortunate we are to be living in the generation of the ingathering of the exiles. The Jewish People are returning to their land, and the nationalist aspect of our people is more and more being consolidated in the shape of an independent country with a strong economy and military. The land is being built up, and already today holds an important place in the family of nations.
Yet this is not our goal. We did not establish a state just for the sake of our existential interests. The purpose of the State and People of Israel is to benefit the whole world, to shower goodness and light on all mankind, as was promised to Abraham: “I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make your name great, and you shall be a blessing.…. Through you shall all the families of the earth be blessed.'” (Bereisheet 12:2-3).
Moreover, Yishayahu said: “At the end of days, the mountain of the L-rd's house shall be established as the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. Many peoples shall go and say: ‘Come, let us go up to the mountain of the L-rd, to the house of the G-d of Jacob. He will teach us of His ways, and we will walk in His paths.’ For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the L-rd from Jerusalem.” (Yishayahu 2:2-3) Mashiach ben Yosef is preparing for Mashiach ben Dovid, just as Shaul HaMelech, who came from Binyamin and Rochel, prepared for Dovid HaMelech, of Yehuda and Leah.
The day is not far off when we will be privileged to see with our own eyes, the fulfillment of Ezekiel’s words: “They shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob My servant, wherein your fathers dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, they, and their children, and their children's children, forever. Dovid my servant shall be their prince forever” (Yechezkeil 37:25).
Looking forward to salvation,
With the Love of Israel,
Shabbat Shalom.
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir
There is a Jewish tradition that we bless the bride and groom under the chuppah with the blessing of the Matriarchs: “The L-rd make the woman that is come into your house like Rochel and like Leah, which two did build the house of Israel” (Rut 4:11).
How did these two build the house of Israel? From Rochel emerged Yosef and from Leah emerged Dovid HaMelech, and from those two, in turn, shall emerge Mashiach ben Yosef and Mashiach ben Dovid.
Through Mashiach ben Yosef shall be revealed the nationhood of the Jewish People (Rav Avraham Yitzchak Kook, Orot 160), while through Mashiach ben Dovid “shall be revealed the climax of nationhood, the longing to unite all mankind into one family, and for them all to proclaim G-d’s name” (Orot, ibid.).
These two Meshichim will ultimately be united together, as the Prophet Yechezkeil said:
“Thus says the L-rd G-d: ‘Behold, I will take the tree of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his companions; and I will put them unto him together with the stick of Yehuda, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in My hand” (Yechezkeil 37:19).
And when shall we be privileged to unite the two Meshichim? In the time of the ingathering of the exiles: “Thus says the L-rd G-d: ‘Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, whither they are gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land. I will make them one nation in the land, upon the mountains of Israel, and one king shall be king to them all; and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms anymore at all” (ibid., 37:21-22).
Today, how fortunate we are to be living in the generation of the ingathering of the exiles. The Jewish People are returning to their land, and the nationalist aspect of our people is more and more being consolidated in the shape of an independent country with a strong economy and military. The land is being built up, and already today holds an important place in the family of nations.
Yet this is not our goal. We did not establish a state just for the sake of our existential interests. The purpose of the State and People of Israel is to benefit the whole world, to shower goodness and light on all mankind, as was promised to Abraham: “I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make your name great, and you shall be a blessing.…. Through you shall all the families of the earth be blessed.'” (Bereisheet 12:2-3).
Moreover, Yishayahu said: “At the end of days, the mountain of the L-rd's house shall be established as the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. Many peoples shall go and say: ‘Come, let us go up to the mountain of the L-rd, to the house of the G-d of Jacob. He will teach us of His ways, and we will walk in His paths.’ For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the L-rd from Jerusalem.” (Yishayahu 2:2-3) Mashiach ben Yosef is preparing for Mashiach ben Dovid, just as Shaul HaMelech, who came from Binyamin and Rochel, prepared for Dovid HaMelech, of Yehuda and Leah.
The day is not far off when we will be privileged to see with our own eyes, the fulfillment of Ezekiel’s words: “They shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob My servant, wherein your fathers dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, they, and their children, and their children's children, forever. Dovid my servant shall be their prince forever” (Yechezkeil 37:25).
Looking forward to salvation,
With the Love of Israel,
Shabbat Shalom.
Son of Biden's Iran Envoy works for ‘Iran Lobby'
by Daniel Greenfield
During the 2008 election, the Obama campaign dropped Robert Malley as an adviser over his work with Hamas on behalf of George Soros’ International Crisis Group. Once in office, Obama brought back his old buddy into the National Security Council.
Malley then became the lead negotiator for the sellout deal to legitimize Iran’s nuclear program.
Despite vocal criticism from Iranian dissidents and the country’s freedom movement, Biden chose Malley as his special envoy to Iran. Even as Robert Malley continues conducting outreach to the Islamic terrorist state on behalf of the Biden administration, his son works at a pro-Iran organization tied to a key figure in the Iran Lobby.
Robert was the son of Simon Malley, an adviser to PLO terrorist leader Yasser Arafat and the founder of a Communist party in Arafat’s native homeland of Egypt. Blaise Malley represents the third generation of the family’s leftist radicalism being used to prop up Islamist movements.
The son of Biden’s envoy to Iran spends his time undermining American efforts against Iran.
Blaise Malley is listed as a full-time reporter for the Quincy Institute run and funded by key figures in the pro-Iran movement. His most recently article agitates against further American involvement in the conflict against the Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen whose motto is, “Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse to the Jews, Victory to Islam.”
Iran spends an estimated $20 million a year backing the Houthis. Their ability to hold parts of Yemen is crucial to the terror regime’s ambitions for the region. America’s first strike against the Houthis was actually in response to their cruise missile attack on the USS Mason.
The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft was founded by George Soros and Charles Koch. Its donors include a roster of leftists and their foundations including the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Barbara Streisand, and Frank Giustra: the billionaire at the center of the Clinton Foundation scandal involving the sale of Uranium One to Russia.
The executive VP of Quincy however is Trita Parsi: a dual Iranian-Swedish national who founded the National Iranian American Council. NIAC, described by critics as the ‘Iran Lobby’, has been accused of violating tax laws and the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
Quincy’s board includes Francis Najafi. a wealthy Iranian real estate developer who is also a major funder of NIAC, and Amir Handjani, the exclusive broker for an American company doing business with Iran, and a Quincy Institute fellow, who also appears to be a donor.
Masih Alinejad, the Iranian-American dissident journalist targeted for kidnapping by the regime, tweeted that, “NIAC and Quincy are the Russia Today of the Iranian Regime. They spend all of their time defaming critics of the Islamic Republic, myself included. When the regime attempts to kill us they’re either silent or mealy-mouthed. ”
As an envoy, Robert Malley is in theory supposed to represent American interests. At a minimum, close family members of Biden’s envoy to Iran should not be employed by an organization that has a vehement pro-Iran agenda and ties to pro-Iranian financial interests.
But Blaise, who was nurtured by the same Islamist-internationalist network, who served as a managing editor at the Journal of Middle East Studies and wrote his thesis on “Is a Left/Right Coalition on Non-Interventionist Foreign Policy Feasible” is just the latest incarnation of the Malley family which seems to have been bred to undermine America and support its enemies. It’s only a matter of time until Blaise rises through the think tanks and then into the government.
And Blaise is benefiting from some of the same connections that followed his father around.
A recent letter in defense of Robert Malley fumed that, “those who accuse Malley of sympathy for the Islamic Republic have no grasp of – or no interest in – true diplomacy”. It was signed by, among others, Trita Parsi’s brother, a board member at NIAC, Amir Handjani, a board member and two fellows at Quincy. How better to dispute the accusation that Malley is on Iran’s side.
The difference between father and son is that the elder Malley is embedded within the government and has to be a bit discreet, while the younger Malley is free to do his best Tokyo Rose impression in the virtual pages of any publication that will run his propaganda.
In The American Prospect, a leftist publication, Blaise Malley warned that “Iran’s leadership may also have lost trust in an American government”, suggested that the Islamic terror state might be “keeping the door open to improving relations with the United States”, but cautioned that “it would be a mistake to assume that Iran doesn’t have a say in the deal’s future as well.”
Iranian propaganda could hardly be any more clearly packaged.
In The New Republic, Blaise Malley claimed that sanctions on Iran had killed 13,000 people despite the fact that food and medicine are not sanctioned. Malley quoted a Quincy official complaining that America had sanctioned Iran and “we won’t guarantee to lift the sanctions if they go back to doing what we wanted.”
“No good has come of trying to isolate other authoritarian countries, such as Iran, North Korea, and others,” Blaise Malley whined at the Washington Examiner.
Forget isolating them abroad, the question is how do we isolate them at home.
Foreign agents for Iran, Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood and the entire network around them have overrun D.C. and the media. And top government officials are complicit in the corruption.
As Iranians protest for freedom in the streets, Robert Malley and the pro-Iran influence networks have been caught up in the backlash. Malley was forced to apologize for a tweet that he described as “poorly worded”. And NIAC, Quincy and their circle have tried to reject allegations that they are part of an ‘Iran Lobby’ by offering some concerned noises about the protests.
The Malley family has come a long way since the French Interior Minister stated that Robert’s father and Blaise’s grandfather was issuing “genuine appeals to murder foreign chiefs of state”.
But while the presentation may have changed, the underlying content remains the same.
The Biden administration is maneuvering to appear to condemn the Islamist regime’s brutal crackdown on the protests while covertly supporting it. But it’s hard to maintain that illusion when the son of Biden’s envoy to Iran is pushing Iranian propaganda for the Iran Lobby.
During the 2008 election, the Obama campaign dropped Robert Malley as an adviser over his work with Hamas on behalf of George Soros’ International Crisis Group. Once in office, Obama brought back his old buddy into the National Security Council.
Malley then became the lead negotiator for the sellout deal to legitimize Iran’s nuclear program.
Despite vocal criticism from Iranian dissidents and the country’s freedom movement, Biden chose Malley as his special envoy to Iran. Even as Robert Malley continues conducting outreach to the Islamic terrorist state on behalf of the Biden administration, his son works at a pro-Iran organization tied to a key figure in the Iran Lobby.
Robert was the son of Simon Malley, an adviser to PLO terrorist leader Yasser Arafat and the founder of a Communist party in Arafat’s native homeland of Egypt. Blaise Malley represents the third generation of the family’s leftist radicalism being used to prop up Islamist movements.
The son of Biden’s envoy to Iran spends his time undermining American efforts against Iran.
Blaise Malley is listed as a full-time reporter for the Quincy Institute run and funded by key figures in the pro-Iran movement. His most recently article agitates against further American involvement in the conflict against the Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen whose motto is, “Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse to the Jews, Victory to Islam.”
Iran spends an estimated $20 million a year backing the Houthis. Their ability to hold parts of Yemen is crucial to the terror regime’s ambitions for the region. America’s first strike against the Houthis was actually in response to their cruise missile attack on the USS Mason.
The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft was founded by George Soros and Charles Koch. Its donors include a roster of leftists and their foundations including the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Barbara Streisand, and Frank Giustra: the billionaire at the center of the Clinton Foundation scandal involving the sale of Uranium One to Russia.
The executive VP of Quincy however is Trita Parsi: a dual Iranian-Swedish national who founded the National Iranian American Council. NIAC, described by critics as the ‘Iran Lobby’, has been accused of violating tax laws and the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
Quincy’s board includes Francis Najafi. a wealthy Iranian real estate developer who is also a major funder of NIAC, and Amir Handjani, the exclusive broker for an American company doing business with Iran, and a Quincy Institute fellow, who also appears to be a donor.
Masih Alinejad, the Iranian-American dissident journalist targeted for kidnapping by the regime, tweeted that, “NIAC and Quincy are the Russia Today of the Iranian Regime. They spend all of their time defaming critics of the Islamic Republic, myself included. When the regime attempts to kill us they’re either silent or mealy-mouthed. ”
As an envoy, Robert Malley is in theory supposed to represent American interests. At a minimum, close family members of Biden’s envoy to Iran should not be employed by an organization that has a vehement pro-Iran agenda and ties to pro-Iranian financial interests.
But Blaise, who was nurtured by the same Islamist-internationalist network, who served as a managing editor at the Journal of Middle East Studies and wrote his thesis on “Is a Left/Right Coalition on Non-Interventionist Foreign Policy Feasible” is just the latest incarnation of the Malley family which seems to have been bred to undermine America and support its enemies. It’s only a matter of time until Blaise rises through the think tanks and then into the government.
And Blaise is benefiting from some of the same connections that followed his father around.
A recent letter in defense of Robert Malley fumed that, “those who accuse Malley of sympathy for the Islamic Republic have no grasp of – or no interest in – true diplomacy”. It was signed by, among others, Trita Parsi’s brother, a board member at NIAC, Amir Handjani, a board member and two fellows at Quincy. How better to dispute the accusation that Malley is on Iran’s side.
The difference between father and son is that the elder Malley is embedded within the government and has to be a bit discreet, while the younger Malley is free to do his best Tokyo Rose impression in the virtual pages of any publication that will run his propaganda.
In The American Prospect, a leftist publication, Blaise Malley warned that “Iran’s leadership may also have lost trust in an American government”, suggested that the Islamic terror state might be “keeping the door open to improving relations with the United States”, but cautioned that “it would be a mistake to assume that Iran doesn’t have a say in the deal’s future as well.”
Iranian propaganda could hardly be any more clearly packaged.
In The New Republic, Blaise Malley claimed that sanctions on Iran had killed 13,000 people despite the fact that food and medicine are not sanctioned. Malley quoted a Quincy official complaining that America had sanctioned Iran and “we won’t guarantee to lift the sanctions if they go back to doing what we wanted.”
“No good has come of trying to isolate other authoritarian countries, such as Iran, North Korea, and others,” Blaise Malley whined at the Washington Examiner.
Forget isolating them abroad, the question is how do we isolate them at home.
Foreign agents for Iran, Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood and the entire network around them have overrun D.C. and the media. And top government officials are complicit in the corruption.
As Iranians protest for freedom in the streets, Robert Malley and the pro-Iran influence networks have been caught up in the backlash. Malley was forced to apologize for a tweet that he described as “poorly worded”. And NIAC, Quincy and their circle have tried to reject allegations that they are part of an ‘Iran Lobby’ by offering some concerned noises about the protests.
The Malley family has come a long way since the French Interior Minister stated that Robert’s father and Blaise’s grandfather was issuing “genuine appeals to murder foreign chiefs of state”.
But while the presentation may have changed, the underlying content remains the same.
The Biden administration is maneuvering to appear to condemn the Islamist regime’s brutal crackdown on the protests while covertly supporting it. But it’s hard to maintain that illusion when the son of Biden’s envoy to Iran is pushing Iranian propaganda for the Iran Lobby.
Tuesday, December 27, 2022
Rav Kook's Ein Ayah: National Jealousy and The Significance of a Name
National Jealousy
(based on Ein Ayah, Berachot 1:79)
Gemara: [Regarding the name,] Reuven, Leah said: “See the difference between my son and the son of my father-in-law. My father-in-law’s son, even though he knowingly sold his status of firstborn, what does it say about him? ‘Eisav hated Yaakov.’ In contrast, my son, even though Yosef took his status of firstborn, still he was not jealous of him.”
Ein Ayah: Reuven is the firstborn of Israel; therefore, he is representative of all of Israel. Israel’s attribute in relation to the other nations parallels Reuven’s relation to his brothers. Thus, Israel taught the world the good trait of forgiving and doing good to those who cause one anguish.
In this way we see the difference between Israel and the nations of the world, who are jealous of Israel because of its advantage over them. The main advantage is only in the realm of the spirit, which mainly comes from the good choice to act in a straight manner. Therefore, those [who choose differently] are the ones who sell their own status of firstborn. Why are they steeped in desires? That is why they are not elevating themselves in degrees of intellectualism, while Israel succeeds when it sets out on the path of wisdom. Despite this fact, “Eisav hated Yaakov.”
In contrast, they pursue us, forcibly take our firstborn status, and have pushed us out of the desired Land and plastered us with false libels. Nevertheless, are eyes are looking forward that Hashem should open up the eyes of all inhabitants of the world to follow the path of Hashem, to know Him and to serve Him. Our eyes do not at all wait for revenge. We end off our prayers: “… that all the evil of the land shall turn to You, all of those who inhabit the universe should recognize and know that to You does every knee bow…”
The Significance of a Name
(based on Ein Ayah, Berachot 1:80)
Gemara: How do we know that a name affects matters? R. Elazar says: “It is as the pasuk says, ‘Go see the doings of Hashem, who places shamot (destruction) in the land’ (Tehillim 46:9). Do not read it as shamot but as sheimot (names).”
Ein Ayah: The scholars of the truth have taught us that there is no such thing as complete coincidence. This is particularly true in regard to man, his intellect, and his speech. Therefore, things will not occur by coincidence, and the general harmony [of Divine providence] encompasses the past, the present, and the future. Therefore, even though a name is basically given to a person by chance, that chance is not free but is suited to the future. On rare occasions, specifically in regard to impactful people from whom emanate broadly based outcomes, the matter will be very noticeable. Regarding more private individuals, the matter is not as noticeable.
The way the Rabbis learned it out from “who places shamot” is marvelous, for one can always attribute deterioration and destruction to chance, which you cannot do for improvements and building. However, when we see that there is not utter destruction, for actually the most fearful turns of events sprout forth the biggest positive outcomes, then we know from the outset that the doings of Hashem include the shamot. Similarly, when the name is well-suited to the distant events of the future, we should realize that there was an invisible connecting factor that made the name fit that which it will demonstrate in the future. In that way, the imprint of the name and that which it demonstrates will be a help to bring the hidden powers to fruition at the appointed time.
Rav Kook on Parashat VaYigash: The Reunion of Yosef and Yehudah
We all have limited amounts of time and energy and must learn how to apportion these resources wisely. In particular, we need to find a balance between activities that are directed inwardly, for our own personal development, and those directed outwardly, for the benefit of others. As Hillel taught, “If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, then what am I?” (Avot 1:14). Both areas are crucial. The difficulty lies in deciding how much of our time and resources should be dedicated to inner growth, and how much for reaching out to others.
The nation as a whole also needs to juggle these two competing spheres. The search for the correct balance was played out in the dispute between Yosef and his brothers. Their struggle corresponded to two different paths within the Jewish people — one stressing the nation’s own spiritual development, and the other emphasizing Israel’s universal responsibility and influence.
Eidut and Torah
The Jewish people are crowned with two qualities, Eidut (testimony) and Torah, as it says: “[God] established testimony in Yaakov; He set down Torah in Israel” (Tehilim78:5). What are these two qualities?
The essence of Eidut is to accurately report facts as they occurred. Nothing may be added or altered when giving testimony. Torah study, on the other hand, involves chiddush — creative and innovative thought.
This dichotomy of Eidut and Torah is the root of the conflict between Yaakov's sons. Yosef stressed the concept of Eidut, as it says, “a testimony (eidut) for Yosef” Tehilim 81:6). The aspect of Eidut reflects Yosef's desire to interact with the nations and expose them to the authentic message of monotheism and morality.
On the other hand, the other brothers — and especially Yehudah, their leader — emphasized the Torah and the special holiness of the Jewish people. They sought to develop and cultivate the unique heritage of Israel. Thus it was Yehudah whom Yaakov picked to establish an academy of Torah study in Goshen. Furthermore, the Midrash credits Yehudah with burning the wagons that Pharaoh sent to bring Yaakov's family to Egypt. Yehudah ordered that the wagons be destroyed when he saw that they were engraved with idolatrous symbols (Breisheet Rabbah 94:3). This act, introducing the law of destroying idols with fire [later codified in Deut. 7:25], demonstrated Yehudah's focus on the aspects of purity and innovation in Torah.
The Message of Shema
Yosef and Yehudah, and their paths of Eidut and Torah, were united when Yaakov brought his family down to Yosef in Egypt. The Sages noted a peculiar incident that took place during the family reunion. The Torah relates that Yosef cried on his father’s neck, but is silent regarding Yaakov's actions at this emotional meeting. What was Yaakov doing? According to the Midrash, he was busy reciting the Shema. What was the significance of the Shema at that particular time?
The Shema’s message is, of course, one of unity. “Listen, Israel: God is our Lord; God is one” (Deut. 6:4). These two phrases refer to two levels (or stages) of God’s unity in the world. The first level is “God is our Lord.” This is God’s unity as it is currently revealed in the world, a world created according to the blueprint of Torah, and through which we can recognize the greatness of the Creator. The second, higher level is “God is one.” This is God’s unity as it will be revealed in the future, a unity that will encompass the entire universe. “After all has ceased to be, the One revered will reign alone” (from the Adon Olam hymn).
Yehudah represents the first level of God’s unity, a unity manifested through the Torah and the special role of the Jewish people. Yosef, on the other hand, sought to sanctify God’s Name among the nations and bring knowledge of one Creator to the entire world. He represents the second level, the universal unity of God. Yaakov's recitation of the Shema thus encapsulated the combined visions of both Yehudah and Yosef.
The Scales of the Levyasan
The two paths within Yaakov's family — Yehudah's path of particularity and Yosef's path of universality — split when Yosef was sold as a slave. The brothers’ reconciliation and the unification of these two paths took place in Vayigash, when Yehudah drew near to his brother Yosef (Bereisheet. 44:18).
The Midrash (Breisheet Rabbah 93:2) chose a curious verse to describe the coming together of Yosef and his brothers. The word vayigash(“and he drew near”) also appears in Iyov's description of the scales of the giant Levyasan: “One is so near (yig’shu) to the other, that no air can enter between them” (Iyov 41:8). What do the Leviathan’s scales have to do with the reunification of Yaakov's family?
The nation as a whole also needs to juggle these two competing spheres. The search for the correct balance was played out in the dispute between Yosef and his brothers. Their struggle corresponded to two different paths within the Jewish people — one stressing the nation’s own spiritual development, and the other emphasizing Israel’s universal responsibility and influence.
Eidut and Torah
The Jewish people are crowned with two qualities, Eidut (testimony) and Torah, as it says: “[God] established testimony in Yaakov; He set down Torah in Israel” (Tehilim78:5). What are these two qualities?
The essence of Eidut is to accurately report facts as they occurred. Nothing may be added or altered when giving testimony. Torah study, on the other hand, involves chiddush — creative and innovative thought.
This dichotomy of Eidut and Torah is the root of the conflict between Yaakov's sons. Yosef stressed the concept of Eidut, as it says, “a testimony (eidut) for Yosef” Tehilim 81:6). The aspect of Eidut reflects Yosef's desire to interact with the nations and expose them to the authentic message of monotheism and morality.
On the other hand, the other brothers — and especially Yehudah, their leader — emphasized the Torah and the special holiness of the Jewish people. They sought to develop and cultivate the unique heritage of Israel. Thus it was Yehudah whom Yaakov picked to establish an academy of Torah study in Goshen. Furthermore, the Midrash credits Yehudah with burning the wagons that Pharaoh sent to bring Yaakov's family to Egypt. Yehudah ordered that the wagons be destroyed when he saw that they were engraved with idolatrous symbols (Breisheet Rabbah 94:3). This act, introducing the law of destroying idols with fire [later codified in Deut. 7:25], demonstrated Yehudah's focus on the aspects of purity and innovation in Torah.
The Message of Shema
Yosef and Yehudah, and their paths of Eidut and Torah, were united when Yaakov brought his family down to Yosef in Egypt. The Sages noted a peculiar incident that took place during the family reunion. The Torah relates that Yosef cried on his father’s neck, but is silent regarding Yaakov's actions at this emotional meeting. What was Yaakov doing? According to the Midrash, he was busy reciting the Shema. What was the significance of the Shema at that particular time?
The Shema’s message is, of course, one of unity. “Listen, Israel: God is our Lord; God is one” (Deut. 6:4). These two phrases refer to two levels (or stages) of God’s unity in the world. The first level is “God is our Lord.” This is God’s unity as it is currently revealed in the world, a world created according to the blueprint of Torah, and through which we can recognize the greatness of the Creator. The second, higher level is “God is one.” This is God’s unity as it will be revealed in the future, a unity that will encompass the entire universe. “After all has ceased to be, the One revered will reign alone” (from the Adon Olam hymn).
Yehudah represents the first level of God’s unity, a unity manifested through the Torah and the special role of the Jewish people. Yosef, on the other hand, sought to sanctify God’s Name among the nations and bring knowledge of one Creator to the entire world. He represents the second level, the universal unity of God. Yaakov's recitation of the Shema thus encapsulated the combined visions of both Yehudah and Yosef.
The Scales of the Levyasan
The two paths within Yaakov's family — Yehudah's path of particularity and Yosef's path of universality — split when Yosef was sold as a slave. The brothers’ reconciliation and the unification of these two paths took place in Vayigash, when Yehudah drew near to his brother Yosef (Bereisheet. 44:18).
The Midrash (Breisheet Rabbah 93:2) chose a curious verse to describe the coming together of Yosef and his brothers. The word vayigash(“and he drew near”) also appears in Iyov's description of the scales of the giant Levyasan: “One is so near (yig’shu) to the other, that no air can enter between them” (Iyov 41:8). What do the Leviathan’s scales have to do with the reunification of Yaakov's family?
Illustration image: Leviathan, North French Hebrew Miscellany manuscript (1278-1298)
According to the Sages, this fearsome sea creature belongs in a category of its own. All living creatures have both males and females, except the Leviathan (Baba Batra 74b). In other words, while all other creatures reflect a quality of duality and fracture that exists in our imperfect world, the Leviathan retains something of the universe’s original unity. Thus the Talmud describes the Leviathan as being akalton— twisting around and encompassing the entire world (Rashi ad loc). Zohar (2:179a) teaches that “its tail is placed in its mouth.” In other words, this wondrous creature has neither beginning nor end. Undetected, it surrounds and unites the entire world. This hidden unity will be revealed in the future, when the righteous tzaddikim will feast on the Leviathan (Baba Batra 74b).
The future will reveal the underlying oneness of the universe, the ideal balance of Torah and Eidut, of Yehudah and Yosef, of our inwardly and outwardly directed efforts, of the particular and the universal. The two paths will be united like the scales of the Leviathan, magnificently arranged “one so near to the other that no air can enter between them.”
(Sapphire from the Land of Israel. Adapted from Shemuot HaRe’iyah, vol. 10 (1930) by Rav Chanan Morrison)
The future will reveal the underlying oneness of the universe, the ideal balance of Torah and Eidut, of Yehudah and Yosef, of our inwardly and outwardly directed efforts, of the particular and the universal. The two paths will be united like the scales of the Leviathan, magnificently arranged “one so near to the other that no air can enter between them.”
(Sapphire from the Land of Israel. Adapted from Shemuot HaRe’iyah, vol. 10 (1930) by Rav Chanan Morrison)
Seventy Nefesh
by HaRav Mordechai Greenberg
Nasi HaYeshiva, Kerem B'Yavneh
One of the principles of Judaism is the unity of the nation of Israel. There are countless statements in the written and oral Torah that deal with this issue. One of them relates to our Parsha: "All the nefesh of Yaakov's household who came to Egypt – seventy." (Bereisheet 46:27) Chazal comment on this (Vayikra Rabbah 4:6):
Esav had [only] six people, yet the Torah calls them: "the members (nafshot) of his household" (Bereisheet 36:6), in plural, since they serve many gods. Yaakov, however, had seventy people, yet the Torah calls them "nefesh" (sing.), since they all serve one G-d.
Chazal extol the issue of unity when they say that even if Israel worships idols, so long as they are united – they will be left alone: "Ephraim is attached to idols; let him be." (Hoshea 4:17) Even when he is attached to idols, still, if he is attached and united – let him be. (Bereisheet Rabbah 38)
Chazal attribute Israel's exile and redemption to the question of division and unity. The Maharal deals with this at length in his work, "Netzach Yisrael," and writes (ch. 4) that on account of this the Second Temple was destroyed, since Yerushalayim and the Temple are the focal point that unite Am Yisrael, and there they are one. When they are divided – they are not worthy of this place, and therefore it is destroyed.
The redemption is also dependent on this. If we will be united, the redemption will come sooner; if not, it will be delayed.
On the pasuk in brit bein habetarim: "[Avraham] took all these to Him; he cut them in the center ... The bird, however, he did not cut up" (Bereisheet 15:10), the Noam Elimelech writes that the bird symbolizes Am Yisrael, in contrast to the other animals, which symbolize the other nations. I.e, the fact that he did not cut up the bird expresses the merit of Am Yisrael, that when they are whole, their merit is unfathomable.
The Maharal explains that Jewish unity is something inherent to them, and therefore they are always called, "nefesh." They went down to Egypt as "seventy nefesh," since, in essence, they are one soul, even though their bodies are separate. (cf. Tanya ch. 32) With this he explains the difference between the roots, ga'al and galah. The meaning of redemption, ga'al, is that G-d gathers them from the four corners of the earth and unites them. Therefore, the aleph is in the middle of the root, since they will be redeemed in the merit of unity. However, in exile they are scattered in the four corners of the earth, which is alluded to by the letter hey, which is composed of a dalet with a yud in the middle, since they are scattered in the four corners of the earth and in the middle; i.e., throughout the entire world. Thus, the aleph in the middle of the root ga'al indicates unity, which leads to redemption, whereas the hey at the end of the root, galah, indicates that although they are scattered, this situation of exile is at the end, and not normal, and will certainly be corrected.
The issue of unity also connects the Parsha and its Haftarah. In next week's Parsha it says, "Assemble and I will tell you what will befall you in the End of Days." (49:1) The Midrash says (Bereisheet Rabbah 98:2):
[Yaakov] said to them: All of you be in one assembly. This is what it says, "Now you, Son of Man, take for yourself one branch, and write upon it, 'For Yehuda and Bnei Yisrael his comrades (chaveirav)'" (Yechezkel 37:16) – it is written chaveiro (sing.) – and prepare yourselves for redemption. What does it say afterwards? "I will make them into one nation in the land." (37:22)
It further says in the Midrash (Kohelet 3:7):
"[There is] a time to mend" – as it says, "Bring them close one to the other" (37:17), and what does is say afterwards? "Thus says the L-rd, Hashem: Behold, I am taking Bnei Yisrael from among the nations to which they have gone; I will gather them from all around and I will bring them to their soil; I will make them into one nation in the land." (37:21-22) This is, "a time to mend."
Similarly, it says on the pasuk, "You are all standing" (Devarim 29:9): When? When you will all be in one group ... Similarly, you find that Bnei Yisrael will not be redeemed until they will all be one assembly, as it says, "In those days, the house of Yehuda will walk with the House if Israel, and they will come together..." (Yirmiya 3:18) Chazal also say on the pasuk, "Who ... founded His group upon the earth" (Amos 9:6) – Israel will not be redeemed until they will all be one group. (Midrash Tanchuma Nitzavim #1)
When the branch of Yosef and the branch of Yehuda, "will become united in your hand," Israel will be redeemed: "I will bring them to their soil; I will make them into one nation in the land, upon the mountains of Israel, and one king will be a king for them all; they will no longer be two nations, and they will no longer be divided into two kingdoms, ever again. (Haftarah, Yechezkel 37:21-22)
The Meshech Chochma writes enthusiastically in Parshat Beshalach on this issue, and his words should be seen inside. Amongst them he writes, "Therefore, [even] for the desecration of the Shabbat, which has spread in our many sins, they could then hope that they wound be granted a delay, for they are a community."
Nasi HaYeshiva, Kerem B'Yavneh
One of the principles of Judaism is the unity of the nation of Israel. There are countless statements in the written and oral Torah that deal with this issue. One of them relates to our Parsha: "All the nefesh of Yaakov's household who came to Egypt – seventy." (Bereisheet 46:27) Chazal comment on this (Vayikra Rabbah 4:6):
Esav had [only] six people, yet the Torah calls them: "the members (nafshot) of his household" (Bereisheet 36:6), in plural, since they serve many gods. Yaakov, however, had seventy people, yet the Torah calls them "nefesh" (sing.), since they all serve one G-d.
Chazal extol the issue of unity when they say that even if Israel worships idols, so long as they are united – they will be left alone: "Ephraim is attached to idols; let him be." (Hoshea 4:17) Even when he is attached to idols, still, if he is attached and united – let him be. (Bereisheet Rabbah 38)
Chazal attribute Israel's exile and redemption to the question of division and unity. The Maharal deals with this at length in his work, "Netzach Yisrael," and writes (ch. 4) that on account of this the Second Temple was destroyed, since Yerushalayim and the Temple are the focal point that unite Am Yisrael, and there they are one. When they are divided – they are not worthy of this place, and therefore it is destroyed.
The redemption is also dependent on this. If we will be united, the redemption will come sooner; if not, it will be delayed.
On the pasuk in brit bein habetarim: "[Avraham] took all these to Him; he cut them in the center ... The bird, however, he did not cut up" (Bereisheet 15:10), the Noam Elimelech writes that the bird symbolizes Am Yisrael, in contrast to the other animals, which symbolize the other nations. I.e, the fact that he did not cut up the bird expresses the merit of Am Yisrael, that when they are whole, their merit is unfathomable.
The Maharal explains that Jewish unity is something inherent to them, and therefore they are always called, "nefesh." They went down to Egypt as "seventy nefesh," since, in essence, they are one soul, even though their bodies are separate. (cf. Tanya ch. 32) With this he explains the difference between the roots, ga'al and galah. The meaning of redemption, ga'al, is that G-d gathers them from the four corners of the earth and unites them. Therefore, the aleph is in the middle of the root, since they will be redeemed in the merit of unity. However, in exile they are scattered in the four corners of the earth, which is alluded to by the letter hey, which is composed of a dalet with a yud in the middle, since they are scattered in the four corners of the earth and in the middle; i.e., throughout the entire world. Thus, the aleph in the middle of the root ga'al indicates unity, which leads to redemption, whereas the hey at the end of the root, galah, indicates that although they are scattered, this situation of exile is at the end, and not normal, and will certainly be corrected.
The issue of unity also connects the Parsha and its Haftarah. In next week's Parsha it says, "Assemble and I will tell you what will befall you in the End of Days." (49:1) The Midrash says (Bereisheet Rabbah 98:2):
[Yaakov] said to them: All of you be in one assembly. This is what it says, "Now you, Son of Man, take for yourself one branch, and write upon it, 'For Yehuda and Bnei Yisrael his comrades (chaveirav)'" (Yechezkel 37:16) – it is written chaveiro (sing.) – and prepare yourselves for redemption. What does it say afterwards? "I will make them into one nation in the land." (37:22)
It further says in the Midrash (Kohelet 3:7):
"[There is] a time to mend" – as it says, "Bring them close one to the other" (37:17), and what does is say afterwards? "Thus says the L-rd, Hashem: Behold, I am taking Bnei Yisrael from among the nations to which they have gone; I will gather them from all around and I will bring them to their soil; I will make them into one nation in the land." (37:21-22) This is, "a time to mend."
Similarly, it says on the pasuk, "You are all standing" (Devarim 29:9): When? When you will all be in one group ... Similarly, you find that Bnei Yisrael will not be redeemed until they will all be one assembly, as it says, "In those days, the house of Yehuda will walk with the House if Israel, and they will come together..." (Yirmiya 3:18) Chazal also say on the pasuk, "Who ... founded His group upon the earth" (Amos 9:6) – Israel will not be redeemed until they will all be one group. (Midrash Tanchuma Nitzavim #1)
When the branch of Yosef and the branch of Yehuda, "will become united in your hand," Israel will be redeemed: "I will bring them to their soil; I will make them into one nation in the land, upon the mountains of Israel, and one king will be a king for them all; they will no longer be two nations, and they will no longer be divided into two kingdoms, ever again. (Haftarah, Yechezkel 37:21-22)
The Meshech Chochma writes enthusiastically in Parshat Beshalach on this issue, and his words should be seen inside. Amongst them he writes, "Therefore, [even] for the desecration of the Shabbat, which has spread in our many sins, they could then hope that they wound be granted a delay, for they are a community."
Fathers and Sons
by HaRav Zalman Baruch Melamed
Rosh HaYeshiva, Bet El
This Torah study is dedicated in the memory of R. Avraham ben-tziyon ben shabtai
Approaching the Fathers of the Nation
This week's Torah portion, "VaYigash ," depicts the peaceful resolution to the episode of the selling of Yosef. Recently, a student approached me with the following question: "How does one go about teaching the story of Yosef and his brothers to youngsters? True, our Torah commentators have given all sorts of interpretations, yet upon sitting down and reading the plain, unadorned text of the Bible, one receives a most appalling impression of the brothers and becomes very apprehensive of their behavior."
The question, of course, extends far beyond the episode of the selling of Yosef. There was once a teacher at one of our religious public schools who asked: "How can we even compare the behavior of, say, Rav Yisrael Meir Kagen, the "Hafetz Haim," a personage of outstanding moral stature, with that of..." - It is forbidden to even repeat his words - "Dovid HaMelech." I bring this statement only for the sake of addressing it. In truth it is forbidden to even consider such a comparison. "Dovid HaMelech lives on," says the Talmud . Dovid HaMelech composed the Book of Tehillim. Dovid HaMelech was the greatest Torah authority of his generation. The daily practices of Dovid HaMelech are related to us by our Sages: how he constantly poured over the Torah, rose up early in the morning to study Jewish law, and busied himself composing songs of praise to the Creator.
Indeed, one who reads the Chumash alone, without studying the words of our Sages, runs the risk of understanding things incorrectly.
When dealing with Yosef and his brothers it is important to remember that they were moral giants. The same is true of Dovid HaMelech. The Torah did not find it necessary to teach us this obvious point. Later, though, when the Rabbis detected that the passage of time was giving rise to mistaken impressions, they found it necessary to teach us that, "Anybody who thinks that Dovid sinned is mistaken."
The dispute between the brothers was a deep and penetrating one. We are not trying to claim that what took place here was justified, for the Sages themselves inform us that the famous "Ten Martyrs" were put to death as a result of the selling of Yosef. Still, one must possess the fundamental understanding that we are dealing here with the fathers of the nation . The fact that our nation has managed persevere for so many generations, and with such distinction, is, in itself, testimony to the greatness of the forefathers. "There were," in actuality, "only three forefathers," says the Talmud - Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov. After these forefathers came Yaakov's sons: the fathers of the Twelve Tribes and the heads of the nation in the wake of the forefathers. The entire nation stems from them. Everything that has transpired, right up until today, goes back to these very roots. The remarkable history of our people teaches us that the roots - the forefathers - were mighty indeed.
The twelve brothers grow up together in Yaakov's house where they lead a deeply spiritual life. Because of this intensely spiritual environment, because of the great ideals and weighty responsibility bound up in it, tension arises between Yosef and his brothers. Their dispute is the result the great responsibility that they bear - the responsibility to uphold and preserve the spirit of the House of Yaakov.
Understanding the Dispute of the Brothers
a. Yosef the Idealist
It is possible to approach the dispute between Yosef and his brothers from a number of different angles. It is possible to see Yosef is an idealist, dreaming dreams of redemption and salvation, as the Sages teach, "Come and see: All that befell Yosef befell Tzion as well... It is written concerning Yosef, 'And Yosef had a dream ' (Ber. 37:5), and it is written concerning Tzion, 'When God will return the captivity of Tzion, we will be like dreamers '" (Tehilim 126). Yosef dreamed, for he had great ideals. True, he brings a bad report to his father concerning his brothers, but this is only because he makes such great behavioral demands of them; he feels that they are capable of more. Because of the weighty implications involved he sees no other course than informing his father, Yaakov, concerning the behavior of his brothers. The brothers, on the other hand, take a different approach - they are more realistic, more pragmatic.
It is possible to view this conflict in light of our present-day situation - for, are we not, after all, the great grand children of the forefathers? And just as Yosef was despised for being a dreamer who longed for the redemption, so too today hatred is often fostered towards those who yearn for the redemption of Israel. They go misunderstood and are often accused of dragging the nation into imminent danger or self destruction. People believe that these dreamers want the unattainable, and the hatred is at times so great that, "They could not say a peaceful word to him" (Ber. 37:4).
It is told, in the name of the Vilna Gaon , that all those who exert themselves settling the Land of Israel, reestablishing the Holy City of Yerushalayim, and advancing the redemption - those who strive to secure Jewish control over the Land of Israel, possess something of "Mashiach ben Yoseph," the Messiah from the line of Yosef. They continue in the spirit of Yosef, and they - like Yosef - go misunderstood. The true validity of their approach goes unrecognized, as it is written, "Yosef recognized his brothers, but they did not recognize him" (ibid. 42:8),
Yosef possesses a great and deep vision, and others do not succeed in understanding him. If only they were willing to recognize Yosef's leadership, says the Vilna Gaon, redemption would come immediately.
b. Yosef the "Internationalist"
Rav Kook explains the dispute between Yosef and his brothers in a different manner. They disagreed concerning the correct way to spread God's light in the world. Yosef believed that the best way for the Jewish People to make their impact felt in the world was by creating a "new Middle East", through attempting to influence the entire world. By associating freely with everybody, strengthening our ties with the other nations and overlooking differences, we will, Yosef felt, succeed in bringing everybody close to God. This, of course, does not imply the complete denial of all differences; rather, it means overlooking them for the sake of maintaining good relations. It means not behaving like a "nation that dwells alone," elevating itself above others. The approach of Yosef calls on the People of Israel to go out and associate with all the other nations of the world, thus influencing them.
The rest of the tribes - Yehudah at their head - thought differently. Their approach calls on the Jewish People to build themselves up from the inside - to ascend, sanctify themselves, and set themselves apart. Only after reaching a high level perfection, only then, as a unique people standing aloof, are we able to serve as a light unto the nations. Not through proselytizing or through a downplaying our uniqueness, but through banding together, joining forces and striving to attain inner perfection.
In our generation, as well, there exist different approaches when it comes to education. Lubavitch Hasidism teaches that one who knows "alef, bet" should go out and teach "alef bet." If one knows a little, one teaches a little. The more one learns, the more one teaches - whatever you've got: Give! There is another approach, though, that says that before one goes out to influence others, one must himself be full to the brim with knowledge. The more a person is overflowing himself, the greater his capacity to affect others, for his knowledge is not of a superficial character, but deep-seated and genuine.
Yosef views the Jewish People as possessing enough strength to influence the rest of the world. We have nothing to fear by going out, interacting and developing relations with the rest of humanity. They will be receptive to our message, and we will not come out any worse. The truth of the matter is, though, that this is slightly more complicated than it sounds. Rav Kook mentions the passage: "Ephraim amongst the nations assimilates," explaining that the disciples of this approach are not always successful. Sometimes there are failures and crises. It is not uncommon that one goes out with the intention of influencing - and returns influenced. Yet, if a basic inner foundation is firmly established, allowing us to rise up to great and elevated heights, afterwards, it is possible to influence the entire world.
It may appear as if we are simply projecting all sorts of profound ideas upon the dispute between Yosef and his brothers. Yet this is not the case. In the course of our long history we find these tendencies reoccurring in the Jewish People.
The Sages of the Talmud teach us: "Yosef, for sanctifying God's name in a hidden, private manner, was rewarded by having a letter from God's name (the Tetragrammaton - YHVH) added to his own." The Hebrew Yosef later became Y'hosef , an additional 'Heh,' or 'h' being added - taken, as it were - from God's own name. "Yehudah," the Talmud continues, "for sanctifying the name of God openly, publicly, merited receiving a name that was made up entirely of the letters of God's name." The Hebrew Yehudah contains, albeit rearranged somewhat, all of the letters of God's name. The above appears to be in keeping with what we have been saying up till now. Yosef is an introspective type. He possesses inner spiritual might. He is not afraid to go out and gather followers because he possesses unseen inner strengths. Therefore. Yehudah, on the other hand, sanctifies God's name openly, this is the appearance of the Kingdom of Israel.
Yosef opens up channels - "gets the ball rolling," so to speak; such is the nature of "Mashiach ben Yosef." "Mashiach ben Dovid," The Mashiach of the house of Dovid, comes along and completes the work. There are those who possess the might, the courage and the bravery to initiate, yet they don't possess the qualities needed to finish the job - this is not their strong point. Such is the nature of Yosef. Yehudah, on the other hand, represents culmination, completion. These, in essence, are the roots of two distinct approaches that afterwards appear and reappear throughout Jewish history. We are called upon, each one of us, to approach the sons of Yaakov, the fathers of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, with an appreciation for their true greatness, and in so doing, to learn whatever possible from the significant courses that they followed.
The Centrality of the "Bet HaMidrash"
The Midrash explains, regarding the words of the Torah, "He (Yaakov) sent Yehudah on ahead of him to make preparations... [in the Goshen district of Egypt]" (Ber. 46:20), that the purpose of this mission was to establish a house of gathering so that there be a place for Yaakov to teach Torah, and for his offspring to study, upon their arrival in Egypt. Yehudah, then, was sent on ahead in order to establish a "Bet-Midrash," a study hall. The first thing that must be done is to secure a Bet-Midrash .
Here in the settlement of Bet-El, this rule held true. When we came to settle Bet-El, more than twenty years ago, we lived, initially, in the near-by army base. When we were finally given the land needed in order to build the settlement, even before a city plan was drawn up, we approached an architect with the request that he prepare a blueprint for the building of the Bet-Midrash. His immediate response was, "You can't begin building a thing until you have a city plan. What if your Bet-Midrash turns out to be in the middle of where a road ought to be? First draw up a city plan, then decide where you want to put this study hall of yours." We told him, "It's written in the Shulhan Aruch that the Bet-Midrash has to be situated at the highest point in the city, and so that's where we plan on building it. The roads will have to be planned out according to the position of the Bet-Midrash, and not the Bet-Midrash according to the roads." This we learned from the behavior of Yaakov, our father, when he sent Yehudah on ahead "to make preparations . And that is exactly what we did. We began by building our Bet-Midrash - the first stone structure built in Judeah and Samaria after the Six Day War. The Bet Midrash takes precedence above all else.
"Shema Yisrael"
The Sages teach that when Yaakov finally reunites with Yosef he cries out, "Shema Yisrael." He had not seen his son for so many years - finally, they meet again. Yosef hugs his father and kisses him, yet Yaakov recites the "Shema." What sort of a response is that? Could Yaakov find a no more appropriate time for his daily recitation of the Shema prayer?
The truth of the matter, though, is that the moment of Yaakov's reunification with Yosef is a most appropriate time for reading the Shema. That moment of joy and elation is the best of all possible times, for it allows Yaakov to elevate all his joy to its true source.
Many years ago I went to visit my grandfather at his home, and I was told that he went to the synagogue to pray. I went to look for him there. I entered the synagogue and my grandfather caught sight of me while in the middle of the recital of the Kaddish prayer. Suddenly I heard his voice rise up above all the others, "Yehe Shmeh Rabbah..." Afterwards, when he met me he told me the reason that he raised his voice so. "I was reminded," he said, "of the story of Yaakov and Yaakov, how Yaakov recited the Shema upon seeing his long lost son. The Hassidic Rabbis say that he desired to elevate his joy to its true heavenly source. Therefore, when I saw you, I shouted for joy, in order to infuse my prayer with the personal joy I was experiencing.
It is incorrect to view the forefathers as detached, emotionless types, completely out of touch with the physical world of reality. Rather, existence itself was, for the forefathers, elevated to an altogether higher plane. The recital of the Shema at the precise moment of Yaakov's reunion with Yosef was an indication of the true content of the joyous atmosphere of the reunion.
The Sages, of course, describe these events according to their own viewpoint and understanding. We, through studying their books and wisdom, see things primarily according to their perspective. We learn how the Sages understood the attitude and behavior of Yaakov: his giving precedence to the Bet-Midrash, his crying out "Shema." We recognize this to be the approach of the Sages. Their outlook, of course, is the result of their greatness of Torah. Whether it was the "Shema" that Yaakov recited or something else - some other type of spiritual elation - is not the point. What interests us is the overall approach, the approach that asks the question: "On what sort of spiritual plane did the forefathers exist?"
We continue this very same spiritual course. This means striving to reach a level on which we exist in a world of Torah that is not detached from day to day life. It means making Torah an essential part of life, part of the spirit of life within, a living and breathing Torah. The wording of the blessing: "For they (the commandments of the Torah) are our life and the length of our days," is not a mere figure of speech that we recite in prayer. These words are the expression of an actual concrete inner reality that resides in the deepest recesses of the Jewish People: The Torah and life are one. May it be God's will that we merit to internalize these lessons, and to walk in the ways of the forefathers.
Rosh HaYeshiva, Bet El
This Torah study is dedicated in the memory of R. Avraham ben-tziyon ben shabtai
Approaching the Fathers of the Nation
This week's Torah portion, "VaYigash ," depicts the peaceful resolution to the episode of the selling of Yosef. Recently, a student approached me with the following question: "How does one go about teaching the story of Yosef and his brothers to youngsters? True, our Torah commentators have given all sorts of interpretations, yet upon sitting down and reading the plain, unadorned text of the Bible, one receives a most appalling impression of the brothers and becomes very apprehensive of their behavior."
The question, of course, extends far beyond the episode of the selling of Yosef. There was once a teacher at one of our religious public schools who asked: "How can we even compare the behavior of, say, Rav Yisrael Meir Kagen, the "Hafetz Haim," a personage of outstanding moral stature, with that of..." - It is forbidden to even repeat his words - "Dovid HaMelech." I bring this statement only for the sake of addressing it. In truth it is forbidden to even consider such a comparison. "Dovid HaMelech lives on," says the Talmud . Dovid HaMelech composed the Book of Tehillim. Dovid HaMelech was the greatest Torah authority of his generation. The daily practices of Dovid HaMelech are related to us by our Sages: how he constantly poured over the Torah, rose up early in the morning to study Jewish law, and busied himself composing songs of praise to the Creator.
Indeed, one who reads the Chumash alone, without studying the words of our Sages, runs the risk of understanding things incorrectly.
When dealing with Yosef and his brothers it is important to remember that they were moral giants. The same is true of Dovid HaMelech. The Torah did not find it necessary to teach us this obvious point. Later, though, when the Rabbis detected that the passage of time was giving rise to mistaken impressions, they found it necessary to teach us that, "Anybody who thinks that Dovid sinned is mistaken."
The dispute between the brothers was a deep and penetrating one. We are not trying to claim that what took place here was justified, for the Sages themselves inform us that the famous "Ten Martyrs" were put to death as a result of the selling of Yosef. Still, one must possess the fundamental understanding that we are dealing here with the fathers of the nation . The fact that our nation has managed persevere for so many generations, and with such distinction, is, in itself, testimony to the greatness of the forefathers. "There were," in actuality, "only three forefathers," says the Talmud - Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov. After these forefathers came Yaakov's sons: the fathers of the Twelve Tribes and the heads of the nation in the wake of the forefathers. The entire nation stems from them. Everything that has transpired, right up until today, goes back to these very roots. The remarkable history of our people teaches us that the roots - the forefathers - were mighty indeed.
The twelve brothers grow up together in Yaakov's house where they lead a deeply spiritual life. Because of this intensely spiritual environment, because of the great ideals and weighty responsibility bound up in it, tension arises between Yosef and his brothers. Their dispute is the result the great responsibility that they bear - the responsibility to uphold and preserve the spirit of the House of Yaakov.
Understanding the Dispute of the Brothers
a. Yosef the Idealist
It is possible to approach the dispute between Yosef and his brothers from a number of different angles. It is possible to see Yosef is an idealist, dreaming dreams of redemption and salvation, as the Sages teach, "Come and see: All that befell Yosef befell Tzion as well... It is written concerning Yosef, 'And Yosef had a dream ' (Ber. 37:5), and it is written concerning Tzion, 'When God will return the captivity of Tzion, we will be like dreamers '" (Tehilim 126). Yosef dreamed, for he had great ideals. True, he brings a bad report to his father concerning his brothers, but this is only because he makes such great behavioral demands of them; he feels that they are capable of more. Because of the weighty implications involved he sees no other course than informing his father, Yaakov, concerning the behavior of his brothers. The brothers, on the other hand, take a different approach - they are more realistic, more pragmatic.
It is possible to view this conflict in light of our present-day situation - for, are we not, after all, the great grand children of the forefathers? And just as Yosef was despised for being a dreamer who longed for the redemption, so too today hatred is often fostered towards those who yearn for the redemption of Israel. They go misunderstood and are often accused of dragging the nation into imminent danger or self destruction. People believe that these dreamers want the unattainable, and the hatred is at times so great that, "They could not say a peaceful word to him" (Ber. 37:4).
It is told, in the name of the Vilna Gaon , that all those who exert themselves settling the Land of Israel, reestablishing the Holy City of Yerushalayim, and advancing the redemption - those who strive to secure Jewish control over the Land of Israel, possess something of "Mashiach ben Yoseph," the Messiah from the line of Yosef. They continue in the spirit of Yosef, and they - like Yosef - go misunderstood. The true validity of their approach goes unrecognized, as it is written, "Yosef recognized his brothers, but they did not recognize him" (ibid. 42:8),
Yosef possesses a great and deep vision, and others do not succeed in understanding him. If only they were willing to recognize Yosef's leadership, says the Vilna Gaon, redemption would come immediately.
b. Yosef the "Internationalist"
Rav Kook explains the dispute between Yosef and his brothers in a different manner. They disagreed concerning the correct way to spread God's light in the world. Yosef believed that the best way for the Jewish People to make their impact felt in the world was by creating a "new Middle East", through attempting to influence the entire world. By associating freely with everybody, strengthening our ties with the other nations and overlooking differences, we will, Yosef felt, succeed in bringing everybody close to God. This, of course, does not imply the complete denial of all differences; rather, it means overlooking them for the sake of maintaining good relations. It means not behaving like a "nation that dwells alone," elevating itself above others. The approach of Yosef calls on the People of Israel to go out and associate with all the other nations of the world, thus influencing them.
The rest of the tribes - Yehudah at their head - thought differently. Their approach calls on the Jewish People to build themselves up from the inside - to ascend, sanctify themselves, and set themselves apart. Only after reaching a high level perfection, only then, as a unique people standing aloof, are we able to serve as a light unto the nations. Not through proselytizing or through a downplaying our uniqueness, but through banding together, joining forces and striving to attain inner perfection.
In our generation, as well, there exist different approaches when it comes to education. Lubavitch Hasidism teaches that one who knows "alef, bet" should go out and teach "alef bet." If one knows a little, one teaches a little. The more one learns, the more one teaches - whatever you've got: Give! There is another approach, though, that says that before one goes out to influence others, one must himself be full to the brim with knowledge. The more a person is overflowing himself, the greater his capacity to affect others, for his knowledge is not of a superficial character, but deep-seated and genuine.
Yosef views the Jewish People as possessing enough strength to influence the rest of the world. We have nothing to fear by going out, interacting and developing relations with the rest of humanity. They will be receptive to our message, and we will not come out any worse. The truth of the matter is, though, that this is slightly more complicated than it sounds. Rav Kook mentions the passage: "Ephraim amongst the nations assimilates," explaining that the disciples of this approach are not always successful. Sometimes there are failures and crises. It is not uncommon that one goes out with the intention of influencing - and returns influenced. Yet, if a basic inner foundation is firmly established, allowing us to rise up to great and elevated heights, afterwards, it is possible to influence the entire world.
It may appear as if we are simply projecting all sorts of profound ideas upon the dispute between Yosef and his brothers. Yet this is not the case. In the course of our long history we find these tendencies reoccurring in the Jewish People.
The Sages of the Talmud teach us: "Yosef, for sanctifying God's name in a hidden, private manner, was rewarded by having a letter from God's name (the Tetragrammaton - YHVH) added to his own." The Hebrew Yosef later became Y'hosef , an additional 'Heh,' or 'h' being added - taken, as it were - from God's own name. "Yehudah," the Talmud continues, "for sanctifying the name of God openly, publicly, merited receiving a name that was made up entirely of the letters of God's name." The Hebrew Yehudah contains, albeit rearranged somewhat, all of the letters of God's name. The above appears to be in keeping with what we have been saying up till now. Yosef is an introspective type. He possesses inner spiritual might. He is not afraid to go out and gather followers because he possesses unseen inner strengths. Therefore. Yehudah, on the other hand, sanctifies God's name openly, this is the appearance of the Kingdom of Israel.
Yosef opens up channels - "gets the ball rolling," so to speak; such is the nature of "Mashiach ben Yosef." "Mashiach ben Dovid," The Mashiach of the house of Dovid, comes along and completes the work. There are those who possess the might, the courage and the bravery to initiate, yet they don't possess the qualities needed to finish the job - this is not their strong point. Such is the nature of Yosef. Yehudah, on the other hand, represents culmination, completion. These, in essence, are the roots of two distinct approaches that afterwards appear and reappear throughout Jewish history. We are called upon, each one of us, to approach the sons of Yaakov, the fathers of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, with an appreciation for their true greatness, and in so doing, to learn whatever possible from the significant courses that they followed.
The Centrality of the "Bet HaMidrash"
The Midrash explains, regarding the words of the Torah, "He (Yaakov) sent Yehudah on ahead of him to make preparations... [in the Goshen district of Egypt]" (Ber. 46:20), that the purpose of this mission was to establish a house of gathering so that there be a place for Yaakov to teach Torah, and for his offspring to study, upon their arrival in Egypt. Yehudah, then, was sent on ahead in order to establish a "Bet-Midrash," a study hall. The first thing that must be done is to secure a Bet-Midrash .
Here in the settlement of Bet-El, this rule held true. When we came to settle Bet-El, more than twenty years ago, we lived, initially, in the near-by army base. When we were finally given the land needed in order to build the settlement, even before a city plan was drawn up, we approached an architect with the request that he prepare a blueprint for the building of the Bet-Midrash. His immediate response was, "You can't begin building a thing until you have a city plan. What if your Bet-Midrash turns out to be in the middle of where a road ought to be? First draw up a city plan, then decide where you want to put this study hall of yours." We told him, "It's written in the Shulhan Aruch that the Bet-Midrash has to be situated at the highest point in the city, and so that's where we plan on building it. The roads will have to be planned out according to the position of the Bet-Midrash, and not the Bet-Midrash according to the roads." This we learned from the behavior of Yaakov, our father, when he sent Yehudah on ahead "to make preparations . And that is exactly what we did. We began by building our Bet-Midrash - the first stone structure built in Judeah and Samaria after the Six Day War. The Bet Midrash takes precedence above all else.
"Shema Yisrael"
The Sages teach that when Yaakov finally reunites with Yosef he cries out, "Shema Yisrael." He had not seen his son for so many years - finally, they meet again. Yosef hugs his father and kisses him, yet Yaakov recites the "Shema." What sort of a response is that? Could Yaakov find a no more appropriate time for his daily recitation of the Shema prayer?
The truth of the matter, though, is that the moment of Yaakov's reunification with Yosef is a most appropriate time for reading the Shema. That moment of joy and elation is the best of all possible times, for it allows Yaakov to elevate all his joy to its true source.
Many years ago I went to visit my grandfather at his home, and I was told that he went to the synagogue to pray. I went to look for him there. I entered the synagogue and my grandfather caught sight of me while in the middle of the recital of the Kaddish prayer. Suddenly I heard his voice rise up above all the others, "Yehe Shmeh Rabbah..." Afterwards, when he met me he told me the reason that he raised his voice so. "I was reminded," he said, "of the story of Yaakov and Yaakov, how Yaakov recited the Shema upon seeing his long lost son. The Hassidic Rabbis say that he desired to elevate his joy to its true heavenly source. Therefore, when I saw you, I shouted for joy, in order to infuse my prayer with the personal joy I was experiencing.
It is incorrect to view the forefathers as detached, emotionless types, completely out of touch with the physical world of reality. Rather, existence itself was, for the forefathers, elevated to an altogether higher plane. The recital of the Shema at the precise moment of Yaakov's reunion with Yosef was an indication of the true content of the joyous atmosphere of the reunion.
The Sages, of course, describe these events according to their own viewpoint and understanding. We, through studying their books and wisdom, see things primarily according to their perspective. We learn how the Sages understood the attitude and behavior of Yaakov: his giving precedence to the Bet-Midrash, his crying out "Shema." We recognize this to be the approach of the Sages. Their outlook, of course, is the result of their greatness of Torah. Whether it was the "Shema" that Yaakov recited or something else - some other type of spiritual elation - is not the point. What interests us is the overall approach, the approach that asks the question: "On what sort of spiritual plane did the forefathers exist?"
We continue this very same spiritual course. This means striving to reach a level on which we exist in a world of Torah that is not detached from day to day life. It means making Torah an essential part of life, part of the spirit of life within, a living and breathing Torah. The wording of the blessing: "For they (the commandments of the Torah) are our life and the length of our days," is not a mere figure of speech that we recite in prayer. These words are the expression of an actual concrete inner reality that resides in the deepest recesses of the Jewish People: The Torah and life are one. May it be God's will that we merit to internalize these lessons, and to walk in the ways of the forefathers.
Friday, December 23, 2022
Rav Kook's Igrot Hare’aya (Letters of Rav Kook): How to Develop New Approaches in Eretz Yisrael’s Rabbinate, part II
#137 – part II
Date and Place: 12 Iyar 5668 (1908), Yafo
Recipient: Rabbi Yitzchak Isaac Halevi. We have already seen letters between the two on the topic of Rav Kook’s planned yeshiva, but this presentation deserves to be seen.
Body: [Last time, we saw Rav Kook’s contention that to solve the religious problems of the generation, it was necessary to found new yeshivot in the New Yishuv to produce rabbis and laymen who could understand and appeal to the pioneering population of Eretz Yisrael.]
Things will change after we have succeeded with that which Hashem desires [in building new religious institutions]. Through the experience, all will see that the correct way is indeed that which is grand for the person who does it and which others see as grand. The time will come when it will be proved that all the made-up fears, with which the leaders of the old institutions scare people, about the dangers of changes for the better, are incorrect. The changes are actually clearly correct, as seen in the Torah and healthy logic that the fear has no basis. To the contrary, by not making changes, the danger will just become more acute. The danger is because all of those who are educated by those steeped in Torah and fear of Heaven are not prepared for life, neither in regard to their knowledge nor in regard to their behavior and manners. The result is that they become, for the most part, weak people, lacking confidence, and they depend on communal support. Those who follow the path of [religious] destruction use those people’s background and strengthen themselves in their negative activities, even though their end will be total destruction, which is discernable to those who have a watchful eye.
After all of this, I want to point out to your honor that only when [we have made these changes] and will have what to point to [as successes], will the old institutions, whose intentions are for the sake of Hashem, admit to us [that we are correct]. Then the good, new ideas will spread throughout all the religious schools and yeshivot in the Holy Land, and there will be an increase in strength for the Holy Nation. These improvements will last forever, and we will see that the blossoms will bring grandeur in a manner that will bring joy to Hashem and to people.
Therefore, there is no reason to scatter our strength at the outset without gain, by trying to seek a joint plan of action with our special brothers, the German Orthodox Jewish community, in regard to institutions that want to continue operating in their traditional style. It is better that we begin to form a new institution as an experiment. We can be sure that Hashem is before us on our path. When we will succeed, then we will have a proper stake upon which to attach the improvements that are needed throughout Eretz Yisrael.
I spoke briefly with Professor Nathan (a representative of the German Jewish community) about starting a yeshiva here for training rabbis for the New Yishuv. I was not able to explain matters to him more fully, based on his state of mind. Of course, I pointed out to him that the entire internal administration must consist of religious people, and especially people who are insiders, who know intimately about the Land and what it is missing.
I hope that you will honor me with practical responses without too much time passing. Matters are pressing at every moment, as we want to actually begin that which we have been planning for quite a while.
Date and Place: 12 Iyar 5668 (1908), Yafo
Recipient: Rabbi Yitzchak Isaac Halevi. We have already seen letters between the two on the topic of Rav Kook’s planned yeshiva, but this presentation deserves to be seen.
Body: [Last time, we saw Rav Kook’s contention that to solve the religious problems of the generation, it was necessary to found new yeshivot in the New Yishuv to produce rabbis and laymen who could understand and appeal to the pioneering population of Eretz Yisrael.]
Things will change after we have succeeded with that which Hashem desires [in building new religious institutions]. Through the experience, all will see that the correct way is indeed that which is grand for the person who does it and which others see as grand. The time will come when it will be proved that all the made-up fears, with which the leaders of the old institutions scare people, about the dangers of changes for the better, are incorrect. The changes are actually clearly correct, as seen in the Torah and healthy logic that the fear has no basis. To the contrary, by not making changes, the danger will just become more acute. The danger is because all of those who are educated by those steeped in Torah and fear of Heaven are not prepared for life, neither in regard to their knowledge nor in regard to their behavior and manners. The result is that they become, for the most part, weak people, lacking confidence, and they depend on communal support. Those who follow the path of [religious] destruction use those people’s background and strengthen themselves in their negative activities, even though their end will be total destruction, which is discernable to those who have a watchful eye.
After all of this, I want to point out to your honor that only when [we have made these changes] and will have what to point to [as successes], will the old institutions, whose intentions are for the sake of Hashem, admit to us [that we are correct]. Then the good, new ideas will spread throughout all the religious schools and yeshivot in the Holy Land, and there will be an increase in strength for the Holy Nation. These improvements will last forever, and we will see that the blossoms will bring grandeur in a manner that will bring joy to Hashem and to people.
Therefore, there is no reason to scatter our strength at the outset without gain, by trying to seek a joint plan of action with our special brothers, the German Orthodox Jewish community, in regard to institutions that want to continue operating in their traditional style. It is better that we begin to form a new institution as an experiment. We can be sure that Hashem is before us on our path. When we will succeed, then we will have a proper stake upon which to attach the improvements that are needed throughout Eretz Yisrael.
I spoke briefly with Professor Nathan (a representative of the German Jewish community) about starting a yeshiva here for training rabbis for the New Yishuv. I was not able to explain matters to him more fully, based on his state of mind. Of course, I pointed out to him that the entire internal administration must consist of religious people, and especially people who are insiders, who know intimately about the Land and what it is missing.
I hope that you will honor me with practical responses without too much time passing. Matters are pressing at every moment, as we want to actually begin that which we have been planning for quite a while.
The Yishai Fleisher Israel Podcast: Hanukkah Yes! Pope No!
SEASON 2022 EPISODE 50: Yishai and Malkah Fleisher come back from a great southern Israel vacation where Malkah swam with dolphins! Is a new government being sworn in yet? And why would Israelis turn to the Pope for help?? Then, on Table Torah: what were Pharaoh's dreams all about?
Enough
by Rav Binny Freedman
A time comes in your life when you finally get it…when in the midst of all your fears and insanity you stop dead in your tracks and somewhere the voice inside your head cries out “Enough.”
Enough fighting and crying or struggling to hold on. And, like a child quieting down after a blind tantrum, your sobs begin to subside, you shudder once or twice, you blink back your tears, and through a mantle of wet lashes you begin to look at the world through new eyes.
This is your awakening.
You come to terms with the fact that he is not Prince Charming and you are not Cinderella (or vice versa) and that in the real world there aren’t always fairy- tale endings (or beginnings for that matter) and any guarantee of “happily ever after” must begin with you-and in the process, a sense of serenity is born from acceptance.
You stop complaining and blaming other people for things they did to you (or didn’t do for you), and you learn that the only thing you can really count on is the unexpected. You learn that people don’t always say what they mean or mean what they say and not everyone will always be there for you and that it’s not always about you. So you learn to stand on your own and to take care of yourself and in the process, a sense of safety and security is born of self-reliance.
You stop judging and pointing fingers, and you begin to accept people as they are and to overlook their shortcomings and human frailties-and in the process a sense of peace and contentment is born of forgiveness.
You learn that it is truly in giving that we receive. And there is power and glory in creating and contributing.
You learn that you don’t know everything, it’s not your job to save the world, and that you can’t teach a pig to sing.
You learn that anything worth achieving is worth working for and that wishing for something to happen is different from working towards making it happen.
You learn that life isn’t always fair, you don’t always get what you think you deserve, and that sometimes, bad things happen to unsuspecting, good people. On these occasions, you learn not to personalize things. You learn that G-d isn’t punishing you or failing to answer your prayers. It’s just life happening. And you learn to deal with evil in its most primal state-the ego. You learn that negative feelings such as anger, envy, and resentment must be understood and redirected, or they will suffocate the life out of you and poison the universe that surrounds you.
You learn to admit when you are wrong and to build bridges instead of walls. You learn to be thankful and to take comfort in many of the simple things we take for granted, things that millions of the people upon the earth can only dream about: a full refrigerator, clean running water, a soft warm bed, a long hot shower. Slowly, you begin to take responsibility for yourself by yourself, and you make yourself a promise to never betray yourself and to never ever settle for less than your heart’s desire.
You hang a wind chime outside your window so you can listen to the wind. And you make it a point to keep smiling, to keep trusting, and to stay open to every wonderful possibility.
Finally, with courage in your heart and with G-d by your side, you take a stand, you take a deep breath, and you begin to design the life you want to live as best you can.
Anonymous
Awakenings. We all need them, but how do we achieve them? This week’s portion, Miketz, begins with a fascinating story that gives us a glimpse into the possibility of awakenings.
Joseph, an imprisoned slave in Egypt, is called to the palace to interpret the dreams of the great Paroh.
Paro is deeply troubled by two dreams that apparently leave him no rest. Seven seemingly healthy wheat-stalks are devoured by seven dying ones, and then, in a second dream, seven fat, robust cows are devoured by seven sickly, dying ones.
Yosef's interpretation: Egypt will experience seven years of plenty, followed by seven years of famine that will overshadow or ‘devour’ the previous years of plenty.
Now Paroh needs a plan, and Joseph offers the solution: Stockpile during the seven years of plenty and distribute food in exchange for land during the years of famine. This will not only allow Egypt to survive the difficult famine but will also serve to consolidate her status as the economic power in the region.
Ultimately, Yosef is appointed viceroy and as the second highest official in Egypt becomes the instrument for affecting this policy.
This entire scenario is nothing short of incredible. Yosef's solution does not seem to be a stroke of genius; why are all the advisors and ministers of Egypt, the greatest country on earth at the time, incapable of arriving at this same conclusion?
Additionally, the idea of the ruler of the empire actually soliciting and relying on the interpretation of a slave wallowing in prison, not to mention subsequently asking for his solution to his own interpretation, resulting in the appointment of said slave to one of the highest posts in the world, is absurd. What is really going on here?
Incidentally, this portion of Miketz is always read on the festival of Chanukah. Is there some relationship between the story of Chanukah we are currently commemorating, and the rise of Yosef to power in Egypt?
Dreams are an opportunity for us to discover more about who we are, where we are really at, and what is in our hearts and minds. Of course, their ability to impact our lives depends entirely on our ability to interpret them. So everything depends on our perspective, and often on our success in changing our perspectives, or seeing things outside of the box.
Yosef in ancient Egypt represented an entirely different way of seeing things.
The ancient Egyptians worshipped nature as the source of all life. They worshipped the power of nature, as well as idolized all aspects of the natural order. Thus, they deified the Nile, which they felt was the source of all sustenance in this world. Central to their ideology and beliefs, therefore, was the concept that the strong survive, and might makes right, as nature dictates.
The idea, therefore, that pale, dying, sickly animals could devour fat, healthy ones was contrary to the natural order and everything they believed. After all, the lesson of nature is that the strong survive and the weak perish. Survival of the fittest was not just a lesson of the environment; it was an ideal to live by.
Perhaps, therefore, the Egyptians, locked as they were in their own mindset, were incapable of seeing things from a different perspective. Perhaps they were in need of an awakening. Indeed, the emergence of the Jewish people on the world scene may well have been indicative of the fact that the world was in need of just such an awakening.
It is interesting to note just what Yosef's solution was. Taken from the perspective of the ancient, pagan Egyptian, it may well have been a radical proposal. After all, famine is just nature’s way of cleansing. The strong survive, and the weak perish, and along with them the diseases and problems they carry which are, in the end, burdens on society. And there is no over-population. The idea of stockpiling food in order to save the population, not to mention parceling out food to other populations in the region, something which ostensibly could undermine their ability to consolidate their position as the power in the region, may well have been counter to everything ancient Egypt stood for.
(And Paroh, in agreeing to call for Yosef, a lowly slave to begin with, may actually be effecting an interpretation of his own: perhaps we need to hear what the ‘sickly, weak bushel of wheat’ has to say…)
Yosef offers Egypt a different way of seeing things. Life doesn’t have to be that way; the strong and the weak can live side by side and help each other. Ultimately, in becoming the viceroy of Egypt, Joseph will have the chance to practice what he preaches. From the darkness of a jail cell, seemingly forgotten and insignificant, Yosef will ultimately bring to the ancient world its first awakening.
A thousand years later, the Greeks too worshipped nature; they deified beauty; and saw as the ideal all things beautiful in nature. This worship of nature opened the door, giving license to all the most basic urges of man.
The Greeks built gymnasiums where man could develop his body; the pursuit of the perfect body was expressed in Greek sculpture and art. The people entertained themselves in the stadiums, where men honed their physical skills, developing animal-like prowess and cunning. Man no longer served G- d; man was god. Hence the gods of Greece were men. And the qualities worshipped in those gods were all the qualities men could achieve: love and beauty, courage and agility, strength and speed. Thus, could Antiochus Epiphanes erect idols of himself. He was after all, the highest of men; he had achieved all that man could achieve: power and might, strength and cunning. He was, therefore, the most powerful god in the world. (Interestingly, Epiphanes means ‘I am G-d’).
Judaism, however, has a different dream, not of fashioning a G-d of the world, but of bringing G-d intothe world. It does not see the body as a goal, but as a tool in the service of G-d.
Here too, a small band of priests and farmers, revolting against mighty Greece in 168 BCE, taught the world that might does not make right, and that power is not the goal, it is merely a tool.
The animal side of man, worshipped by the pagan world, is not to be idolized; not made the ideal; rather, it is to be channeled, even directed, in the pursuit of a relationship with G-d.
To be sure, there is a beauty in nature, magnificence, even. But it is precisely that beauty that can lead man to find G-d in the world, not to ignore Him.
And this really is the central message of Chanukah: that the victory was meaningless if it was only in the service of man. What made it significant for Jews everywhere, forever, was the recognition of a greater truth: the re-dedication of the Temple, and the re-establishment of man as serving G-d.
In fact, the name Chanukah also stems from the root word “Chen”, meaning Beauty. And one of the issues, central to all that Chanukah represents, is the real meaning of beauty. The Greeks worshipped beauty as part of nature; and they considered themselves experts on this beauty. Greek beauty, however, is external; it focuses on the symmetry in nature, and aspires to recreate this in man, and in all that man does. It is about what we see, but not about who we are and who we can become. Greek beauty is about the perfect body; but it neglects the perfection of character; it strives to perfect the physical self; but denies the spiritual self within.
Judaism’s perception is quite different: beauty is inner symmetry; the perfection of my neshama, the soul within me; that part of me that strives to come close to G-d.
Physical beauty is only valuable if it is a vessel for real, inner beauty. Judaism sees the beauty of harmony in the world; but not just external harmony; the homogeny of purpose; the beauty in understanding the true meaning of our being; the struggle with the existential question of why we are here; what our purpose on this earth is. The Greeks, whose religion was essentially hedonism, had a very straightforward response to this question: we are here to have a good time; to make the most of the time we have.
The Jews, on the other hand, believe that we are here to perfect the world; to make the world a better place. In doing this we become partners with G-d. Hence, the name ‘Chanukah’ expresses the essence of the holiday’s role in conveying this message to mankind.
Perhaps this ideological difference is at the root of our celebration of Chanukah.
If Chanukah were about military victory, there wouldn’t really be that much to celebrate. In fact, the newly found independence of the Hasmonean dynasty lasted a scant quarter-century, before giving way to the new master: Rome. And even in its heyday, it comprised barely 35 square miles around Jerusalem, and a strip of land in what is today the Gaza strip; hardly an accomplishment worthy of so much fuss. No, clearly, the celebration is of something far deeper, far more lasting, than the defeat of a few Greek soldiers.
Chanukah was coming, and the Jews were dreading its’ arrival; the Nazis always liked to play games on Jewish holidays. There was one boy, about to turn thirteen, who could not imagine his bar mitzvah Chanukah passing by without any celebration. So, a couple of weeks before Chanukah, he began to save little scraps of his meager potato ration, hoping to use it as oil. Every day, he set aside a little piece of potato and placed it in his pocket. He ripped threads from his camp uniform and fashioned them into wicks. When the first night of Chanukah arrived, word spread that there was a boy lighting Chanukah candles; the barrack was soon filled with inmates. One could sense the despair, as the Jews looked around at their reality, and recalled happier times, when Chanukah was so full of light.
All eyes were on the boy as he made his way to the back of the barrack, knelt down on the floor, and prepared his candles. Any act of religious expression in the camps was a crime punishable by death; this child was not only risking his life, but the lives of the entire barrack. But no one said a word. Total silence filled the room, as the boy lit the flame and began the recitation of the blessings.
“Blessed art thou…who has sanctified us…and commanded us to light the candles of Chanukah.”
Lighting candles in Bergen Belsen? Was there ever any place as dark as that place in the shadows of the crematoria?
“Blessed art thou…who performed miracles for our ancestors; in those days and in our time as well”
Did G-d have any miracles left, here in the valley of death?
A crash, as the door burst open; an SS officer stood in the doorway, resplendent in his black uniform; the death’s head insignia gleaming. The crowd of inmates parted as he strode to the back of the barracks, the only sound, his footsteps approaching the little boy.
“Get rid of those candles, schnell!” screamed the officer in a rage.
The boy looked up at the officer, and back again at the candles; and in a quiet voice, that resonated in the barracks, responded:
“But sir, today is Chanukah; and on Chanukah we don’t extinguish light, we bring it into the world.”
The silence between the officer and the boy was deafening; and then, by some miracle, the officer inexplicably turned and strode out of the barracks.
Why is lighting the candles of the Menorah so critical to Chanukah?
Why was it so important, in the story of Chanukah, to light the Menorah in the Temple? There is, after all, no mention of any of the other ritual ceremonies: the burning of incense, the offering of sacrifices, and the showbread; to name but a few.
A Menorah is about giving light. What is the purpose of light? Light itself allows man to see, and consequently to derive pleasure from, the world around him. This, however, is most certainly not the idea behind lighting the candles on Chanukah. One of the prayers traditionally recited when lighting the Chanukah lights, is the “Nerot Halalu” prayer:
“Ve’Ein Lanu Reshut Le’Hishtamesh Ba’hem”
‘We have no permission to use them’.
We are not meant to benefit physically from these candles; neither to read by their light, nor to use the heat of their fire for any pleasure or gain.
“E’la LirO’tam Bilvad”
‘We are only to see them.’
Sometimes we need to take a step back and just appreciate the light. We need to see all the light in the world around us, and in our lives, and we need to recall that we are here, in the end only to bring light.
And that light is not about what I can get, nor how much I can conquer, it is all about what I can give.
Two thousand years ago, after a horrific war against the mightiest empire on the face of the earth, the Jews re-conquered the Temple and discovered pigs running around the altar, and an idol of Jupiter in the Holy of Holies. But after all that, there was no rage, all they wanted to do was to light the menorah. All the Jews have ever wanted to do is bring a little light into the world.
Chanukah, then, like Yosef's message so long ago, is an opportunity to re-experience that light. To recall that the greatest gift we can give, is the gift of light.
This too, was a message the world needed to hear; this was the awakening of Chanukah.
Four thousand years ago a single individual, alone and bereft, gave the world a message it needed to hear. Two thousand years ago, a small nation, alone and bereft, again gave the world a message it needed to hear.
Today, alone amongst the community of nations, Israel has a message the world needs to hear. It is time to kindle the flame that will bring light back into the world. It is time for an awakening.
May Hashem bless us all, as individuals, as a people, and as a world, to experience the awakening we all so desperately need. As the verse in the prayers after a meal suggests:
“Az Hayinu Ke’Cholmim” “Then we will be like dreamers”, awakening from a long dream, to discover the clarity of morning…
Best wishes to all for a Shabbat Shalom as well as a sweet and wonderful Chanukah full of light…
A time comes in your life when you finally get it…when in the midst of all your fears and insanity you stop dead in your tracks and somewhere the voice inside your head cries out “Enough.”
Enough fighting and crying or struggling to hold on. And, like a child quieting down after a blind tantrum, your sobs begin to subside, you shudder once or twice, you blink back your tears, and through a mantle of wet lashes you begin to look at the world through new eyes.
This is your awakening.
You come to terms with the fact that he is not Prince Charming and you are not Cinderella (or vice versa) and that in the real world there aren’t always fairy- tale endings (or beginnings for that matter) and any guarantee of “happily ever after” must begin with you-and in the process, a sense of serenity is born from acceptance.
You stop complaining and blaming other people for things they did to you (or didn’t do for you), and you learn that the only thing you can really count on is the unexpected. You learn that people don’t always say what they mean or mean what they say and not everyone will always be there for you and that it’s not always about you. So you learn to stand on your own and to take care of yourself and in the process, a sense of safety and security is born of self-reliance.
You stop judging and pointing fingers, and you begin to accept people as they are and to overlook their shortcomings and human frailties-and in the process a sense of peace and contentment is born of forgiveness.
You learn that it is truly in giving that we receive. And there is power and glory in creating and contributing.
You learn that you don’t know everything, it’s not your job to save the world, and that you can’t teach a pig to sing.
You learn that anything worth achieving is worth working for and that wishing for something to happen is different from working towards making it happen.
You learn that life isn’t always fair, you don’t always get what you think you deserve, and that sometimes, bad things happen to unsuspecting, good people. On these occasions, you learn not to personalize things. You learn that G-d isn’t punishing you or failing to answer your prayers. It’s just life happening. And you learn to deal with evil in its most primal state-the ego. You learn that negative feelings such as anger, envy, and resentment must be understood and redirected, or they will suffocate the life out of you and poison the universe that surrounds you.
You learn to admit when you are wrong and to build bridges instead of walls. You learn to be thankful and to take comfort in many of the simple things we take for granted, things that millions of the people upon the earth can only dream about: a full refrigerator, clean running water, a soft warm bed, a long hot shower. Slowly, you begin to take responsibility for yourself by yourself, and you make yourself a promise to never betray yourself and to never ever settle for less than your heart’s desire.
You hang a wind chime outside your window so you can listen to the wind. And you make it a point to keep smiling, to keep trusting, and to stay open to every wonderful possibility.
Finally, with courage in your heart and with G-d by your side, you take a stand, you take a deep breath, and you begin to design the life you want to live as best you can.
Anonymous
Awakenings. We all need them, but how do we achieve them? This week’s portion, Miketz, begins with a fascinating story that gives us a glimpse into the possibility of awakenings.
Joseph, an imprisoned slave in Egypt, is called to the palace to interpret the dreams of the great Paroh.
Paro is deeply troubled by two dreams that apparently leave him no rest. Seven seemingly healthy wheat-stalks are devoured by seven dying ones, and then, in a second dream, seven fat, robust cows are devoured by seven sickly, dying ones.
Yosef's interpretation: Egypt will experience seven years of plenty, followed by seven years of famine that will overshadow or ‘devour’ the previous years of plenty.
Now Paroh needs a plan, and Joseph offers the solution: Stockpile during the seven years of plenty and distribute food in exchange for land during the years of famine. This will not only allow Egypt to survive the difficult famine but will also serve to consolidate her status as the economic power in the region.
Ultimately, Yosef is appointed viceroy and as the second highest official in Egypt becomes the instrument for affecting this policy.
This entire scenario is nothing short of incredible. Yosef's solution does not seem to be a stroke of genius; why are all the advisors and ministers of Egypt, the greatest country on earth at the time, incapable of arriving at this same conclusion?
Additionally, the idea of the ruler of the empire actually soliciting and relying on the interpretation of a slave wallowing in prison, not to mention subsequently asking for his solution to his own interpretation, resulting in the appointment of said slave to one of the highest posts in the world, is absurd. What is really going on here?
Incidentally, this portion of Miketz is always read on the festival of Chanukah. Is there some relationship between the story of Chanukah we are currently commemorating, and the rise of Yosef to power in Egypt?
Dreams are an opportunity for us to discover more about who we are, where we are really at, and what is in our hearts and minds. Of course, their ability to impact our lives depends entirely on our ability to interpret them. So everything depends on our perspective, and often on our success in changing our perspectives, or seeing things outside of the box.
Yosef in ancient Egypt represented an entirely different way of seeing things.
The ancient Egyptians worshipped nature as the source of all life. They worshipped the power of nature, as well as idolized all aspects of the natural order. Thus, they deified the Nile, which they felt was the source of all sustenance in this world. Central to their ideology and beliefs, therefore, was the concept that the strong survive, and might makes right, as nature dictates.
The idea, therefore, that pale, dying, sickly animals could devour fat, healthy ones was contrary to the natural order and everything they believed. After all, the lesson of nature is that the strong survive and the weak perish. Survival of the fittest was not just a lesson of the environment; it was an ideal to live by.
Perhaps, therefore, the Egyptians, locked as they were in their own mindset, were incapable of seeing things from a different perspective. Perhaps they were in need of an awakening. Indeed, the emergence of the Jewish people on the world scene may well have been indicative of the fact that the world was in need of just such an awakening.
It is interesting to note just what Yosef's solution was. Taken from the perspective of the ancient, pagan Egyptian, it may well have been a radical proposal. After all, famine is just nature’s way of cleansing. The strong survive, and the weak perish, and along with them the diseases and problems they carry which are, in the end, burdens on society. And there is no over-population. The idea of stockpiling food in order to save the population, not to mention parceling out food to other populations in the region, something which ostensibly could undermine their ability to consolidate their position as the power in the region, may well have been counter to everything ancient Egypt stood for.
(And Paroh, in agreeing to call for Yosef, a lowly slave to begin with, may actually be effecting an interpretation of his own: perhaps we need to hear what the ‘sickly, weak bushel of wheat’ has to say…)
Yosef offers Egypt a different way of seeing things. Life doesn’t have to be that way; the strong and the weak can live side by side and help each other. Ultimately, in becoming the viceroy of Egypt, Joseph will have the chance to practice what he preaches. From the darkness of a jail cell, seemingly forgotten and insignificant, Yosef will ultimately bring to the ancient world its first awakening.
A thousand years later, the Greeks too worshipped nature; they deified beauty; and saw as the ideal all things beautiful in nature. This worship of nature opened the door, giving license to all the most basic urges of man.
The Greeks built gymnasiums where man could develop his body; the pursuit of the perfect body was expressed in Greek sculpture and art. The people entertained themselves in the stadiums, where men honed their physical skills, developing animal-like prowess and cunning. Man no longer served G- d; man was god. Hence the gods of Greece were men. And the qualities worshipped in those gods were all the qualities men could achieve: love and beauty, courage and agility, strength and speed. Thus, could Antiochus Epiphanes erect idols of himself. He was after all, the highest of men; he had achieved all that man could achieve: power and might, strength and cunning. He was, therefore, the most powerful god in the world. (Interestingly, Epiphanes means ‘I am G-d’).
Judaism, however, has a different dream, not of fashioning a G-d of the world, but of bringing G-d intothe world. It does not see the body as a goal, but as a tool in the service of G-d.
Here too, a small band of priests and farmers, revolting against mighty Greece in 168 BCE, taught the world that might does not make right, and that power is not the goal, it is merely a tool.
The animal side of man, worshipped by the pagan world, is not to be idolized; not made the ideal; rather, it is to be channeled, even directed, in the pursuit of a relationship with G-d.
To be sure, there is a beauty in nature, magnificence, even. But it is precisely that beauty that can lead man to find G-d in the world, not to ignore Him.
And this really is the central message of Chanukah: that the victory was meaningless if it was only in the service of man. What made it significant for Jews everywhere, forever, was the recognition of a greater truth: the re-dedication of the Temple, and the re-establishment of man as serving G-d.
In fact, the name Chanukah also stems from the root word “Chen”, meaning Beauty. And one of the issues, central to all that Chanukah represents, is the real meaning of beauty. The Greeks worshipped beauty as part of nature; and they considered themselves experts on this beauty. Greek beauty, however, is external; it focuses on the symmetry in nature, and aspires to recreate this in man, and in all that man does. It is about what we see, but not about who we are and who we can become. Greek beauty is about the perfect body; but it neglects the perfection of character; it strives to perfect the physical self; but denies the spiritual self within.
Judaism’s perception is quite different: beauty is inner symmetry; the perfection of my neshama, the soul within me; that part of me that strives to come close to G-d.
Physical beauty is only valuable if it is a vessel for real, inner beauty. Judaism sees the beauty of harmony in the world; but not just external harmony; the homogeny of purpose; the beauty in understanding the true meaning of our being; the struggle with the existential question of why we are here; what our purpose on this earth is. The Greeks, whose religion was essentially hedonism, had a very straightforward response to this question: we are here to have a good time; to make the most of the time we have.
The Jews, on the other hand, believe that we are here to perfect the world; to make the world a better place. In doing this we become partners with G-d. Hence, the name ‘Chanukah’ expresses the essence of the holiday’s role in conveying this message to mankind.
Perhaps this ideological difference is at the root of our celebration of Chanukah.
If Chanukah were about military victory, there wouldn’t really be that much to celebrate. In fact, the newly found independence of the Hasmonean dynasty lasted a scant quarter-century, before giving way to the new master: Rome. And even in its heyday, it comprised barely 35 square miles around Jerusalem, and a strip of land in what is today the Gaza strip; hardly an accomplishment worthy of so much fuss. No, clearly, the celebration is of something far deeper, far more lasting, than the defeat of a few Greek soldiers.
Chanukah was coming, and the Jews were dreading its’ arrival; the Nazis always liked to play games on Jewish holidays. There was one boy, about to turn thirteen, who could not imagine his bar mitzvah Chanukah passing by without any celebration. So, a couple of weeks before Chanukah, he began to save little scraps of his meager potato ration, hoping to use it as oil. Every day, he set aside a little piece of potato and placed it in his pocket. He ripped threads from his camp uniform and fashioned them into wicks. When the first night of Chanukah arrived, word spread that there was a boy lighting Chanukah candles; the barrack was soon filled with inmates. One could sense the despair, as the Jews looked around at their reality, and recalled happier times, when Chanukah was so full of light.
All eyes were on the boy as he made his way to the back of the barrack, knelt down on the floor, and prepared his candles. Any act of religious expression in the camps was a crime punishable by death; this child was not only risking his life, but the lives of the entire barrack. But no one said a word. Total silence filled the room, as the boy lit the flame and began the recitation of the blessings.
“Blessed art thou…who has sanctified us…and commanded us to light the candles of Chanukah.”
Lighting candles in Bergen Belsen? Was there ever any place as dark as that place in the shadows of the crematoria?
“Blessed art thou…who performed miracles for our ancestors; in those days and in our time as well”
Did G-d have any miracles left, here in the valley of death?
A crash, as the door burst open; an SS officer stood in the doorway, resplendent in his black uniform; the death’s head insignia gleaming. The crowd of inmates parted as he strode to the back of the barracks, the only sound, his footsteps approaching the little boy.
“Get rid of those candles, schnell!” screamed the officer in a rage.
The boy looked up at the officer, and back again at the candles; and in a quiet voice, that resonated in the barracks, responded:
“But sir, today is Chanukah; and on Chanukah we don’t extinguish light, we bring it into the world.”
The silence between the officer and the boy was deafening; and then, by some miracle, the officer inexplicably turned and strode out of the barracks.
Why is lighting the candles of the Menorah so critical to Chanukah?
Why was it so important, in the story of Chanukah, to light the Menorah in the Temple? There is, after all, no mention of any of the other ritual ceremonies: the burning of incense, the offering of sacrifices, and the showbread; to name but a few.
A Menorah is about giving light. What is the purpose of light? Light itself allows man to see, and consequently to derive pleasure from, the world around him. This, however, is most certainly not the idea behind lighting the candles on Chanukah. One of the prayers traditionally recited when lighting the Chanukah lights, is the “Nerot Halalu” prayer:
“Ve’Ein Lanu Reshut Le’Hishtamesh Ba’hem”
‘We have no permission to use them’.
We are not meant to benefit physically from these candles; neither to read by their light, nor to use the heat of their fire for any pleasure or gain.
“E’la LirO’tam Bilvad”
‘We are only to see them.’
Sometimes we need to take a step back and just appreciate the light. We need to see all the light in the world around us, and in our lives, and we need to recall that we are here, in the end only to bring light.
And that light is not about what I can get, nor how much I can conquer, it is all about what I can give.
Two thousand years ago, after a horrific war against the mightiest empire on the face of the earth, the Jews re-conquered the Temple and discovered pigs running around the altar, and an idol of Jupiter in the Holy of Holies. But after all that, there was no rage, all they wanted to do was to light the menorah. All the Jews have ever wanted to do is bring a little light into the world.
Chanukah, then, like Yosef's message so long ago, is an opportunity to re-experience that light. To recall that the greatest gift we can give, is the gift of light.
This too, was a message the world needed to hear; this was the awakening of Chanukah.
Four thousand years ago a single individual, alone and bereft, gave the world a message it needed to hear. Two thousand years ago, a small nation, alone and bereft, again gave the world a message it needed to hear.
Today, alone amongst the community of nations, Israel has a message the world needs to hear. It is time to kindle the flame that will bring light back into the world. It is time for an awakening.
May Hashem bless us all, as individuals, as a people, and as a world, to experience the awakening we all so desperately need. As the verse in the prayers after a meal suggests:
“Az Hayinu Ke’Cholmim” “Then we will be like dreamers”, awakening from a long dream, to discover the clarity of morning…
Best wishes to all for a Shabbat Shalom as well as a sweet and wonderful Chanukah full of light…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)