by Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger
*The Western attempt to distinguish between Hamas terrorists and the majority of Gaza Arabs defies Middle East reality, which documents that Hamas terrorists and most Gaza Arabs are interwoven with each other, socially, educationally, culturally, ideologically, and religiously.
*Moreover, Middle East reality highlights Hamas as a terror state (Gaza and potentially the West Bank), not as merely a terror organization.
*Therefore, most of the Arabs in Gaza enthusiastically celebrated the October 7, 2023 Hamas ISIS-like slaughter, rape, torture and mutilation of (mostly) civilians, heralding it as role model of sacrifice and heroism in the service of a Holy Islamic War and a demonstration of national liberation fortitude.
*The fact that the Arab population of Gaza lends itself to terrorism was underscored by a June 29, 1967 memorandum, submitted to the US Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara by General Earle G. Wheeler, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs-of-Staff. The memorandum presented a map of Israel’s minimal security requirements, including Gaza, which “serves as a salient for introduction of Arab subversion and terrorism, and its retention would be to Israel’s military advantage…. It has served as a training area for [Palestinian terrorists]…. Occupation of the Gaza Strip by Israel would reduce the hostile border by a factor of five and eliminate a source for raids and training of [terrorists]….”
*The terroristic potential of the population of Gaza has been leveraged since 1947 by the Muslim Brotherhood – the largest Sunni terror organization, which established Hamas in 1988 – when it established Gaza as one of its five centers in British Mandate Palestine (Haifa, Jaffa, Nablus, Jerusalem and Gaza). The Gaza branch collaborated closely with the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, the birth place of the Muslim Brotherhood. Initially, Hamas’ popularity was limited to the Gaza middle class, such as the religious establishment, lawyers and businessmen. However, since the 1990s, Hamas has increasingly evolved into a focal point of social, ideological and religious cohesion with the Gaza population at-large.
*The appeal of the Muslim Brotherhood and its Gaza branch, Hamas, has surged dramatically since 1993, through the K-12 hate-education system, Friday incitement in the mosques and the official and public idolization of terrorism, which were instituted by Mahmoud Abbas through the Oslo Accord. Initially, it benefitted the Palestinian Authority – headed by Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas – but rapidly catapulted Hamas into unprecedented popularity, as an integral element of the Gaza culture, a role model for the Gaza youth.
*Realizing the high-level identification of Gaza Arabs with Hamas - and the evolution of Hamas from a terror organization into a terror state - the Palestinian Authority has refrained from holding election since 2005, in order to avoid a Hamas landslide victory. Furthermore, after the October 7 massacre Hamas has surged to its highest popularity among Arabs in Judea and Samaria (West Bank).
*The Western attempt to subordinate the complex, frustrating, costly and inconvenient Middle East reality to its own alternative and convenient Middle East, has led to the assumption that Hamas terrorists and the majority of Gaza Arabs are disjointed culturally and ideologically.
*However, Middle East reality features Hamas as an entity, which is consistent with the worldview, values, education and ideology of most Gazan parents, who send their children to Hamas run schools, participate in Friday services in Hamas run mosques, and enthusiastically cheer Hamas’ ISIS-like terroristic operations.
*Contrary to Western conventional wisdom, Hamas is not a terror organization in the mold of Peru’s Shining Path, Italy’s Red Brigade, France’s Action Direct and multitude of other terror organizations, which represent a fringe of their societies, terrorizing the government and its educational, cultural and religious institutions. Hamas is the terrorist state of Gaza, representing Gaza’s educational, cultural and religious institutions, enjoying the moral support of most Gazans. In many respects, Hamas benefits from more popular support than enjoyed by Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, Syria’s Bashar Assad and Iran’s Ayatollahs.
*Western policy based on the erroneous assumption that Hamas and Gaza Arabs are disjointed from one another, inadvertently plays into the hands of Hamas, yielding a robust tailwind to terrorism and a powerful headwind to counter-terrorism.
Sunday, December 31, 2023
Friday, December 29, 2023
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: Excitement about Receiving a Sefer of Kabbala
#181
Date and Place: 29 Tevet 5669 (1909), Yafo
Recipient: Rav Shlomo Elyashov (Rav Kook used his name’s Yiddish spelling; it is also pronounced Elyashiv). He was from and in Lithuania. Rav Elyashov, one of the greatest kabbalists of his era, wrote several sefarim, including Leshem Shvo V’achlama (he was often called “The Leshem”). Rav Kook and the Leshem enjoyed a long relationship. When Rav Kook was the rabbi in Biosk, Rav Elyashov taught him Kabbala. As we see here, the two continued a relationship at a distance. In 1922, Rav Elyashov moved to Eretz Yisrael with Rav Kook’s help. Through his daughter, the Leshem was the grandfather of Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, the great Talmudist and leader, who, along with his parents, moved to Eretz Yisrael with the Leshem and adopted his last name.
Body: [The basic content of this letter is simple (thanks for receiving the author’s sefer) and the flowery language (which I lowered and sometimes turned from third person to second person, for reading ease) and double meanings of some phrases makes this difficult to translate. The opportunity to focus on the interaction of the two great Kabbalists and friends is worth the effort.]
The house was filled with light, when the holy sefer (Hakdamot U’shearim), with the grandeur of the crown of his Torah’s brilliance, came to my hands. I will not use the strength needed to withhold from the honor of the sanctity of my master, who is so dear to my soul, the emotion of my internal joy, from the light that was good (see Bereishit 1:4). I thank Hashem, Who shall show us His light and salvation, on the one hand by means of a clear sign of the End of Days (Sanhedrin 98a) – the settlement of the Desired Land. On the other hand, may He show us the proliferation of the internal light of the holy Torah (deep Kabbalistic ideas). The latter is more beloved.
At this time, as your holy book is still in my hand, I devoured several pages, even before the pages were bound, out of my great love of its sanctity. It was as sweet as honey in my mouth, may it and its taste be blessed. So too, may Hashem, Who adds on from the source of life to give people long life and years of goodness, good health, and wonderful light, add on these blessings to my dear and honored master, a good and long life. May you bring to fruition all that the spirit of Hashem that is within you shall strive for, and let these matters be elevated one rung after another, as they enter Hashem’s sanctum and His portion, as the Chatam Sofer writes in his responsum (Yoreh Deah 233). If this is so for the straightforward ideas of the Torah, all the more so that this is true of holy Torah secrets.
My soul has such a strong desire to see the secrets of the holy manuscripts of his holy brilliance. If it would be possible to arrange for me that a scribe will copy your wonderful pamphlets, I would be joyously willing to pay all expenses, just so that I could receive the light beams earlier (before they are published), which would refresh my heart in this great Land.
My exhausting activities from bearing the burden of the Nation of Hashem who are in the process of returning [to the Land], may the Exalted one bless them, are great. Therefore, I am compelled to be brief in the place that my heart tells me to write at length. [Just the process of writing to you] allows me to gaze at the beauty of the glow of the honor and sanctity of your Torah in my imagination, as I concentrate on having my words reach opposite the light of the holy candelabrum of pure gold, referring to you, my honored master. Indeed, I have become intertwined with you with a divine bond, through the depths of the heart.
Date and Place: 29 Tevet 5669 (1909), Yafo
Recipient: Rav Shlomo Elyashov (Rav Kook used his name’s Yiddish spelling; it is also pronounced Elyashiv). He was from and in Lithuania. Rav Elyashov, one of the greatest kabbalists of his era, wrote several sefarim, including Leshem Shvo V’achlama (he was often called “The Leshem”). Rav Kook and the Leshem enjoyed a long relationship. When Rav Kook was the rabbi in Biosk, Rav Elyashov taught him Kabbala. As we see here, the two continued a relationship at a distance. In 1922, Rav Elyashov moved to Eretz Yisrael with Rav Kook’s help. Through his daughter, the Leshem was the grandfather of Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, the great Talmudist and leader, who, along with his parents, moved to Eretz Yisrael with the Leshem and adopted his last name.
Body: [The basic content of this letter is simple (thanks for receiving the author’s sefer) and the flowery language (which I lowered and sometimes turned from third person to second person, for reading ease) and double meanings of some phrases makes this difficult to translate. The opportunity to focus on the interaction of the two great Kabbalists and friends is worth the effort.]
The house was filled with light, when the holy sefer (Hakdamot U’shearim), with the grandeur of the crown of his Torah’s brilliance, came to my hands. I will not use the strength needed to withhold from the honor of the sanctity of my master, who is so dear to my soul, the emotion of my internal joy, from the light that was good (see Bereishit 1:4). I thank Hashem, Who shall show us His light and salvation, on the one hand by means of a clear sign of the End of Days (Sanhedrin 98a) – the settlement of the Desired Land. On the other hand, may He show us the proliferation of the internal light of the holy Torah (deep Kabbalistic ideas). The latter is more beloved.
At this time, as your holy book is still in my hand, I devoured several pages, even before the pages were bound, out of my great love of its sanctity. It was as sweet as honey in my mouth, may it and its taste be blessed. So too, may Hashem, Who adds on from the source of life to give people long life and years of goodness, good health, and wonderful light, add on these blessings to my dear and honored master, a good and long life. May you bring to fruition all that the spirit of Hashem that is within you shall strive for, and let these matters be elevated one rung after another, as they enter Hashem’s sanctum and His portion, as the Chatam Sofer writes in his responsum (Yoreh Deah 233). If this is so for the straightforward ideas of the Torah, all the more so that this is true of holy Torah secrets.
My soul has such a strong desire to see the secrets of the holy manuscripts of his holy brilliance. If it would be possible to arrange for me that a scribe will copy your wonderful pamphlets, I would be joyously willing to pay all expenses, just so that I could receive the light beams earlier (before they are published), which would refresh my heart in this great Land.
My exhausting activities from bearing the burden of the Nation of Hashem who are in the process of returning [to the Land], may the Exalted one bless them, are great. Therefore, I am compelled to be brief in the place that my heart tells me to write at length. [Just the process of writing to you] allows me to gaze at the beauty of the glow of the honor and sanctity of your Torah in my imagination, as I concentrate on having my words reach opposite the light of the holy candelabrum of pure gold, referring to you, my honored master. Indeed, I have become intertwined with you with a divine bond, through the depths of the heart.
The Redemptive Torah
by HaRav Dov Begon
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir
In Parashat Vayechi we read: “Yisrael reached out with his right hand, and placed it on Ephraim’s head, even though he was the younger son. He placed his left hand on Menashe’s head” (Bereisheet 48:14).
Yosef tried to change this - attempting to place his father’s right hand on the head of Menashe, the older son - but Ya'akov refused, saying, “I know, my son, I know [that Menashe is the firstborn], but his younger brother will become even greater” (Bereisheet 48:19). Rashi explains that Yehoshua was destined to emerge from Ephraim, and that Yehoshua would apportion the Land among the tribes and would teach Torah to Israel. Apportioning the Land and teaching Torah were the most important things in Ya'akov’s eyes. That is why he put his right hand, the stronger hand, on Ephraim’s head.
Today, our generation faces parallel challenges to those of the generation of Yehoshua Bin Nun. The two most important issues of our generation are (1) settling the Land and taking hold of it despite the opposition of our enemies, and (2) the return to Judaism and to teaching the Torah to the myriads of our people. Both projects require strengthening. Ya'akov’s blessing, given with his right hand, the strong hand, defends us and shall continue to do so through the help of G-d. “‘May G-d make you like Ephraim and Menashe.’ Ya'akov deliberately put Ephraim before Menashe".
In our national situation, we are "as if" aboard a ship that has come upon stormy seas, experiencing immense challenges navigating back to safe shores. In order to overcome these terrible difficulties and to restore to one another's faith and trust in the idea that it is possible to reach port, we must follow in the paths of Ya'akov and of Yehoshua, both of whom believed that - even in the most difficult circumstances - we will return to Eretz Yisrael and settle the land, despite our enemies. This must occur amidst our drawing strength and faith from devotion to, and study of, the Torah, which has been the source of Israel’s strength and might from time immemorial. King David said, “G-d will give strength to His people,” and “strength” can only refer to Torah. Through this, “G-d will bless His people with peace.”
BeSorot Tovot,
Looking forward to complete salvation,
With the Love of Am Yisrael and Eretz Yisrael,
Shabbat Shalom.
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir
In Parashat Vayechi we read: “Yisrael reached out with his right hand, and placed it on Ephraim’s head, even though he was the younger son. He placed his left hand on Menashe’s head” (Bereisheet 48:14).
Yosef tried to change this - attempting to place his father’s right hand on the head of Menashe, the older son - but Ya'akov refused, saying, “I know, my son, I know [that Menashe is the firstborn], but his younger brother will become even greater” (Bereisheet 48:19). Rashi explains that Yehoshua was destined to emerge from Ephraim, and that Yehoshua would apportion the Land among the tribes and would teach Torah to Israel. Apportioning the Land and teaching Torah were the most important things in Ya'akov’s eyes. That is why he put his right hand, the stronger hand, on Ephraim’s head.
Today, our generation faces parallel challenges to those of the generation of Yehoshua Bin Nun. The two most important issues of our generation are (1) settling the Land and taking hold of it despite the opposition of our enemies, and (2) the return to Judaism and to teaching the Torah to the myriads of our people. Both projects require strengthening. Ya'akov’s blessing, given with his right hand, the strong hand, defends us and shall continue to do so through the help of G-d. “‘May G-d make you like Ephraim and Menashe.’ Ya'akov deliberately put Ephraim before Menashe".
In our national situation, we are "as if" aboard a ship that has come upon stormy seas, experiencing immense challenges navigating back to safe shores. In order to overcome these terrible difficulties and to restore to one another's faith and trust in the idea that it is possible to reach port, we must follow in the paths of Ya'akov and of Yehoshua, both of whom believed that - even in the most difficult circumstances - we will return to Eretz Yisrael and settle the land, despite our enemies. This must occur amidst our drawing strength and faith from devotion to, and study of, the Torah, which has been the source of Israel’s strength and might from time immemorial. King David said, “G-d will give strength to His people,” and “strength” can only refer to Torah. Through this, “G-d will bless His people with peace.”
BeSorot Tovot,
Looking forward to complete salvation,
With the Love of Am Yisrael and Eretz Yisrael,
Shabbat Shalom.
The Yishai Fleisher Israel Podcast: SHRINE OF GENESIS
SEASON 2023 EPISODE 51: Yishai is on IDF guard duty again and discusses the Ten Front War and the three ways to understand the phrase "From the River to the Sea." Then, Tomer Ohayon has arrived in Israel to serve on reserve duty but left his family back on "shlichut" in NJ. Ben Bresky on the legendary Uzi sub-machine gun and it's inventor. Then, Brian Schrauger on dangerous narrative of "Christ at the Checkpoint." And finally, the end of the Book of Genesis and why Jacob was adamant on being buried the Tomb of the Ancestors.
Ephraim and Menashe
by Rav Binny Freedman
It was finally the day; after over a year of training I was finally about to get my bars and join the very special family of IDF Officers. My parents had flown in from the US for the occasion along with my younger brother and were on their way down for the ceremony, which was a couple of hours away, deep in the desert on the Shizaphon Armored Corps base.
We were being inspected by the base sergeant-major an hour before the ceremony when we would be receiving our officer’s bars at long last. The Army Chief of Staff (Moshe Levy) would be attending so everything had to be perfect. He stopped in front of me and, looking down, saw my Tzitzit (religious fringes) hanging down to my knees and snapped an order: “tuck those in immediately! I had better not see those hanging out during the ceremony!”
To be honest, I don’t normally wear my tzitzit out; they have been wrapped around my belt for many years, but in the army the extremely challenging environment had made me realize I needed to take an extreme position so I started wearing my tzitzit out as a reminder that I wanted to be careful not to cross any red lines, as well as an easy way to send the message to those around me that I was religious….
So his harsh command took me by surprise, especially coming as it did on the last day of our course when the bars were already on my shoulders waiting to be uncovered. Realizing I could easily be detained and prevented from standing on the parade ground if the Sergeant-Major so decided, it would have been a simple thing to just tuck them in for a couple of hours. But there was a principle at stake here much larger than whether I wore my tzitzit out: was I an Israeli soldier who happened to be Jewish? It was precisely this reasoning that stood behind my decision to join the Israeli Army as opposed to the American army despite having grown up in America until the age of eighteen. After two thousand years of dreaming, I wanted to serve as a Jew, in the first Jewish army since the fall of bar Kochba in 135 C.E.
It was a chance to decide whether I was an Israeli Jew or a Jewish Israeli: which was really my priority?
This week’s portion, Vayechi, provides us with a good example of this idea. At the beginning of the portion Yaakov takes ill and realizes his death is near. It is interesting to note that this is the first instance in the Torah of a person actually becoming ill; until this point in history it seems people just reached the end of their days, and simply died. So a person did not ordinarily have any advance warning of the fact that his end was near. As such, it is valuable to take note of how Yaakov reacts to this knowledge.
It seems that one of the things one does at the end of his or her life, is to bless one’s children:
“And it was, after these things that someone said to Yosef: ‘Behold! Your father is ill. (Hineh’ Avichah’ Choleh’), so he took his two sons, Menashe and Ephraim, with him.” (Bereisheet 48:1)
Immediately upon hearing that his father’s life was nearing its end, Yosef takes his sons for a blessing, which ends up being one of the strangest interactions in the entire Torah (48:1-22):
“And Yaakov said to Yosef E-l Sha-dai (G-d) appeared to me in Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed me. And He said to me: I will make you fruitful and numerous; I will make you a congregation of nations, and I will give this land to your offspring after you as an eternal possession.
And now, your two sons born to you in the land of Egypt before I came to you in Egypt, shall be mine; Ephraim and Menashe shall be mine like Re’uven and Shimon.” (48:5)
This is the introduction to the famous blessing of Menashe and Ephraim, which we recall every Friday night, invoking their names as we bless our children.
It is strange that when Yosef brings his sons for a blessing, Yaakov at first seems to ignore them. And one wonders about the significance of Yaakov reminding Yosef of his own blessings, received from G-d so long ago, upon leaving the house of his parents when running away from Esav. Why is this so important, right now, as Yaakov is about to give these grandsons, sons of Yosef, ruler of Egypt, their last blessing?
And then comes the strangest part of the entire story: after describing to Yosef the fact that both “Ephraim and Menashe shall be mine like Re’uven and Shimon” (48:5), he ‘suddenly’ sees the two boys:
“Then Yisrael (Yaakov) saw Yosef’s sons and he said: ‘Who are these?’ (Mi Eleh’?)
“And Yosef said to his father: ‘They are my sons whom G-d has given me here’,
“And he (Yaakov) said:’Take them to me, and I will bless them.” (48:8-10)
What is going on here? How could Yaakov not recognize his grandsons? Especially given that he just finished discussing with Yosef the fact that they were like sons to him!
Note the obvious switch between the name Yaakov, and the name Yisrael. When Yaakov is describing to Yosef his blessing from G-d all those years ago, he is called Yaakov. But when he prepares to bless the next generation, he is called Yisrael (the name given him after his struggle in the night with… himself? an angel of Eisav?) Why the change of names?
And what is the meaning of Yosef’s response to his father’s puzzling question? What is Yosef trying to communicate by saying that “They are my sons whom G-d has given me here” (48:9) what other sons does Yosef have? Why the need to remind Yaakov that these two boys are Egyptian born? And why re-iterate that ‘they are my sons’? Why not just say: ‘This is Menashe, and this is Ephraim’?
What inner struggle is hidden here beneath the surface?
Rashi, who normally helps us make sense of precisely these types of questions in the text, elicits here (48:8) a rather puzzling comment, quoting the Midrash Tanchumah, which suggests that Yaakov temporarily lost his prophetic vision “Because in the future Yeravam and Achav would descend from the tribe of Ephraim, and Yehu and his sons from Menashe.”
These three individuals (Yeravam, Achav, and Yehu) were all kings of Israel who led the Jewish people astray by spreading idol worship throughout the kingdom. Which of course, leaves us wondering what these sorry periods in Jewish history have to do with Yaakov’s blessing of Menashe and Ephraim some five hundred years earlier?
The story of Yeravam, the son of Nevat, is particularly fascinating, and may help to shed some light on what lies behind this puzzling Midrash (rabbinic legend).
When Shlomo HaMelech, the son and heir of Dovid HaMelech, died, his son Rechavam, inherited the throne. Unfortunately, Rechavam seems not to have been a chip off the old block. Choosing not to listen to his father’s older advisors, he heeded the advice of a younger group of his own confidants, committing a classic error in raising taxes.
Coming so soon after the completion of the first Beit HaMikdash, which involved heavy taxes levied on the Jewish people, this ultimately allowed Yeravam to mount a rebellion resulting in the cessation of ten tribes, creating a Northern Kingdom of Israel.
Yeravam crowned himself King of the new Northern Kingdom of ten tribes, (as opposed to the Southern tribes of Yehudah, Binyamin, and the Levites who remained loyal to the rightful King from the house of Dovid.) Yerushalayim and the Beit HaMikdash remained under the control of the Southern Kingdom of Yehudah.
In the first year of his reign, Yeravam was faced with an interesting dilemma: at each of the three regalim, (Pesach, Shavuot, and Sukkoth) the Jewish people would all come up to Yerushalayim to share in the festival, based on the Biblical command to visit the Beit HaMikdash three times a year on the regalim.
Now, no one save a rightful King from the House of Dovid could sit in the courtyard of the Beit HaMikdash; everyone else had to stand. This would mean that while Rechavam, the grandson of Dovid HaMelech, would sit on a throne, Yeravam, who was from the tribe of Ephraim, would have to stand like everyone else.
Realizing that this would be a reminder that he was not the rightful King, he had golden calves (idols) placed at all the border crossings, causing the people to fall back to their idolatrous ways and prevent them from ever reaching Yerushalayim at all. (Indeed many years later the fifteenth day of Av would become a Jewish holiday during the First temple period, as it was the day these idols were finally removed, and Jews could go up again to Yerushalayim….)
Yeravam has come to represent in Jewish history the epitome of the good idea gone bad. More than the ends justifying the means, the story of Yeravam Ben Nevat is the case of the ends and the means becoming all mixed up.
Indeed, this is the essence of the pagan idolatry of ancient Egypt.
Paganism is the worship of nature, in all of its power and beauty, and the pagan, more than anything else, immerses himself in the physical world of nature; of the here and now, and survival of the fittest. In the end, in the world of nature, might makes right, everything inevitably dies, and there is no purpose beyond the here and now.
Judaism, however, suggests that there is a world of difference between one who eats to live, and one who just lives to eat. Ultimately, nature is not the goal; it is simply a vehicle to a higher purpose.
Ancient Egypt was all about the worship of nature, which is why its gods were all powerful symbols in nature, as well as being the background to how an entire country became immersed in power, and the here and now. And it was this surrounding which formed the basis of Yaakov’s question to Yosef.
After twenty-two years in Egypt, Yaakov’s real question was who Yosef had become. Was he still the dreamer of dreams? Could he still see the creator of the sun, moon, and stars, even from the darkness of the pit, or was he now the ruler of Egypt immersed in the here and now?
Perhaps this is why Yaakov was addressing himself first to Yosef, and not to Binyamin: because before blessing the next generation, he was wondering where this generation (Yosef) really was. Was he a Jewish Egyptian, or an Egyptian Jew? Had he become so immersed in the land of the Nile as to forget that all of this was simply a vehicle to something greater? The more powerful one becomes, the more challenging it is to recall that power in this world is simply a tool of the source of all power: Hashem.
And this as well is why Yaakov recalls the original blessing he received from Hashem when running from Esav all those years ago. After all, for the first time, Yaakov had just confronted the world of Eisav, the world of the field and the hunt, of cruelty and nature. In so doing he had of necessity taken on ‘the hands of Eisav’, leaving him struggling with just who he had become.
Indeed, it is at this point, on his way down to the house of Lavan, that Yaakov makes a pact with G-d:
“And Yaakov swore an oath saying: ‘If G-d will be with me and watch over me on this journey, and He will give me bread to eat and clothing to wear, and I will return in peace to the house of my father, then Hashem will be for me a G-d (Elokim).”(28:22-21)
Essentially, now that Yaakov was leaving the tents of study, he recognized that his challenge was to remember, even when immersed in the flocks of Lavan, (which on a certain level represented the world of the field and of nature), that the bread really comes from G-d, and that everything in this physical world is really just a means to achieve a higher purpose.
And perhaps this was, as well, Yaakov’s question regarding Menashe and Ephraim: who are these two young men? Are they Jews growing up in the palace, ever aware of their roles as vehicles for some great and wonderful destiny, or had they become princes of Egypt, focused only on the here and now?
Indeed, this was the great tragedy of Yeravam (as well as Achav and Yehu); Kings of Israel, placed uniquely, with the potential to change the course of history, and yet becoming so immersed in the trappings of being Kings, that they lost sight of the purpose behind it all.
Yaakov was concerned here with building a family into a nation that would change the course of human history and fulfill the mission of the Jewish people, imbedded into the fabric of creation itself: to bring G-d into the world, by making the world a place that is full of all that G-d represents.
This as well, is what we are doing when we bless our children on Friday night by invoking the names of the very same Menashe and Ephraim. We run through the week, so immersed in the world of Eisav, and making sure that the Nile River overflows its banks… We tend to forget what it is really all about. So on Shabbat, beginning with Friday night, we get back in touch with what is really going on in the world. We try to reconnect with the purpose of it all.
What do we think of while we are blessing our children? Perhaps the greatest challenge in raising children is whether they become vehicles for increasing G-d’s presence in the world. And of course, we cannot expect our children to get this message if we ourselves do not live it. Which may well have been Yaakov’s challenge to Yosef: Living in the palace as ruler of Egypt, have you succeeded in remaining the role model to your children of who really rules the world? Who indeed, are these children? Are they princes of Egypt, or sons of Yaakov?
And this, indeed, is Yosef’s response: “They are my sons whom G-d has given me here”, even here in Egypt, in the palaces of Egypt, they are still my sons, and they, as am I, are still aware that all of this, comes from Hashem as a gift with a higher purpose than just filling the storehouses of Egypt.
And this is the greatest aspiration we may have for ourselves, and especially for our children:
Have we succeeded in teaching them that life is more than the here and now, and that all the things we as a generation are so privileged to have and even to take for granted, are simply vehicles to create that better world we all so long for?
Perhaps this week, as we bless our children around the Shabbat table, or use the moment to think about where we are headed and whether our ‘children’: the ideas we have and the accomplishments we achieve, are really contributing to a better world.
Shabbat Shalom.
We were being inspected by the base sergeant-major an hour before the ceremony when we would be receiving our officer’s bars at long last. The Army Chief of Staff (Moshe Levy) would be attending so everything had to be perfect. He stopped in front of me and, looking down, saw my Tzitzit (religious fringes) hanging down to my knees and snapped an order: “tuck those in immediately! I had better not see those hanging out during the ceremony!”
To be honest, I don’t normally wear my tzitzit out; they have been wrapped around my belt for many years, but in the army the extremely challenging environment had made me realize I needed to take an extreme position so I started wearing my tzitzit out as a reminder that I wanted to be careful not to cross any red lines, as well as an easy way to send the message to those around me that I was religious….
So his harsh command took me by surprise, especially coming as it did on the last day of our course when the bars were already on my shoulders waiting to be uncovered. Realizing I could easily be detained and prevented from standing on the parade ground if the Sergeant-Major so decided, it would have been a simple thing to just tuck them in for a couple of hours. But there was a principle at stake here much larger than whether I wore my tzitzit out: was I an Israeli soldier who happened to be Jewish? It was precisely this reasoning that stood behind my decision to join the Israeli Army as opposed to the American army despite having grown up in America until the age of eighteen. After two thousand years of dreaming, I wanted to serve as a Jew, in the first Jewish army since the fall of bar Kochba in 135 C.E.
It was a chance to decide whether I was an Israeli Jew or a Jewish Israeli: which was really my priority?
This week’s portion, Vayechi, provides us with a good example of this idea. At the beginning of the portion Yaakov takes ill and realizes his death is near. It is interesting to note that this is the first instance in the Torah of a person actually becoming ill; until this point in history it seems people just reached the end of their days, and simply died. So a person did not ordinarily have any advance warning of the fact that his end was near. As such, it is valuable to take note of how Yaakov reacts to this knowledge.
It seems that one of the things one does at the end of his or her life, is to bless one’s children:
“And it was, after these things that someone said to Yosef: ‘Behold! Your father is ill. (Hineh’ Avichah’ Choleh’), so he took his two sons, Menashe and Ephraim, with him.” (Bereisheet 48:1)
Immediately upon hearing that his father’s life was nearing its end, Yosef takes his sons for a blessing, which ends up being one of the strangest interactions in the entire Torah (48:1-22):
“And Yaakov said to Yosef E-l Sha-dai (G-d) appeared to me in Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed me. And He said to me: I will make you fruitful and numerous; I will make you a congregation of nations, and I will give this land to your offspring after you as an eternal possession.
And now, your two sons born to you in the land of Egypt before I came to you in Egypt, shall be mine; Ephraim and Menashe shall be mine like Re’uven and Shimon.” (48:5)
This is the introduction to the famous blessing of Menashe and Ephraim, which we recall every Friday night, invoking their names as we bless our children.
It is strange that when Yosef brings his sons for a blessing, Yaakov at first seems to ignore them. And one wonders about the significance of Yaakov reminding Yosef of his own blessings, received from G-d so long ago, upon leaving the house of his parents when running away from Esav. Why is this so important, right now, as Yaakov is about to give these grandsons, sons of Yosef, ruler of Egypt, their last blessing?
And then comes the strangest part of the entire story: after describing to Yosef the fact that both “Ephraim and Menashe shall be mine like Re’uven and Shimon” (48:5), he ‘suddenly’ sees the two boys:
“Then Yisrael (Yaakov) saw Yosef’s sons and he said: ‘Who are these?’ (Mi Eleh’?)
“And Yosef said to his father: ‘They are my sons whom G-d has given me here’,
“And he (Yaakov) said:’Take them to me, and I will bless them.” (48:8-10)
What is going on here? How could Yaakov not recognize his grandsons? Especially given that he just finished discussing with Yosef the fact that they were like sons to him!
Note the obvious switch between the name Yaakov, and the name Yisrael. When Yaakov is describing to Yosef his blessing from G-d all those years ago, he is called Yaakov. But when he prepares to bless the next generation, he is called Yisrael (the name given him after his struggle in the night with… himself? an angel of Eisav?) Why the change of names?
And what is the meaning of Yosef’s response to his father’s puzzling question? What is Yosef trying to communicate by saying that “They are my sons whom G-d has given me here” (48:9) what other sons does Yosef have? Why the need to remind Yaakov that these two boys are Egyptian born? And why re-iterate that ‘they are my sons’? Why not just say: ‘This is Menashe, and this is Ephraim’?
What inner struggle is hidden here beneath the surface?
Rashi, who normally helps us make sense of precisely these types of questions in the text, elicits here (48:8) a rather puzzling comment, quoting the Midrash Tanchumah, which suggests that Yaakov temporarily lost his prophetic vision “Because in the future Yeravam and Achav would descend from the tribe of Ephraim, and Yehu and his sons from Menashe.”
These three individuals (Yeravam, Achav, and Yehu) were all kings of Israel who led the Jewish people astray by spreading idol worship throughout the kingdom. Which of course, leaves us wondering what these sorry periods in Jewish history have to do with Yaakov’s blessing of Menashe and Ephraim some five hundred years earlier?
The story of Yeravam, the son of Nevat, is particularly fascinating, and may help to shed some light on what lies behind this puzzling Midrash (rabbinic legend).
When Shlomo HaMelech, the son and heir of Dovid HaMelech, died, his son Rechavam, inherited the throne. Unfortunately, Rechavam seems not to have been a chip off the old block. Choosing not to listen to his father’s older advisors, he heeded the advice of a younger group of his own confidants, committing a classic error in raising taxes.
Coming so soon after the completion of the first Beit HaMikdash, which involved heavy taxes levied on the Jewish people, this ultimately allowed Yeravam to mount a rebellion resulting in the cessation of ten tribes, creating a Northern Kingdom of Israel.
Yeravam crowned himself King of the new Northern Kingdom of ten tribes, (as opposed to the Southern tribes of Yehudah, Binyamin, and the Levites who remained loyal to the rightful King from the house of Dovid.) Yerushalayim and the Beit HaMikdash remained under the control of the Southern Kingdom of Yehudah.
In the first year of his reign, Yeravam was faced with an interesting dilemma: at each of the three regalim, (Pesach, Shavuot, and Sukkoth) the Jewish people would all come up to Yerushalayim to share in the festival, based on the Biblical command to visit the Beit HaMikdash three times a year on the regalim.
Now, no one save a rightful King from the House of Dovid could sit in the courtyard of the Beit HaMikdash; everyone else had to stand. This would mean that while Rechavam, the grandson of Dovid HaMelech, would sit on a throne, Yeravam, who was from the tribe of Ephraim, would have to stand like everyone else.
Realizing that this would be a reminder that he was not the rightful King, he had golden calves (idols) placed at all the border crossings, causing the people to fall back to their idolatrous ways and prevent them from ever reaching Yerushalayim at all. (Indeed many years later the fifteenth day of Av would become a Jewish holiday during the First temple period, as it was the day these idols were finally removed, and Jews could go up again to Yerushalayim….)
Yeravam has come to represent in Jewish history the epitome of the good idea gone bad. More than the ends justifying the means, the story of Yeravam Ben Nevat is the case of the ends and the means becoming all mixed up.
Indeed, this is the essence of the pagan idolatry of ancient Egypt.
Paganism is the worship of nature, in all of its power and beauty, and the pagan, more than anything else, immerses himself in the physical world of nature; of the here and now, and survival of the fittest. In the end, in the world of nature, might makes right, everything inevitably dies, and there is no purpose beyond the here and now.
Judaism, however, suggests that there is a world of difference between one who eats to live, and one who just lives to eat. Ultimately, nature is not the goal; it is simply a vehicle to a higher purpose.
Ancient Egypt was all about the worship of nature, which is why its gods were all powerful symbols in nature, as well as being the background to how an entire country became immersed in power, and the here and now. And it was this surrounding which formed the basis of Yaakov’s question to Yosef.
After twenty-two years in Egypt, Yaakov’s real question was who Yosef had become. Was he still the dreamer of dreams? Could he still see the creator of the sun, moon, and stars, even from the darkness of the pit, or was he now the ruler of Egypt immersed in the here and now?
Perhaps this is why Yaakov was addressing himself first to Yosef, and not to Binyamin: because before blessing the next generation, he was wondering where this generation (Yosef) really was. Was he a Jewish Egyptian, or an Egyptian Jew? Had he become so immersed in the land of the Nile as to forget that all of this was simply a vehicle to something greater? The more powerful one becomes, the more challenging it is to recall that power in this world is simply a tool of the source of all power: Hashem.
And this as well is why Yaakov recalls the original blessing he received from Hashem when running from Esav all those years ago. After all, for the first time, Yaakov had just confronted the world of Eisav, the world of the field and the hunt, of cruelty and nature. In so doing he had of necessity taken on ‘the hands of Eisav’, leaving him struggling with just who he had become.
Indeed, it is at this point, on his way down to the house of Lavan, that Yaakov makes a pact with G-d:
“And Yaakov swore an oath saying: ‘If G-d will be with me and watch over me on this journey, and He will give me bread to eat and clothing to wear, and I will return in peace to the house of my father, then Hashem will be for me a G-d (Elokim).”(28:22-21)
Essentially, now that Yaakov was leaving the tents of study, he recognized that his challenge was to remember, even when immersed in the flocks of Lavan, (which on a certain level represented the world of the field and of nature), that the bread really comes from G-d, and that everything in this physical world is really just a means to achieve a higher purpose.
And perhaps this was, as well, Yaakov’s question regarding Menashe and Ephraim: who are these two young men? Are they Jews growing up in the palace, ever aware of their roles as vehicles for some great and wonderful destiny, or had they become princes of Egypt, focused only on the here and now?
Indeed, this was the great tragedy of Yeravam (as well as Achav and Yehu); Kings of Israel, placed uniquely, with the potential to change the course of history, and yet becoming so immersed in the trappings of being Kings, that they lost sight of the purpose behind it all.
Yaakov was concerned here with building a family into a nation that would change the course of human history and fulfill the mission of the Jewish people, imbedded into the fabric of creation itself: to bring G-d into the world, by making the world a place that is full of all that G-d represents.
This as well, is what we are doing when we bless our children on Friday night by invoking the names of the very same Menashe and Ephraim. We run through the week, so immersed in the world of Eisav, and making sure that the Nile River overflows its banks… We tend to forget what it is really all about. So on Shabbat, beginning with Friday night, we get back in touch with what is really going on in the world. We try to reconnect with the purpose of it all.
What do we think of while we are blessing our children? Perhaps the greatest challenge in raising children is whether they become vehicles for increasing G-d’s presence in the world. And of course, we cannot expect our children to get this message if we ourselves do not live it. Which may well have been Yaakov’s challenge to Yosef: Living in the palace as ruler of Egypt, have you succeeded in remaining the role model to your children of who really rules the world? Who indeed, are these children? Are they princes of Egypt, or sons of Yaakov?
And this, indeed, is Yosef’s response: “They are my sons whom G-d has given me here”, even here in Egypt, in the palaces of Egypt, they are still my sons, and they, as am I, are still aware that all of this, comes from Hashem as a gift with a higher purpose than just filling the storehouses of Egypt.
And this is the greatest aspiration we may have for ourselves, and especially for our children:
Have we succeeded in teaching them that life is more than the here and now, and that all the things we as a generation are so privileged to have and even to take for granted, are simply vehicles to create that better world we all so long for?
Perhaps this week, as we bless our children around the Shabbat table, or use the moment to think about where we are headed and whether our ‘children’: the ideas we have and the accomplishments we achieve, are really contributing to a better world.
Shabbat Shalom.
Thursday, December 28, 2023
Who Supports Hamas?
by Alan M. Dershowitz
Many of the current protests that now demand a unilateral ceasefire – including the attempts to shut down Christmas celebrations -- are orchestrated by some of the same radical groups that organized the pro-Hamas demonstrations before Israel went into Gaza. Pictured: Demonstrators protest against Israel on the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City on November 7, 2023. (Photo by Kena Betankur/AFP via Getty Images)
The main groups that comprise the bulk of organizers and demonstrators who have supported the Hamas barbarism against Israel are:
1) Radical Islamic groups that, like the Islamic Republic of Iran after the 1979 revolution, regard Israel as the "Little Satan" and America as the "Big Satan."
2) American revolutionary groups who used to be affiliated with Communism but now call themselves radical socialists or workers parties. Their goal is to overthrow our government and they attach themselves to every disruptive movement in the hope of garnering support and creating distrust for American democracy.
3) Old-fashioned anti-Semites who hate anything associated with Jews and concoct conspiracy theories that blame "the Jews" for all evils.
4) Useful idiots who have little or no knowledge of the issues but march in lockstep with all "woke," "hard left," and "anti-colonial" causes on the theory that "if it's left, it must be right."
Continue Reading Article
- Many of the current protests that now demand a unilateral ceasefire – including the attempts to shut down Christmas celebrations -- are orchestrated by some of the same radical groups that organized the pro-Hamas demonstrations before Israel went into Gaza.
- Demonstrations and protests by groups such as the Students for Justice in Palestine, Jewish Voice for Peace or the National Lawyers Guild seem anything but spontaneous and grassroots responses to "Israel's military actions in Gaza." They are not demonstrations against what Israel does; they are protests against what Israel is, namely the democratic nation-state of the Jewish people.
- Recall that these protests began before Israel counterattacked against Hamas. They were in full bloom on October 8, even while the bodies of 1,200 murdered Israelis, including babies burned alive, were still being gathered and counted, and the roughly 240 hostages taken by Hamas to Gaza identified.
- Where are the calls for anything that would actually help the Palestinians or make their lives better: freedom of speech, equal justice under the law, freedom of the press, better job opportunities, and an end to government corruption and abuse?
- The protests are exclusively anti-Israel, anti-American, pro-Hamas, and pro-terrorism.
- So when you watch an anti-Israel demonstration on television, please understand who is behind it and what are their ultimate goals, because the next target is American democracy -- and you.
Many of the current protests that now demand a unilateral ceasefire – including the attempts to shut down Christmas celebrations -- are orchestrated by some of the same radical groups that organized the pro-Hamas demonstrations before Israel went into Gaza. Pictured: Demonstrators protest against Israel on the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City on November 7, 2023. (Photo by Kena Betankur/AFP via Getty Images)
The main groups that comprise the bulk of organizers and demonstrators who have supported the Hamas barbarism against Israel are:
1) Radical Islamic groups that, like the Islamic Republic of Iran after the 1979 revolution, regard Israel as the "Little Satan" and America as the "Big Satan."
2) American revolutionary groups who used to be affiliated with Communism but now call themselves radical socialists or workers parties. Their goal is to overthrow our government and they attach themselves to every disruptive movement in the hope of garnering support and creating distrust for American democracy.
3) Old-fashioned anti-Semites who hate anything associated with Jews and concoct conspiracy theories that blame "the Jews" for all evils.
4) Useful idiots who have little or no knowledge of the issues but march in lockstep with all "woke," "hard left," and "anti-colonial" causes on the theory that "if it's left, it must be right."
Continue Reading Article
Wednesday, December 27, 2023
A monumental cliff hanger
by Rabbi Pinchas Winston
Friday Night
The Torah says that Ya’akov Avinu, sensing his end was near, decided to let his sons in on one of the best kept secrets of all history, the end of days. But, instead of spilling the beans Ya’akov moved on to blessing his sons, leaving us with a monumental cliff hanger. We could sure use that critical information now.
Rashi explains the sudden change of direction. Apparently, the information was not something Ya’akov Avinu knew on his own, but was a prophecy that he had to receive, but didn’t. So all he could do was move on to the next item on his personal end of days agenda, which was to bless his sons. That he did without a problem.
The Gemora elaborates somewhat on what actually happened at that time:
“Ya’akov wanted to reveal to his sons the End of Days, but the Divine Presence left him. He asked: ‘Perhaps, God forbid, there is something unfit from my bed, just as Yishmael was born to Avraham, and Eisav to my father Yitzchak?’ His sons answered, ‘Shema Yisroel, Hashem Elokeinu, Hashem Echad: Just as in your heart only [God is] one, so too in our hearts, there is only one.’ At that moment Ya’akov said, ‘Boruch Shem kevod Malchuso l’olam va’ed—Blessed is the Name of His glorious kingdom forever!’” (Pesachim 56a)
We can understand Ya’akov’s question and concern. But how did his sons’ recital of the Shema and their professing the oneness of God, answer it, and why did he conclude with Boruch Shem?
Because that was obviously the question that Ya’akov had asked them, about Yichud Hashem, the unification of God’s Name. Everything that had gone wrong for the brothers, particularly the slaughter of Shechem and the sale of Yosef, was the result of a lack of Yichud Hashem. Ya’akov knew that if he lost the prophecy about the End of Days it was because his sons still had not completed their teshuvah.
In fact, though the Gemora does not indicate if Ya’akov had been satisfied with their answer, the Zohar does:
“Ya’akov wanted to establish the ‘Mystery of Unity’ below and composed the 24 letters of ‘Blessed be the Name of His glorious kingdom forever.’ He didn’t give it 25 letters since the Mishkan had yet to be built. Once the Mishkan was built, the first word was completed…With regard to this the verse says, ‘God spoke to him from the Appointed Tent, saying, etc.’ (Vayikra 1:1), which has 25 letters.” (Zohar 2:139b)
In other words, only once the Mishkan had been built was the unity of God expressed by Boruch Shem on par with the unity of God declared through the Shema. The Mishkan, in which the service of God was performed 24/7, and in which miracles daily occurred, made it perfectly clear to anyone who witnessed them that the Divine Presence was as real on earth as it was in Heaven. The future words of the Zechariah HaNavi, “on that day, God will be One and His Name, One” (Zechariah 14:9) were fulfilled on a daily basis in the Mishkan.
Shabbos Day
REMEMBER HOW PAROH said, “Who is God that I should listen to His voice to let the Jewish people out? I do not know God, and will I not let the Jewish people out” (Shemos 5:2)? It loses something in the translation, because Pharaoh not only believed in God, he believed that Elokim, the God of nature, had punished the world with the Flood.
This is why Paroh did not take Moshe Rabbeinu’s threat seriously. He knew that nature had rules that God Himself made and obeyed. If the Jewish people were going to go free, Paroh calculated, they would have to do it “naturally,” and naturally speaking they lacked the means to go free.
Moshe Rabbeinu, on the other hand, was trying to introduce Paroh, and really the Jewish people, to a higher level of God’s reality, Hovayah. This is the level of Divine revelation that becomes obvious specifically because it overrides the Laws of Physics, as the 10 Plagues did, et al. “It’s good that you see Elokim,” Moshe Rabbeinu told Paroh. “But if you trace Elokim upwards, you will see that it was Hovayah that gave rise to Elokim, and is what tells Elokim what to do and when.”
And lest one make the mistake of thinking that this was uniquely Paroh’s problem, it has been the problem of just about everyone going back to Gan Aiden and the first sin. We’re all failing the same test on some level that Ya’akov Avinu asked his sons about. They answered with the Shema and said, “Just as in your heart only [God is] one, so too in our hearts, there is only one,” meaning that we are now clear on the yichud of Hovayah-Elokim.
Ya’akov Avinu suspected otherwise, or the prophecy about the End of Days would not have left him. That is what Moshiach’s arrival will do for mankind, unify Hovayah and Elokim as Hovayah-Elokim. If they had in fact completed the yichud in their hearts as well as their minds, then it would have been the End of Days in their time, and the prophecy would not have left Ya’akov.
Ya’akov’s suspicions were confirmed after his death here:
“They commanded [messengers to go] to Yosef to say, ‘Your father commanded [us] before his death, saying, “Say to Yosef, ‘Please, forgive now your brothers’ sin…’” Yosef wept when they spoke to him…But Yosef told them, ‘Don’t be afraid, for am I instead of God?’”
“Am I perhaps in His place?…If I wanted to harm you, would I be able? Did not all of you plan evil against me? The Holy One, Blessed is He, however, designed it for good. So how can I alone harm you?” (Rashi)
In other words, Yosef told them, can anything happen against the will of God? Whether a person does good or evil it is all the will of God. Neither good nor evil has any independent power to override the will of God, and the moment a person acts in any way that would suggest otherwise, they have separated Elokim from Hovayah. That is the real sin in sin.
In fact, it was this separation of Hovayah and Elokim that the original snake used to trap Chava into eating from the Aitz HaDa’as Tov v’Ra. Ever wonder where God was when they were talking and Chava capitulated and ate? From the Torah, it sounds like God was somewhere else altogether because that is how they both acted.
In fact, God was right there the whole time, quietly watching everything unfold, especially once Chava said:
“The woman said to the snake, ‘We may eat from all the fruit of the trees of the garden, but of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, Elokim said, ‘You shall not eat of it, and you shall not touch it, lest you die.’” (Bereishis 3:2-3)
The snake, a.k.a., the Sitra Achra, picked up on Chava’s lack of Hovayah awareness when she failed to mention the Name with Elokim, and answered her:
“‘You will surely not die. Elokim knows that on the day that you eat of it, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like Elokim, knowing good and evil.’” (Bereishis 2:4-5)
This is what gave Chava a sense that she was on her own, to do as she saw fit. Being real with Hovayah-Elokim would have made her realize that God was there and that the whole thing was a test. As Dovid HaMelech later wrote: “I have placed Hovayah before me constantly; because [He is] at my right hand, I will not falter” (Tehillim 16:8). “If I can see everything in life as coming directly from God,” Dovid HaMelech said, “no matter how natural it looks, then I will always know that I am being tested and rise to the occasion.”
Shalosh Seudot
THERE IS A hint to this issue being the main one for the brothers and redemption, at the end of Parashas Mikeitz. After the viceroy’s goblet was found in Binyomin’s sack, and they were forced to return to Egypt to face judgment, Yosef told his brothers:
“What is this deed that you have committed? Don’t you know that a person like me—kamoni—practices divination—nachesh yenachesh?” (Bereishis 44:15)
The Hebrew word kamoni—like me—is spelled Chof-Mem-Nun-Yud. If you go backwards two letters in the verse from the Mem, the letter that follows is a Shin. Do the same again and you arrive at a Yud, and one more time brings you to a Ches. Together, the letters spell Moshiach in reverse, and that is pretty amazing even if you don’t believe in things like this.
This is especially so, since it occurs in the verse that also happens to mention the word nachash—snake, a word that appears very, very few times in the entire Torah. It also happens to have the same gematria as Moshiach, 358. This, we are told, is significant because it was the snake who caused us to go into exile, but it will be Moshiach who will take us out of it.
But why here, why now? Even if this was not Yosef himself hinting to his brothers, it is the Torah hinting to us. Why?
Because this was the official turning point, or potential turning point. This was the place that the brothers were supposed to realize that all that had happened was from God—“This is from Hovayah, that which is wondrous in our eyes” (Tehillim 118:23)—part of some greater master plan that they had been oblivious to when they sold Yosef, but of which they were now fast becoming aware.
And they came so close too, buuuuttt just missed it, saying instead:
“What shall we say to my master? What shall we speak, and how shall we exonerate ourselves? Elokim has found your servants’ iniquity…” (Bereishis 44:16)
Elokim only? Really? Not Hovayah-Elokim…after all you have gone through and were supposed to have learned about the inner workings of Hashgochah Pratis? Apparently not, and apparently setting up an even bigger reveal, and thousands of years of exile. It was the only way left to lead the Jewish people to the level of realization that the yichud of Hovayah and Elokim is redemption, as the verse of “kamoni” is telling us.
Acharis K’Reishis, Part 1
I HAVE QUOTED several times from a sefer called Acharis K’Reishis, which means “Last Like First.” It is a remarkable work by Rabbi Aryeh Shapira, shlita, based on the teachings of the Ramchal (Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzato) and the GR”A (Vilna Gaon) regarding the final redemption, and its similarity to the first redemptions from Egypt and Bavel.
This is must-know information for anyone who wants to be ready for the final redemption, it should come quickly in our time. In fact, the information is so crucial, and the Ramchal and GR”A are so prominent, that it is hugely surprising that this is not taught everywhere and that more people do not know about it.
Therefore, I have decided to translate sections here. After all, the point of redemption is to make the reality of ain od Milvado real to the entire world.
The Future Redemption, Part 1
We will now clarify, with the help of God, what is relevant to the future redemption from what we have already brought from the commentary of the GR”A on Tikunei Zohar Chadash (27b), that the beginning will be with a pekidah—remembrance, as happened in the time of Koresh (Cyrus).
Actually, it is discussed in the Gemora in Kesuvos, 110b:
Rav Zeira was avoiding [being seen] by [his teacher] Rav Yehudah, wanting to go to [from Bavel to] Eretz Yisroel, [knowing that his teacher disapproved]. Rav Yehudah held that anyone who ascends from Bavel to Eretz Yisrael transgresses a positive mitzvah, as it says, “They will be taken to Bavel and remain then until the day that I recall—pokdei—them, God testified” (Yirmiyahu 27:22).
These words are amazing. What relevance does the verse in Yirmiyahu about redemption during the First Temple have to the final redemption?
Tosafos there already picked up on this and they wrote:
Even though the verse is written regarding the first exile, it can be said that the verse was particular about the second exile as well. These words also require explanation, because in the end, the verse was [only] said regarding the First Temple.
According to the GR”A however, the matter is illuminated. The Chachamim accepted that every redemption follows the same pattern of pekidah, [an initial act of redemption], and zechirah [the completion of the redemption]. Thus, whatever applied regarding the return of Tzion [the first time] is to also be the order for the future [redemptions] as well.
This is what Rav Yehudah learned from what was said regarding the First Temple, “They will be taken to Babylonia and there they shall remain until the day that I recall them.” The future redemption will also be according to this order, and the Jewish people will not leave exile until the time of the pekidah. Chazak!
Good Shabbos,
Pinchas Winston
www.thirtysix.org
www.shaarnunproductions.org
Friday Night
The Torah says that Ya’akov Avinu, sensing his end was near, decided to let his sons in on one of the best kept secrets of all history, the end of days. But, instead of spilling the beans Ya’akov moved on to blessing his sons, leaving us with a monumental cliff hanger. We could sure use that critical information now.
Rashi explains the sudden change of direction. Apparently, the information was not something Ya’akov Avinu knew on his own, but was a prophecy that he had to receive, but didn’t. So all he could do was move on to the next item on his personal end of days agenda, which was to bless his sons. That he did without a problem.
The Gemora elaborates somewhat on what actually happened at that time:
“Ya’akov wanted to reveal to his sons the End of Days, but the Divine Presence left him. He asked: ‘Perhaps, God forbid, there is something unfit from my bed, just as Yishmael was born to Avraham, and Eisav to my father Yitzchak?’ His sons answered, ‘Shema Yisroel, Hashem Elokeinu, Hashem Echad: Just as in your heart only [God is] one, so too in our hearts, there is only one.’ At that moment Ya’akov said, ‘Boruch Shem kevod Malchuso l’olam va’ed—Blessed is the Name of His glorious kingdom forever!’” (Pesachim 56a)
We can understand Ya’akov’s question and concern. But how did his sons’ recital of the Shema and their professing the oneness of God, answer it, and why did he conclude with Boruch Shem?
Because that was obviously the question that Ya’akov had asked them, about Yichud Hashem, the unification of God’s Name. Everything that had gone wrong for the brothers, particularly the slaughter of Shechem and the sale of Yosef, was the result of a lack of Yichud Hashem. Ya’akov knew that if he lost the prophecy about the End of Days it was because his sons still had not completed their teshuvah.
In fact, though the Gemora does not indicate if Ya’akov had been satisfied with their answer, the Zohar does:
“Ya’akov wanted to establish the ‘Mystery of Unity’ below and composed the 24 letters of ‘Blessed be the Name of His glorious kingdom forever.’ He didn’t give it 25 letters since the Mishkan had yet to be built. Once the Mishkan was built, the first word was completed…With regard to this the verse says, ‘God spoke to him from the Appointed Tent, saying, etc.’ (Vayikra 1:1), which has 25 letters.” (Zohar 2:139b)
In other words, only once the Mishkan had been built was the unity of God expressed by Boruch Shem on par with the unity of God declared through the Shema. The Mishkan, in which the service of God was performed 24/7, and in which miracles daily occurred, made it perfectly clear to anyone who witnessed them that the Divine Presence was as real on earth as it was in Heaven. The future words of the Zechariah HaNavi, “on that day, God will be One and His Name, One” (Zechariah 14:9) were fulfilled on a daily basis in the Mishkan.
Shabbos Day
REMEMBER HOW PAROH said, “Who is God that I should listen to His voice to let the Jewish people out? I do not know God, and will I not let the Jewish people out” (Shemos 5:2)? It loses something in the translation, because Pharaoh not only believed in God, he believed that Elokim, the God of nature, had punished the world with the Flood.
This is why Paroh did not take Moshe Rabbeinu’s threat seriously. He knew that nature had rules that God Himself made and obeyed. If the Jewish people were going to go free, Paroh calculated, they would have to do it “naturally,” and naturally speaking they lacked the means to go free.
Moshe Rabbeinu, on the other hand, was trying to introduce Paroh, and really the Jewish people, to a higher level of God’s reality, Hovayah. This is the level of Divine revelation that becomes obvious specifically because it overrides the Laws of Physics, as the 10 Plagues did, et al. “It’s good that you see Elokim,” Moshe Rabbeinu told Paroh. “But if you trace Elokim upwards, you will see that it was Hovayah that gave rise to Elokim, and is what tells Elokim what to do and when.”
And lest one make the mistake of thinking that this was uniquely Paroh’s problem, it has been the problem of just about everyone going back to Gan Aiden and the first sin. We’re all failing the same test on some level that Ya’akov Avinu asked his sons about. They answered with the Shema and said, “Just as in your heart only [God is] one, so too in our hearts, there is only one,” meaning that we are now clear on the yichud of Hovayah-Elokim.
Ya’akov Avinu suspected otherwise, or the prophecy about the End of Days would not have left him. That is what Moshiach’s arrival will do for mankind, unify Hovayah and Elokim as Hovayah-Elokim. If they had in fact completed the yichud in their hearts as well as their minds, then it would have been the End of Days in their time, and the prophecy would not have left Ya’akov.
Ya’akov’s suspicions were confirmed after his death here:
“They commanded [messengers to go] to Yosef to say, ‘Your father commanded [us] before his death, saying, “Say to Yosef, ‘Please, forgive now your brothers’ sin…’” Yosef wept when they spoke to him…But Yosef told them, ‘Don’t be afraid, for am I instead of God?’”
“Am I perhaps in His place?…If I wanted to harm you, would I be able? Did not all of you plan evil against me? The Holy One, Blessed is He, however, designed it for good. So how can I alone harm you?” (Rashi)
In other words, Yosef told them, can anything happen against the will of God? Whether a person does good or evil it is all the will of God. Neither good nor evil has any independent power to override the will of God, and the moment a person acts in any way that would suggest otherwise, they have separated Elokim from Hovayah. That is the real sin in sin.
In fact, it was this separation of Hovayah and Elokim that the original snake used to trap Chava into eating from the Aitz HaDa’as Tov v’Ra. Ever wonder where God was when they were talking and Chava capitulated and ate? From the Torah, it sounds like God was somewhere else altogether because that is how they both acted.
In fact, God was right there the whole time, quietly watching everything unfold, especially once Chava said:
“The woman said to the snake, ‘We may eat from all the fruit of the trees of the garden, but of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, Elokim said, ‘You shall not eat of it, and you shall not touch it, lest you die.’” (Bereishis 3:2-3)
The snake, a.k.a., the Sitra Achra, picked up on Chava’s lack of Hovayah awareness when she failed to mention the Name with Elokim, and answered her:
“‘You will surely not die. Elokim knows that on the day that you eat of it, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like Elokim, knowing good and evil.’” (Bereishis 2:4-5)
This is what gave Chava a sense that she was on her own, to do as she saw fit. Being real with Hovayah-Elokim would have made her realize that God was there and that the whole thing was a test. As Dovid HaMelech later wrote: “I have placed Hovayah before me constantly; because [He is] at my right hand, I will not falter” (Tehillim 16:8). “If I can see everything in life as coming directly from God,” Dovid HaMelech said, “no matter how natural it looks, then I will always know that I am being tested and rise to the occasion.”
Shalosh Seudot
THERE IS A hint to this issue being the main one for the brothers and redemption, at the end of Parashas Mikeitz. After the viceroy’s goblet was found in Binyomin’s sack, and they were forced to return to Egypt to face judgment, Yosef told his brothers:
“What is this deed that you have committed? Don’t you know that a person like me—kamoni—practices divination—nachesh yenachesh?” (Bereishis 44:15)
The Hebrew word kamoni—like me—is spelled Chof-Mem-Nun-Yud. If you go backwards two letters in the verse from the Mem, the letter that follows is a Shin. Do the same again and you arrive at a Yud, and one more time brings you to a Ches. Together, the letters spell Moshiach in reverse, and that is pretty amazing even if you don’t believe in things like this.
This is especially so, since it occurs in the verse that also happens to mention the word nachash—snake, a word that appears very, very few times in the entire Torah. It also happens to have the same gematria as Moshiach, 358. This, we are told, is significant because it was the snake who caused us to go into exile, but it will be Moshiach who will take us out of it.
But why here, why now? Even if this was not Yosef himself hinting to his brothers, it is the Torah hinting to us. Why?
Because this was the official turning point, or potential turning point. This was the place that the brothers were supposed to realize that all that had happened was from God—“This is from Hovayah, that which is wondrous in our eyes” (Tehillim 118:23)—part of some greater master plan that they had been oblivious to when they sold Yosef, but of which they were now fast becoming aware.
And they came so close too, buuuuttt just missed it, saying instead:
“What shall we say to my master? What shall we speak, and how shall we exonerate ourselves? Elokim has found your servants’ iniquity…” (Bereishis 44:16)
Elokim only? Really? Not Hovayah-Elokim…after all you have gone through and were supposed to have learned about the inner workings of Hashgochah Pratis? Apparently not, and apparently setting up an even bigger reveal, and thousands of years of exile. It was the only way left to lead the Jewish people to the level of realization that the yichud of Hovayah and Elokim is redemption, as the verse of “kamoni” is telling us.
Acharis K’Reishis, Part 1
I HAVE QUOTED several times from a sefer called Acharis K’Reishis, which means “Last Like First.” It is a remarkable work by Rabbi Aryeh Shapira, shlita, based on the teachings of the Ramchal (Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzato) and the GR”A (Vilna Gaon) regarding the final redemption, and its similarity to the first redemptions from Egypt and Bavel.
This is must-know information for anyone who wants to be ready for the final redemption, it should come quickly in our time. In fact, the information is so crucial, and the Ramchal and GR”A are so prominent, that it is hugely surprising that this is not taught everywhere and that more people do not know about it.
Therefore, I have decided to translate sections here. After all, the point of redemption is to make the reality of ain od Milvado real to the entire world.
The Future Redemption, Part 1
We will now clarify, with the help of God, what is relevant to the future redemption from what we have already brought from the commentary of the GR”A on Tikunei Zohar Chadash (27b), that the beginning will be with a pekidah—remembrance, as happened in the time of Koresh (Cyrus).
Actually, it is discussed in the Gemora in Kesuvos, 110b:
Rav Zeira was avoiding [being seen] by [his teacher] Rav Yehudah, wanting to go to [from Bavel to] Eretz Yisroel, [knowing that his teacher disapproved]. Rav Yehudah held that anyone who ascends from Bavel to Eretz Yisrael transgresses a positive mitzvah, as it says, “They will be taken to Bavel and remain then until the day that I recall—pokdei—them, God testified” (Yirmiyahu 27:22).
These words are amazing. What relevance does the verse in Yirmiyahu about redemption during the First Temple have to the final redemption?
Tosafos there already picked up on this and they wrote:
Even though the verse is written regarding the first exile, it can be said that the verse was particular about the second exile as well. These words also require explanation, because in the end, the verse was [only] said regarding the First Temple.
According to the GR”A however, the matter is illuminated. The Chachamim accepted that every redemption follows the same pattern of pekidah, [an initial act of redemption], and zechirah [the completion of the redemption]. Thus, whatever applied regarding the return of Tzion [the first time] is to also be the order for the future [redemptions] as well.
This is what Rav Yehudah learned from what was said regarding the First Temple, “They will be taken to Babylonia and there they shall remain until the day that I recall them.” The future redemption will also be according to this order, and the Jewish people will not leave exile until the time of the pekidah. Chazak!
Good Shabbos,
Pinchas Winston
www.thirtysix.org
www.shaarnunproductions.org
Seek Peace and Pursue it
BS”D
Parashat Va’ye’chi 5784
by HaRav Nachman Kahana
A:
With the passage of time, we can safely conclude that the only thing which is permanent in our physical world is the phenomena of change, except for one ageless feature – Judenhass – hatred of the Jew. It is enduring, perpetual, and grows in concert with the population of gentiles, wherever they may be.
Its resilience was predicted by the archenemy of Am Yisrael – Bil’am, in his venomous curse turned blessing (Bamidbar 23,9):
כי מראש צרים אראנו ומגבעות אשורנו הן עם לבדד ישכן ובגוים לא יתחשב
From the rocky peaks I see them, from the heights I view them.
I see a people who live apart and are distinct from gentile beliefs and mores.
The nations and religious have since time immemorial tried to eradicate our presence with minimal success, despite the huge efforts they put into this unfeasible goal.
Hashem presented us with a way of life different than any other culture, to guarantee our superiority as His chosen nation and not to be corrupted by pagans and untruthful beliefs.
We marry among ourselves; we dress differently and what we eat is stubbornly “Jewish food”. Our language is not spoken by any other nation or race, the manner that we are conceived and born and the way we die and are buried are uniquely Jewish.
We have paid the price for being HaShem’s chosen nation, but our return to Eretz Yisrael at this time in history is signaling a change in the way the Almighty will relate to us in the future. The immense divide between Jews and gentiles will become exponentially greater. HaShem’s miracles will become ever more evident, as presented by the prophet Yechezkel 37,15-28 and served as the haftara in last week’s parasha Vayigash (Yechezkel 37,19-24):
יט) דבר אלהם כה אמר אדני יקוק הנה אני לקח את עץ יוסף אשר ביד אפרים ושבטי ישראל חברו חבריו ונתתי אותם עליו את עץ יהודה ועשיתם לעץ אחד והיו אחד בידי:
כ) והיו העצים אשר תכתב עליהם בידך לעיניהם:
כא) ודבר אליהם כה אמר אדני יקוק הנה אני לקח את בני ישראל מבין הגוים אשר הלכו שם וקבצתי אתם מסביב והבאתי אותם אל אדמתם:
כב) ועשיתי אתם לגוי אחד בארץ בהרי ישראל ומלך אחד יהיה לכלם למלך ולא יהיה יהיו עוד לשני גוים ולא יחצו עוד לשתי ממלכות עוד:
כג) ולא יטמאו עוד בגלוליהם ובשקוציהם ובכל פשעיהם והושעתי אתם מכל מושבתיהם אשר חטאו בהם וטהרתי אותם והיו לי לעם ואני אהיה להם לאלהים:
כד) ועבדי דוד מלך עליהם ורועה אחד יהיה לכלם ובמשפטי ילכו וחקתי ישמרו ועשו אותם:
כה) וישבו על הארץ אשר נתתי לעבדי ליעקב אשר ישבו בה אבותיכם וישבו עליה המה ובניהם ובני בניהם עד עולם ודוד עבדי נשיא להם לעולם:
כו) וכרתי להם ברית שלום ברית עולם יהיה אותם ונתתים והרביתי אותם ונתתי את מקדשי בתוכם לעולם:
כז) והיה משכני עליהם והייתי להם לאלהים והמה יהיו לי לעם:
כח) וידעו הגוים כי אני יקוק מקדש את ישראל בהיות מקדשי בתוכם לעולם
This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, to where they have gone. I will gather them from every side and bring them back into their own land.
I will make them one nation in the land, upon the mountains of Israel. There will be one king over all of them and shall no more be like two nations nor be divided into two kingdoms.
They will no longer defile themselves with their idols and vile images or with any of their offenses, for I will save them from all their sinful backsliding, and I will cleanse them. They will be my people, and I will be their God.
My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd. They will follow my laws and be careful to keep my decrees.
They will live in the land I gave to my servant Jacob, the land where your ancestors lived. They and their children and their children will live there forever, and David my servant will be their prince forever.
I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant. I will establish them and increase their numbers, and I will put my sanctuary among them forever.
My dwelling place will be with them; I will be their God, and they will be my people.
Then the nations will know that I the Lord has sanctified Israel when my sanctuary shall be in the midst of them.
B:
However, this status of redemption requires a promo of chaos. The situation of utopia as pictured by the prophet Yechezkel cannot exist when all around us are the evil incarnate of Aisav and Yishmael. The stated in Tehillim 34,15:
סור מרע ועשה טוב בקש שלום ורדפהו:
Turn from evil and do good; seek peace and pursue it.
As long as evil dominates the world, the gentile nations will not permit us to benefit from a good life for ourselves and for the few remaining righteous gentiles, as outlined by the prophet Yechezkel above.
What we are witnessing today is the beginning of HaShem’s count-down time for justice. It is beginning with the ongoing destruction of Amalek in Gaza and will embrace the far-reaching regions of Christianity and Islam. Not to speak of the billions within humanity who deny the existence of the omnipotent God.
During this period of retribution, revenge and damnation for what these people have wrought upon Am Yisrael from the destruction of the Bet Hamikdash and our two-thousand-year exile from Eretz Yisrael, there will be a cathartic and purification process here in the holy land.
The four hundred thousand gentiles from Eastern Europe who entered the land by virtue of the irresponsible ‘Grandparent’ clause in the Law of Return, whereby one whose parents are both goyim but has a Jewish grandparent may enter the country with full Israeli citizenship. Except for a very small minority, they are not interested in converting to Judaism, preferring instead to establish churches and non-kosher food stores in every city in the holy land. They will have to go.
The millions of Moslems between the “sea and the river” who support the actions and beliefs of Hamas and their likes will have to go.
These are ambitious goals for a miniscule population of seven million Jews in Eretz Yisrael, but numbers have no bearing when HaShem emanates His messages to His prophets, like the one quoted above in Yechezkel 37.
C:
Some relevant pesukim (Torah verses):
1- Devarim 32,43
הרנינו גוים עמו כי דם עבדיו יקום ונקם ישיב לצריו וכפר אדמתו עמו:
Rejoice, you nations, with His people – for He (HaShem) will avenge the blood of his servants; He will take vengeance on His enemies and make atonement for His land and people.
2- Yoel 4,21
ונקיתי דמם לא נקיתי ויקוק שכן בציון:
Judah will be inhabited forever and Jerusalem through all generations. Shall I leave their innocent blood unavenged? No, I will not. The Lord dwells in Zion!
3- Tehilim 79,10
למה יאמרו הגוים איה אלהיהם יודע בגיים בגוים לעינינו נקמת דם עבדיך השפוך:
Why should the nations say, where is their God? Before our eyes, make known among the nations that you avenge the outpoured blood of your servants.
4- Ibid: 9,13
כי דרש דמים אותם זכר לא שכח צעקת עניים ענוים:
Sing the praises of the Lord, enthroned in Zion; proclaim among the nations what He has done. For He who avenges blood remembers, He does not ignore the cries of the afflicted.
5- Ibid: 120,7
אני שלום וכי אדבר המה למלחמה
Too long have I lived among those who hate peace. I am for peace; but when I speak, they are for war.
6- Ibid 144,15
אשרי העם שככה לו אשרי העם שיקוק א-להיו:
Blessed is the people of whom this is true; blessed is the people whose God is the Lord.
Shabbat Shalom
Nachman Kahana
Copyright © 5784/2023 Nachman Kahana
Parashat Va’ye’chi 5784
by HaRav Nachman Kahana
A:
With the passage of time, we can safely conclude that the only thing which is permanent in our physical world is the phenomena of change, except for one ageless feature – Judenhass – hatred of the Jew. It is enduring, perpetual, and grows in concert with the population of gentiles, wherever they may be.
Its resilience was predicted by the archenemy of Am Yisrael – Bil’am, in his venomous curse turned blessing (Bamidbar 23,9):
כי מראש צרים אראנו ומגבעות אשורנו הן עם לבדד ישכן ובגוים לא יתחשב
From the rocky peaks I see them, from the heights I view them.
I see a people who live apart and are distinct from gentile beliefs and mores.
The nations and religious have since time immemorial tried to eradicate our presence with minimal success, despite the huge efforts they put into this unfeasible goal.
Hashem presented us with a way of life different than any other culture, to guarantee our superiority as His chosen nation and not to be corrupted by pagans and untruthful beliefs.
We marry among ourselves; we dress differently and what we eat is stubbornly “Jewish food”. Our language is not spoken by any other nation or race, the manner that we are conceived and born and the way we die and are buried are uniquely Jewish.
We have paid the price for being HaShem’s chosen nation, but our return to Eretz Yisrael at this time in history is signaling a change in the way the Almighty will relate to us in the future. The immense divide between Jews and gentiles will become exponentially greater. HaShem’s miracles will become ever more evident, as presented by the prophet Yechezkel 37,15-28 and served as the haftara in last week’s parasha Vayigash (Yechezkel 37,19-24):
יט) דבר אלהם כה אמר אדני יקוק הנה אני לקח את עץ יוסף אשר ביד אפרים ושבטי ישראל חברו חבריו ונתתי אותם עליו את עץ יהודה ועשיתם לעץ אחד והיו אחד בידי:
כ) והיו העצים אשר תכתב עליהם בידך לעיניהם:
כא) ודבר אליהם כה אמר אדני יקוק הנה אני לקח את בני ישראל מבין הגוים אשר הלכו שם וקבצתי אתם מסביב והבאתי אותם אל אדמתם:
כב) ועשיתי אתם לגוי אחד בארץ בהרי ישראל ומלך אחד יהיה לכלם למלך ולא יהיה יהיו עוד לשני גוים ולא יחצו עוד לשתי ממלכות עוד:
כג) ולא יטמאו עוד בגלוליהם ובשקוציהם ובכל פשעיהם והושעתי אתם מכל מושבתיהם אשר חטאו בהם וטהרתי אותם והיו לי לעם ואני אהיה להם לאלהים:
כד) ועבדי דוד מלך עליהם ורועה אחד יהיה לכלם ובמשפטי ילכו וחקתי ישמרו ועשו אותם:
כה) וישבו על הארץ אשר נתתי לעבדי ליעקב אשר ישבו בה אבותיכם וישבו עליה המה ובניהם ובני בניהם עד עולם ודוד עבדי נשיא להם לעולם:
כו) וכרתי להם ברית שלום ברית עולם יהיה אותם ונתתים והרביתי אותם ונתתי את מקדשי בתוכם לעולם:
כז) והיה משכני עליהם והייתי להם לאלהים והמה יהיו לי לעם:
כח) וידעו הגוים כי אני יקוק מקדש את ישראל בהיות מקדשי בתוכם לעולם
This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, to where they have gone. I will gather them from every side and bring them back into their own land.
I will make them one nation in the land, upon the mountains of Israel. There will be one king over all of them and shall no more be like two nations nor be divided into two kingdoms.
They will no longer defile themselves with their idols and vile images or with any of their offenses, for I will save them from all their sinful backsliding, and I will cleanse them. They will be my people, and I will be their God.
My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd. They will follow my laws and be careful to keep my decrees.
They will live in the land I gave to my servant Jacob, the land where your ancestors lived. They and their children and their children will live there forever, and David my servant will be their prince forever.
I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant. I will establish them and increase their numbers, and I will put my sanctuary among them forever.
My dwelling place will be with them; I will be their God, and they will be my people.
Then the nations will know that I the Lord has sanctified Israel when my sanctuary shall be in the midst of them.
B:
However, this status of redemption requires a promo of chaos. The situation of utopia as pictured by the prophet Yechezkel cannot exist when all around us are the evil incarnate of Aisav and Yishmael. The stated in Tehillim 34,15:
סור מרע ועשה טוב בקש שלום ורדפהו:
Turn from evil and do good; seek peace and pursue it.
As long as evil dominates the world, the gentile nations will not permit us to benefit from a good life for ourselves and for the few remaining righteous gentiles, as outlined by the prophet Yechezkel above.
What we are witnessing today is the beginning of HaShem’s count-down time for justice. It is beginning with the ongoing destruction of Amalek in Gaza and will embrace the far-reaching regions of Christianity and Islam. Not to speak of the billions within humanity who deny the existence of the omnipotent God.
During this period of retribution, revenge and damnation for what these people have wrought upon Am Yisrael from the destruction of the Bet Hamikdash and our two-thousand-year exile from Eretz Yisrael, there will be a cathartic and purification process here in the holy land.
The four hundred thousand gentiles from Eastern Europe who entered the land by virtue of the irresponsible ‘Grandparent’ clause in the Law of Return, whereby one whose parents are both goyim but has a Jewish grandparent may enter the country with full Israeli citizenship. Except for a very small minority, they are not interested in converting to Judaism, preferring instead to establish churches and non-kosher food stores in every city in the holy land. They will have to go.
The millions of Moslems between the “sea and the river” who support the actions and beliefs of Hamas and their likes will have to go.
These are ambitious goals for a miniscule population of seven million Jews in Eretz Yisrael, but numbers have no bearing when HaShem emanates His messages to His prophets, like the one quoted above in Yechezkel 37.
C:
Some relevant pesukim (Torah verses):
1- Devarim 32,43
הרנינו גוים עמו כי דם עבדיו יקום ונקם ישיב לצריו וכפר אדמתו עמו:
Rejoice, you nations, with His people – for He (HaShem) will avenge the blood of his servants; He will take vengeance on His enemies and make atonement for His land and people.
2- Yoel 4,21
ונקיתי דמם לא נקיתי ויקוק שכן בציון:
Judah will be inhabited forever and Jerusalem through all generations. Shall I leave their innocent blood unavenged? No, I will not. The Lord dwells in Zion!
3- Tehilim 79,10
למה יאמרו הגוים איה אלהיהם יודע בגיים בגוים לעינינו נקמת דם עבדיך השפוך:
Why should the nations say, where is their God? Before our eyes, make known among the nations that you avenge the outpoured blood of your servants.
4- Ibid: 9,13
כי דרש דמים אותם זכר לא שכח צעקת עניים ענוים:
Sing the praises of the Lord, enthroned in Zion; proclaim among the nations what He has done. For He who avenges blood remembers, He does not ignore the cries of the afflicted.
5- Ibid: 120,7
אני שלום וכי אדבר המה למלחמה
Too long have I lived among those who hate peace. I am for peace; but when I speak, they are for war.
6- Ibid 144,15
אשרי העם שככה לו אשרי העם שיקוק א-להיו:
Blessed is the people of whom this is true; blessed is the people whose God is the Lord.
Shabbat Shalom
Nachman Kahana
Copyright © 5784/2023 Nachman Kahana
Rav Kook on Parashat Vayechi: Yaakov Did Not Die
The Tanna Rebbi Yochanan made an astounding claim regarding Yaakov:
“Rebbi Yochanan stated, ‘Our father Yaakov did not die.’
Rebbi Nachman asked, ‘Was it in vain that they eulogized Jacob and embalmed his body and buried him?'
Rebbi Yochanan responded, ‘I derive this from a verse: ‘Fear not, Yaakov My servant... for I will save you from afar, and your offspring from the land of their captivity’ (Yirmiyahu 30:10). The verse likens Yaakov to his offspring: just as his offspring lives, so too, Jacob lives.'” (Ta’anit 5b)
What did Rebbi Yochanan mean that Yaakov did not die? If he intended to say that Yaakov’s soul is still alive, that requires no verse — the souls of all righteous people are eternal. And if he meant that Yaakov’s body did not die, several verses explicitly state that he died (for example, “Yosef’s brothers realized that their father had died” (Ber. 50:15)).
Tosafot explains that, when describing Yaakov’s death, the Torah only says that he “expired,” not that he “died” (Ber. 49:33). We need to examine the difference between these two verbs.
Also, why did Rebbi Yochanan make this claim of eternity only for Yaakov, and not for Avraham and Yitzchak?
Two Aspects of Death
When a person dies, two things occur. First, the bodily functions (breathing, pumping of the heart, and so on) cease. This is called geviya, expiring. The natural cessation of bodily functions is a sign of a virtuous, well-lived life, since an unhealthy and profligate lifestyle brings about an early demise of the body.
The second aspect of death concerns the soul. After the sin of Adam, death was decreed in order to allow the soul to purify itself from its contact with the body’s physical drives and desires. Death purges the soul of those sensual influences that distance one from true closeness to God. The aspect of death that cleanses the soul is called mitah.
Thus, Shlomo HaMelech wrote that “Love is strong as death” (Shir HaShirim 8:6). How is love like death? Just as death purifies the soul from the body’s physical wants, so too, a truly intense love for God will overwhelm any other form of desire.
Illustration image: ‘Jacob blessing the sons of Joseph’ (Jan Victors, 1650)
The Impact of Intermediate Actions
All actions that we perform during our lifetime make a deep impression on our souls. The soul is influenced not only by our ultimate goals but also by the intermediate actions we take to achieve those goals. Sometimes, these actions are themselves worthy means for attaining our goals, and their impact on the soul is a positive one.
At other times, a specific goal is achieved via means that contradict the overall objective. This is like scaffolding that is erected when building. The scaffolding is needed to aid in the construction, but is removed once the building is complete. So too, these temporary means will be canceled after the goal is attained, and their impure influence on the soul must be purged.
Yaakov’s Family was Complete
Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov are called the Avot (forefathers), since the main objective of their lives was to father a holy nation.
Avraham and Yitzchak’s efforts towards this goal included using means that needed to be relinquished once the objective is attained — i.e., they bore and raised Yishmael and Eisav. Even though these offspring contested the true goal of the Avot, they were needed in order to accomplish their overall aim. Therefore, the Torah uses the word mitahto describe Avraham and Yitzchak’s death. It was necessary to purge the influence of fathering and raising these non-Jewish nations on their souls, since this occupation conflicted with their soul’s inner mission.
But while the souls of Avraham and Yitzchak required the cleansing effect of mitah, Yaakov’s “bed was complete.” All of his children were included within the people of Israel. Yaakov did not need to occupy himself with any transitory means; all of his efforts were eternal, in line with God’s design for His world. Therefore the verse says, “For I, God, have not changed; and you, the children of Yaakov, are not consumed” (Malachi 3:6). The eternal nature of the Jewish people is particularly bound to Yaakov, the forefather who “did not die.”
In certain respects, Yaakov did die, but this was only in personal matters, due to the baseness of the physical world and its negative influence upon the human soul. That was not the true essence of Yaakov’s soul. When the Torah describes Yaakov’s passing, it does so in terms of his life’s goal, as the father of the Jewish people. The Torah does not use the word “death,” since there was no need to purge his soul of its ties to its worldly occupations.
This explains why we do not find in the Torah that Yaakov’s sons eulogized their father. Only the Egyptians did so — “A profound mourning for Egypt” (Ber. 50:11). Yaakov had assisted the Egyptians by bringing the years of famine to an early end. From the standpoint of the Egyptians, Yaakov had died, and the connection of his soul to these matters was severed. Therefore, the Egyptians had reason to mourn.
But Yaakov’s sons, who knew that Yaakov was still alive with them, had no need to eulogize their father.
(Gold from the Land of Israel pp. 95-98. Adapted from Midbar Shur, pp. 242-251 by Rav Chanan Morrison)
“Rebbi Yochanan stated, ‘Our father Yaakov did not die.’
Rebbi Nachman asked, ‘Was it in vain that they eulogized Jacob and embalmed his body and buried him?'
Rebbi Yochanan responded, ‘I derive this from a verse: ‘Fear not, Yaakov My servant... for I will save you from afar, and your offspring from the land of their captivity’ (Yirmiyahu 30:10). The verse likens Yaakov to his offspring: just as his offspring lives, so too, Jacob lives.'” (Ta’anit 5b)
What did Rebbi Yochanan mean that Yaakov did not die? If he intended to say that Yaakov’s soul is still alive, that requires no verse — the souls of all righteous people are eternal. And if he meant that Yaakov’s body did not die, several verses explicitly state that he died (for example, “Yosef’s brothers realized that their father had died” (Ber. 50:15)).
Tosafot explains that, when describing Yaakov’s death, the Torah only says that he “expired,” not that he “died” (Ber. 49:33). We need to examine the difference between these two verbs.
Also, why did Rebbi Yochanan make this claim of eternity only for Yaakov, and not for Avraham and Yitzchak?
Two Aspects of Death
When a person dies, two things occur. First, the bodily functions (breathing, pumping of the heart, and so on) cease. This is called geviya, expiring. The natural cessation of bodily functions is a sign of a virtuous, well-lived life, since an unhealthy and profligate lifestyle brings about an early demise of the body.
The second aspect of death concerns the soul. After the sin of Adam, death was decreed in order to allow the soul to purify itself from its contact with the body’s physical drives and desires. Death purges the soul of those sensual influences that distance one from true closeness to God. The aspect of death that cleanses the soul is called mitah.
Thus, Shlomo HaMelech wrote that “Love is strong as death” (Shir HaShirim 8:6). How is love like death? Just as death purifies the soul from the body’s physical wants, so too, a truly intense love for God will overwhelm any other form of desire.
Illustration image: ‘Jacob blessing the sons of Joseph’ (Jan Victors, 1650)
The Impact of Intermediate Actions
All actions that we perform during our lifetime make a deep impression on our souls. The soul is influenced not only by our ultimate goals but also by the intermediate actions we take to achieve those goals. Sometimes, these actions are themselves worthy means for attaining our goals, and their impact on the soul is a positive one.
At other times, a specific goal is achieved via means that contradict the overall objective. This is like scaffolding that is erected when building. The scaffolding is needed to aid in the construction, but is removed once the building is complete. So too, these temporary means will be canceled after the goal is attained, and their impure influence on the soul must be purged.
Yaakov’s Family was Complete
Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov are called the Avot (forefathers), since the main objective of their lives was to father a holy nation.
Avraham and Yitzchak’s efforts towards this goal included using means that needed to be relinquished once the objective is attained — i.e., they bore and raised Yishmael and Eisav. Even though these offspring contested the true goal of the Avot, they were needed in order to accomplish their overall aim. Therefore, the Torah uses the word mitahto describe Avraham and Yitzchak’s death. It was necessary to purge the influence of fathering and raising these non-Jewish nations on their souls, since this occupation conflicted with their soul’s inner mission.
But while the souls of Avraham and Yitzchak required the cleansing effect of mitah, Yaakov’s “bed was complete.” All of his children were included within the people of Israel. Yaakov did not need to occupy himself with any transitory means; all of his efforts were eternal, in line with God’s design for His world. Therefore the verse says, “For I, God, have not changed; and you, the children of Yaakov, are not consumed” (Malachi 3:6). The eternal nature of the Jewish people is particularly bound to Yaakov, the forefather who “did not die.”
In certain respects, Yaakov did die, but this was only in personal matters, due to the baseness of the physical world and its negative influence upon the human soul. That was not the true essence of Yaakov’s soul. When the Torah describes Yaakov’s passing, it does so in terms of his life’s goal, as the father of the Jewish people. The Torah does not use the word “death,” since there was no need to purge his soul of its ties to its worldly occupations.
This explains why we do not find in the Torah that Yaakov’s sons eulogized their father. Only the Egyptians did so — “A profound mourning for Egypt” (Ber. 50:11). Yaakov had assisted the Egyptians by bringing the years of famine to an early end. From the standpoint of the Egyptians, Yaakov had died, and the connection of his soul to these matters was severed. Therefore, the Egyptians had reason to mourn.
But Yaakov’s sons, who knew that Yaakov was still alive with them, had no need to eulogize their father.
(Gold from the Land of Israel pp. 95-98. Adapted from Midbar Shur, pp. 242-251 by Rav Chanan Morrison)
Future sight
by Rabbi Dov Berel Wein
The last seventeen years of the life of our father Yaakov are ones of apparent tranquility and comfort. Even though he is already in Egypt and is aware that this is the beginning of the long and brutal exile, foreseen by his grandfather Avraham in his vision of the covenant that will bind the Jewish people to its creator and destiny, he nevertheless enjoys the temporary comfort, care and familial tranquility that now surrounds him.
Yaakov wished to have such a life, decades earlier. In the words of Rashi, he wanted to dwell with a sense of security and well-being – before the situation with Yosef and his brothers erupted and subjected him and them the trauma that is recorded for us in the previous Torah chapters. Yet, it is obvious from the tone and wordings of his final blessings to his children, that Yaakov is looking far ahead, well past Egyptian exile and even towards the end of days.
Rashi points out that the Shechina had departed from Yaakov during his years of grief over the disappearance of his beloved son Yosef. When one is tragically affected by grief and sadness, it is almost impossible to have a vision or a sense of the future and better times.
The rabbis, in their sensitive wisdom, cautioned against providing comfort when a wound is open and the pain fresh and severe. There is little room for the Shechina to enter a person whose heart is been broken and is in an emotional state of grief and depression. But now when his family is restored and his spirits have been raised, he is once again blessed with farsighted vision and words of prophecy and eternity.
Judaism and the Jewish people always look toward the future even when their current circumstances are bitter and sad. Yaakov himself appraised it when he said he would receive his reward tomorrow. Our reward is always tomorrow, for we realize that temporary situations, both good and better, are transitory and in the long run of human existence, the experience of one generation or even a few generations may not be as vital and important as we think them to be.
Looking back at the 18th and 19th centuries, I am struck by the fact that, with the exception of study, all of the other ideas and social streams of those times have practically disappeared from Jewish life. There are no more enlightened Jews – only Jews with different degrees of observance present in their lives. The idols that once were worshipped have either been smashed by events of history or have collapsed of their own ineptitude and distortion.
It is often difficult to judge present circumstances because we ourselves are only temporary residents here. We tend to give greater weight to events which again, in the long run of history, may not count for much.
Our father Yaakov looks forward to the future and sees the sojourn of the Jewish people in Egypt, important and necessary as it may have been, to be only a blip on the radar screen of the eternity of Israel and the Jewish faith.
Yaakov wished to have such a life, decades earlier. In the words of Rashi, he wanted to dwell with a sense of security and well-being – before the situation with Yosef and his brothers erupted and subjected him and them the trauma that is recorded for us in the previous Torah chapters. Yet, it is obvious from the tone and wordings of his final blessings to his children, that Yaakov is looking far ahead, well past Egyptian exile and even towards the end of days.
Rashi points out that the Shechina had departed from Yaakov during his years of grief over the disappearance of his beloved son Yosef. When one is tragically affected by grief and sadness, it is almost impossible to have a vision or a sense of the future and better times.
The rabbis, in their sensitive wisdom, cautioned against providing comfort when a wound is open and the pain fresh and severe. There is little room for the Shechina to enter a person whose heart is been broken and is in an emotional state of grief and depression. But now when his family is restored and his spirits have been raised, he is once again blessed with farsighted vision and words of prophecy and eternity.
Judaism and the Jewish people always look toward the future even when their current circumstances are bitter and sad. Yaakov himself appraised it when he said he would receive his reward tomorrow. Our reward is always tomorrow, for we realize that temporary situations, both good and better, are transitory and in the long run of human existence, the experience of one generation or even a few generations may not be as vital and important as we think them to be.
Looking back at the 18th and 19th centuries, I am struck by the fact that, with the exception of study, all of the other ideas and social streams of those times have practically disappeared from Jewish life. There are no more enlightened Jews – only Jews with different degrees of observance present in their lives. The idols that once were worshipped have either been smashed by events of history or have collapsed of their own ineptitude and distortion.
It is often difficult to judge present circumstances because we ourselves are only temporary residents here. We tend to give greater weight to events which again, in the long run of history, may not count for much.
Our father Yaakov looks forward to the future and sees the sojourn of the Jewish people in Egypt, important and necessary as it may have been, to be only a blip on the radar screen of the eternity of Israel and the Jewish faith.
Biden Must Not "Go Wobbly" on Israel
by Con Coughlin
- Apart from dispatching several aircraft carrier battle groups and maintaining arms supplies to Israel, the US has also provided important diplomatic cover for Israel at the United Nations in New York, frustrating numerous attempts by the body to impose a ceasefire on Israel.
- [T]he IDF has been astounded at the scale of the underground terrorist infrastructure that Hamas has constructed, and is determined to make sure the entire network, which was used to deadly effect to carry out the October 7 attacks, is destroyed before it considers any reduction in military activity.
- It is vital, therefore, that the Biden administration fully comprehends that, from Israel's perspective, destroying Hamas is nothing less than an existential struggle, one that is vital to the future survival, security and prosperity of the Jewish state and in fact the entire region.
- With the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) making good progress in their attempts to destroy the Islamist Hamas terrorist organisation, this is not the moment for the Biden administration to soften its support for Israel.
- On the contrary, with the IDF exposing the true extent of Hamas's underground terrorist infrastructure in Gaza, with many of the terrorists' key command and control systems located either within or beneath hospitals, schools and mosques, Washington needs to give Israel the backing it needs to finish its declared objective of wiping Hamas from the face of the earth.
Continue Reading Article
Does Biden Want Israel to Lose the War?
by Robert Williams
Pictured: US President Joe Biden meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Tel Aviv, Israel on October 18, 2023. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
US President Joe Biden has gone out of his way -- and it is enormously appreciated! -- to stand by America's ally Israel, defending itself from being further attacked by Hamas and other Iranian proxy groups in the region. The Biden administration has sent warships to the region, materiel to counter the more than 9,500 rockets and missiles fired at Israel since October 7, aimed at the cities of a country roughly the size of New Jersey. It is bewildering that he has come under so much unjust criticism for supporting a country that is basically also fighting for the US and the Free World against a terrorist group, Hamas, that apparently sees nothing wrong with burning babies alive, beheading them, raping and torturing men, women and children and then murdering them.
Continue Reading Article
- Have any demands been made on Hamas's patrons, Iran and Qatar, to tell their Hamas beneficiaries to stop? Have any demands been made on them to do anything? Why is only the victim of the October 7 invasion being asked to make concessions, and not the aggressor?
- "I will not replace Hamastan with Fatahstan.... According to a poll that was carried out a few days ago, 82% of the Palestinian population in Judea and Samaria justifies the horrific massacre of Oct. 7." — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
- Unfortunately, the October 7 massacre proved beyond a doubt that both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority actually mean it when they say that they want to annihilate Israel. According to a November 14 poll by the Arab World for Research and Development, 75% of the Palestinians polled support the October 7 massacre and 74.7% support the creation of a single Palestinian state "from the river to the sea"... This is what the Biden administration wants to reward with a Palestinian state?
- Trade tangible land in Israel for intangible promises from Lebanon -- protected by a military that might wilt at the first shot?
- Perhaps Biden could please reconsider?
Pictured: US President Joe Biden meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Tel Aviv, Israel on October 18, 2023. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
US President Joe Biden has gone out of his way -- and it is enormously appreciated! -- to stand by America's ally Israel, defending itself from being further attacked by Hamas and other Iranian proxy groups in the region. The Biden administration has sent warships to the region, materiel to counter the more than 9,500 rockets and missiles fired at Israel since October 7, aimed at the cities of a country roughly the size of New Jersey. It is bewildering that he has come under so much unjust criticism for supporting a country that is basically also fighting for the US and the Free World against a terrorist group, Hamas, that apparently sees nothing wrong with burning babies alive, beheading them, raping and torturing men, women and children and then murdering them.
Continue Reading Article
The Biden Administration, Palestinians and Inconvenient Truths
by Bassam Tawil
As US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan was in the Middle East last week trying to restrain Israel in its war against the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group and to "revamp" the Palestinian Authority (PA), a public opinion poll again illustrated that, unlike the Biden administration, most Palestinians do not trust the PA and prefer Hamas's terrorism to a peaceful settlement with Israel. Pictured: Sullivan speaks at a White House news briefing on December 4, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
As US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan was in the Middle East last week trying to restrain Israel in its war against the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group and to "revamp" the Palestinian Authority (PA), a public opinion poll again illustrated how the Biden administration continues to intentionally ignore the reality of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The results of the poll also showed that, unlike the Biden administration, most Palestinians do not trust the PA and prefer Hamas's terrorism to a peaceful settlement with Israel.
Sullivan was reportedly in the Middle East for two reasons: to pressure Israel to scale down its military operations against Hamas, and to discuss the possibility of having the Palestinian Authority govern the Gaza Strip the day after the current war ends.
Continue Reading Article
- The results of the poll also showed that, unlike the Biden administration, most Palestinians do not trust the Palestinian Authority and prefer Hamas's terrorism to a peaceful settlement with Israel.
- The PA might say that it is ready to change, but this will be in order to deceive the Biden administration and the rest of the international community into continuing to pour billions of dollars on Abbas and his cohorts...
- Despite whatever commitments might be signed in blood, in the eyes of Palestinian leaders, they are just Western fantasies. After the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993 and 1995 , then PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat assured his people -- in Arabic -- that Oslo was no more binding than the Treaty of Al-Hudaibiyya, when the Islamic prophet Mohammad agreed not to attack for ten years, then, with his opponents safely neutralized, he assembled an army and attacked after two years.
- [S]upport for Abbas and his ruling Fatah faction has dropped significantly. The same is true for trust in the Palestinian Authority as a whole, as demand for its dissolution has risen to nearly 60%, the highest percentage ever recorded in PSR polls. Demand for Abbas's resignation has increased to around 90%... 63% are now in favor of "armed struggle".
- According to the poll, most Palestinians justify Hamas's October 7 massacre, including murder, decapitation, rape and burning people alive. These are the same people that the Biden administration wants to give a state next to Israel.
- If new presidential elections were held today with only two candidates, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh would receive 78% of the vote as opposed to 16% for Abbas. The poll also showed that 54% of Palestinians think that Hamas is the most deserving of representing and leading the Palestinian people today....
- It is enough for Biden administration officials to look at the results of the poll of PSR and talk to ordinary Palestinians to understand that the White House's policies, such as promoting the creation of an Iran-sponsored Palestinian terror state, are not wanted by anyone but Iran and them.
As US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan was in the Middle East last week trying to restrain Israel in its war against the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group and to "revamp" the Palestinian Authority (PA), a public opinion poll again illustrated that, unlike the Biden administration, most Palestinians do not trust the PA and prefer Hamas's terrorism to a peaceful settlement with Israel. Pictured: Sullivan speaks at a White House news briefing on December 4, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
As US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan was in the Middle East last week trying to restrain Israel in its war against the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group and to "revamp" the Palestinian Authority (PA), a public opinion poll again illustrated how the Biden administration continues to intentionally ignore the reality of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The results of the poll also showed that, unlike the Biden administration, most Palestinians do not trust the PA and prefer Hamas's terrorism to a peaceful settlement with Israel.
Sullivan was reportedly in the Middle East for two reasons: to pressure Israel to scale down its military operations against Hamas, and to discuss the possibility of having the Palestinian Authority govern the Gaza Strip the day after the current war ends.
Continue Reading Article
Tuesday, December 26, 2023
Of Rivers and Seas
by Rabbi Steven Pruzansky
(First published at Israelnationalnews.com)
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” chant myriads of Jew haters and their airheaded acolytes in academia. It is meant to be offensive, provocative, and intimidating, and is a not-so-subtle call for the genocide of the Jews of Israel. It has become a staple at rallies and on college campuses, where analogous calls for ethnic cleansing anywhere else in the world but Israel and to any other ethnic group but Jews would be met with swift retribution. By the modern standards of the loony left, this is protected free speech.
There are those who argue that this is the case (although campus rules are stricter and the First Amendment does not alow for threatening speech) but “free” has never been synonymous with “intelligent,” and this slogan is one of the dumbest imaginable. If those who scream it ever came within a country mile of understanding the full implications of what they were saying, they would halt immediately, apologize profusely, burst out laughing, or become Zionists.
Because these protesters are more known for their blind hatred and ferocious anti-Jewish venom than they are for their perspicacity, decency, or common sense, they will pay no mind to the absurdities they continue to squeal.
Consider:
1) If Palestine would be indeed “free” if Jews in Israel were exterminated or expelled, it would become the only free Arab, Muslim country in the Middle East. This region has a sorry – i.e., deadly – history and Arabs have an unblemished record of being incapable of sustaining any type of democracy or protecting the freedoms of any of its citizens. We must therefore believe, as the chant goes, that something breathtaking and novel will occur in the Arab polity that this land – “from the river to the sea” – will achieve something no Arab state has achieved: freedom.
2) There were (are) two areas “from the river to the sea” that are controlled by Arab Muslims – the territory under the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority (our Judea and Samaria) and the shrinking territory under the jurisdiction of Hamas. Neither of those areas are “free” by any reasonable definition of the term. No freedoms are protected – not press, not movement, not commerce, not speech, not religion, not assembly. Women are routinely subjected to “honor” killings by their loving relatives. The death penalty is arbitrarily and summarily applied. If “Palestine” were to be given over to the Palestinian Arabs, and is indeed to be free, it will necessitate the elimination of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.
3) The only time in all of history that “Palestine” has ever been “free” is when it has been controlled by Israel, meaning, now. Palestine was never a country or a nation. It was a geographic entity formerly called Judea, spawned by the Romans, and ruled over by Christians, Byzantines, Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans, and the British. In the more than nineteen centuries since the destruction of the Second Temple and the exile of most but certainly not all Jews (there has always been a remnant of Jews in the land of Israel), the territory of Palestine has only tasted freedom in one era. That is from 1948 until today – and only those areas under Israel’s control. All of which makes the proper retort to “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” that “it already is! And it will only be free if it exists under its classic name, Israel, not under the name the Roman interlopers gave it. And it will only be free as long as it is governed by Jews.
4) If the pusillanimous protesters want to get technical, historic Palestine includes land on both sides of the Jordan River. That was the original British Mandate over this land in the aftermath of its conquest during World War I. The eastern part of the territory called Palestine was unilaterally severed by the British from the Jewish homeland in 1921 by Winston Churchill, who later boasted that he created Transjordan “with the stroke of a pen one Sunday afternoon in Cairo.” Perhaps that is why they mention “the river,” because though Jordan is part of historic Palestine, the lack of freedom for its citizens troubles none of the chanters, if only because the Jews do not administer that country.
In fact, the lack of freedom anywhere else in the Middle East or the world, for that matter, is of no interest. It is then not freedom that concerns them, but Jewish sovereignty. For historic Palestine to be “free,” Jordan would have to be displaced as well. But then they would need a new slogan. "From Iraq to the sea...?"
The chant is certainly insincere, but it is also fraudulent to the core. Israel is the only bastion of freedom in the entire Middle East, the only country where the rights of citizens and residents are protected. That is one good reason Israeli Arabs, for all their conflicted identity, prefer living in Israel with the Jewish Zionists rather than moving to the territory controlled by the PA or by Hamas and living under Arab Muslim rule. This is born out not only by repeated polling – but by the votes with their feet. They would rather be in Israel than anywhere else. No Israeli Arab leaves his home in Nazareth to go live in Jenin.
Indeed, it is instructive that this chant has not made its way to Israel – anywhere in Israel, from the river to the sea. The Israeli Arabs know firsthand where they find freedom and where they will find oppression, brutality, and hatred. They choose to live as a minority in freedom with the Jews than in despotism with their fellow Arabs.
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is a poor reflection on the chanters’ morality and intelligence. As has been demonstrated, most of them cannot even name the river and the sea they are yelping about. All it has going for it is a rhyme, fueled by an intense hatred of Jews.
Our response should be a better rhyme, one created by Ribonut Achshav, the Israeli Sovereignty movement: “From the river to the sea, Israeli sovereignty.” It rhymes perfectly. It has the additional bonus of being cogent, coherent, moral, and Jewish.
We should get used to it, because when we do, the world will get used to it as well.
(First published at Israelnationalnews.com)
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” chant myriads of Jew haters and their airheaded acolytes in academia. It is meant to be offensive, provocative, and intimidating, and is a not-so-subtle call for the genocide of the Jews of Israel. It has become a staple at rallies and on college campuses, where analogous calls for ethnic cleansing anywhere else in the world but Israel and to any other ethnic group but Jews would be met with swift retribution. By the modern standards of the loony left, this is protected free speech.
There are those who argue that this is the case (although campus rules are stricter and the First Amendment does not alow for threatening speech) but “free” has never been synonymous with “intelligent,” and this slogan is one of the dumbest imaginable. If those who scream it ever came within a country mile of understanding the full implications of what they were saying, they would halt immediately, apologize profusely, burst out laughing, or become Zionists.
Because these protesters are more known for their blind hatred and ferocious anti-Jewish venom than they are for their perspicacity, decency, or common sense, they will pay no mind to the absurdities they continue to squeal.
Consider:
1) If Palestine would be indeed “free” if Jews in Israel were exterminated or expelled, it would become the only free Arab, Muslim country in the Middle East. This region has a sorry – i.e., deadly – history and Arabs have an unblemished record of being incapable of sustaining any type of democracy or protecting the freedoms of any of its citizens. We must therefore believe, as the chant goes, that something breathtaking and novel will occur in the Arab polity that this land – “from the river to the sea” – will achieve something no Arab state has achieved: freedom.
2) There were (are) two areas “from the river to the sea” that are controlled by Arab Muslims – the territory under the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority (our Judea and Samaria) and the shrinking territory under the jurisdiction of Hamas. Neither of those areas are “free” by any reasonable definition of the term. No freedoms are protected – not press, not movement, not commerce, not speech, not religion, not assembly. Women are routinely subjected to “honor” killings by their loving relatives. The death penalty is arbitrarily and summarily applied. If “Palestine” were to be given over to the Palestinian Arabs, and is indeed to be free, it will necessitate the elimination of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.
3) The only time in all of history that “Palestine” has ever been “free” is when it has been controlled by Israel, meaning, now. Palestine was never a country or a nation. It was a geographic entity formerly called Judea, spawned by the Romans, and ruled over by Christians, Byzantines, Muslims, Crusaders, Ottomans, and the British. In the more than nineteen centuries since the destruction of the Second Temple and the exile of most but certainly not all Jews (there has always been a remnant of Jews in the land of Israel), the territory of Palestine has only tasted freedom in one era. That is from 1948 until today – and only those areas under Israel’s control. All of which makes the proper retort to “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” that “it already is! And it will only be free if it exists under its classic name, Israel, not under the name the Roman interlopers gave it. And it will only be free as long as it is governed by Jews.
4) If the pusillanimous protesters want to get technical, historic Palestine includes land on both sides of the Jordan River. That was the original British Mandate over this land in the aftermath of its conquest during World War I. The eastern part of the territory called Palestine was unilaterally severed by the British from the Jewish homeland in 1921 by Winston Churchill, who later boasted that he created Transjordan “with the stroke of a pen one Sunday afternoon in Cairo.” Perhaps that is why they mention “the river,” because though Jordan is part of historic Palestine, the lack of freedom for its citizens troubles none of the chanters, if only because the Jews do not administer that country.
In fact, the lack of freedom anywhere else in the Middle East or the world, for that matter, is of no interest. It is then not freedom that concerns them, but Jewish sovereignty. For historic Palestine to be “free,” Jordan would have to be displaced as well. But then they would need a new slogan. "From Iraq to the sea...?"
The chant is certainly insincere, but it is also fraudulent to the core. Israel is the only bastion of freedom in the entire Middle East, the only country where the rights of citizens and residents are protected. That is one good reason Israeli Arabs, for all their conflicted identity, prefer living in Israel with the Jewish Zionists rather than moving to the territory controlled by the PA or by Hamas and living under Arab Muslim rule. This is born out not only by repeated polling – but by the votes with their feet. They would rather be in Israel than anywhere else. No Israeli Arab leaves his home in Nazareth to go live in Jenin.
Indeed, it is instructive that this chant has not made its way to Israel – anywhere in Israel, from the river to the sea. The Israeli Arabs know firsthand where they find freedom and where they will find oppression, brutality, and hatred. They choose to live as a minority in freedom with the Jews than in despotism with their fellow Arabs.
“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is a poor reflection on the chanters’ morality and intelligence. As has been demonstrated, most of them cannot even name the river and the sea they are yelping about. All it has going for it is a rhyme, fueled by an intense hatred of Jews.
Our response should be a better rhyme, one created by Ribonut Achshav, the Israeli Sovereignty movement: “From the river to the sea, Israeli sovereignty.” It rhymes perfectly. It has the additional bonus of being cogent, coherent, moral, and Jewish.
We should get used to it, because when we do, the world will get used to it as well.
Rav Kook's Ein Ayah: Quarreling With Evil People and Completing the Whole and the Individual
Quarreling With Evil People
(based on Ein Ayah, Berachot 1:84)
Gemara: Rabbi Yochanan said in the name of Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai: “It is permitted to quarrel with evil people in this world, as the pasuk says: ‘Those who leave Torah will praise an evil person, and those who keep Torah will quarrel with them’ (Mishlei 28:4).”
Ein Ayah: The prohibition to quarrel would have been because quarreling arouses anger, which is an improper acquisition in the realm of one’s character. On the other hand, hatred of evil that quarreling with evil people develops is correct in and of itself, and it is a far-reaching moral/ intellectual acquisition. Therefore, it is better to acquire the far-reaching intellectual level of hating evil, even though it heightens one’s power of anger, which is more limited in scope.
Completing the Whole and the Individual
(based on Ein Ayah, Berachot 1:89)
Gemara: About whoever is involved in Torah and gemilut chasadim (kindness) and prays with the community, Hashem says: “It is as if he redeemed Me and My sons from among the nations.”
Ein Ayah: There is a matter of self-completion by means of attaining knowledge of the truth and a matter of completing a counterpart by acts of kindness. However, neither suffices until he realizes that a person will not reach his final goal unless he attaches himself to society as a whole.
It is true that one who is involved in matters of the community should realize that it is impossible for the whole to be successful without its individual components being successful. It is impossible for the whole to be successful by means of the individuals improving each other unless each one strives also for personal shleimut (completeness).
The unity to which we refer is the foundation of Israel. We refer to, “who is like Your nation, Israel, one nation…” (from Mincha of Shabbat), which stems from the fact that Hashem is one. The nations of the world are unable to recognize this unity, how all this pleasant unity is nothing but the shleimut of the whole, which is worthy to pursue. When the nations form communities of different types, it is because the individual cannot succeed unless the community is able to band together to overcome possible obstacles. However, the goal of each one is his personal welfare…
Alas, as long as, in our great sins, we have not completed the shleimut of this unity, we are entrenched in exile. As such, the individual shleimut does not reach its desired levels and as a result the shleimut of the whole is also lacking.
This is why the gemara discusses one who is involved in Torah, to truly complete himself, and in gemilut chasadim, to complete his counterpart, and prays with the community, to impress upon himself that the goal of the personal shleimut is only for the shleimut of the whole. About such a person Hashem says: “I consider it as if he redeemed Me,” as the shleimut of the whole itself is related to His Blessed Name. It is also as if he redeemed “My sons,” as the individual shleimut flows from the pure source of the shleimut of the whole on its lofty level. This happens when the individual makes his priority just to see how the whole is successful and can stand on a high level. The concept of divinity among the nations of the world cannot be more than to help them reach individual shleimut. The idea of a shleimut of the whole can exist only by means of a central nation that will unite all of the world’s inhabitants in the light of knowledge of Hashem. This is the unique quality of Israel. By binding together all of the good deeds of the individuals, the general goal will be reached when the individual sets his heart on that goal.
(based on Ein Ayah, Berachot 1:84)
Gemara: Rabbi Yochanan said in the name of Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai: “It is permitted to quarrel with evil people in this world, as the pasuk says: ‘Those who leave Torah will praise an evil person, and those who keep Torah will quarrel with them’ (Mishlei 28:4).”
Ein Ayah: The prohibition to quarrel would have been because quarreling arouses anger, which is an improper acquisition in the realm of one’s character. On the other hand, hatred of evil that quarreling with evil people develops is correct in and of itself, and it is a far-reaching moral/ intellectual acquisition. Therefore, it is better to acquire the far-reaching intellectual level of hating evil, even though it heightens one’s power of anger, which is more limited in scope.
Completing the Whole and the Individual
(based on Ein Ayah, Berachot 1:89)
Gemara: About whoever is involved in Torah and gemilut chasadim (kindness) and prays with the community, Hashem says: “It is as if he redeemed Me and My sons from among the nations.”
Ein Ayah: There is a matter of self-completion by means of attaining knowledge of the truth and a matter of completing a counterpart by acts of kindness. However, neither suffices until he realizes that a person will not reach his final goal unless he attaches himself to society as a whole.
It is true that one who is involved in matters of the community should realize that it is impossible for the whole to be successful without its individual components being successful. It is impossible for the whole to be successful by means of the individuals improving each other unless each one strives also for personal shleimut (completeness).
The unity to which we refer is the foundation of Israel. We refer to, “who is like Your nation, Israel, one nation…” (from Mincha of Shabbat), which stems from the fact that Hashem is one. The nations of the world are unable to recognize this unity, how all this pleasant unity is nothing but the shleimut of the whole, which is worthy to pursue. When the nations form communities of different types, it is because the individual cannot succeed unless the community is able to band together to overcome possible obstacles. However, the goal of each one is his personal welfare…
Alas, as long as, in our great sins, we have not completed the shleimut of this unity, we are entrenched in exile. As such, the individual shleimut does not reach its desired levels and as a result the shleimut of the whole is also lacking.
This is why the gemara discusses one who is involved in Torah, to truly complete himself, and in gemilut chasadim, to complete his counterpart, and prays with the community, to impress upon himself that the goal of the personal shleimut is only for the shleimut of the whole. About such a person Hashem says: “I consider it as if he redeemed Me,” as the shleimut of the whole itself is related to His Blessed Name. It is also as if he redeemed “My sons,” as the individual shleimut flows from the pure source of the shleimut of the whole on its lofty level. This happens when the individual makes his priority just to see how the whole is successful and can stand on a high level. The concept of divinity among the nations of the world cannot be more than to help them reach individual shleimut. The idea of a shleimut of the whole can exist only by means of a central nation that will unite all of the world’s inhabitants in the light of knowledge of Hashem. This is the unique quality of Israel. By binding together all of the good deeds of the individuals, the general goal will be reached when the individual sets his heart on that goal.
He Crossed His Hands
by HaRav Mordechai Greenberg
Nasi HaYeshiva, Kerem B'Yavneh
When Yaakov blessed his grandchildren, Ephraim and Menashe, it says, "Yisrael extended his right hand and laid it on Ephraim’s head, though he was the younger, and his left hand on Menashe’s head. He crossed his hands, because Menashe was the firstborn.” (Bereisheet 48:14) An obvious question arises here. Since by crossing his hands Yaakov negated the natural order, it should have said, “He crossed his hands, even though Menashe was the firstborn.”
Furthermore, the Netziv comments that it would have been more appropriate for Yaakov to switch the way the two lads stood, to place Ephraim opposite his right hand, and Menashe on his left side. Why did he leave them in position, and cross his hands instead?
The Netziv explains that Yaakov did not intend to negate Menashe’s status entirely, since he was the firstborn. Rather, Menashe’s primacy is expressed mainly in the material realm, whereas Ephraim excelled in the spiritual and Torah realm. Therefore, in the arrangement of the camps in the desert, which was patterned after the arrangement of the heavenly chariot, Ephraim came before Menashe, since he leads in the spiritual realm.
The hand serves the head, and belongs to the spiritual, lofty, aspect of man. In contrast, the foot serves the body, and acts unconsciously, instinctively. Therefore, Chazal say, “A son is the leg of his father.” The father’s qualities are expressed in the son as the father’s leg, i.e., in a natural manner without conscious thought.
Yaakov did not want to change the way in which the two lads stood, since then it would seem that Menashe's status of firstborn was entirely revoked. Instead, he stood them so that Menashe was opposite Yaakov’s right leg, and Ephraim was opposite the left leg, since this is their standing in the natural realm. Menashe has the primacy in the physical world, corresponding to the foot, whereas Ephraim was opposite Yaakov’s right hand, since he has the primacy in the spiritual world. Therefore Yaakov crossed his hands, placing his right hand on Ephraim's head and his left hand on Menashe’s, instead of switching the way they stood – “because Menashe is the firstborn.”
With this he also explains the change in the order of the census in the desert. In the beginning of Sefer Bamidbar, Ephraim appears first, whereas at the end of Bamidbar, in the second count, Menashe is first. This is because in the desert Israel lived in a miraculous fashion, and there Ephraim leads. However, as they are about to enter the Land of Israel, the manner of Divine guidance changed; the miracles ceased, and everything occurred in a natural manner. There, Menashe leads.
The Netziv correctly points out a slight variation in Parashat Bamidbar (2:18-20): “The banner of the camp of Ephraim according to their legions shall be to the west ... Upon him is the tribe of Menashe.” On the other hand, regarding the other tribes it says, “Those encamping near him are...” The latter phrase has the connotation of a little one who is dependent on the great one, so that the entire surrounding camp leans on him, on the center. On the other hand, the expression, “Upon him,” has the opposite connotation, that the second one is above, and looks after the little ones. Thus, "Upon him is the tribe of Menashe," means that Menashe is the greater one and worries about the needs of the little one, Ephraim. Even though Ephraim is the head of the camp, still, in regards to all that pertains to the natural course, Menashe is the leader, and he takes care of Ephraim.
Nasi HaYeshiva, Kerem B'Yavneh
When Yaakov blessed his grandchildren, Ephraim and Menashe, it says, "Yisrael extended his right hand and laid it on Ephraim’s head, though he was the younger, and his left hand on Menashe’s head. He crossed his hands, because Menashe was the firstborn.” (Bereisheet 48:14) An obvious question arises here. Since by crossing his hands Yaakov negated the natural order, it should have said, “He crossed his hands, even though Menashe was the firstborn.”
Furthermore, the Netziv comments that it would have been more appropriate for Yaakov to switch the way the two lads stood, to place Ephraim opposite his right hand, and Menashe on his left side. Why did he leave them in position, and cross his hands instead?
The Netziv explains that Yaakov did not intend to negate Menashe’s status entirely, since he was the firstborn. Rather, Menashe’s primacy is expressed mainly in the material realm, whereas Ephraim excelled in the spiritual and Torah realm. Therefore, in the arrangement of the camps in the desert, which was patterned after the arrangement of the heavenly chariot, Ephraim came before Menashe, since he leads in the spiritual realm.
The hand serves the head, and belongs to the spiritual, lofty, aspect of man. In contrast, the foot serves the body, and acts unconsciously, instinctively. Therefore, Chazal say, “A son is the leg of his father.” The father’s qualities are expressed in the son as the father’s leg, i.e., in a natural manner without conscious thought.
Yaakov did not want to change the way in which the two lads stood, since then it would seem that Menashe's status of firstborn was entirely revoked. Instead, he stood them so that Menashe was opposite Yaakov’s right leg, and Ephraim was opposite the left leg, since this is their standing in the natural realm. Menashe has the primacy in the physical world, corresponding to the foot, whereas Ephraim was opposite Yaakov’s right hand, since he has the primacy in the spiritual world. Therefore Yaakov crossed his hands, placing his right hand on Ephraim's head and his left hand on Menashe’s, instead of switching the way they stood – “because Menashe is the firstborn.”
With this he also explains the change in the order of the census in the desert. In the beginning of Sefer Bamidbar, Ephraim appears first, whereas at the end of Bamidbar, in the second count, Menashe is first. This is because in the desert Israel lived in a miraculous fashion, and there Ephraim leads. However, as they are about to enter the Land of Israel, the manner of Divine guidance changed; the miracles ceased, and everything occurred in a natural manner. There, Menashe leads.
The Netziv correctly points out a slight variation in Parashat Bamidbar (2:18-20): “The banner of the camp of Ephraim according to their legions shall be to the west ... Upon him is the tribe of Menashe.” On the other hand, regarding the other tribes it says, “Those encamping near him are...” The latter phrase has the connotation of a little one who is dependent on the great one, so that the entire surrounding camp leans on him, on the center. On the other hand, the expression, “Upon him,” has the opposite connotation, that the second one is above, and looks after the little ones. Thus, "Upon him is the tribe of Menashe," means that Menashe is the greater one and worries about the needs of the little one, Ephraim. Even though Ephraim is the head of the camp, still, in regards to all that pertains to the natural course, Menashe is the leader, and he takes care of Ephraim.
How UNWRA Grooms Terrorists
by Bassam Tawil
More than 50% of UNRWA's annual budget of $1.6 billion is dedicated to funding Palestinian schools. These schools have been fostering war-mongering hatred against Israel, and against Jews in general, while predictably churning out their final product: terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. Pictured: A still shot from the documentary film "Camp Jihad," featuring a summer camp in Gaza sponsored and funded by UNWRA. (Image source: Nahum Bedein Center for Near East Policy Research)
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) was originally a small agency mandated to provide basic humanitarian relief for Palestinians, including a vote for renewal every three years. Seventy-three years and four generations later, and with more than 30,000 employees and an annual budget of more than $1 billion, it has astonishingly become one of the largest UN agencies.
In the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, UNWRA has, in fact, long been operating as the de facto government. By providing the residents of the Gaza Strip with various services, UNRWA exempted Hamas from its responsibilities as the governing body, such as creating a working economy that would pay for education and healthcare, and allowed it, instead, to invest resources in building tunnels and manufacturing weapons. If UNRWA were not there, Hamas would have been forced to fill the vacuum and, for example, build hospitals and schools and find solutions to economic hardship, including unemployment and poverty.
Continue Reading Article
- By providing the residents of the Gaza Strip with various services, UNRWA exempted Hamas from its responsibilities as the governing body, such as creating a working economy that would pay for education and healthcare, and allowed it, instead, to invest resources in building tunnels and manufacturing weapons.
- "They [UNRWA] teach us that the Al-Aqsa Mosque belongs to us [Muslims], that Palestine belongs to us," said Atif Sharha, a student at an UNRWA school.
- "Yes, they teach us that the Zionists are our enemy," said Nur Taha, a third-year student from Kalandia. "We should carry out an [terror] operation against them [Zionists]."
- "The Palestinian matriculation exams [at UNRWA] have become a finishing school in extremism. It is as if the Palestinian Authority is cramming as much hate into the tests as possible, to ensure the twelve previous years of indoctrination stay with them into adulthood." — Marcus Sheff, CEO at the Institute for Cultural Peace and Tolerance in School Education, i24news.tv, July 23, 2023.
- Despite years of considerable condemnation of the textbooks, newly produced editions, approved by UNRWA, are exponentially worse....
- Whatever hopes that anyone may have held for the trustworthiness of UNRWA have long expired, and were arguably misplaced at the outset. UNRWA, in its current state, has proven itself irremediably defective, unworkable and yet another massive stain on the already scandalously stained UN.
- It is high time for the international community and those who actually want a better future for the Palestinians to liquidate UNRWA and take actions that truly help the Palestinians move forward to a golden life.
More than 50% of UNRWA's annual budget of $1.6 billion is dedicated to funding Palestinian schools. These schools have been fostering war-mongering hatred against Israel, and against Jews in general, while predictably churning out their final product: terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. Pictured: A still shot from the documentary film "Camp Jihad," featuring a summer camp in Gaza sponsored and funded by UNWRA. (Image source: Nahum Bedein Center for Near East Policy Research)
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) was originally a small agency mandated to provide basic humanitarian relief for Palestinians, including a vote for renewal every three years. Seventy-three years and four generations later, and with more than 30,000 employees and an annual budget of more than $1 billion, it has astonishingly become one of the largest UN agencies.
In the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, UNWRA has, in fact, long been operating as the de facto government. By providing the residents of the Gaza Strip with various services, UNRWA exempted Hamas from its responsibilities as the governing body, such as creating a working economy that would pay for education and healthcare, and allowed it, instead, to invest resources in building tunnels and manufacturing weapons. If UNRWA were not there, Hamas would have been forced to fill the vacuum and, for example, build hospitals and schools and find solutions to economic hardship, including unemployment and poverty.
Continue Reading Article
Friday, December 22, 2023
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: Responding to Inquiries About Organizational Affairs
#180
Date and Place: 10 Tevet 5669 (1909), Yafo
Recipient: Rav Yonasan Binyamin Halevi Horowitz. Rav Horowitz was a Slovakian rabbi, who made aliya a few years prior to this letter. As a representative of Agudas Yisroel in Israel, which, among other things, had him supervise dispensing of funds for various projects, he had connection with Rav Kook and many other rabbis. Years later, he would take part and chronicle the famous tour of moshavot that Rav Kook and Rav Zonnenfeld led.
Body: I received your important letters. I am very happy about the good beginnings that have taken place in Petach Tikva (referring to the establishment of a certain religious school there, in which the two of them were involved, each in his own way). Even though there is still a need to strengthen the situation, we should have trust that Hashem will help and allow us to finish that which we began.
Regarding your brother-in-law, my opinion is that in any place that we find even an opening the width of a needle’s eye, through which we can positively impact the belief and fear of Hashem in the hearts of our children, wherever they are, we cannot stand idly by. Therefore, I wholeheartedly agree that your brother-in-law accept the position. May we receive trustworthy young men even from that far-flung place, with Hashem’s help.
Regarding the letter of the leading rabbis concerning [the appointment of] the Chacham Bashi (Chief Rabbi of the Turkish Empire, based in Constantinople), at this time I do not see myself having any role, because I am not an expert on the proper steps in this political matter. However, if you have a beneficial, special role you would like me to fill in the matter, I will try to be as helpful as I can be. [Certainly, we do not want anyone to] sit on the chair of the Chacham Bashi if he is not a Torah scholar and a fearer of Hashem.
Regarding the paper Haniyar (lit., The Paper), the first installment, in which I have an article, was already published. It is expected that next week the first full edition will come out. I believe that we will be able to secure Haniyar itself as time goes on (the various stages are unclear to me), so that it will be the monthly paper that we desire to have. I have already told you that I believe that we must go on the broad path of knowledge that gives strength to Hashem. Along with that, we need to include articles on practical matters as time goes on, which will strengthen our goal of establishing support for authentic Judaism with the strength of Torah and mitzvot on the holy soil.
Now it is necessary to obtain an official license, which is not particularly expensive, indeed not costing even ten Napoléon coins. I believe it is correct to acquire for ourselves this status. The Savior of Israel shall help us, to fortify the effort of the group of those to whose hearts Hashem is significant. May that which we work on be successfully established.
Perhaps you can inform me how much you will be able to allocate monthly toward the monthly publication, so that I will be able to know in the coming days to what extent we can work on glorifying it in quantity and quality. It is better not to be too thrifty regarding the cost of writers, when these are justified.
Please also tell me how the board of education in Petach Tikva is doing.
I sign my name as your reliable friend, who is connected to you with bonds of love for your delicate spirit. Please also send me, on a monthly basis, the students’ grades on tests, as you send them to the board members in Jerusalem.
Date and Place: 10 Tevet 5669 (1909), Yafo
Recipient: Rav Yonasan Binyamin Halevi Horowitz. Rav Horowitz was a Slovakian rabbi, who made aliya a few years prior to this letter. As a representative of Agudas Yisroel in Israel, which, among other things, had him supervise dispensing of funds for various projects, he had connection with Rav Kook and many other rabbis. Years later, he would take part and chronicle the famous tour of moshavot that Rav Kook and Rav Zonnenfeld led.
Body: I received your important letters. I am very happy about the good beginnings that have taken place in Petach Tikva (referring to the establishment of a certain religious school there, in which the two of them were involved, each in his own way). Even though there is still a need to strengthen the situation, we should have trust that Hashem will help and allow us to finish that which we began.
Regarding your brother-in-law, my opinion is that in any place that we find even an opening the width of a needle’s eye, through which we can positively impact the belief and fear of Hashem in the hearts of our children, wherever they are, we cannot stand idly by. Therefore, I wholeheartedly agree that your brother-in-law accept the position. May we receive trustworthy young men even from that far-flung place, with Hashem’s help.
Regarding the letter of the leading rabbis concerning [the appointment of] the Chacham Bashi (Chief Rabbi of the Turkish Empire, based in Constantinople), at this time I do not see myself having any role, because I am not an expert on the proper steps in this political matter. However, if you have a beneficial, special role you would like me to fill in the matter, I will try to be as helpful as I can be. [Certainly, we do not want anyone to] sit on the chair of the Chacham Bashi if he is not a Torah scholar and a fearer of Hashem.
Regarding the paper Haniyar (lit., The Paper), the first installment, in which I have an article, was already published. It is expected that next week the first full edition will come out. I believe that we will be able to secure Haniyar itself as time goes on (the various stages are unclear to me), so that it will be the monthly paper that we desire to have. I have already told you that I believe that we must go on the broad path of knowledge that gives strength to Hashem. Along with that, we need to include articles on practical matters as time goes on, which will strengthen our goal of establishing support for authentic Judaism with the strength of Torah and mitzvot on the holy soil.
Now it is necessary to obtain an official license, which is not particularly expensive, indeed not costing even ten Napoléon coins. I believe it is correct to acquire for ourselves this status. The Savior of Israel shall help us, to fortify the effort of the group of those to whose hearts Hashem is significant. May that which we work on be successfully established.
Perhaps you can inform me how much you will be able to allocate monthly toward the monthly publication, so that I will be able to know in the coming days to what extent we can work on glorifying it in quantity and quality. It is better not to be too thrifty regarding the cost of writers, when these are justified.
Please also tell me how the board of education in Petach Tikva is doing.
I sign my name as your reliable friend, who is connected to you with bonds of love for your delicate spirit. Please also send me, on a monthly basis, the students’ grades on tests, as you send them to the board members in Jerusalem.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)