Friday, November 29, 2024

Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: What Requires Protest?

#279 

Date and Place: 15 Adar I 5670 (1910), Yafo

Recipient and Background: The secretariat of the Mizrachi Center of Frankfort.

Body: I received your letter from 8 Adar I.

[I refer now to] the claim that the official Zionist institutions are going against our holy religion in formal affairs. Realize that if we will believe everything that the masses say, there would be many such instances. However, we must obviously not build, based on [such reports], a fundamental approach to protest publicly against them.

That which indeed does exceed any doubt is that which the administration of the Gymnasium allowed themselves to do – to join the two genders together, young men and young women, in one school and the same classes, without any semblance of modesty or the way of Judaism. This is also the cultural approach of most of the enlightened countries, and the beginning of this sin [in Eretz Yisrael]started in the schools of the moshavot (agriculture settlements). Hashem knows what ethical deterioration will result from these behaviors. On this matter we should protest with all of our strength. It also seems that whenever they hold balls with large groups on Saturday night, they desecrate Shabbat without embarrassment while doing the preparatory work. Be strong, brothers with pure hearts. Let us work diligently to “fence off” [as much forbidden activity] as we can succeed in doing, and may Hashem be of assistance to us.

[Now we will turn to the public announcements about the Tachkemoni school, which the Mizrachi organization sponsored.] Rav Shlesinger has still not sent me [the text]. Certainly he will tell me soon. However, the matter is difficult for me in the short term, for I am entrenched in the position of leading the “Shaarei Torah” school. This is also a respected educational system, and even though it has a different approach and spirit from Tachkemoni, it still “goes to one place.” That is, to erect on a strong foundation an institution that spreads the light of Hashem and the sanctity of the holy Torah on holy soil. I cannot touch anything that that Shaarei Torah is nourished from. Maybe it would be correct to connect this institution with [funds] that come from Russia by the encouragement generated by my public announcement. We will take this up again in future letters so that we can clarify the matter,

P.S. – Everything that I described about the negative elements of the institutions mentioned addresses only actions taken. There is so much to protest in regard to philosophical positions. It is well known that [there are problematic] teachers, especially those in the Gymnasium, and especially one who teaches the Holy Scriptures, who removes the soul of Judaism from the hearts of their students, with his extreme ideas and his disgusting adherence to the worst of the biblical critics. I do not want to disgust my pen by presenting the lowly ideas about the worth of the Torah and the Prophets in its entirety, which is presented before our youngsters by these distorting teachers. How could we be quiet about that?! Devise plans, beloved, respected brothers. Devise plans and speak up, and He who provides strength for Israel will help us find the power we need to help His Nation and His lot.

When One Rises, the Other Falls

by HaRav Dov Begon,
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir

The relationship between Israel and the nations over thousands of years is difficult and complex, especially regarding the control of Yerushalayim. The end of that struggle is hinted at in G-d’s words to Rivka: “Two nations are in your womb. Two governments will separate from inside you. The upper hand will go from one government to the other. The greater one will serve the younger” (Beresheet 25:23). Rashi comments, “From the womb, Esav and Ya'akov separated, one to his wickedness and the other to his righteousness.” They will not be equal in greatness. When one rises, the other will fall. Tyre did not reach its greatness until Yerushalayim was destroyed. Each desired the downfall of the other to become greater than it (Ohr HaChaim HaKadosh, Ibid.).

Seemingly we can ask: Why can’t Esav and Ya'akov live side by side in peace and tranquillity, without fighting each other? Why is this historic see-saw necessary, such that when one rises the other falls? Why this equation of greatness-destruction? Why cannot Tyre and Yerushalayim be built up simultaneously?

The answer is that Tyre and Yerushalayim are not typical Near East cities. The two of them each represent a different culture. One’s culture is the opposite of the other’s. Tyre represents Esav and his culture: “Esav became a skilled trapper; a man of the field” (Beresheet 25:27). That is, he knew how to deceive his father and other people (Rashi, Ibid.)

Yerushalayim represents Ya'akov, his personality and his culture: “Ya'akov was a righteous man who remained with the tents” (Ibid.). “He said what was in his heart, and he sat in the tents of Torah” (Rashi).

These two cultures - the culture of deception and falsehood, and the culture of righteousness, reverence and love of G-d and man - cannot coexist in peace. Quite the contrary, when the culture of falsehood rears its head and takes control, Israel and Yerushalayim decline. Conversely, when the Jewish People return to their land and to Yerushalayim their capitol, it is a sign of their renaissance and rebirth, following two thousand years of downfall in the exile.

Yet “a righteous man falls seven times but rises up again” (Mishlei 24:16)... Right now, we are finally standing up on our own two feet. Each morning, in the blessings before the Shema, we pray, “May You lead us erect [komemiyut] into our land.” Rereading “komemiyut,” this prayer can be asking for G-d to redeem us via two “komot” [stages]. The first stage comprises the ingathering of the exiles, the rebuilding of a national home, and the rebuilding of Yerushalayim as Capital of the State of Israel, all of which is taking place before our very eyes.

The second stage is spiritual renewal, the ascendancy of the good spirit of Ya'akov, the “righteous man who remained with the tents,” that good spirit concealed within the whole Jewish People in the aggregate, and within every Jewish individual. The more the spirit of Ya'akov the Patriarch emerges and grows, the more the divine promise, that “the older one will serve the younger” (Beresheet 25:23), will come to fruition. In other words, first will come the fulfillment of the prophecy, “Liberators shall ascend upon Har Tzion to judge the mountain of Esav; and the kingdom shall be the L-rd’s” (Ovadiah v. 21), and then will come the fulfillment of, “The L-rd shall be King over all the earth. On that day the L-rd shall be one and His name One” (Zechariah 14:9).

Besorot Tovot,
Shabbat Shalom and Chodesh Tov,
Looking forward to complete salvation,
With the Love of Am Yisrael and Eretz Yisrael.

Yeshivat Machon Meir: Sichot with Rosh HaYeshivah Parashat Toldot (video)

Changing direction mid-stream

by Rav Binny Freedman

Sometimes, the most poetic people can come in the most surprising packages.

If you would have asked me what Abir would end up doing with his life, I would have imagined him as a bouncer, or perhaps a taxi driver in New York.

Abir, an ex-paratrooper, is one of the unsung heroes of the battle of the Chinese chicken farm, when a battalion of paratroopers in the Yom Kippur war had to take a crucial Egyptian position by running 300 yards of open kill-ground; most of the battalion never made it out of there. I could easily have imagined him grabbing one of the first planes out after the war, maybe to New York or Los Angeles.

But you can still find Abir tucked away in the art gallery he owns called the Olive Tree in the Old City of Jerusalem opposite the Cardo. He is one of those personalities described in books as ‘larger than life’, tall, dark, and handsome, with a robust, deep laugh and a twinkle in his eye, and it still amazes me to see how much pleasure he takes from the quiet solitude of his gallery; he almost seems to draw the energy out of the walls.

His gallery, just like its owner, reads like a book you can’t put down.

This gallery, which was a sesame seed factory where the Ottomans and Turks made Halva (he remembers his father during the siege of Jerusalem when there was no food, going in to the factory and wiping his feet on the floor so he could walk out with Halva on his feet and eat it!) still boasts a large fifteen hundred year old mill stone used to grind down the sesame at the end of the Talmudic period.

And in the back, there is a large portrait of his parents, who walked to Israel on foot all the way from Iraq to escape danger and arrive safely in Israel. But you can easily miss the most amazing part of the gallery, if you don’t take the time to take the gallery tour….

A number of years ago, Abir decided he needed a safe in the gallery. Often, when people would buy art they would pay in cash, and on a good day he could accrue a significant amount of cash….

As he was a do-it-yourself kind of guy, he decided to break away the wall and install the safe himself. The old Ottoman & Mameluke building stone is soft, and fell away easily, despite its thickness, under the swings of his 5kg hammer.

At a certain point, he hit hard rock and couldn’t figure it out. When he cleared away the debris he uncovered what turned out to be the highest known remaining section of what has come to be known as the Broad Wall, which was re-fortified by King Hezekiah during the First Temple period (mentioned in the bible in the book of Kings) over twenty seven hundred years ago! (Eventually, National Geographic included his story in a documentary.)

And as if that wasn’t enough, Abir, among other things, buys Roman glass from the hey-day of the Roman Empire, transforming it into Jewish ritual pieces (such as Mezuzot, candlesticks, and Saturday night havdalah spice sets).

He has been known to say,

”Two thousand years ago, the Roman Empire destroyed my city, burned my Temple, and exiled my people. Today you cannot find a real Roman of that empire anywhere in the world, but I, a Jew, live here in a Jewish State and make a living from their remains!”

For reasons Abir himself cannot fully explain, this adventurous soul, whom one might have expected to find exploring the world, chose instead to explore his own backyard.

It would have been so easy, after all the tragedy of his war-time experiences, for Abir to have left this land behind long ago, yet here he still sits, crafting his glass and soaking up the history of an ancient land that seeps out through his very pores.


How and why do some people seem to change direction almost mid-stream? What allows us to connect to our true mission (s) in life, especially when they seem so out of character to where we thought we were headed?

One of the less-noticed verses in this week’s portion of Toldot affords us a unique opportunity to gain insight into this question.

Yitzchak the second of our Avot seems to be mirroring his father’s life.

Avraham has two sons, Yishmael and Yitzchak, but it is only the younger son, Yitzchak, who follows the beliefs of his father and becomes the righteous person his father hopes to raise.

Yitzchak also has two sons, Ya’acov and Eisav, and again, it is only the younger son who seems to follow in his father’s path becoming the righteous son his parents hoped to raise.

Avraham’s elder son Ishmael will ultimately leave the fold, as will Yitzchak’s elder son Eisav.

Both Avraham and Yitzchak are given the ability to bless others, and will share many of the same experiences even down to the detail of disguising their wives (Sarah and Rivka respectively) as their sisters, when each is confronted with a severe famine forcing them to relocate. According to the Midrash (quoted in Rashi 25:19) Yitzchak even looks exactly like Avraham, to ensure that people will not suggest he is the illegitimate son of another.

Avraham had dug in this area which had been stopped up and filled with earth by the local Philistines (in an attempt, perhaps, to later ‘discover’ and thus lay claim to them) as soon as Avraham died (26:15).

Yitzchak is all about following in the footsteps of his father Avraham, trying to do everything his father did. He even digs the same exact wells his father dug, re-claiming these wells as his property by digging them up anew:

“And Yitzchak dug anew the wells of water which they had dug in the days of Avraham his father, which the Philistines had stopped up after Avraham’s death, and he called them by the same names his father had called them.” (26:18)

And it makes sense that Yitzchak re-dug these wells, having acquired many flocks and herds (26:14), just like his father, for which he would obviously need to dig many wells.

Even the beginning of the portion, which is supposedly the portion of Yitzchak, makes this quite clear:

“Ve’eleh toldot Yitzchak ben Avraham, Avraham holid et Yitzchak.”
“And these are the stories (generations) of Yitzchak the son of Avrham, Avraham begot Yitzchak.” (25:19)

While there is much to say about the striking similarities between Avraham and Yitzchak’s life, the difference between Yitzchak and Abraham may be very simple: Avraham was the first; the beginning; Yitzchak was the one who had to follow up; he was the continuation. These are two entirely different roles, each with their challenges and difficulties, and represent different parts of the process, which can best be described as the creation of the nation that will become the Jewish people.

Avraham arrives on the world scene as a lone voice in a very lonely desert; the world is a morass of pagan idolatry, which believes in many gods, and worships the world of nature. Avraham’s mission is to introduce to the world the idea that there is one G-d who created the world and that there is therefore one objective ethic, which can guide the world to peace and coexistence.

Yitzchak does not have the privilege of being the founder of this new idea, and the creator of a new world order. But he is the one who has the challenging task of ensuring that this idea, indeed this mission, does not die. He is not the creator of a new idea, but he is nonetheless its bearer.

All of which makes one particular verse seem rather strange:

After settling in Gerar, a Philistine city, to ride out the famine, and successfully navigating the conflict with the locals concerning his wife Rivka (when the King, Avimelech, orders the Philistines to leave them alone), Yitzchak’s reaction is decidedly unlike his father’s.

One might have expected Yitzchak to gather his flocks and move away, back to the mountains, just as his father Avraham left Egypt when the famine and drought finally passed in his day. (Bereisheet 13:1).

But rather than leave the inhospitable environment of Philistine Gerar, Yitzchak actually stays, and begins to farm the land:

“Vayizra Yitzchak ba’aretz ha’hi, va’yimtza bashana ha’hi meah shearim, va’yevarchehu’ Hashem. Vayigdal ha’ish vayelech haloch ve’gadel ad ki’ gadal me’od. Vayehi’ lo mikneh tzon u’mikneh bakarva’avudah rabah….”

“And Yitzchak sowed in that land, and in that year he reaped a hundred fold, and Hashem blessed him. And the man (Yitzchak) became great and kept becoming greater until he was very great. And he had acquired flocks and herds and much enterprise (worked fields?).” (26:12-14)

Why does Yitzchak, out of the blue, become a farmer, a path his father Avraham never seems to pursue? In fact, the history of farming up to this point is rather less than illustrious. Noach farmed the land, planting vineyards which were ultimately his undoing, causing him to get drunk and fall naked in his tent. (Bereisheet  9:20-21)

And before him, Kayin farmed the land which may well have been part of what led him into the field where he murdered his brother Hevel the shepherd.

Indeed, the land (and the process of farming it) was cursed by G-d way back when Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden.

“Arura ha’adama ba’avurecha’, be’itzavon tochalena kol yemei chayecha’. Ve’kotz ve’dardar tatzmiach lach ve’achalta’ met esev ha’sadeh. Be’zeat apecha’ tochal lechem….”

“Cursed is the land for you, in sadness shall you eat of it all the days of your life. And thorns and thistles shall grow for you and you shall eat of the grass of the field. By the sweat of your brow shall you eat bread.” (Bereisheet 3:17-19)

Perhaps this why so many of the great leaders of the Jewish people were shepherds, all the way from Avraham and Ya’acov (and Yitzchak himself) down to Moshe and Dovid HaMelech.

So why does Yitzchak suddenly decide to begin working the land? Why this sudden departure from the path of Avraham that Yitzchak seems until now to have been dedicated to follow?

What, indeed, is the difference between farming and herding? A shepherd can essentially take his livelihood with him wherever he goes, something we might have supposed Yitzchak would want to do; after all, he is currently residing in Gerar, a Philistine city whose residents were somewhat less than friendly, and he is apparently becoming quite wealthy, arousing no small amount of jealousy amongst his Philistine neighbors (26:14).

Indeed, this has been the path of the Jew for the last two thousand years, living with his bags packed ready to leave town at a moment’s notice, ahead of the pogroms and forced baptisms that was our lot time and time again.

And yet something causes Yitzchak to pursue a new path; to begin to farm, an enterprise rooted in permanence, and yet not easily transferable.

There is another detail where Yitzchak’s life here begins to take a different direction from his father Avraham’s.

When Avraham is confronted with a famine, he actually leaves the land of Israel (not long after he got there in the first place, journeying down to Egypt where he will find fame and fortune as a herdsman, before coming back home to Israel.

Yitzchak, however, faced with the same situation does not leave Israel, rather moving to Gerar, a Philistine city near the coast (not far from today’s Gaza). And he does not divert from his father’s response of his own accord; he does this because this is what G-d tells him to do:

“V ayera elav Hashem va’yomer: ‘Al tered mitzrayma; shechon ba’aretz asher omar eilecha’. Gur ba’aretz hazot ve’eheyeh imcha’, va’avarecheka’ ki’ lecha’ u’lezaracha’ eten et kol ha’aratzot ha’el va’hakimoti et ha’shevuah’ asher nishbati’ le’Avraham avicha’. Ve’hirbeti et zaracha’ ke’chochvei’ ha’shamayim, ve’natati’ le’zaracha’ et kol ha’aratzot ha’el, ve’hitbarachu’ be’zaracha’ kol goyei ha’aretz.”

“And G-d appeared to him and said: ‘Do not go down to Egypt; dwell in the land that I will tell you. Live in this land and I will be with you and I will bless you, for to you and your offspring I will give all these lands and I will establish the oath that I swore to Avraham your father. And I will multiply your seed like the stars of the heavens and I will give to your seed all of these lands and through your seed all the nations of the land will be blessed.” (26:2-4)

Perhaps Yitzchak’s deviation in occupation is a direct result of G-d’s intervention in his chosen location. Why does G-d not want Yitzchak to leave the land of Israel? Especially considering the fact that G-d has brought a famine to the land, this would seem to be an unfair request. At first glance, this would certainly seem to be in keeping with the theme of Yitzchak’s role to be the bearer of Avraham’s message. Avraham is told by G-d to embark on a journey, leaving everything behind to go to “the land that I will show you.” (12:1). And now Yitzchak is told that his mission is to actually settle (and thus stay in) that very same “land that I will tell you”.

But it goes deeper than that. The Torah Temimah explains that Yitzchak notes that there are two blessings Hashem (G-d) promises him here: that he will multiply (and produce many offspring), and that he will be granted these lands.

And just as the blessing of many offspring can only come as a result of man’s active decision to pursue this blessing with another in order to procreate, Yitzchak understands that “blessing only resides in the work of my own hands” (“Ein bracha shoreh elah be’ma’aseh yadai” Tosefta Berachot chap. 6). In other words, if we want to receive G-d’s blessings in our lives, we have to be willing to do the work to allow that blessing in.

Here too, lies the great difference between herding flocks and working the land. Flocks are what you have, but land is what you work. More than any other enterprise, land connects us to the idea that nothing in this world is really ours.

There is a beautiful Midrash which illustrates this point:

Two plaintiffs appear before the judge in a dispute over land.
“Zeh omer shel avotai, ve’zeh omer shel avotai…” each claims the land as his inheritance, but neither can offer any evidence to support their claim.

Finally, the judge says to them:

“I have heard each of your claims and can find no basis to find for one of you against the other. So, let’s hear what the land has to say”. At which point the judge bends low to the ground cupping a hand over his ears as if to hear the land’s conversation….! (At this point the two litigants probably are wondering whether they came to the wrong judge…!) Finally, he straightens up and, looking at each litigant in turn, says to them:

“The land says it’s not yours, and it’s not yours; you’re it’s, “ki afar atah, ve’el afar tashuv.” (Bereisheet 3:19) “For you are dust and you will return to the dust.”

A person can plough his land, sow his field, irrigate his crops and dream of riches, but it all depends on the rain, doesn’t it? There are few occupations in which man has more obviously depended on G-d than farming. I may have cattle, but I am only farming the land. And yet, no matter how much rain falls, if you haven’t planted your crops, you’re not going to have any food in the cupboard either. So, farming represents our partnership with G-d. We have to be willing to do our bit in order for Hashem to bestow His blessings.

Why is that? If we are indeed worthy of those blessings, why can’t the crops just grow in the field? After all, then we could all spend our days immersed in acts of kindness and learning Torah, right?

Maybe we need to work the land (and everything else in our lives) so hard, because our willingness to work for something demonstrates how much we really want it.

“Le’fum tza’arah agra’ ” says the Talmud; according to the travail (work) is the reward. You get what you put in; you reap what you sow. Ultimately, Hashem created this world as a tremendous act of kindness to us that is so endless it is beyond our capacity to comprehend. And all Hashem really wants is to bestow His love and kindness and blessing on us. But in order to do that, we have to want to receive it. G-d desperately wants us to want what he wants to give us. And isn’t that the essence of all relationships? A healthy relationship is all about giving, and if we find ourselves blessed to be in such healthy, loving relationships we want so very much to give to those we love and we want even more that they should want what we can give them.

All any parent really wants is to be able to give their children all the right things. And we hope that our children will want what we want to give them.

Four thousand years ago, Yitzchak begins to work the land, changing his course and entering a whole new level in his relationship with G-d. If the land represents the gifts we are given, maybe farming represents what we choose to do with those gifts while fully aware they are not really ours to have, but only to work, and that, like all gifts they may not necessarily be here tomorrow.

Like Abir in his shop, with his Roman glass and ancient walls, and his awareness that every day is a gift and a new field to be tilled, may we all be blessed with the wisdom to recognize all the ‘land’ we have been given to work, and the perseverance to farm those ‘fields’ and taste of their bounty….

Shabbat Shalom,
Chodesh Tov

The Yishai Fleisher Israel Podcast: NARR WARS

SEASON 2024 EPISODE 43: Fighting for Israel's narrative! Yishai and Malkah discuss the murder of a rabbi in Dubai and review videos from haters at Sara Lawrence and lovers like Congressman Ritchie Toress. Then, Jonathan Conricus is a narrative warrior who helps Israel fight against the lies - and asks how Israel fell on October the 7th. Finally, Ben Bresky on Robert Kennedy and the Jewish State. Plus: Table Torah on fighting to get  the blessing!

Wednesday, November 27, 2024

Jealousy

by Rabbi Pinchas Winston

THE JEWISH PEOPLE have had many enemies over the millennia, but most of them were descendants of either Yishmael or Eisav. The amazing thing is that Yishmael was Yitzchak Avinu’s half-brother, and Eisav was Ya’akov’s full-brother. Talk about sibling rivalry! But then again, Kayin was Hevel’s full brother, too, and he murdered him.

Brothers have been killing brothers ever since the beginning of history. It’s how God made the world, and jealousy is usually at the center of it. Jealousy seems so instinctual that you see it at work at the earliest of ages. Just adding a new baby to the family can spark feelings of jealousy and inspire retribution in a child who only two years previously had the same attention.

And, jealousy is the source of earlier Palestinian, pardon me, Philistinian hatred of Jews in this week’s parsha as well: “And he had possessions of sheep and possessions of cattle and much production, and the Philistines envied him…And Yitzchak said to them, ‘Why have you come to me, since you hate me, and you sent me away from you?’ ” (Bereishis 26:14, 27).

I have watched documentaries on both world wars, and it is scary how primordial senses of entitlement have sparked and fueled so many major wars. No one ever starts a world war. They start wars to get what they want, hopefully without causing a bigger war than they can fight. Sometimes, the gamble pays off, and sometimes, it just leads to an escalation of hostilities until the whole world is involved. We’re watching that happen again today.

War is so part and parcel of human culture that the Greeks even made up a god to rule over it, Ares. Whereas pre-2001, the world barely ever talked about World War III, it has become an increasingly more commonly discussed topic. “Gunpowder” exists in so many places in the world today, and we have to be concerned about any “matches” that might inadvertently get “thrown” in that direction.

I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised by any of this if God Himself said, “The imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth” (Bereishis 8:21). One could argue, “Hey God, that may be so, but You made us this way! Who do you blame when a watch is faulty, the watch or the watchmaker?”

But imagine taking your broken watch back to the manufacturer and hearing, “There is nothing wrong with your watch. We made it to break after two months.” Wouldn’t you be angry, even if it was true and you just happened to miss that point when you bought it? What honest company would intentionally make a defective product?

But isn’t that what God did when He made man? God is perfect, and therefore, anything He creates must be perfect, too. If it doesn’t seem to be, it is not because of some oversight on God’s part. It is because, well, we just can’t see how it is perfect. After all, unlike man, who improves through trial and error, God knows the future and how to get it right the first time.

So God made Sarah barren and then made the famine in Eretz Yisroel. This way, Avraham would be compelled to go south to Egypt for food and pick up Hagar as a concubine while there. This would lead Sarah to encourage Hagar to have a child from Avraham on her behalf, and Yishmael would be born. The Gemora says that God “regretted” making Yishmael, but He not only did it, He made him the way he wanted.

Moving on to Eisav, we learn from Sha’ar HaGilgulim how the holiness of parents, especially during conception, affects the level of righteousness of the soul that goes into their child. In the entire history of man we can assume that Yitzchak Avinu and Rivkah Imeinu were the two of the holiest people to have been married to one another. And yet, Eisav was still born to them, even though less righteous people have done much better.

It’s not the way we would have done things. Evil is happy to be here and grateful for all the good, naive, and weak people it can take advantage of. But though happy to be here, the good people are not happy about the creation and maintenance of evil. It seems like a lot more than just a big waste of time. World War II alone took the lives of 72 million people and caused billions of dollars of damage. If God forbid, there is another world war, and there are some serious signs these days that there will be, it has the potential to do a lot worse.

The seeming lack of logic in creating evil and letting it get away with what it has, has caused many over the millennia to question the existence of God or at least His involvement in human history. The lack of what people deem to be an appropriate Divine response to evil has made many an evil leader believe they have free rein to do what they want, so they have.

Yes, good does seem to eventually triumph over evil, but not before evil has made an incredibly black and usually deadly mark on history. The ones who remain alive to witness such triumph are the fortunate ones, but what about all those who died trying to stop evil and instead fell victim along the way?

The only answer is not a very satisfying one for many. It is the same one God gave to Iyov when he asked God such questions firsthand. God told Iyov, “Where were you when I founded the earth” (Iyov 38:4)? This was God telling Iyov, “You want to understand the movie after walking in halfway through? Good luck.”

If human logic was identical to Divine logic, we wouldn’t have needed Torah. We would have figured out right and wrong for ourselves and never left Gan Aiden. Whatever seems illogical to us about what God has done or is doing has to do with the limitations of human logic, not Divine logic, which takes into account so much more than human logic ever can.

Not everyone who looks at abstract art knows what is going on in the painting, but that doesn’t mean they can’t enjoy what they are looking at until they do. Similarly, but far more profoundly, we may be looking at abstract history and still lack the keys to decipher it. But that only emphasizes the need to have faith in the Painter, that He knows what He is painting and why. It is that kind of faith that allows us to enjoy this world as we do when we can, and survive history when we have to.

As a final note, though not related to the parsha, the Zohar says that the first twenty-four days of Kislev, corresponding to the twenty-four letters of the Boruch Shem, the second verse of the Shema, are a build-up to the twenty-fifth of Kislev and the holiday of Chanukah. To make use of this important idea, I will be posting a short daily message, b”H, on each of the letters on their respective days, starting with the second day of Rosh Chodesh, the first of Kislev. You will find this at: www.shaarnunproductions.org

Rabbi Daniel Glatstein on Parshat Toldos: The Garments of Nimrod that Yaakov Wore - The Astounding Revelation of the Chida

Rabbi Ari Kahn on Parashat Toldot: Validation (video)

Rav Kook's Ein Ayah: Prayer With the Community and The Purpose of Prayer

Gemara: Whoever prays behind a beit k’nesset is called a rasha(wicked person). Abayei said: This is said only if he did not turn his face toward the beit k’nesset.

Ein Ayah: A beit k’nesset is a gathering place for the tzibbur (community) in the service of Hashem. The rule is that a person, even if he is very noteworthy for his level, must include himself with the community. Then he can benefit from the tzibbur, and the tzibburcan benefit from him. However, if he will choose a path, even concerning his service of Hashem, of separating himself from the path of the tzibbur, this will not find favor in Hashem’s eyes and he will continuously deteriorate. This idea is hinted in the idea of praying behind a beit k’nesset, which implies that he considers himself worthy to “build his own altar” for the use of his unique service of Hashem.

Abayei’s distinction of the direction in which he prays outside the beit k’nesset also contains a hint. The above criticism of one who separates himself applies only if he separates himself totally, in order to chart a course of service of Hashem according to the viewpoint of his heart. If so, even if he is otherwise a giant among giants, he is considered an evil person. However, if his goal is to be included in and to participate with the community, just that occasionally he needs to follow an approach to service according to his status and situation, this is not a problem.

In another place, we hinted about the imagery of the back of a beit k’nesset in the following regard. There are two purposes of a beit k’nesset [or, actually, of prayer in general, for which purpose a beit k’nesset is used]. One is to glorify and exalt the Name of Hashem. In truth, the main purpose of the creation of prayer is for that goal, so that people can recognize Hashem’s impact on the world, fear Him, and follow His path for their own good.

The second purpose is an offshoot of the first. Prayer enables one to obtain that which he asks for. If the ethical element [the first mentioned above] was missed and only receiving that which one asked for was achieved, there would be a theological difficulty. What is the purpose and logic of prayer? After all, it is impossible for Hashem to experience a change of heart, so why does He need our prayer? [In other words, if that which we desire is something that Hashem would like us to have, He would provide it without our request, and if He does not want us to have it, our prayer will not change His mind.] Rather, there is an ethical element to prayer. Specifically, by realizing that everything comes from Hashem, man’s ethical status will improve, and righteousness and straightness will increase. This by itself makes it very worthwhile for prayer to exist.

The main, inner goal of prayer, which is its ethical side, is hinted at by the inside of the beit k’nesset, representing the main reason for its existence. The secondary element of fulfillment of requests is metaphorically referred to as behind the beit k’nesset. That’s why the gemara says that one who prays only behind the beit k’nesset and does not relate to its ethical side is considered a rasha whose prayer is despised. This is along the lines of the pasuk: “Someone who removes his ear from hearing Torah” and thereby does not look to improve himself, “his prayer is an abomination” (Mishlei 28:9). This is because prayer from which no improvement in one’s actions will grow is like blasphemy to Hashem because it implies that, Heaven forbid, Hashem changes His mind. Therefore, Hashem desires only the prayers of those who are straight, for in all of their prayers they draw the internal characteristic of elevating the soul, which is the purpose of prayer.

The Truth and Deception of Yaakov

by HaRav Mordechai Greenberg
Nasi HaYeshiva, Kerem B'Yavneh


"Give truth to Yaakov." (Micha 7:20) The primary trait of Yaakov is that of honesty. However, our parsha relates actions of Yaakov that stand in conflict with the trait of honesty. Yaakov takes advantage of Esav and purchases from him the birthright. He acquiesces to his mother's command and goes to deceive his father, Yitzchak. Yaakov later says to Rachel, "I am his [Lavan's] brother in deception." (Rashi Bereisheet 29:12) How can we learn the trait of truth from Yaakov?

The Netziv (Harchev Davar) cites the Midrash on the verse, "Fetch me from there two choice young kids of the goats" - good for you and good for your children. Good for you that you will receive the blessings through them, and good for your children, who will be atoned through them on Yom Kippur. What is the connection between the blessings and the two goats of Yom Kippur.

The Netziv explains that every trait has use, and "bad traits" have good in them, provided that they are used in proper measure. This is similar to poisons that are sometimes used as medicines, and they are good when used with professional supervision.

The same is true with the two goats. One was sacrificed on the Altar, whereas the second was sent to Azazel, which is a kind of offering for the forces of tum'ah. This is also something positive when done upon G-d's command (cf. Ramban to Parshat Acharei-Mot). This is what Rivka meant. The two goats of Yom Kippur are equal in their mitzvah, even though one is for holiness, and the second - the opposite. So, too, the two traits that Yaakov is expressing now, one of truth, in listening to his mother, and the second of falsehood, in deceiving his father - both are considered a mitzvah to bring the blessings upon himself.

In Midrash Rabbah it says that Yaakov was punished because he caused Esav to "scream a great and bitter cry." His punishment was that Mordechai later, "screamed a great and bitter cry" in Shushan.

Why was Yaakov not punished for causing that his father "trembled very greatly?" The Netziv explains that to use a sin for pure intentions there is a need for extreme carefulness not to derive pleasure from the sin. This is unlike a mitzvah, where even if one derives pleasure from the mitzvah, the mitzvah remains intact. However, when doing a sin with pure intentions, it is not considered a mitzvah when one derives benefit from the sin.

This is expressed in the Gemara (Nazir 23b), where it says, "Great in a sin done with pure intentions," which is learned from Yael (who seduced Sisera and killed him). The Gemara asks, "But Yael derived pleasure from the sin?" and answers that the pleasure of the wicked is considered bad by the righteous. Based on this, when Yaakov scared Yitzchak, he did not derive any pleasure, and certainly felt bad, but was forced to do this. On the other hand, when Esav screamed, Yaakov felt inwardly happy. Since Yaakov was doing a sin for the sake of pure intentions, he was not allowed to derive pleasure from it and was therefore punished.

This was Yaakov's test, that he knows how to deceive, but does this with pure intentions and does not derive pleasure from it. Through this he proved that his trait is truth even at a time that he needs to lie. Everything is tested based on the its opposite. Avraham, whose trait was chesed, was tested with the trait of yir'ah - "Now I know that you are a G-d fearing man". (22:12) Otherwise, it would have been possible to think that the trait of chesed was natural to him, and is not so much of a virtue. Similarly, Yaakov, whose trait was truth, was tested whether he knows how to deceive when necessary without being affected and not to derive pleasure. Therefore he says, "I lived with Lavan and observed the 613 mitzvot," and I was not drawn to deceit like Yaakov.

Chazal comment in the Midrash that when Yaakov went in to Yitzchak, he prayed, "Hashem, rescue my soul from lying lips, from a deceitful tongue." (Tehillim 120:2) This is most striking! He is going in to lie, and asks that G-d rescue him from falsehood? Rather, even though now he is rightfully going to deceive his father, there is concern that he might be affected by this also in the future, even when there is no need, and he prayed about this.

This is what Yitzchak said to Esav, "Your brother came with cunningness." (27:35) Why did Yitzchak have to say this to him and cause him anguish? Rather, he told Esav that he had mistaken in estimating Yaakov. Until now Yitzchak thought that Yaakov was completely straightforward, and could not lie even when necessary, so that he requires Esav's assistance in serving G-d. Now Yitzchak became aware that Yaakov also can come with cunning. Since he now sees that Yaakov not only "dwells in tents," but is also a man of the world - "Indeed, he shall remain blessed." (27:33)

Rav Kook on Parashat Toldot: Harnessing the Power of Esav

We know little about the birth of most Biblical personalities. Yet, the Torah describes in detail the birth of Yaakov and Esav and their respective naming.

“The first one came out reddish, hairy all over like a fur coat. They named him Esav. His brother then came out, his hand grasping Esav’s heel. He named him Yaakov.” (Ber. 25:25-26)

The name Esav means “made” or “completed.” From day one, Esav was full of strength and energy. The name Yaakov refers to the fact that he was holding on to Esav’s heel (ekev). Later on, Yaakov is named a second time; here too, his name refers to his relationship with his brother Esav. The night before meeting up with Esav, he struggles with a mysterious stranger. This stranger — according to some, Esau’s guardian angel — informs him:

“Your name will no longer be Yaakov, but Yisrael. You have struggled with angels and men, and you have prevailed” (Ber. 32:29). 

What is the inner meaning of Yaakov’s names? What is the significance of his grasping on to Esav’s heel? Why does he have two names? 



Restraint versus Control
Just as there are both positive and negative forces in the world, so too, every person is a composite of positive and negative traits. We need these negative forces, however; without their power and vitality, many goals and aspirations would lack the energy necessary to be realized.

Esau represents the raw, base forces in the world. His reddish complexion indicated the violent and brutal nature of his personality. Jacob did not prevent Esav from coming into the world; after all, the world needs Esau and his raw power. Rather, Yaakov held on to Esav’s heel, holding him back. The name Yaakov refers to this aspect of restraint, reining in the fierce forces.

Ultimately, however, our goal is not to simply hold back these negative forces. We aspire to gain control over them and utilize them, like a hydroelectric dam that harnesses the vast energy of a raging waterfall for the production of electricity. For example, the Talmud tells us that a person with blood-thirsty tendencies should become a shochet (ritual slaughterer) or a mohel, thus sublimating his violent nature for noble purposes. This higher aspiration is represented by Yaakov’s second name, Yisrael, which comes from the root-word sar, meaning “to rule.”

The name Yaakov is appropriate when the Jews are in the Diaspora. There, they serve as a moral conscience to partially restrict the wild and violent forces in the world. But when redeemed and living in their own land, the Jewish people are able to attain the higher level of Yisrael. Then they have the opportunity to demonstrate how a nation may utilize its material capabilities for constructive and ethical goals.

(Gold from the Land of Israel, pp. 58-59. Adapted from Ein Eyah vol. I, p. 68 by Rav Chanan Morrison)

Esav is searching

by Rabbi Dov Berel Wein

In the competition between the brothers Esav and Yaakov, Esav originally downplays any long-range view of the situation. He demands immediate gratification and is therefore more than willing to relinquish his birthright – which is only a long-range asset – in favor of an immediate bowl of hot lentils. As the Torah dutifully records for us in this week's reading, Esau will come to regret this youthful decision later in life. But, like almost all of us, he will put the blame for the mistake on others – on the shrewdness of Yaakov taking advantage of him – rather than on his own error and weakness.

By blaming Yaakov for what was his own short sidedness, Esav compounds the original error of judgment on his part. After having tasted all the immoral pleasures of life, and after a career of violence, Esav remains unfulfilled, unhappy and frustrated. He now longs for the blessing and approval of his old father, a person who he has long treated as being completely irrelevant to him. His shout of anguish, when he realizes that the spiritual blessings of his father have already been bestowed on his brother Yaakov and that what is left for him are the fleeting blessings of temporal existence and power, reverberates throughout human history. He realizes that the blessings given to Jacob are those of eternity and lasting memory while all physical blessings in this world are merely temporary and always subject to revision. The Torah always deals with eternal standards and never bows to current themes and ideas no matter how attractive they may seem at the time.

Every generation feels that it discovers new ways to propel humanity and civilization forward. Somehow, we always feel ourselves to be wiser than our elders, smarter than our ancestors. But, if one makes an honest review of human history, it becomes clear that the true principles of civilization – morality, kindness, education and individual freedom – remain constant throughout the story of humankind. Deviations from these principles, in the hope of achieving a utopian society, have always resulted in tragedy and destruction.

The cry of Esav reverberates through the halls of world history. And, what makes it most pathetic is that what Esav is searching for can easily be found in what he himself has previously discarded and denigrated. But, it is always the egotistical hubris of humankind that prevents it from seriously and logically examining its situation and thoughts. One has to admit to past errors and to restore oneself to the path of goodness and righteousness, which alone can lead to a lasting feeling of happiness and accomplishment in this world.

Esav would like to be Yaakov, but without having to behave with the restraint and outlook on life that is the most central point of reference in the life and behavior of Yaakov. It is as Justice Brandeis once put it: "I would like to have the serenity and peace of the Sabbath but without its restraints." It is dealing with that fallacy of thought that makes Yaakov Yaakov and Esav Esav.

Esav's Deception in His Perennial Struggle with Israel

by Rav Dov Lior

This week's Torah portion of Toldot (B'resheet 25,19-28,9), recounts the birth of twin boys, Yaakov and Esav, to Yitzchak and Rikvah. Even inside their mother's womb, these twins went their separate ways – one to holiness, one to the opposite.

The root of the conflict between them lies in the fundamental contrast that divides them. On the one hand, within our Patriarch Yaakov were embedded spiritual powers as early as when he was in the womb, and from there they continually grew and expanded. On the other hand, Esav's impurity simply could not tolerate the revelation of holiness.

The struggle between them began before they were born, as G-d told Rivkah: "Two nations are in your womb… and one kingdom shall be stronger than the other" (25,23). And it continues up to this very day, as the Sages taught in the Midrash: "It is a clear Halacha [Jewish law] that Esav loathes Yaakov."

The source for this hatred is imbedded so deeply within Yaakov's nemesis that it cannot be repressed in This World. Only when Yaakov and his descendants – the Jewish People – attain a sufficiently sublime level of spirituality will the wickedness in the world recognize the power of this spirituality and yield to it.

This long-lasting struggle is waged on various fronts, and we see in this week's Torah portion that it involves deception and trickery as well. At one point, Rivka warns Yaakov to watch out for his brother: "Esav your brother is mit'nachem to you to kill you" (27.42). The renowned 19th-century commentator Netziv (R. Naftali Tzvi Berlin, in his Harchev Davar) explains the word mit'nachem to mean that Esav is playing a tricky game here. For he knows that Yaakov knows that he wants to kill him, and he sees Yaakov taking extra precautions against him. Esav thereupon acts, on the outside, as if he does not want to harm Yaakov. Rikva, however, sees right through him, and warns Yaakov that his brother is aiming "to kill you - his declaration that he wants peace are just a trick so that he will be able to harm you, and you must therefore escape."

Over the past years [this was written in late 2007 - HF], we have been witness to a phenomenon by which our enemies claim to want peace – when really their intentions are to soothe us to careless sleep. The true desire of the Europeans and their Arab supporters is to destroy Yaakov, its land, and its state. There is absolutely no truth to their peace declarations.

Our nation must know that our peace and security will not come from the other nations, but rather from within our own spiritual strengths. We must strengthen our Torah observance, and then "the voice is the voice of Yaakov" (27,22) – at which time Esav and supporters will have no ability to harm us.

We pray to merit that our nation and all its members awaken from their slumber, recognize their mission in the world, and act in accordance with the Divine charge. Would that we be a light unto the nations, and merit to see G-d's salvation upon His nation and inheritance – very soon!

Monday, November 25, 2024

Why Palestinians Will Not Have New Leaders

by Bassam Tawil
  • For the past three decades, leaders of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas have systematically targeted political activists, journalists, social media users, students, professors and human rights activists as part of an ongoing campaign to silence critics and deter others from speaking out against the lack of democracy and freedom of speech.
  • Torture included beatings, solitary confinement, feet-whipping, threats and taunts, and forcing detainees into various painful positions for extended periods. [Human Rights Watch] commented that "the habitual, deliberate, widely known use of torture, using similar tactics over years with no action taken by senior officials in either authority to stop these abuses, make these practices systematic."
  • This abuse has transformed the PA-controlled areas in the West Bank and the Hamas-run Gaza Strip into Palestinian dictatorships similar to those that have long existed in most Arab countries. In addition, it has resulted in the suppression of the emergence of new leaders capable of leading the Palestinians towards security, stability and prosperity.
  • Palestinians still remember how political activist and human rights defender Nizar Banat, an outspoken critic of corruption in the Palestinian Authority, was beaten to death by PA security officers in Hebron in 2021. Until today, no one has been punished for the killing of Banat.
  • The family of the slain political activist was naïve enough to believe that the ICC or any other international agency would serve them justice.
  • The ICC does not care about crimes committed by Palestinians against their own people. Instead, the court's antisemitic prosecutor is busy searching for ways to punish Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for daring to fight back in a war that was launched by Hamas on October 7, 2023.
  • Palestinians have not only been deprived of a large portion of the international financial aid -- stolen by corrupt Palestinian leaders -- but also of the right to elect new leaders and representatives through free elections.
  • Those who are hoping that a new (and pragmatic) Palestinian leadership will take over one day are in for a disappointment. Even after 89-year-old PA President Mahmoud Abbas is gone, his cronies and inner circle will continue to run the show. They will not, under any circumstances, share the cake with other Palestinians.
  • The same applies to the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. No Palestinian will agree to play any role in the administration of the Gaza Strip after the current Israel-Hamas war, as long as the Iran-backed terrorist group and its friends are still around. That is why it is necessary to eliminate Hamas completely and make sure that it loses its military, political and civilian capabilities in the Gaza Strip. This could take a few more months or years, but it is far better than ending the war in a way that keeps Hamas in power.

Palestinians still remember how political activist and human rights defender Nizar Banat, an outspoken critic of corruption in the Palestinian Authority (PA), was beaten to death by PA security officers in Hebron in 2021. Until today, no one has been punished for the killing of Banat. Pictured: Plain-clothed PA security officers beat a man in Ramallah on June 26, 2021, during a demonstration to protest Banat's killing. (Photo by Ahmad Gharabli/AFP via Getty Images)

Palestinian leaders have a long history of cracking down on their political rivals and opponents. For the past three decades, leaders of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas have systematically targeted political activists, journalists, social media users, students, professors and human rights activists as part of an ongoing campaign to silence critics and deter others from speaking out against the lack of democracy and freedom of speech.

In 2017, Magdalena Mughrabi, Deputy Middle East and North Africa Director at Amnesty International, warned that "the last few months have seen a sharp escalation in attacks on journalists and the media by the Palestinian authorities in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza in a bid to silence dissent." She added: "This is a chilling setback for freedom of expression in Palestine."

Since then, the situation has only worsened, as a growing number of Palestinians have found themselves targeted by both the PA and Hamas.

Continue Reading Article

The Pope's Genocide Cowardice

by Daniel Greenfield

Pope Francis recently implied that Israel was committing “genocide” in its campaign against Hamas. While the pope was eager to apply the term to Muslims terrorists dying in the war, he has been reluctant to apply it to Christians being massacred by Muslims in the Middle East.

Over 50,000 Christians were massacred by Muslims in Nigeria. Dozens of churches were attacked, some on Christmas, without the pope ever condemning this as genocide.

In 2016, after millions of Christians had fled Islamic violence in Nigeria, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Pakistan and much of the Muslim world, Pope Francis rejected calling it a genocide.

“I want to say clearly that I do not like it when people speak of a ‘genocide of Christians,’ for example in the Middle East,” Pope Francis argued, and claimed that he preferred the term “martyrdom.”

The pope’s comments were a retreat from his reaction a year earlier to the abduction and killing of priests in Syria when he declared it, “a form of genocide — I insist on the word — is taking place, and it must end.”

Over the course of a year, Pope Francis had decided to run away from calling the murder of Christians a “genocide”.

A week later he visited Armenia, on the front lines of a war with a Muslim country and used the term “genocide” as a purely historic reference, while failing to use it to describe the contemporary treatment of Christians in the Middle East where he admitted that “religious and ethnic minorities had become the target of persecution and cruel treatment, to the point that suffering for one’s religious belief has become a daily reality.” He also refused to name the Muslim perpetrators, only complaining about “a presentation of religion and religious values in a fundamentalist way, which is used to justify the spread of hatred, discrimination and violence.”

The pope’s refusal to address the subject of Islamic terrorism was an ongoing problem.

In 2014, Pope Francis met with a delegation from the World Jewish Congress to condemn the murder of Christians in the Middle East.



WJC President Ronald Lauder, a Republican donor, asked after the meeting, “Why doesn’t the world react? There has been a tremendous focus on Israel when it defended itself, as any country would, when thousands of rockets were fired on it by terrorists, but not a word for the thousands of Christians in Iraq, Syria and the Middle East.”

The strange thing was why the question was coming from a Jewish leader and not the pope.

Lauder claimed that the pope “privately” told him that “first it was your turn and now it is our turn. In other words, first Jews suffered savage attacks that were met with the world’s silence and now it is Christians who are being annihilated and the world is silent.”

Pope Francis was clearly referencing the threat often heard by Middle Eastern Christians, ““First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people”, yet he wasn’t willing to say it out loud.

Worse still, when Pope Francis met with a WJC delegation in 2016, his focus was on the sacred importance of bringing more Muslims into Europe. Earlier that year, Muslim terrorists had bombed Brussels Airport and a train station, killing 32 people and wounding hundreds more.

Pope Francis, instead of condemning the horrifying mass migration that had brought Muslims terrorists into the heart of Europe to murder Christians, claimed that, “Europe often forgets that it has been enriched by migrants” because it has a falling birth rate and is “lacking creativity” that the Muslim migrants were bringing to it.

“We need to reflect on integration, which is important. The people who committed the terrorist attacks in Belgium were not properly integrated,” he argued.

Bringing Muslim migrants to Europe became one of the pope’s great obsessions.

In 2024, Pope Francis claimed that rejecting open borders and mass migration was a “grave sin”. He had previously washed the feet of Muslim migrants and claimed that, “the presence of God today is also called Rohingya” in reference to an invasive Muslim group of migrants who had been expelled from Burma after engaging in systematic violence against Buddhists.

Some Jews have reacted to the pope’s genocide accusation by accusing him of antisemitism, but there’s no reason to think that he is bigoted against Jews in any particular way. Rather, Pope Francis has a politically correct tendency of accusing Christians and Jews, and other groups of genocide, especially when resisting Islam, while refusing to speak out against Islamic terrorism.

Much as the pope has been willing to accuse Israel of genocide, he has also been all too willing to accuse Christians of genocide. In Rwanda, Pope Francis blamed the Catholic Church for the genocide in that country and asked for forgiveness.

After a visit to Canada, Pope Francis described the alleged deaths of Indian children in church schools as genocide. “I asked forgiveness for this activity, which was genocide.” Over 80 Catholic churches have been burned in Canada over the deaths which may not have occurred.

The pope can accuse Christians and Jews of genocide, he just can’t seem to use the term to describe the actual Muslim genocide of Christians that is taking place around the world.

In Nigeria, the massacre of 50,000 Christians has not been condemned by him as a genocide.

Pope Francis is willing to describe the deaths of Muslims terrorists and their human shields as genocide, but not the mass murder of Christians praying in churches on Christmas.

Not content to sell out Christian communities around the world, he demands that Europe accept a stream of endless Muslim migrant invaders until Paris, London and Brussels are as unsafe for Christians as Nigeria.

Pope Francis has slurred Israel, but he is the one enabling a worldwide Christian genocide.

UNRWA Hires Palestinian Terrorists, Glorifies Violence And Terrorism

by Bassam Tawil
  • According to Israeli intelligence, more than 450 terrorists belonging to terrorist organizations in Gaza, mainly Hamas, are also employed by UNRWA.
  • "By not firing them, the UN Secretary-General and UNRWA's Commissioner General are brazenly demonstrating their determination to continue employing members of Hamas and Islamic Jihad even after having been presented with incriminating evidence to this effect. It is time for donor governments to wake up and stop funneling their taxpayers' money to members of designated terrorist organizations." – www.idf.il, August 5, 2024
  • UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini recently told the UN General Assembly that his agency provides tolerant, respectful and anti-extremist education in Gaza. However, IMPACT-se's new report unveils institutional teaching material taught in five UNRWA schools in Gaza, where Hamas commanders have been exposed masquerading as school principals.
  • A poem taught to seventh-graders... calls on knights, symbolizing Arab leaders, to liberate the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem "from the fist of unbelief, from Satan's aides – revenge to the Jews."
  • What is disturbing is that the UN chief and other donor countries refuse to see what many Palestinians already see, namely that UNRWA has long been playing a significant role in inciting hatred against Israel and raising another generation of Palestinian children on the glorification of violence and terrorism. It is time for this agency, as well as the entire UN, to be dismantled and removed, or at least, as suggested years ago, to have nations pay only for what they want and to get what they pay for.
  • It is also time for the Palestinian "refugees" to move on with their lives and stop relying on Western taxpayers' money.

According to Israeli intelligence, more than 450 terrorists belonging to terrorist organizations in Gaza, mainly Hamas, are also employed by UNRWA. Several terrorists who participated in the October 7 atrocities were officially employed by UNRWA. Pictured: Israeli soldiers inspect the entrance to a Hamas terror tunnel directly outside an UNRWA compound in Gaza City, on February 8, 2024. (Photo by Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images)

Since the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel, in which terrorists from Gaza murdered 1,200 Israelis, there has been increased evidence of the role the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) plays in supporting and funding Palestinian terrorism.

In early November, Israel passed a new law that will ban UNRWA's operations in Israel, and prevent Israeli officials from cooperating with the agency. Given UNRWA's longtime support for Hamas in the Gaza Strip, the ban will benefit not only Israel, but also those Palestinians who are not affiliated with the Iran-backed Palestinian terrorist group.

Continue Reading Article

Friday, November 22, 2024

Rav Kook's Ein Ayah: Help Not to Lose One’s Level

Gemara: Whoever regularly comes to the beit k’nesset and one day he does not come, Hashem asks about him, as the pasuk says: “Who among you fears Hashem and listens to the voice of His servant, who went in the darkness and there was no light for him... (Yeshaya 50:10)”

Ein Ayah: A general insight regarding all of the paths toward human completeness, whether of the community or of the individual, that must be employed is that once people advance in the levels of ethical completeness, they must try to not fall back from their level and not lose their pleasant attainment. This is because regarding everything that reached its completeness in actuality, when it subsequently falls back, it becomes more lacking than it is for one who never acquired the matter in the first place. This is the foundation of the halacha that one who practiced good minhagimand wants to discontinue them, needs hatara (dissolution of the implied oath to continue the practice).

In relation to community life, a good minhag is especially severe because when an ethical attainment subsequently deteriorates, it causes an even greater lacking than had it been absent from him in the first place. Therefore one has to be more careful because “we go up in sanctity and do not go down.” Therefore, one who already stood at a certain high level of service of Hashem should not allow himself to ever go down from it.

If such a person does falter, the hand of Divine Providence is outstretched to alert him to the matter and arrange for rebuke. This is because: “He that Hashem loves, He rebukes” (Mishlei 3:12). The rebuke may continue until he returns to his normal strength. This is because there is a lot of Divine Providence in regard to the acquisition of human completeness, as man is the central figure of the creation, as we explained in the previous passage. Therefore, the gemara says, Hashem asks about one (mashil bo) who regularly comes to the beit k’nesset and one day he does not come. [The following passage can be understood best if Rav Kook was basing himself on the literal translation of this phrase, mashil bo, which is that He causes the question in him.] In other words, Hashem arranges reasons that cause the person to ask about himself because he should have had trust in Hashem’s Name. The fundamental element of the Name of Hashem is the assurance that Hashem’s leadership will help to attain true completeness, which is to resemble Hashem’s paths. This is because Hashem’s leadership is the secret of His great and lofty Name.

Yeshivat Machon Meir: Sichot with Rosh HaYeshivah Parshat Chayei Sarah (video)

One year ago...........

Rabbi Ari Kahn on Parashat Chaye Sara: Real Estate (video)

How much of what we do, is really about what we do?

by Rav Binny Freedman

I don’t recall the exact year, but it was in the late eighties, and the summer just did not seem to want to end. The Jewish holiday of Sukkot had long since come and gone, and still there was no rain. The Kinneret Lake, Israel’s only freshwater lake, and source of fully a third of Israel’s drinking water, was dangerously low, as was the aquifer, and the crops were dry in the fields.

The Rabbinic authorities had already declared two public fast days, to no avail; sunny blue skies prevailed and still the rains would not come. Newscasters spoke of the worst drought in a century, and you could see people were getting worried.

In the west, when black rain clouds fill the sky, people get depressed and annoyed about having to wear rain gear, while outings are cancelled. But in Israel when the skies open up, you can still see people singing in the rain; Israel is a country that naturally attunes you to appreciate the finer gifts of life, which was why you could sense the tension in the air that came with the prolonged dry season.

Finally, the chief rabbinate of the State of Israel, in conjunction with the various Rabbinic leaders in the country, declared a special public fast day that would culminate in a mass community prayer at the Kotel, the Western wall.

I was studying in Yeshiva at the time, and I still remember the Roshei (heads of the) Yeshiva declaring that everyone in the Yeshiva was expected to fast, and that there would be buses to take all who wished, to the Kotel. Needless to say, we all went.

I remember arriving at the Kotel, seeing hundreds of buses disgorging thousands upon thousands of Jews from all over the country, all of whom had come out of a sense of communal responsibility; there was a powerful sense of togetherness that afternoon.

Most of all, I remember seeing an elderly gentleman, dressed in a long black coat and hat and carrying an umbrella. I laughed and commented that he obviously had a lot of faith, to assume the prayers would work so quickly. He told me that when he was a boy, he remembered hearing a story of Rav Shmuel Salant, the revered sage who had been the rabbi of Jerusalem a century earlier, showing up to a similar prayer event with an umbrella, and that in the end, it began to rain that very afternoon. Here was a chance to mimic the actions of great Rabbis; and besides he continued, if you don’t believe it will work, then what was the point of it all?

I contemplated what he had said as we began to pray, and soon lost myself in the power of the experience of forty thousand Jews saying Psalms all together.

Here we were, in a modern state of Israel, all together, repeating the words our ancestors had been saying for thousands of years, and experiencing a moment described in the Talmud almost as in a dream.

Had I not been there I would probably not believe it happened, but I promise you, that very afternoon, at approximately 4 P.M., right in the middle of the prayers… it began to rain! There was a brief pause, and everyone’s faces filled with smiles, and then we continued the prayer service, only this time, though we were still reciting the same psalm we had been reciting a moment earlier, the words were no longer words of beseeching and entreaty, they were words of thanksgiving and gratitude.

I cannot begin to describe the intensity of that experience: the feeling of being in the moment, completely at one and together with forty thousand people at the Western wall in Jerusalem. Afterwards, on the bus back, we couldn’t stop talking about it; and someone remarked about the power of prayer, to which someone else responded: Obviously, G-d wanted to bring the rain; He was jut waiting to see if we wanted it enough!

Although I looked for him, I did not see that elderly gentleman again that afternoon, but I know what I saw; and I will always believe that the rain that day came in no small part because of an old man with an umbrella.

How much of what we do, is really about what we do? Do things really happen in this world as a result of what we do, or are our actions simply an excuse for G-d to do what he wants to do anyway?


This week’s portion, Chayei Sarah, in one of the Torah’s classic stories, is a perfect example of this question.

Chayei Sarah begins with the burial of Sarah, dealing essentially with the challenges of death; a topic that seems to be all about fate and destiny. After all, we don’t get to decide when, or for that mater, how we die, much as some of us would like to believe otherwise.

As soon as Sarah is buried, the very next story is the choosing of a wife for Yitzchak, almost as if the Torah is trying to remind us that even in death, life must go on.

Perhaps death is also an inescapable part of life, but as well, these two stories seem to contrast the experiences that are out of our hands, and those that seem to be within our power to change; or are they?

In short, Avraham realizes his son is of marriageable age (according to Jewish tradition he is thirty- six), and does not want his son marrying into a local Canaanite family, for whatever the reason, so he entrusts his faithful servant, Eliezer, with the task of finding a bride for Yitzchak back home in Charan, where Avraham originally comes from.

Now remember, this is the same Avraham who had no children along with his wife Sarah, until the ripe old age of one hundred, and then, only as a result of G-d’s direct promise and intervention. So why is he so concerned with setting out to find a wife for his son now? Did not Hashem promise Avraham that “through Yitzchak will you have seed”, and that the descendants of Yitzchak would one day inherit the land?

Indeed, it was this very promise, which seems to have formed the basis for Avraham’s faith in the fact that he would one day have a son. Avraham was originally challenged by the fact that he had no children, and asks G-d:

“And Avraham said: G-d, what can you give me, and I am childless, and the head of my household is Eliezer of Damascus… You have not given me seed, and the head of my household will inherit me.” (Bereisheet 14:2)

To which G-d responds:

“… This one (Eliezer) will not inherit you; but (a child) that will come from your own loins, he will inherit you.” (14:3)

Hashem has already promised Avraham that through Yitzchak the Jewish people will be born (see also 17:16,19,21), and indeed miraculously, Yitzchak is born to Avraham and Sarah, despite the fact that Sarah is already ninety years old, and long past menopause (18:11). So why does Avraham doubt the fact that Hashem will provide a suitable mate for his son Yitzchak, even, if necessary, through miraculous intervention?

And, if Avraham is already concerned with the practical aspects of finding the right wife for Yitzchak, why is he sending Eliezer? Why does he not attend to this critical task himself, with Yitzchak in tow? Should not Yitzchak have the opportunity to search himself for the person he will spend the rest of his life with?

Incredibly, the marriage of Yitzchak and Rivkah (the woman Eliezer ultimately finds and brings back home) is sealed before Yitzchak ever meets his betrothed! Indeed, when Rivkah, riding on a camel, arrives in the southern Negev, she spies a man in the field coming their way, and falls off her camel! And only when she asks the servant Eliezer who the ‘fellow’ is, does she discover it is Yitzchak, her husband to be!

Should not the decision regarding such an important relationship as marriage be a process of exploring common dreams, not to mention that shared feeling of love that goes beyond the definable? Is there no room for ‘that loving feeling’? How can the Torah hold up for us as a model of courtship, essentially what amounts to the purchase of a bride? (And, if we accept the Midrash, a child bride at that!)

And how exactly does Eliezer decide that this girl is the one for Yitzchak? No doubt the manner in which Eliezer chooses Rivkah as Yitzchak’s bride is one of the strangest stories in the entire Torah:

Avraham first swears Eliezer to his mission, warning him not to create a situation wherein Yitzchak ends up following his wife back to Aram Na’haraim (in Mesopotamia); he must find a woman who will follow Eliezer back to Canaan. It would seem the issue here is not finding a woman who does not come from an idolatrous family, but rather removing the woman from the influence of such an environment.

This, however, makes the task of finding someone virtuous enough to be worthy of continuing the dream of Avraham, all the more challenging. So Eliezer comes up with a simple test:

“And he (Eliezer) said: ‘Hashem, G-d of my master Avraham, please happen (Hakreh’ Nah’) before me this day and do kindness with my master Avraham.

“Behold I will stand by the wellspring, where the maidens come to draw water. And it shall be that the girl to whom I say: ‘Please tilt your pitcher that I might drink’, who then responds: ‘Drink, and I will give water to your camels as well’, she will be the one You (G-d) have proven to be the one for Your servant, Yitzchak, and of her will I know that You have done kindness with my master.” (24:12-14)

Recall that Eliezer is going back into a foreign culture; very different from the world of monotheistic ethics and sensitivities Avraham has created. He is faced with no small challenge: how will he find, in the midst of the morass of pagan idolatry, the woman worthy not just of marrying the righteous Yitzchak, and not even just the woman who can live in the shadow of the tent of Avraham? This is the woman who will ultimately be the matriarch of the entire Jewish people! How will he recognize, in a short time, a woman with that kind of potential? So he has devised what, upon closer inspection, is no small challenge.

Imagine a strong man, dusty from the road, asking a young girl to “tilt her pitcher” so that he might drink! “Do it yourself!” would be the average response, yet he expects to find someone who will be glad to do this, and he expects to find her, it seems, at a specific place, and at a specific time! He is just going to show up at this particular well, and wait for this impressive woman or girl to appear!

And that’s not all; she will not only agree to give him the water she has drawn for herself, she will then offer, without even being asked, to water all of his camels! Drawing enough water, bucket by bucket, to quench the thirst of ten thirsty camels would seem to be an incredible amount of work, yet Eliezer expects to find a girl willing to do all this without even being asked! Eliezer, it seems, is not just setting up a test; he wants no less than a minor miracle!

Which brings us back to our original question: If Eliezer is essentially giving voice to the fact that finding an appropriate wife for Yitzchak amidst the heathens of Mesopotamia would be a miracle, then why send Eliezer off in the first place? If a miracle is needed, can’t Hashem just perform the miracle in Canaan? Why not ask Hashem to cause such a unique girl to get lost and show up at the well in Be’er Sheva (in Canaan)?

In fact, isn’t finding the right person always a miracle of sorts? So once a miracle is necessary, what difference does it make how big (and how noticeable) the miracle actually is?

Needless to say, this is not just a question concerning Eliezer and Yitzchak; this is a question we face every single day. Visit any singles event and you will readily see how many people there are today dreaming and often praying for just such a miracle. When considering how many different series of circumstances must come together for two people to meet and decide that they are meant for each other, is not every successful marriage a miracle?

And yet, you won’t meet the right person in your life if you sit at home in a closet playing violin; but why not? If in reality the result is nothing short of miraculous, why do we need to be so involved in what ultimately is nothing short of a miracle?

Ask Yossi Ben Chanan whether he believes miracles are possible, and he may well go back, in his mind’s eye to the long night he spent on Tel Shams in October 1973. Having been wounded already in the head, he nonetheless rejoined his men and his commander, Yanosh Ben Gal, for the drive towards Damascus. A week after the disastrous surprise Syrian attack on the Golan, the Israeli troops had repulsed the invaders and were fighting the retreating Syrian Armored Corps along the highway to Damascus, when they encountered opposition in the form of the well entrenched and fortified hilltop at Tel Shams. The Israelis, determined to send a message to Syria that would make them think twice before ever crossing the border again were set on reaching the outskirts of Damascus, which could not be accomplished as long as the Syrians controlled the road from their vantage high atop Tel Shams.

After a failed frontal assault, a closer look at the aerial recon photos revealed a weak spot in the Syrian defenses; there was a shepherd’s path that might be approachable from the rear, so Yossi Ben Chanan volunteered to take his seven tanks up what amounted to an almost impossible approach in order to surprise the Syrians from the valley behind them. Although his plan succeeded, his tank was hit in the battle and he was thrown nearly twenty feet in the air from his burning tank, breaking his leg in three places. The rest of the unit (or what was left of them) pulled back, having succeeded in their mission to disable the tanks and guns on top of Tel Shams.

Ben Chanan’s tank driver, Tzvika, also on foot having escaped after the tank was destroyed, risked his life to jump back into the burning tank and remove the radio, enabling them to get word to Ben Gal’s unit that they were alone and wounded, behind enemy lines. In the middle of what he would later describe as the longest and loneliest night of his life, Yossi Ben Chanan described being able to hear Arab voices walking the hilltop and being sure his life would end that night.

It should have; with no troops to send, and no armor to back them up, not to mention all the other places what few forces remained were needed, there was no hope that Ben Chanan would make it through the night, let alone survive the Syrians who would obviously find him once dawn broke.

Yanosh Ben Gal was sure he was saying goodbye to his closest friend, because after all, there are no such things as miracles. At least he thought there weren’t, until Yoni Netanyahu (he who would later be of Entebbe fame) arrived at their position, and walked into the radio room. A Captain in the Matkal recon unit, the most elite unit in the Israeli army, he immediately volunteered to get Yossi and his soldier out.

Anyone watching this would have seen all the arched eyebrows and realized this was not just an impossible mission, it was a suicidal one. But someone forgot to tell that to Yoni, who had been at Yossi’s only a few months earlier.

With no real backup, and no vehicles capable of getting them up there, they came up the same rear approach to Tel Shams … on foot! When they finally found Ben Chanan with dawn about to break, they realized they would never be able to get him down off the hill; his legs were too badly broken, and first light was approaching. Again, they were all doomed, but, for whatever the reason, G-d seemed to have different plans. So Ben Gal found, in the middle of the battlefield… a helicopter! Commandeering it himself, they flew in, picked Yossi and his soldier out from the heart of the enemy position, and brought them back to base. (Yoni and his men, for whom there was no room in the small helicopter, simply turned and walked back down the mountain!)


So if Yossi Ben Chanan was supposed to survive, why did Hashem need Netanyahu’s commandos to head up the hill? Why not just send the helicopter in to begin with?

What is this balance between the seemingly natural and the observably miraculous, that always lies intertwined at the heart of life’s experiences and challenges?

Indeed, why did Eliezer ask G-d for such a complicated verification of what he was looking for? Why not simply say that the girl who approaches him and offers him water will be the one for Yitzchak?

The Talmud suggests that Eliezer’s request was not entirely correct:

“Shmuel bar Nachmani said in the name of Rav Yonatan: Eliezer, the servant of Avraham, even though he asked an unreasonable request, was responded to reasonably: (He said “The girl to whom I say: ‘Please tilt your pitcher….”, which could have been any girl, even … a mentally imbalanced girl, yet Rivkah opportuned to come to him.” (Tractate Ta’anit 4a)

In other words, explains Rav Baruch Ha’Levi Epstein in his Torah Temimah:

“Ein Somchin Al Ha’Nes”, “We are not supposed to rely on miracles”.

And when we pray for something we are actually meant to specify what it is we need (and not just assume Hashem will figure it out and provide the right thing).

Yet, if one is not supposed to expect the miraculous, then why is Eliezer asking for such a farfetched sign, to determine the correct bride for Yitzchak?

This is complicated even further by the fact that there seems to be a specific injunction in the Torah against just such a weighted request, known as Nichush, or Divination.

The Torah tells us one is not supposed to declare in advance that if certain events transpire, they are signs meant to imply specific forms of behavior. In other words, if I declare, that if a black bird lands on my balcony in the next five minutes, I will take it as a sign that I am meant to pursue a particular business deal, even if a black bird does indeed land on my balcony two minutes later, I have transgressed the prohibition of “Lo’ Te’Nachshu’ ” (“Thou shall not Divine”). We are meant to trust in G-d, and not give our lives over to the random forces of nature. So why wasn’t Eliezer’s declared ‘test’ not a form of Nichush (Divination)?

In fact, the Talmud uses this very story of Eliezer finding Rivkah as the prime example of what Nichush really is! :

“Rav said, any case of Nichush which is not like the case of Eliezer, the servant of Avraham, is not Nichush.” (Chullin 95b)

In other words, any divination wherein a person does not completely rely on a given occurrence, as opposed to what Eliezer did here (declaring he would only pursue a girl as a potential bride if she behaved exactly as he described in advance…) is not forbidden (as a form of idolatry). Which leaves us wondering why Eliezer was not in fact guilty of Nichush (Divination)? Or was he? Was Rivkah, the bride of Yitzchak and the matriarch of the Jewish people, chosen by way of witchcraft?

The Torah Temimah suggests an explanation that may help us to unlock this entire puzzle: The fundamental difference between Divination, and what Eliezer did, was in the simple inclusion of one additional ‘detail’: the name of G-d.

Nichush is when a person seeks a particular occurrence or event on which he can rely; it refers to a person’s declaration that such an occurrence can be used to steer one’s path in life. The seemingly random occurrences in the world are then declared to be the basis for our actions in this world, and indeed they represent the sum total of all that is real in this world.

That is why Divination is so closely associated with pagan idolatry, relying as it does on the pattern of events and activity in the natural order of the world. Paganism is in fact the worship of nature, and is centered on the worship of all things in nature: the power and the beauty, and even the stream of activity so much a part of nature and the natural order.

Ultimately, then, Nichush, or divination, is the suggestion that the natural order is the source of reality in this world.

Eliezer, however, was not declaring such actions to be the source of reality; he was simply requesting of (praying to) the true source of all reality, Hashem, those actions as a demonstration that he was on the right path. This, then, is not divination, but in fact a form of affirmation that it is really G-d that runs the world.

If it is merely actions that determine reality, then the source of such activity is unimportant. Judaism suggests, however, that the challenge is to recognize that all the events that unfold in this world are ultimately steered by the source of all reality, towards a common goal.

Indeed, suggests the Torah Temimah, perhaps the word Nichush is also related to the root Kachash, which means denial, because assuming the events that we see to be the sum total of all reality, is to deny the higher reality (G-d) from whence they stem.

This brings us back full circle to the story of Eliezer.

Ultimately, Eliezer (and through him Avraham, and for that matter Yitzchak as well) could not sit at home and wait for the proper bride to show up on their doorstep. If we are not partnered somehow with G-d in making the world a better place, then there is no purpose to our being here. The question, however, is how much we are willing to stand up and do our share in changing the world, and impacting reality.

However, in our pursuit of such a partnership with G-d we are forced to make challenging decisions and choices, which leaves us with a dilemma: how do we know the choices we have made are indeed correct?

If G-d always tells us what choices to make, then they are no longer our choices, and we are not serving any purpose in this world, and certainly we are not living up to our potential as partners with G-d.

Yet, when we are faced with such difficult decisions, how are we to know that we are indeed on the right path, pursuing the correct course of action? How can we be sure we are following the path G-d created for us?

It is in this respect, once we have struggled with such choices, that we have the right to ask G-d’s help. In effect, we want to be Hashem’s partners, and we want Hashem to help us be the best partners we can be.

To quote the Vilna Gaon (in his Even Sheleimah), to assume G-d’s help, and believe with perfect faith that G-d will respond to our prayers, if we have done nothing to help make those prayers come true, is not faith; it is the height of arrogance.

Who says we are worthy of G-d helping us? What have we really done, in fact, to deserve or expect such help? Only once we have done everything in our power (including struggling with all the possibilities inherent in such difficult decisions) do we then have the right, and perhaps even the responsibility, to ask Hashem’s help. At this point, a person has the right to say: ‘I have done everything I possibly can; now I need Your help.’

In fact, this is the essence of what true partnership is all about: the willingness to step up and do everything you can to ensure success, while at the same time recognizing, and even appreciating, that you cannot do it alone.

This then, is perhaps why Avraham feels, now Sarah is gone, that he has to do everything in his power to live up to the partnership G-d has entrusted him with. Yet, at the same time, the woman who will be a worthy partner for the likes of a Yitzchak, brought up in the tent of Avraham, an environment of extreme ethics and loving kindness, will need character traits that are far above average.

To live up to the responsibility of entering the family of the same Avraham who is willing to pray for the wicked people of Sodom; the man who runs to greet guests in the desert heat immediately after his circumcision, and whose shepherds refuse to allow their flocks to graze on Canaanite land, idolaters though they be, (for fear of taking that which is not theirs,) is no simple task. Such a woman would have to be extraordinary; and so Eliezer realizes that he can only go so far; ultimately it will be up to G-d to provide such a unique person.

And maybe this is the essence of what finding the right people and projects in our life is all about.

Indeed, Yitzchak has little or nothing to do with meeting and marrying his wife. Eliezer is sent to find an appropriate mate for the future father of the Jewish people. He finds her, sees that she ‘fits the profile’ and brings her home, whereupon Rivkah and Yitzchak see each other, and get married! In fact, the Torah tells us that Yitzchak does not even love Rivkah until after they are married!

“And the servant (Eliezer) told to Yitzchak all the things he had done, and Yitzchak brought her (Rivkah) into the tent of Sarah his mother, and he took (read: married) Rivkah, and she became unto him a wife, and he loved her….” (24:66-67)

How could Yitzchak only love Rivkah after they were married? Isn’t love a prerequisite for a successful marriage? In truth, what the Torah is perhaps suggesting here is an entirely different understanding of what relationships are all about. What is love, and for that matter what is marriage?

We live in a society that views relationship as based first and foremost on some ‘loving feeling’; on the here and now; if I am not enjoying this moment with you, then why should I pursue a relationship into the future? Which is why Hollywood portrays people so often meeting and almost immediately ‘making love’ without even knowing each other’s names.

But that is not what love is all about. We make the mistake in thinking that love is something you find, hence you can ‘lose that loving feeling’. But love isn’t a noun; it’s a verb, and it isn’t something you find, it’s something you build.

In fact, love is all about giving (hence the relationship between the Aramaic Hav, giving, and the Hebrew Ahava, love.), as opposed to lust, which is all about taking. The more I give to something, the more I love it. This is why the assumption that you can love someone on first sight is mistaken. The feeling we sometimes have in such moments is not true love; it is rather the excitement at the potential for love. But that potential takes a lot of work if it is ever to become real.

Hence Yitzchak can marry Rivkah, once Eliezer has ascertained that the awesome potential for love is there. But that love will only come later, once they are both willing to put in the work.

In fact, it is this work that is the essence of all loving relationships. We have made love and marriage so complicated, with so much scrutiny and analysis, that it is a wonder anyone gets married!

What indeed do two people need to be sure of before getting married? It’s not as complicated as one might think, and essentially boils down to three things:They need to trust and respect each other.
2. They need to share common goals and dreams.
And 3. They need to be willing to put in the long hard years of work that allow for such trust and respect to grow, and such dreams to be achieved, together.

Most people think once they have found the right person, the hard part is done; but the marriage of Yitzchak suggests that the work has just begun.

And of course, this is the secret of every relationship, including our relationship with G-d. Do we trust G-d? Do we respect G-d? Do we share the same goals as G-d? And do we want a relationship with Him? Are we prepared to put in the work? Do we love Hashem? Do we believe Hashem (G-d) loves us?

Perhaps, if we are willing to make the effort, in this as in all relationships, Hashem will more than meet us half-way. And what an amazing world that would be.

Shabbat Shalom.