by HaRav Dov Begon
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir
In the Shmonah Esreh prayer, after the request for the ingathering of the exiles, comes the request: “Restore our judges as at the first, and our counselors as at the beginning; remove from us grief and suffering.” This ordering is no coincidence. As the ingathering of the exiles continues, we make the urgent request that G-d set up legal and educational systems for the Jewish People as they originally were, so that “Remove from us grief and suffering” can be fulfilled. Indeed, the individual and national mood depends upon these two systems - that of education and that of law. If these systems operate properly, resting upon kindness, mercy, and justice, there is joy and happiness in the world. If, however, education and law are corrupt, then there is grief and suffering, and the nation is engulfed in sadness.
In the past, in Biblical times, those in charge of education and law were the wise men, the rabbis and prophets -- the noble men of spirit whose task it was to educate the Jewish People in the light of the holy Torah to follow in G-d’s path. It was Hillel who said, “Be among the students of Aaron, loving peace and pursuing peace, loving people and bringing them close to the Torah” (Pirkei Avot 1). The legal system was in the hands of the Sanhedrin, in which sat the greatest Torah scholars, men of sterling character, fearful of sin, chosen carefully to stand at the head of the legal system. The whole nation was nourished spiritually and morally by these noble, superior personages.
Right now, we are at the height of a period of ingathering of exiles. As such, it is only natural that there be tension as the different streams of Israeli society struggle over the spiritual, cultural and legal fabric that that society should have. In these struggles, we must scrupulously safeguard the unity of the people despite differences of opinion.
Rav Tzvi Yehuda Kook used to say that education and law are two spheres that must be rectified within the Jewish People, and that this can be achieved through returning to the sources, for through this we become one. Moreover, the more we delve into those sources, the greater will be our common ground. Yet in order to begin rapprochement between the different camps, what is most important is clarifying such questions as who and what we are as a nation, and what is unique about us. By studying and clarifying the identity and destiny of the Jewish People, we will understand that we are a chosen people whose historic destiny was already stated to the father of our nation, Avraham: “I will make you into a great nation... You shall become a blessing.... All the families of the earth will be blessed through you” (Bereisheet 12:2-3). When these ideas are set firmly in the hearts of the Jewish masses, we will continue together on the winding pathway upward towards complete, redemption, secure and joyful.
Looking forward to salvation,
With the Love of Israel,
Shabbat Shalom.
Friday, March 17, 2023
Biden Administration's Delusional Plan to Combat Palestinian Terrorism
by Bassam Tawil

The Biden administration is fooling itself into believing that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and the PA leadership will suddenly change their policy towards the terrorists just because they are getting an additional 5,000 "commandos." These "commandos" will simply join the tens of thousands of Palestinian security officers who are doing nothing to enforce law and order or prevent terrorism. Pictured: Terrorists from the Fatah-affiliated al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades march in Nablus on March 14, 2023, to show support for Palestinian terrorists held in Israeli custody. (Photo by Jaafar Ashtiyeh/AFP via Getty Images)
The Biden administration believes that the best way to de-escalate tensions between Israel and the Palestinians is by allowing the Palestinian Authority (PA) to recruit more officers to the Palestinian security forces in the West Bank.
According to reports, the Biden Administration officials recently proposed a plan "to provide 5,000 Palestinians with commando training in Jordan" and then deploy them to areas under the control of the PA. The 5,000 officers will bring with them 5,000 rifles to Palestinian cities and towns -- where almost every Palestinian already has a weapon.
Continue Reading Article
- [T]he Biden Administration officials recently proposed a plan "to provide 5,000 Palestinians with commando training in Jordan" and then deploy them to areas under the control of the PA. The 5,000 officers will bring with them 5,000 rifles to Palestinian cities and towns -- where almost every Palestinian already has a weapon.
- Any time the US has funded, armed and trained Palestinian militias, the target has invariably ended up not terrorist groups but Israelis. Why is there any reason to think that this time will be different?
- In addition, the plan would require Israel "to sharply curtail IDF counterterror operations." The Biden administration, in other words, wants Israel to stop defending itself and rely on the Palestinian leadership and the new Palestinian "commandos" to go after the terrorists. Palestinian officials, meanwhile, are busy glorifying terrorism and paying visits to the families of terrorists.
- This would leave the Israelis with the rights to neither self-defense nor hot-pursuit. Terrorists will be able strike inside Israel, then run back to the Palestinian areas where they will be "home free;" instead of being arrested, they will be celebrated.
- The Biden plan also reportedly "foresees the deployment of foreign forces, including U.S. military forces, on the ground."
- Israel, roughly the size of New Jersey, would have on its border a Palestinian terrorist army, well-trained, well-funded, and "protected" by a superpower.
- [The Israelis] would find themselves in the impossible position of risking harming the Europeans and Americans forces stationed there. These troops, mingled among the Palestinians, would essentially be "human shields," deliberately placed in harm's way to prevent Israel from taking any action.
- What, then, is the Biden Administration really doing?
- An international military presence to help the Palestinians in the West Bank would handcuff the Israelis. This appears to be the real plan.
- Worse, if "foreign countries" were allowed into the West Bank to work with the new US-trained Palestinian militias, who would get to decide which foreign countries?
- Or perhaps the US will try to persuade the Palestinians to reintegrate Gaza, run by Hamas, an Iranian proxy, into the West Bank, as the US Department of State's new Special Representative for Palestinian Affairs, Hady Amr, recommended in his Brookings report?
- It would be suicidal for Israel to permit "foreign forces," who any day could be hostile, on border of Jerusalem. Why would, or should, any country, especially such a small one, place its border security in the less-than-reliable hands of someone else? Would Germany? Would France?
- All that is needed is for Abbas to order his security forces to go after the armed groups, in accordance with the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement (Oslo II) of 1995.
- Abbas, however, has so far refused to issue such an order. He is most probably afraid that if he does so, his people, who view the terrorists as "heroes," would revolt against him, denounce him as a "traitor" a "collaborator" with Israel, and kill him, as happened to Egyptian President Anwar Sadat after he signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
- The Palestinian Authority is not prepared to send its forces to arrest Palestinian terrorists so long as they do not pose a threat to Abbas or his associates.
- Abbas's security forces proved that they can be tough, but only against human rights activists, not terrorists.
- If the Biden Administration were serious about the Palestinian Authority reining in its terrorists, it could simply demand that the Palestinians honor Article XIV of the Oslo II agreement, which states that, "except for the Palestinian Police and the Israeli military forces, no other armed forces shall be established or operate in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip."
- The Biden Administration could also remind the Palestinians of Article XV of the same agreement that states that "both sides shall take all measures necessary in order to prevent acts of terrorism, crimes and hostilities directed against each other..."
- Above all, the Biden Administration needs to keep all foreign troops out of the area. They are simply decoys -- to protect the terrorists from counterattacks.

The Biden administration is fooling itself into believing that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and the PA leadership will suddenly change their policy towards the terrorists just because they are getting an additional 5,000 "commandos." These "commandos" will simply join the tens of thousands of Palestinian security officers who are doing nothing to enforce law and order or prevent terrorism. Pictured: Terrorists from the Fatah-affiliated al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades march in Nablus on March 14, 2023, to show support for Palestinian terrorists held in Israeli custody. (Photo by Jaafar Ashtiyeh/AFP via Getty Images)
The Biden administration believes that the best way to de-escalate tensions between Israel and the Palestinians is by allowing the Palestinian Authority (PA) to recruit more officers to the Palestinian security forces in the West Bank.
According to reports, the Biden Administration officials recently proposed a plan "to provide 5,000 Palestinians with commando training in Jordan" and then deploy them to areas under the control of the PA. The 5,000 officers will bring with them 5,000 rifles to Palestinian cities and towns -- where almost every Palestinian already has a weapon.
Continue Reading Article

Wednesday, March 15, 2023
Social and Political Centrifugation
BS”D
Parshiot Vayakhel and Pekudai 5783
by HaRav Nachman Kahana
The first order of business – right to the point: Why are people worried about what is happening in our beautiful Medinat Yisrael? I answer with a short parable:
A plane was experiencing dramatic turbulence. The passengers were frightened to death except for one young girl who sat very serenely. After the plane stabilized, they asked her why she was not frightened. And she replied: “My father is the pilot”.
In Eretz Yisrael our Father in Heaven is the “skipper”, the captain, the pilot, the master of all. There is a purpose, a direction, a goal which is being implemented by HaShem to draw us closer to Him in preparation for the final ascent to the peak of our Jewish Mount Everest – the restoration of our former greatness as the spiritual center connecting heaven and earth. The method HaShem is using is social and religious centrifugation. Centrifugation is separation through sedimentation – meaning that when centrifugal force is applied, the denser particles sink to the bottom of the container, while the more lightweight particles remain suspended.
More on this later.
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642, an Italian astronomer, physicist, and engineer) stated: “Mathematics is the language in which God has written the universe.”
Perhaps he was inspired by what Rambam stated in the Laws of Tshuva, chap. 3:
כל אחד ואחד מבני האדם יש לו זכיות ועונות, מי שזכיותיו יתירות על עונותיו צדיק, ומי שעונותיו יתירות על זכיותיו רשע, מחצה למחצה בינוני, וכן המדינה אם היו זכיות כל יושביה מרובות על עונותיהן הרי זו צדקת, ואם היו עונותיהם מרובין הרי זו רשעה, וכן כל העולם כולו.
Every individual has merits and demerits. One whose merits outnumber his demerits is catalogued a tzadik, but one whose demerits are more is a rasha. So it is with a nation and with all humanity (numbers determine the fate of individuals and nations).
Rambam continues to explain that HaShem’s reckoning is not calculated only on the basis of the number of merits and sins but takes into account their magnitude. There are some merits which outweigh many sins and in contrast, a sin may outweigh many merits.
It is no secret that we are experiencing a traumatic social period. Good-meaning people are endeavoring to unite the extremes in order to find a modus vivendi, but with little success. Why?
Answer: Another allegory: A man was down on all fours searching for a lost object. A by-passer inquired:
Q: What did you lose?
A: My wallet
Q: Where?
A: On the next street.
Q: So why are you looking for it here?
A: There it’s dark, here there’s a streetlight.
The peacemakers are looking in the wrong direction. They view the controversy as a political one where the losers are refusing to accept the outcome of the democratically held elections. This is partly correct but not correct enough to produce a solution.
We are experiencing a social challenge that’s been waiting 75 years to happen; and it appears that the time has come. It is a repeat of Jewish history where Torah loyal people are pitted against rejectionist Jews who wish to throw off the yoke placed upon our national collective shoulders at Mount Sinai.
It is a replay of those who danced in a frenzy around the Golden Calf while the Levites fought to protect the Torah we had just received from the Creator Himself.
This present episode is a time bomb long waiting to explode, as predicted in the Torah in Vayikra 20:22-24.
(כב) וּשְׁמַרְתֶּם אֶת כָּל חֻקֹּתַי וְאֶת כָּל מִשְׁפָּטַי וַעֲשִׂיתֶם אֹתָם וְלֹא תָקִיא אֶתְכֶם הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי מֵבִיא אֶתְכֶם שָׁמָּה לָשֶׁבֶת בָּהּ: (כג) וְלֹא תֵלְכוּ בְּחֻקֹּת הַגּוֹי אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי מְשַׁלֵּחַ מִפְּנֵיכֶם כִּי אֶת כָּל אֵלֶּה עָשׂוּ וָאָקֻץ בָּם: (כד) וָאֹמַר לָכֶם אַתֶּם תִּירְשׁוּ אֶת אַדְמָתָם וַאֲנִי אֶתְּנֶנָּה לָכֶם לָרֶשֶׁת אֹתָהּ אֶרֶץ זָבַת חָלָב וּדְבָשׁ אֲנִי ה’ אֱלֹהֵיכֶם אֲשֶׁר הִבְדַּלְתִּי אֶתְכֶם מִן הָעַמִּים:
22 You shall keep all my statutes and all my ordinances and observe them, so that the land to which I bring you to settle in will not regurgitate (expel) you. 23 You shall not follow the practices of the nation that I am driving out before you. Because they did all these things, I abhorred them. 24 But I have said to you, you shall inherit their land, and I will give it to you to possess, a land flowing with milk and honey. I am the Lord your God who has separated you from the gentile nations.
HaShem built into the fabric of nature that the land of Israel cannot suffer iniquities (sins), and eventually regurgitates the deniers of Torah from the land.
Seculars claim that:Their religious involvement is a private affair; so, if they choose to eat a cheeseburger on Yom Kippur day no one is harmed! False!
If consenting adults want to indulge in Torah-prohibited relations, it harms no one. False!
They have the right to live like a goy in Israel’s democratic society, no one is harmed. False!
False, false, so what is true?
A basic principle in Judaism is that HaShem instills in all people the physical and mental ability to sin, but not the halachic right to sin. A driver’s license awards one the legal permissibility to drive, but not the right to drive recklessly.
This principle is more serious in the land sanctified by HaShem where every sin affects not only the perpetrator but the population at large.
I recall several years ago a Shabbat guest rose from the table to go to the bathroom. After a few moments the smell of cigarette smoke emerged from the bathroom. The gentleman who smoked in my house on Shabbat was a well-known rabbi in New York.
I was in a quandary about what to do when he returned to the table. It’s one thing when a Jew violates the Shabbat in the street, but when he intrudes into my sanctuary to desecrate the values that I hold holy, my first reaction was to throw him out from our home.
Eretz Yisrael is HaShem’s sanctuary in this world. When one sins, the regurgitation process begins, first by demonstrating against the Torah, followed by transferring one’s money abroad, and then the land expels him and his family.
Three months ago, the citizens of Israel went to the election booths to decide which ideology would define the State of Israel for the foreseeable future. The majority voted for parties which were conservative, pro-Judaism and pro Eretz Yisrael, rejecting the central and left parties that desire freedom to decide one’s gender, freedom from our time-tested values and mores, freedom to reject G-d and the traditional values and social way of life as defined by the Torah. In short pro HaShem vs. the antis.
In the end it will play out that the rejectionists will either return to the Torah or they will not be here.
This is HaShem’s method of social and political centrifugation to separate the deniers from the believers.
The Winds of Anti-Semitism
I believed that I was up-to-date on current events, however, I received a phone call from a trusted friend (R.O.) informing me of the severity of the increasing anti-Semitic wave filling the hollow spaces in American society. Things that I was not aware of, having been in Israel over 60 years and not having visited the US for over 25.
Perhaps this is HaShem’s way of bringing G-d fearing Jews here prepared to sacrifice for the privilege of defending and building the land.
Every day the demographic balance in the county changes to the good of Torah, with the large birthrate of religious people and the very small birthright among the secular. The demonstrators see the writing on the wall, but they cannot erase it with all their shouting.
It appears that HaShem has changed gears and we are accelerating toward the configuration necessary for the final redemption of Am Yisrael.
No one promised us a smooth ride. There are people who won’t pay to take a pleasant walk, but pay to try the Pendulum ride, Roller coaster and Ferris wheel, because it makes them feel alive. The rebuilding of the Jewish State in our ancient holy land is what makes us feel alive as we implement the promises of our holy prophets.
Shabbat Shalom
Nachman Kahana
Copyright © 5783/2023 Nachman Kahana
Parshiot Vayakhel and Pekudai 5783
by HaRav Nachman Kahana
The first order of business – right to the point: Why are people worried about what is happening in our beautiful Medinat Yisrael? I answer with a short parable:
A plane was experiencing dramatic turbulence. The passengers were frightened to death except for one young girl who sat very serenely. After the plane stabilized, they asked her why she was not frightened. And she replied: “My father is the pilot”.
In Eretz Yisrael our Father in Heaven is the “skipper”, the captain, the pilot, the master of all. There is a purpose, a direction, a goal which is being implemented by HaShem to draw us closer to Him in preparation for the final ascent to the peak of our Jewish Mount Everest – the restoration of our former greatness as the spiritual center connecting heaven and earth. The method HaShem is using is social and religious centrifugation. Centrifugation is separation through sedimentation – meaning that when centrifugal force is applied, the denser particles sink to the bottom of the container, while the more lightweight particles remain suspended.
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642, an Italian astronomer, physicist, and engineer) stated: “Mathematics is the language in which God has written the universe.”
Perhaps he was inspired by what Rambam stated in the Laws of Tshuva, chap. 3:
כל אחד ואחד מבני האדם יש לו זכיות ועונות, מי שזכיותיו יתירות על עונותיו צדיק, ומי שעונותיו יתירות על זכיותיו רשע, מחצה למחצה בינוני, וכן המדינה אם היו זכיות כל יושביה מרובות על עונותיהן הרי זו צדקת, ואם היו עונותיהם מרובין הרי זו רשעה, וכן כל העולם כולו.
Every individual has merits and demerits. One whose merits outnumber his demerits is catalogued a tzadik, but one whose demerits are more is a rasha. So it is with a nation and with all humanity (numbers determine the fate of individuals and nations).
Rambam continues to explain that HaShem’s reckoning is not calculated only on the basis of the number of merits and sins but takes into account their magnitude. There are some merits which outweigh many sins and in contrast, a sin may outweigh many merits.
It is no secret that we are experiencing a traumatic social period. Good-meaning people are endeavoring to unite the extremes in order to find a modus vivendi, but with little success. Why?
Answer: Another allegory: A man was down on all fours searching for a lost object. A by-passer inquired:
Q: What did you lose?
A: My wallet
Q: Where?
A: On the next street.
Q: So why are you looking for it here?
A: There it’s dark, here there’s a streetlight.
The peacemakers are looking in the wrong direction. They view the controversy as a political one where the losers are refusing to accept the outcome of the democratically held elections. This is partly correct but not correct enough to produce a solution.
We are experiencing a social challenge that’s been waiting 75 years to happen; and it appears that the time has come. It is a repeat of Jewish history where Torah loyal people are pitted against rejectionist Jews who wish to throw off the yoke placed upon our national collective shoulders at Mount Sinai.
It is a replay of those who danced in a frenzy around the Golden Calf while the Levites fought to protect the Torah we had just received from the Creator Himself.
This present episode is a time bomb long waiting to explode, as predicted in the Torah in Vayikra 20:22-24.
(כב) וּשְׁמַרְתֶּם אֶת כָּל חֻקֹּתַי וְאֶת כָּל מִשְׁפָּטַי וַעֲשִׂיתֶם אֹתָם וְלֹא תָקִיא אֶתְכֶם הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי מֵבִיא אֶתְכֶם שָׁמָּה לָשֶׁבֶת בָּהּ: (כג) וְלֹא תֵלְכוּ בְּחֻקֹּת הַגּוֹי אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי מְשַׁלֵּחַ מִפְּנֵיכֶם כִּי אֶת כָּל אֵלֶּה עָשׂוּ וָאָקֻץ בָּם: (כד) וָאֹמַר לָכֶם אַתֶּם תִּירְשׁוּ אֶת אַדְמָתָם וַאֲנִי אֶתְּנֶנָּה לָכֶם לָרֶשֶׁת אֹתָהּ אֶרֶץ זָבַת חָלָב וּדְבָשׁ אֲנִי ה’ אֱלֹהֵיכֶם אֲשֶׁר הִבְדַּלְתִּי אֶתְכֶם מִן הָעַמִּים:
22 You shall keep all my statutes and all my ordinances and observe them, so that the land to which I bring you to settle in will not regurgitate (expel) you. 23 You shall not follow the practices of the nation that I am driving out before you. Because they did all these things, I abhorred them. 24 But I have said to you, you shall inherit their land, and I will give it to you to possess, a land flowing with milk and honey. I am the Lord your God who has separated you from the gentile nations.
HaShem built into the fabric of nature that the land of Israel cannot suffer iniquities (sins), and eventually regurgitates the deniers of Torah from the land.
Seculars claim that:Their religious involvement is a private affair; so, if they choose to eat a cheeseburger on Yom Kippur day no one is harmed! False!
If consenting adults want to indulge in Torah-prohibited relations, it harms no one. False!
They have the right to live like a goy in Israel’s democratic society, no one is harmed. False!
False, false, so what is true?
A basic principle in Judaism is that HaShem instills in all people the physical and mental ability to sin, but not the halachic right to sin. A driver’s license awards one the legal permissibility to drive, but not the right to drive recklessly.
This principle is more serious in the land sanctified by HaShem where every sin affects not only the perpetrator but the population at large.
I recall several years ago a Shabbat guest rose from the table to go to the bathroom. After a few moments the smell of cigarette smoke emerged from the bathroom. The gentleman who smoked in my house on Shabbat was a well-known rabbi in New York.
I was in a quandary about what to do when he returned to the table. It’s one thing when a Jew violates the Shabbat in the street, but when he intrudes into my sanctuary to desecrate the values that I hold holy, my first reaction was to throw him out from our home.
Eretz Yisrael is HaShem’s sanctuary in this world. When one sins, the regurgitation process begins, first by demonstrating against the Torah, followed by transferring one’s money abroad, and then the land expels him and his family.
Three months ago, the citizens of Israel went to the election booths to decide which ideology would define the State of Israel for the foreseeable future. The majority voted for parties which were conservative, pro-Judaism and pro Eretz Yisrael, rejecting the central and left parties that desire freedom to decide one’s gender, freedom from our time-tested values and mores, freedom to reject G-d and the traditional values and social way of life as defined by the Torah. In short pro HaShem vs. the antis.
In the end it will play out that the rejectionists will either return to the Torah or they will not be here.
This is HaShem’s method of social and political centrifugation to separate the deniers from the believers.
The Winds of Anti-Semitism
I believed that I was up-to-date on current events, however, I received a phone call from a trusted friend (R.O.) informing me of the severity of the increasing anti-Semitic wave filling the hollow spaces in American society. Things that I was not aware of, having been in Israel over 60 years and not having visited the US for over 25.
Perhaps this is HaShem’s way of bringing G-d fearing Jews here prepared to sacrifice for the privilege of defending and building the land.
Every day the demographic balance in the county changes to the good of Torah, with the large birthrate of religious people and the very small birthright among the secular. The demonstrators see the writing on the wall, but they cannot erase it with all their shouting.
It appears that HaShem has changed gears and we are accelerating toward the configuration necessary for the final redemption of Am Yisrael.
No one promised us a smooth ride. There are people who won’t pay to take a pleasant walk, but pay to try the Pendulum ride, Roller coaster and Ferris wheel, because it makes them feel alive. The rebuilding of the Jewish State in our ancient holy land is what makes us feel alive as we implement the promises of our holy prophets.
Shabbat Shalom
Nachman Kahana
Copyright © 5783/2023 Nachman Kahana
The Walk and the Talk of Ain Od Milvado
by Rabbi Pinchas Winston
Friday Night
THE EXPRESSION IS, “You only get one shot at a first impression,” and in life, a first impression can mean everything. A good one can open doors for a person who might not be that worthy, and a bad first impression can leave a worthy person always fighting uphill.
The Hebrew word for impression is roshem, which may not mean that much…unless you learn Kabbalah. Then it means a ton, because the Roshem is why we’re here at all, and why we have all that we do and so much more than we don’t yet even know about. The amazing thing about this roshem is how so very little can result in so very much. It’s like watching a rough building sketch in the sand rise into a state-of-the-art skyscraper on the spot, and then some.
I have chosen to write about this now because I am currently involved in translating some material on the topic and am super amazed by the idea. I am also writing about it now because the material is from Rabbi Shlomo Elyashiv, zt”l, whose yahrzeit is next Monday, b”H, on the 27th of Adar. And you may notice that “Leshem Shevo v’Achlamah” is mentioned in this week’s parsha (Shemos 39:12), which also happens to be the name of all of Rabbi Elyashiv’s seforim. How’s that for hashgochah pratis!
The problem is that understanding and appreciating the idea of the Roshem requires a lot of background information, some of which I have mentioned piecemeal over the years, and most of which I have written about in my books. It would take too long and too many pages to do that here, so I feel like that rabbi who succumbed to temptation and golfed a hole-in-one one Shabbos morning on his way to shul. As God told some very confused angels (even a hole-in-one on a Shabbos morning is Divine Providence), “Who’s he going to tell?” In my case it is more like, “What am I going to tell?”
Maybe we should start with an analogy. It’s like a class that is supposed to have a new teacher. If the teacher introduces themself to the class on their first day, they’ll have a tough time from the beginning. But if the principal, whom the students fear, is the one to introduce the new teacher and ask for cooperation, the teacher may have a more respectful environment in which to begin. Even after the principal has left the room, the impression he leaves behind is usually enough to set the proper stage for the new teacher.
Now comes the hard part: translating a simple analogy into a sophisticated kabbalistic idea.
God can do anything He wants, any way He wants to do it. We can’t even confirm if our reality is actually occurring, or just taking place in our minds, whatever our minds may actually be. The mishnah in Pirkei Avos (5:1) questions why God made Creation in 10 statements because it knows that God could have done it in one, even none. When a human does something a specific way, it is often because of some limitation. When God does, it is only to give us the greatest good, and perhaps teach us something about life along the way.
We haven’t strayed from our topic. We’re just working our way towards the answer.
Shabbos Day
THERE ARE DIFFERENT levels of appreciation. The average person walking the street might marvel at a fancy car or enjoy a good steak, but rarely thinks about how amazing life is, or the world that supports it. A scientist who studies that world and pays closer attention to how it works should have a higher level of appreciation, but may pay little regard to how any of it became possible in the first place. He may not care about the process God used to make the potential that is the basis of all existence, especially if He has a difficult time believing in Him.
There is a difference between being God and just a god. All kinds of ancient societies believed in several gods at one time, which meant that each one had limited existence and power. Even though Zeus in Greek mythology was the boss, he was still dependent upon others to do his bidding. His thunderbolts could only do so much. He was limited.
God, on the other hand, shares nothing. He is infinite, omnipotent, and omniscient. He is not in the world. The world, by definition, is within Him (though He does an amazing job of hiding this from the unworthy). That’s a problem, because according to our understanding of infinity, nothing else should be able to exist besides God’s infinite light, especially us and our finite world.
We don’t know how that works, just how it came to be. God told us. God wanted to reveal Himself to something, though we don’t know why, other than that He is all good and wanted to do good to something else. Go figure. So He emanated a spiritual light from His Essence, which we don’t understand or talk about, and created a concept called Tzimtzum—Constriction. Nevertheless, this only resulted in Ohr Ain Sof—Light Without End, a spiritual light that was still very infinite except that it also possessed the potential for the future world of man.
The next step was to constrict that light even more, and this resulted in a spherical area called the Challal—Hollow. Compared to infinity it is very small, but compared to our universe, it is massive beyond comprehension though—and this is really important—quite limited. In fact, so limited that it resulted in something we take totally for granted but, which is what allows us to exist and make life meaningful: measurement. Without measurement nothing finite can exist, and there can be no up or down, right or left, small or big, etc.
The Challal therefore, was the net result of withdrawing Ohr Ain Sof back from a single point to a certain “area” beyond that point. What God was left with was a spherical area in which Ohr Ain Sof is no longer, surrounded by nothing but Ohr Ain Sof infinitely on all sides and in every direction, kept in place by nothing other than the will of God. The Challal is a spiritual “hole” that God “excavated” within Ohr Ain Sof in order to be a “construction site” for the future Creation.
Only one problem (at least). Excavating a hole only provides a place for future construction. Construction itself requires all the necessary materials which have to come from somewhere else, in this case the Ohr Ain Sof that was just evacuated. The Challal meant that Creation could now happen, but seemingly at the cost of losing the very potential to make it happen.
Unless of course, the Ohr Ain Sof, on its way out, left something behind…like a roshem, for example.
Seudas Shlishis
IN GENERAL, THE word means “residue.” If you let the water out of a bathtub, some water will remain on its walls that you can’t do much with, perhaps together with a soap film, but it certainly tells you that water once filled the tub. That’s the “impression” the water left on its way out.
Likewise, the roshem left by the Ohr Ain Sof on its way out, compared to the Ohr Ain Sof from which it came, was like residue of residue. Relative to its source, it was practically non-existent. And yet, it contained all the potential for any world that would ever exist, everything that would ever exist within it, and all that would ever occur. Compared to the Ohr Ain Sof it was next to nothing. Compared to anything we know, it is everything.
Nothing would have ever come of that potential though had God not let some more Ohr Ain Sof (Kav Ohr Ain Sof) back into the Challal to actualize the potential in the Roshem, but that’s an even longer story. Excavating for a skyscraper leaves nothing but a hole. “Excavating” for Creation left the possibility of a finite world and everything necessary to make it happen.
This was not the only level at which this occurred. This process of emanation and withdrawal happened all the way down, and still does. The emanation brings the potential down to a new and lower level, and the withdrawal leaves that potential behind in roshem form to later be actualized.
Even more amazing is how we, human beings, are the product of the same process and live by it as well. From birth we have all this potential that we do not know about or even sense, until something comes along to make us access it. The light that first led to our conception gave it to us, before withdrawing to another plane.
When it comes time to actualize a specific potential, God will emanate a new light that will result in some kind of event, perhaps a crisis of some sort, to cause us to act in a way to bring that specific potential into reality. It’s very similar to how the Kav Ohr Ain Sof later re-enters the Challal to activate potential in the Roshem to create new worlds and everything in them.
The point is that we have no idea of our potential unless we have already actualized some of it. We tend to look at life as just one random event after another, at least the ones that we don’t plan. But God knows exactly what we’re capable of, and when we need to find out for ourselves, the events of lives occur to help us do exactly that.
Change your approach to daily life. Get used to asking: What potential might this event, planned or unplanned, help me to actualize?
Ain Od Milvado, Part 32
THIS WAS THE Mishkan. Yes, it was a house of worship and spiritual focal point for the Jewish people. But it was also an “event” God sent our way to push us to new spiritual heights, just in the building of it. The events that led up to its construction, including the incident of the golden calf, were custom-designed to move the Jewish people to the next level at that stage of history. That’s the way it always works.
But what is it all leading towards? What is all our potential supposed to help us do? To become increasingly real with the realization that there is nothing other than God, because this is the ultimate potential waiting to be actualized. It sounds kind of trivial, but it is the basis of the ultimate prophecy for mankind: “God will be King over the entire earth. On that day, God will be One, and His Name, One” (Zechariah 14:9).
Obviously billions of people need to move up quite a few levels with respect to ain od Milvado. But even people who believe that they’ve got this idea down are capable of reaching much greater heights. It’s one thing to quote it, paint it on your car window, or make it into a bumper sticker, but it is something that is supposed to be forefront in our minds no matter what we experience.
For example, this means never getting frustrated or angry. God is behind what you’re going through, and it is for your good, as bad as it seems to you. If you watch the news, you shouldn’t hear a human anchorman, but God talking through their mouth saying, “Hi, I’m God. You want to see what I did today, as crazy as it may seem to you?”
You constantly hear today, “This world is so crazy!” or “People are so crazy!” It is true, but it is also all God. When Rebi Akiva said after his personal misfortune, “All that God does He does for the good,” he wasn’t simply just calming himself down. He was accepting that all of it had been to push him to a higher level of ain od Milvado, and it did.
The rabbis of the Mishnah said that they’d rather not live during the time of Moshiach’s arrival. They knew how confusing and difficult it would be to stay spiritually aligned. Today, you can’t afford to only talk ain od Milvado. You have to walk it too, and that is what all of the events of today have been sent to lead us to.
Friday Night
THE EXPRESSION IS, “You only get one shot at a first impression,” and in life, a first impression can mean everything. A good one can open doors for a person who might not be that worthy, and a bad first impression can leave a worthy person always fighting uphill.
The Hebrew word for impression is roshem, which may not mean that much…unless you learn Kabbalah. Then it means a ton, because the Roshem is why we’re here at all, and why we have all that we do and so much more than we don’t yet even know about. The amazing thing about this roshem is how so very little can result in so very much. It’s like watching a rough building sketch in the sand rise into a state-of-the-art skyscraper on the spot, and then some.
I have chosen to write about this now because I am currently involved in translating some material on the topic and am super amazed by the idea. I am also writing about it now because the material is from Rabbi Shlomo Elyashiv, zt”l, whose yahrzeit is next Monday, b”H, on the 27th of Adar. And you may notice that “Leshem Shevo v’Achlamah” is mentioned in this week’s parsha (Shemos 39:12), which also happens to be the name of all of Rabbi Elyashiv’s seforim. How’s that for hashgochah pratis!
The problem is that understanding and appreciating the idea of the Roshem requires a lot of background information, some of which I have mentioned piecemeal over the years, and most of which I have written about in my books. It would take too long and too many pages to do that here, so I feel like that rabbi who succumbed to temptation and golfed a hole-in-one one Shabbos morning on his way to shul. As God told some very confused angels (even a hole-in-one on a Shabbos morning is Divine Providence), “Who’s he going to tell?” In my case it is more like, “What am I going to tell?”
Maybe we should start with an analogy. It’s like a class that is supposed to have a new teacher. If the teacher introduces themself to the class on their first day, they’ll have a tough time from the beginning. But if the principal, whom the students fear, is the one to introduce the new teacher and ask for cooperation, the teacher may have a more respectful environment in which to begin. Even after the principal has left the room, the impression he leaves behind is usually enough to set the proper stage for the new teacher.
Now comes the hard part: translating a simple analogy into a sophisticated kabbalistic idea.
God can do anything He wants, any way He wants to do it. We can’t even confirm if our reality is actually occurring, or just taking place in our minds, whatever our minds may actually be. The mishnah in Pirkei Avos (5:1) questions why God made Creation in 10 statements because it knows that God could have done it in one, even none. When a human does something a specific way, it is often because of some limitation. When God does, it is only to give us the greatest good, and perhaps teach us something about life along the way.
We haven’t strayed from our topic. We’re just working our way towards the answer.
Shabbos Day
THERE ARE DIFFERENT levels of appreciation. The average person walking the street might marvel at a fancy car or enjoy a good steak, but rarely thinks about how amazing life is, or the world that supports it. A scientist who studies that world and pays closer attention to how it works should have a higher level of appreciation, but may pay little regard to how any of it became possible in the first place. He may not care about the process God used to make the potential that is the basis of all existence, especially if He has a difficult time believing in Him.
There is a difference between being God and just a god. All kinds of ancient societies believed in several gods at one time, which meant that each one had limited existence and power. Even though Zeus in Greek mythology was the boss, he was still dependent upon others to do his bidding. His thunderbolts could only do so much. He was limited.
God, on the other hand, shares nothing. He is infinite, omnipotent, and omniscient. He is not in the world. The world, by definition, is within Him (though He does an amazing job of hiding this from the unworthy). That’s a problem, because according to our understanding of infinity, nothing else should be able to exist besides God’s infinite light, especially us and our finite world.
We don’t know how that works, just how it came to be. God told us. God wanted to reveal Himself to something, though we don’t know why, other than that He is all good and wanted to do good to something else. Go figure. So He emanated a spiritual light from His Essence, which we don’t understand or talk about, and created a concept called Tzimtzum—Constriction. Nevertheless, this only resulted in Ohr Ain Sof—Light Without End, a spiritual light that was still very infinite except that it also possessed the potential for the future world of man.
The next step was to constrict that light even more, and this resulted in a spherical area called the Challal—Hollow. Compared to infinity it is very small, but compared to our universe, it is massive beyond comprehension though—and this is really important—quite limited. In fact, so limited that it resulted in something we take totally for granted but, which is what allows us to exist and make life meaningful: measurement. Without measurement nothing finite can exist, and there can be no up or down, right or left, small or big, etc.
The Challal therefore, was the net result of withdrawing Ohr Ain Sof back from a single point to a certain “area” beyond that point. What God was left with was a spherical area in which Ohr Ain Sof is no longer, surrounded by nothing but Ohr Ain Sof infinitely on all sides and in every direction, kept in place by nothing other than the will of God. The Challal is a spiritual “hole” that God “excavated” within Ohr Ain Sof in order to be a “construction site” for the future Creation.
Only one problem (at least). Excavating a hole only provides a place for future construction. Construction itself requires all the necessary materials which have to come from somewhere else, in this case the Ohr Ain Sof that was just evacuated. The Challal meant that Creation could now happen, but seemingly at the cost of losing the very potential to make it happen.
Unless of course, the Ohr Ain Sof, on its way out, left something behind…like a roshem, for example.
Seudas Shlishis
IN GENERAL, THE word means “residue.” If you let the water out of a bathtub, some water will remain on its walls that you can’t do much with, perhaps together with a soap film, but it certainly tells you that water once filled the tub. That’s the “impression” the water left on its way out.
Likewise, the roshem left by the Ohr Ain Sof on its way out, compared to the Ohr Ain Sof from which it came, was like residue of residue. Relative to its source, it was practically non-existent. And yet, it contained all the potential for any world that would ever exist, everything that would ever exist within it, and all that would ever occur. Compared to the Ohr Ain Sof it was next to nothing. Compared to anything we know, it is everything.
Nothing would have ever come of that potential though had God not let some more Ohr Ain Sof (Kav Ohr Ain Sof) back into the Challal to actualize the potential in the Roshem, but that’s an even longer story. Excavating for a skyscraper leaves nothing but a hole. “Excavating” for Creation left the possibility of a finite world and everything necessary to make it happen.
This was not the only level at which this occurred. This process of emanation and withdrawal happened all the way down, and still does. The emanation brings the potential down to a new and lower level, and the withdrawal leaves that potential behind in roshem form to later be actualized.
Even more amazing is how we, human beings, are the product of the same process and live by it as well. From birth we have all this potential that we do not know about or even sense, until something comes along to make us access it. The light that first led to our conception gave it to us, before withdrawing to another plane.
When it comes time to actualize a specific potential, God will emanate a new light that will result in some kind of event, perhaps a crisis of some sort, to cause us to act in a way to bring that specific potential into reality. It’s very similar to how the Kav Ohr Ain Sof later re-enters the Challal to activate potential in the Roshem to create new worlds and everything in them.
The point is that we have no idea of our potential unless we have already actualized some of it. We tend to look at life as just one random event after another, at least the ones that we don’t plan. But God knows exactly what we’re capable of, and when we need to find out for ourselves, the events of lives occur to help us do exactly that.
Change your approach to daily life. Get used to asking: What potential might this event, planned or unplanned, help me to actualize?
Ain Od Milvado, Part 32
THIS WAS THE Mishkan. Yes, it was a house of worship and spiritual focal point for the Jewish people. But it was also an “event” God sent our way to push us to new spiritual heights, just in the building of it. The events that led up to its construction, including the incident of the golden calf, were custom-designed to move the Jewish people to the next level at that stage of history. That’s the way it always works.
But what is it all leading towards? What is all our potential supposed to help us do? To become increasingly real with the realization that there is nothing other than God, because this is the ultimate potential waiting to be actualized. It sounds kind of trivial, but it is the basis of the ultimate prophecy for mankind: “God will be King over the entire earth. On that day, God will be One, and His Name, One” (Zechariah 14:9).
Obviously billions of people need to move up quite a few levels with respect to ain od Milvado. But even people who believe that they’ve got this idea down are capable of reaching much greater heights. It’s one thing to quote it, paint it on your car window, or make it into a bumper sticker, but it is something that is supposed to be forefront in our minds no matter what we experience.
For example, this means never getting frustrated or angry. God is behind what you’re going through, and it is for your good, as bad as it seems to you. If you watch the news, you shouldn’t hear a human anchorman, but God talking through their mouth saying, “Hi, I’m God. You want to see what I did today, as crazy as it may seem to you?”
You constantly hear today, “This world is so crazy!” or “People are so crazy!” It is true, but it is also all God. When Rebi Akiva said after his personal misfortune, “All that God does He does for the good,” he wasn’t simply just calming himself down. He was accepting that all of it had been to push him to a higher level of ain od Milvado, and it did.
The rabbis of the Mishnah said that they’d rather not live during the time of Moshiach’s arrival. They knew how confusing and difficult it would be to stay spiritually aligned. Today, you can’t afford to only talk ain od Milvado. You have to walk it too, and that is what all of the events of today have been sent to lead us to.
Hollow Sanctimony Over Hawara
by Daniel Greenfield
That evening, some Jewish residents showed up to protest in Hawara. And some did more than protest. They set the junk cars in a nearby lot on fire. A few threw stones and smashed things. The terrorists claim that one of their own was killed in the rioting, but that is suspect.
The outrage that ensued was everything that had been entirely absent from the terrorist killings of 14 Israelis this year, including an American, Elan Ganeles, who was killed the next day.
Biden’s State Department spokesman Ned Price blasted what he falsely called, “the wide scale and indiscriminate violence by settlers against Palestinians civilians” and demanded that Israel “ensure full accountability and prosecute those responsible for the attacks in addition to compensation for the property.”
This comes as the Biden administration has not only failed to demand accountability from the Palestinian Authority, but continues to fund the terrorists killing Jews.
Nobody expected anything else from the Biden administration or the media. An optimist might have expected more from American Jews.
The Sabbath of that week was the one known as ‘Zachor’ or ‘Remember’ during which the biblical verses from (Deuteronomy 25:17-19) commemorating an attack on the freed Jewish slaves leaving Egypt are read. “Remember what Amalek did to you on the way, when you went out of Egypt, how he happened upon you on the way and cut off all the stragglers at your rear.”
In Judaism, those verses are so important that everyone must come to the synagogue to hear them. Long before the Holocaust, ‘Never Again’ was engraved with burning letters in the Bible. That reading was followed by the story of King Shaul who was removed from ruling over Israel because he had taken pity on the Amalekite king. The Prophet Samuel, an old man, takes up the sword and does what the king failed to do and executes him, stating bluntly, “As your sword bereaved women, so will your mother be bereaved among women.” (Samuel 1 15:33)
In one of the larger and wealthier Modern Orthodox synagogues in the Los Angeles area, the rabbi’s sermon was not on the subject of these politically incorrect readings even though they represent a unique religious obligation for which many of the congregants had come to the synagogue. Nor did the murder of Elan Ganeles, who had been part of the same Modern Orthodox movement, among the fourteen Jews murdered by terrorists just that year, come up.
Instead, like the rabbis of a number of other Modern Orthodox congregations, he denounced “vigilantes” and the way they had disgraced the Jewish people by taking the law into their own hands, and spoke at length of how terrible it was for Jews to fight back in such a manner.
Over the Purim week, I’ve heard stories of similar condemnations of ‘vigilantism’ delivered in mellifluous tones from the pulpits of prosperous synagogues resting in suburban enclaves.
That Sabbath was the gateway to the Jewish holiday of Purim which relates how the Jews gathered en masse and wreaked havoc on those who had plotted to exterminate them.
“And the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword and with slaying and destruction,” Megilat Esther, the Scroll of Esther, relates. That’s more than a junk car lot fire.
The Los Angeles Jewish community recently panicked over shootings which wounded two men. Its synagogues are protected by extensive armed security. How would American Jews react if such shootings were an everyday occurrence, not an aberration? What might they be willing to do if they watched those around them be battered, shot and killed week after week?
“After the brutal murder, candies and sweets were handed out, cake was distributed, and people were singing. When did all this stop?” Sackett wrote of what happened in the Muslim village after the riot. “Since that day, not one rock has been thrown at Jewish cars.”
The ethical question of when people may take the law into their hands is a difficult one. Violence should never be an easy answer, but when things get bad enough, it can be inescapable. And those who live privileged lives of comfort and security could at least try to envision what life is like for those under the gun.
American Jews, even those in the Modern Orthodox community, remain crippled by liberal niceties, by the conviction that violence is something only the ‘bad guys’ commit.
“How can such a thing happen? How could it come to this, that Jewish young men should ransack and burn homes and cars?” Rabbi Moshe Hauer, the Executive Vice President of the Orthodox Union, deplored.
After constant terrorism, it’s more of a wonder that so few go out and do such things.
But on a Purim long ago, Jewish young men did far worse in Shushan. And King Shaul was deposed by the word of G-d not because he went too far, but didn’t go far enough.
Mindlessly deploring violence, regardless of the circumstances, is not a Jewish value.
The Torah warns against needless violence, but it also commands it if the situation calls for it. Some Modern Orthodox Jews have so absorbed liberal pieties that they are shocked and horrified by violence and have lost touch with Jewish values. They agonized over the video of some of the rioters praying ‘Maariv’ as if there were an innate contradiction with reciting ‘Aleinu’: derived from the prayer recited by Joshua when entering to conquer the land of Israel.
It’s understandable for people who live comfortable lives to deplore violence and ugliness, but there’s something deeply troubling when there’s more moral outrage directed at Jews burning junk cars in the village of their killers than at the killers. That isn’t morality speaking, it’s shame.
Modern Orthodox Jews who fall into the trap of holding Israeli Jews to one standard and their Arab Muslim attackers to a much lower one are duplicating the infamous Israel double standard. Under such double standards, survival becomes all but impossible. If the targets of terrorism are chained down by liberal pieties with everything expected of them and nothing of their enemies, that’s not morality, it’s a suicide pact. And there’s nothing Jewish about a suicide pact. either.
The ugly reality is that violence works. Building a society that transcends violence requires the cooperation of both sides. Without such cooperation, civilization doesn’t exist, neither does law and order. Israeli law, or that of any country, is completely inadequate to such a problem. The Israeli military or security service going in to occasionally arrest a few terrorists is a band-aid.
In a tribal society, tribal violence is a natural resort. Last fall, the Druze, a Muslim minority group in Israel, threatened to storm an Arab Muslim city after terrorists kidnapped one of their own from the hospital and tried to hold him hostage. Druze men brandished rifles and warned that if the body wasn’t returned to the family, they would take it. The Hawara rioters played by those rules. Unless a new Israeli government can cut a better deal than tribal violence, that may be the reality. Governments exist, among other things, to protect people from violence. If they show that they are unwilling and unable to systemically do so, they leave their people no other choice.
And American Jews would do better to understand than to sanctimoniously condescend.
Jews, even pro-Israel Jews, all too often embody Robert Frost’s line, “a liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel.” Those who condemned the protesters, while offering hardly a thought for their killers, boasted that they “been accused of being blindly pro-Israel” in the past, but now they had disproven it. There is nothing shameful about being “blindly pro-America”, “pro-Israel” or “pro-civilization” when faced with a struggle to the death. It’s a liberal fallacy to think that objectivity is the way to confront the moral issues that arise when trying to survive.
American liberal Jews have all too easily forgotten what life and death struggles look like. They panic when they see Jews fighting back and condemn even the mildest reactions with far more outrage than they do the terrorists who are murdering them. That perhaps is why ‘Zachor’ or ‘Remember’ had to be a divine mandate. Most peoples would not need to be ordered to remember to strike back, but Jews are uncomfortable with such things and easily forget.
A voice from heaven had thundered, “Remember!” while a thousand smaller voices still command, “Forget”.
One Sunday, two brothers, Hillel and Yagel Yaniv, young men with a bright future ahead of them were murdered while stuck in traffic in the Muslim village of Hawara in Israel. The locals celebrated their crime by singing, handing out candy and shooting off fireworks in the air.
“Every day, yes! – every single day – at least 20 Jewish cars get stoned while driving through Hawara,” Shmuel Sackett, the head of a tree-planting foundation, wrote.
1,600 Israeli Jewish families have to travel the road that goes through the village. Stoning cars, he clarified, means “throwing bricks and dropping cinder blocks from rooftops.”
“Imagine a young mother with 3 children in her car, driving home from the supermarket. As she is driving, a brick comes crashing through her windshield. The shock of what happened is enough to give her a heart attack! The children start screaming, there is broken glass everywhere, but she cannot stop for help… because she’s in the middle of Hawara with a mob just waiting to finish the job.”
“Every day, yes! – every single day – at least 20 Jewish cars get stoned while driving through Hawara,” Shmuel Sackett, the head of a tree-planting foundation, wrote.
1,600 Israeli Jewish families have to travel the road that goes through the village. Stoning cars, he clarified, means “throwing bricks and dropping cinder blocks from rooftops.”
“Imagine a young mother with 3 children in her car, driving home from the supermarket. As she is driving, a brick comes crashing through her windshield. The shock of what happened is enough to give her a heart attack! The children start screaming, there is broken glass everywhere, but she cannot stop for help… because she’s in the middle of Hawara with a mob just waiting to finish the job.”
That evening, some Jewish residents showed up to protest in Hawara. And some did more than protest. They set the junk cars in a nearby lot on fire. A few threw stones and smashed things. The terrorists claim that one of their own was killed in the rioting, but that is suspect.
The outrage that ensued was everything that had been entirely absent from the terrorist killings of 14 Israelis this year, including an American, Elan Ganeles, who was killed the next day.
Biden’s State Department spokesman Ned Price blasted what he falsely called, “the wide scale and indiscriminate violence by settlers against Palestinians civilians” and demanded that Israel “ensure full accountability and prosecute those responsible for the attacks in addition to compensation for the property.”
This comes as the Biden administration has not only failed to demand accountability from the Palestinian Authority, but continues to fund the terrorists killing Jews.
Nobody expected anything else from the Biden administration or the media. An optimist might have expected more from American Jews.
The Sabbath of that week was the one known as ‘Zachor’ or ‘Remember’ during which the biblical verses from (Deuteronomy 25:17-19) commemorating an attack on the freed Jewish slaves leaving Egypt are read. “Remember what Amalek did to you on the way, when you went out of Egypt, how he happened upon you on the way and cut off all the stragglers at your rear.”
In Judaism, those verses are so important that everyone must come to the synagogue to hear them. Long before the Holocaust, ‘Never Again’ was engraved with burning letters in the Bible. That reading was followed by the story of King Shaul who was removed from ruling over Israel because he had taken pity on the Amalekite king. The Prophet Samuel, an old man, takes up the sword and does what the king failed to do and executes him, stating bluntly, “As your sword bereaved women, so will your mother be bereaved among women.” (Samuel 1 15:33)
In one of the larger and wealthier Modern Orthodox synagogues in the Los Angeles area, the rabbi’s sermon was not on the subject of these politically incorrect readings even though they represent a unique religious obligation for which many of the congregants had come to the synagogue. Nor did the murder of Elan Ganeles, who had been part of the same Modern Orthodox movement, among the fourteen Jews murdered by terrorists just that year, come up.
Instead, like the rabbis of a number of other Modern Orthodox congregations, he denounced “vigilantes” and the way they had disgraced the Jewish people by taking the law into their own hands, and spoke at length of how terrible it was for Jews to fight back in such a manner.
Over the Purim week, I’ve heard stories of similar condemnations of ‘vigilantism’ delivered in mellifluous tones from the pulpits of prosperous synagogues resting in suburban enclaves.
That Sabbath was the gateway to the Jewish holiday of Purim which relates how the Jews gathered en masse and wreaked havoc on those who had plotted to exterminate them.
“And the Jews smote all their enemies with the stroke of the sword and with slaying and destruction,” Megilat Esther, the Scroll of Esther, relates. That’s more than a junk car lot fire.
The Los Angeles Jewish community recently panicked over shootings which wounded two men. Its synagogues are protected by extensive armed security. How would American Jews react if such shootings were an everyday occurrence, not an aberration? What might they be willing to do if they watched those around them be battered, shot and killed week after week?
“After the brutal murder, candies and sweets were handed out, cake was distributed, and people were singing. When did all this stop?” Sackett wrote of what happened in the Muslim village after the riot. “Since that day, not one rock has been thrown at Jewish cars.”
The ethical question of when people may take the law into their hands is a difficult one. Violence should never be an easy answer, but when things get bad enough, it can be inescapable. And those who live privileged lives of comfort and security could at least try to envision what life is like for those under the gun.
American Jews, even those in the Modern Orthodox community, remain crippled by liberal niceties, by the conviction that violence is something only the ‘bad guys’ commit.
“How can such a thing happen? How could it come to this, that Jewish young men should ransack and burn homes and cars?” Rabbi Moshe Hauer, the Executive Vice President of the Orthodox Union, deplored.
After constant terrorism, it’s more of a wonder that so few go out and do such things.
But on a Purim long ago, Jewish young men did far worse in Shushan. And King Shaul was deposed by the word of G-d not because he went too far, but didn’t go far enough.
Mindlessly deploring violence, regardless of the circumstances, is not a Jewish value.
The Torah warns against needless violence, but it also commands it if the situation calls for it. Some Modern Orthodox Jews have so absorbed liberal pieties that they are shocked and horrified by violence and have lost touch with Jewish values. They agonized over the video of some of the rioters praying ‘Maariv’ as if there were an innate contradiction with reciting ‘Aleinu’: derived from the prayer recited by Joshua when entering to conquer the land of Israel.
It’s understandable for people who live comfortable lives to deplore violence and ugliness, but there’s something deeply troubling when there’s more moral outrage directed at Jews burning junk cars in the village of their killers than at the killers. That isn’t morality speaking, it’s shame.
Modern Orthodox Jews who fall into the trap of holding Israeli Jews to one standard and their Arab Muslim attackers to a much lower one are duplicating the infamous Israel double standard. Under such double standards, survival becomes all but impossible. If the targets of terrorism are chained down by liberal pieties with everything expected of them and nothing of their enemies, that’s not morality, it’s a suicide pact. And there’s nothing Jewish about a suicide pact. either.
The ugly reality is that violence works. Building a society that transcends violence requires the cooperation of both sides. Without such cooperation, civilization doesn’t exist, neither does law and order. Israeli law, or that of any country, is completely inadequate to such a problem. The Israeli military or security service going in to occasionally arrest a few terrorists is a band-aid.
In a tribal society, tribal violence is a natural resort. Last fall, the Druze, a Muslim minority group in Israel, threatened to storm an Arab Muslim city after terrorists kidnapped one of their own from the hospital and tried to hold him hostage. Druze men brandished rifles and warned that if the body wasn’t returned to the family, they would take it. The Hawara rioters played by those rules. Unless a new Israeli government can cut a better deal than tribal violence, that may be the reality. Governments exist, among other things, to protect people from violence. If they show that they are unwilling and unable to systemically do so, they leave their people no other choice.
And American Jews would do better to understand than to sanctimoniously condescend.
Jews, even pro-Israel Jews, all too often embody Robert Frost’s line, “a liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel.” Those who condemned the protesters, while offering hardly a thought for their killers, boasted that they “been accused of being blindly pro-Israel” in the past, but now they had disproven it. There is nothing shameful about being “blindly pro-America”, “pro-Israel” or “pro-civilization” when faced with a struggle to the death. It’s a liberal fallacy to think that objectivity is the way to confront the moral issues that arise when trying to survive.
American liberal Jews have all too easily forgotten what life and death struggles look like. They panic when they see Jews fighting back and condemn even the mildest reactions with far more outrage than they do the terrorists who are murdering them. That perhaps is why ‘Zachor’ or ‘Remember’ had to be a divine mandate. Most peoples would not need to be ordered to remember to strike back, but Jews are uncomfortable with such things and easily forget.
A voice from heaven had thundered, “Remember!” while a thousand smaller voices still command, “Forget”.
Monday, March 13, 2023
Rav Kook's Ein Ayah: The Intersection of the Intellect and Emotion
(based on Ein Ayah, Berachot 1:136)
Gemara: “Who is like the wise, and who knows the pesher (literally, the deeper understanding, but here, compromise) of the matter?” (Kohelet 8:1). Who is like Hashem Who knows how to make a compromise between two tzaddikim, Chizkiyah (the king) and Yeshaya (the prophet)? Chizkiya said: “Yeshaya should come to me, as we have found that Eliyahu went before Achav …” Yeshaya said: “Chizkiya should come to me, for we have found that Yehoram the son of Achav came before Elisha…” What did Hashem do? He brought afflictions onto Chizkiya and said to Yeshaya to go visit the sick.
Ein Ayah: The power of prophecy that Hashem bestowed upon Israelduring its era had the goal of fulfilling the eternal needs of the nation. It was meant to make eternal spiritual life attainable and to teach the ways of life to be used to obtain constant existence, so that its spirit would last forever and merit eternal national existence.
The power of the monarchy was to strengthen Israel’s national life in the present. Realize that there are ways of leading that add power to the nation in the short term but detract from its future prospects. Similarly, there are many things that weaken the nation in the short term but provide power and resolve in the future.
Following an extreme is always difficult and dangerous. If the nation is concerned only with future success and pays no attention to present needs, marauders will come to plunder and kill in a way that will endanger the people’s spiritual status and their hopes for eternal existence. On the other hand, the destruction can be immense if the heart of the nation is seduced to place its concerns only on short term life and strength. In so doing, they will trip and fall after a generation.
Hashem, Who guards Israel, regularly arranges factors that cause a balance between the power of the immediate and the future survival so that the nation does not trip in its path and will survive for many generations into the future. “As the new heavens and the new land stand before Me, so too will your offspring and your name stand” (Yeshaya 66:22).
Therefore, Yeshaya was concerned that if he gave precedence to the power of the monarchy [by going to Chizkiya], the nation’s spirit might fall and forget their efforts for eternity. Chizkiya was concerned that if the nation would see the power of the kingdom as weak in relation to that of prophecy, they would lose political strength. This could cause bad outcomes for their moral status, even in regard to Torah, fear of Hashem, and good middot, which the king’s power supported.
Hashem made a compromise between them. The eye of providence saw that according to the status of Israel at that time, they needed an exactly equal balance between the concerns. The public perception had to be that the kingdom had ultimate power and strength of the nationhood. Yet, those seeing the inner situation would see the king surrendering his temporary leadership for the welfare of prophetic eternity. This was Hashem’s compromise. Chizkiya was afflicted; Yeshaya went to visit the ill. Openly, the king was primary, for Yeshaya went to him. Internally, it was the king who suffered. This showed that sometimes, the immediate outlook of national strength has to cede when it rivals the eternal goals. From the external perspective of sensual desires, people need to be held in check by a powerful [righteous] kingdom. However, internally, regarding one’s intellect and desires for sanctity, he needs to be lead by a more gentle dominion, which shows the positive path, and out of love choose the path of good [represented by prophecy]. This is along the lines of the Rambam (Melachim 2:5) that although, externally, the king should have an advantage over a prophet, Yehoshafat privately would rise from his chair to honor talmidei chachamim.
Gemara: “Who is like the wise, and who knows the pesher (literally, the deeper understanding, but here, compromise) of the matter?” (Kohelet 8:1). Who is like Hashem Who knows how to make a compromise between two tzaddikim, Chizkiyah (the king) and Yeshaya (the prophet)? Chizkiya said: “Yeshaya should come to me, as we have found that Eliyahu went before Achav …” Yeshaya said: “Chizkiya should come to me, for we have found that Yehoram the son of Achav came before Elisha…” What did Hashem do? He brought afflictions onto Chizkiya and said to Yeshaya to go visit the sick.
Ein Ayah: The power of prophecy that Hashem bestowed upon Israelduring its era had the goal of fulfilling the eternal needs of the nation. It was meant to make eternal spiritual life attainable and to teach the ways of life to be used to obtain constant existence, so that its spirit would last forever and merit eternal national existence.
The power of the monarchy was to strengthen Israel’s national life in the present. Realize that there are ways of leading that add power to the nation in the short term but detract from its future prospects. Similarly, there are many things that weaken the nation in the short term but provide power and resolve in the future.
Following an extreme is always difficult and dangerous. If the nation is concerned only with future success and pays no attention to present needs, marauders will come to plunder and kill in a way that will endanger the people’s spiritual status and their hopes for eternal existence. On the other hand, the destruction can be immense if the heart of the nation is seduced to place its concerns only on short term life and strength. In so doing, they will trip and fall after a generation.
Hashem, Who guards Israel, regularly arranges factors that cause a balance between the power of the immediate and the future survival so that the nation does not trip in its path and will survive for many generations into the future. “As the new heavens and the new land stand before Me, so too will your offspring and your name stand” (Yeshaya 66:22).
Therefore, Yeshaya was concerned that if he gave precedence to the power of the monarchy [by going to Chizkiya], the nation’s spirit might fall and forget their efforts for eternity. Chizkiya was concerned that if the nation would see the power of the kingdom as weak in relation to that of prophecy, they would lose political strength. This could cause bad outcomes for their moral status, even in regard to Torah, fear of Hashem, and good middot, which the king’s power supported.
Hashem made a compromise between them. The eye of providence saw that according to the status of Israel at that time, they needed an exactly equal balance between the concerns. The public perception had to be that the kingdom had ultimate power and strength of the nationhood. Yet, those seeing the inner situation would see the king surrendering his temporary leadership for the welfare of prophetic eternity. This was Hashem’s compromise. Chizkiya was afflicted; Yeshaya went to visit the ill. Openly, the king was primary, for Yeshaya went to him. Internally, it was the king who suffered. This showed that sometimes, the immediate outlook of national strength has to cede when it rivals the eternal goals. From the external perspective of sensual desires, people need to be held in check by a powerful [righteous] kingdom. However, internally, regarding one’s intellect and desires for sanctity, he needs to be lead by a more gentle dominion, which shows the positive path, and out of love choose the path of good [represented by prophecy]. This is along the lines of the Rambam (Melachim 2:5) that although, externally, the king should have an advantage over a prophet, Yehoshafat privately would rise from his chair to honor talmidei chachamim.
Holy and Mundane
by HaRav Mordechai Greenberg
Nasi HaYeshiva, Kerem B'Yavneh
The ten curtains of the Mishkan were attached in a special manner. They did not sew the ten curtains into one large one, nor did they leave any two curtains separate, as it says (Shemot 36:10-13):
He attached five curtains to one another, and five curtains he attached to one another. He made loops of turquoise wool on the edge of a single curtain at the end of one set; so he did at the edge of the outermost curtain on the second set ... He made fifty clasps of gold and attached the curtains to one another with the clasps -- so the Mishkan became one.
The Sforno explains that when the curtains were spread out on the Mishkan, the place where the two sets of curtains were connected with the clasps was directly above the Parochet, which separated between the holy and holy-of-holies. This manner of attachment -- not through sewing, yet no two separate, but rather connection with clasps -- comes to teach that, on the one hand, the holy connects with the holy-of-holies -- "the Mishkan became one." Yet, on the other hand, they did not spread one curtain on the entire Mishkan, to indicate that the holy and holy-of-holies are not one level, but are distinct.
This idea has a deep meaning. There are those who focus on the spiritual realm alone, disregarding material needs. There are also those who submerse themselves in the pleasures of the physical world, and seek to negate spirituality, which, in their opinion, contradicts materialism. The truth is that G-d is one: "The Creator of all is He." So, too, Israel: "One nation in the land," and unity is the basis of its worldview. Israel knows that the mundane, holy, and holy-of-holies are, indeed, distinct in their levels, but they are not detached one from another. The soul is above the body, but connected to it, and needs it, just as every spiritual matter requires a material container.
It says in the Zohar that the Divine Presence does not dwell in a place that is lacking. Therefore, the Mishkan, the dwelling of the Divine Presence, has to unify all the separate elements. Thus, all the various level of holiness are united in it, yet, at the same time, the different levels are recognizable. "Differentiation is not separation," and the definition of the various levels does not necessarily lead to a separation between them.
The Kabbalists compare this relationship to that of the sanctity of Shabbat and Yom Kippur. Shabbat is more sacred than Yom Kippur, since one who desecrates Shabbat is sentenced with stoning, whereas one who desecrates Yom Kippur is punished with karet. Nonetheless, it is a mitzvah to enjoy the Shabbat with food and material things, and on Yom Kippur, whose sanctity is less, there is a mitzvah of affliction. This teaches that self-affliction is not the ideal, only once a year in order to atone for sins, but rather the primary mitzvah is to sanctify the physical life. Thus it says in Parshat Mishpatim, "You shall be holy people to Me." (Shemot 22:30) The Kotzker Rebbe comments that G-d does not lack angels and seraphim, but rather He wants that there be holy people, who live in a mundane world, but are holy.
Thus, G-d Himself commands, "They shall make a Sanctuary for Me -- so that I may dwell among them." (Shemot 25:8) G-d desired that He have a dwelling specifically in the material world.
Nasi HaYeshiva, Kerem B'Yavneh
The ten curtains of the Mishkan were attached in a special manner. They did not sew the ten curtains into one large one, nor did they leave any two curtains separate, as it says (Shemot 36:10-13):
He attached five curtains to one another, and five curtains he attached to one another. He made loops of turquoise wool on the edge of a single curtain at the end of one set; so he did at the edge of the outermost curtain on the second set ... He made fifty clasps of gold and attached the curtains to one another with the clasps -- so the Mishkan became one.
The Sforno explains that when the curtains were spread out on the Mishkan, the place where the two sets of curtains were connected with the clasps was directly above the Parochet, which separated between the holy and holy-of-holies. This manner of attachment -- not through sewing, yet no two separate, but rather connection with clasps -- comes to teach that, on the one hand, the holy connects with the holy-of-holies -- "the Mishkan became one." Yet, on the other hand, they did not spread one curtain on the entire Mishkan, to indicate that the holy and holy-of-holies are not one level, but are distinct.
This idea has a deep meaning. There are those who focus on the spiritual realm alone, disregarding material needs. There are also those who submerse themselves in the pleasures of the physical world, and seek to negate spirituality, which, in their opinion, contradicts materialism. The truth is that G-d is one: "The Creator of all is He." So, too, Israel: "One nation in the land," and unity is the basis of its worldview. Israel knows that the mundane, holy, and holy-of-holies are, indeed, distinct in their levels, but they are not detached one from another. The soul is above the body, but connected to it, and needs it, just as every spiritual matter requires a material container.
It says in the Zohar that the Divine Presence does not dwell in a place that is lacking. Therefore, the Mishkan, the dwelling of the Divine Presence, has to unify all the separate elements. Thus, all the various level of holiness are united in it, yet, at the same time, the different levels are recognizable. "Differentiation is not separation," and the definition of the various levels does not necessarily lead to a separation between them.
The Kabbalists compare this relationship to that of the sanctity of Shabbat and Yom Kippur. Shabbat is more sacred than Yom Kippur, since one who desecrates Shabbat is sentenced with stoning, whereas one who desecrates Yom Kippur is punished with karet. Nonetheless, it is a mitzvah to enjoy the Shabbat with food and material things, and on Yom Kippur, whose sanctity is less, there is a mitzvah of affliction. This teaches that self-affliction is not the ideal, only once a year in order to atone for sins, but rather the primary mitzvah is to sanctify the physical life. Thus it says in Parshat Mishpatim, "You shall be holy people to Me." (Shemot 22:30) The Kotzker Rebbe comments that G-d does not lack angels and seraphim, but rather He wants that there be holy people, who live in a mundane world, but are holy.
Thus, G-d Himself commands, "They shall make a Sanctuary for Me -- so that I may dwell among them." (Shemot 25:8) G-d desired that He have a dwelling specifically in the material world.
Rav Kook on Parashat Vayakheil: Technology and Shabbat
“Do not ignite fire in any of your dwellings on Shabbat day.” (Shemot 35:3)
The Torah forbids 39 different categories of activity on Shabbat. Yet only one — lighting fire — is explicitly prohibited in the Torah. Why?
And why does the Torah qualify the prohibition of lighting fire with the phrase, “in any of your dwellings"? Is it not forbidden to start a fire in any location?
Guidelines for Technology
The control and use of fire is unique to humanity. It is the basis for our advances in science and innovations in technology. Even now, fuel sources for burning, coal and oil, are what power modern societies. In short, fire is a metaphor for our power and control over nature, the fruit of our God-given intelligence.
What is the central message of Shabbat? When we refrain from working on the seventh day, we acknowledge that God is the Creator of the world.
One might think that only the pristine natural world is truly the work of God. Human technology, on the other hand, is artificial and perhaps alien to the true purpose of the universe. Therefore, the Torah specifically prohibits lighting fire on Shabbat, emphasizing that our progress in science and technology is also part of creation. Everything is included in the ultimate design of the universe. Our advances and inventions contribute towards the goal of creation in accordance with God’s sublime wisdom.
Along with the recognition that all of our accomplishments are in essence the work of God, we must also be aware that we have tremendous power to change and improve the world. This change will be for a blessing if we are wise enough to utilize our technology within the guidelines of integrity and holiness.

Fire in the Beit HaMikdash
This caveat leads to the second question we asked: why does the Torah limit the prohibition of lighting fire on the Shabbat to “your dwellings"? The Talmud (Shabbat 20a) explains that lighting fire is only forbidden in private dwellings, but in the Beit HaMikdash, it is permitted to burn offerings on Shabbat. Why should fire be permitted in the Beit HaMikdash?
The holy Beit HaMikdash was a focal point of prophecy and Divine revelation. It was the ultimate source of enlightenment, for both the individual and the nation. The fire used in the Beit HaMikdash is a metaphor for our mission to improve the world through advances in science and technology. We need to internalize the message that it is up to us to develop and advance the world, until the entire universe is renewed with a new heart and soul, with understanding and harmony. Permitting the technological innovation of fire in Beit HaMikdash on Shabbat indicates that God wants us to utilize our intellectual gifts to innovate and improve, in a fashion similar to God’s own creative acts.
We need to be constantly aware of our extraordinary potential when we follow the path that our Maker designated for us. At this spiritual level, we should not think that we are incapable of accomplishing new things. As the Talmud declares, “If they desire, the righteous can create worlds” (Sanhedrin 65b). When humanity attains ethical perfection, justice will then guide all of our actions, and scientific advances and inventions will draw their inspiration from the source of Divine morality, the holy Beit HaMikdash.
(Gold from the Land of Israel, pp. 164-165. Adapted from Ein Eyah vol. III, p. 53 by Rav Chanan Morrison)
The Torah forbids 39 different categories of activity on Shabbat. Yet only one — lighting fire — is explicitly prohibited in the Torah. Why?
And why does the Torah qualify the prohibition of lighting fire with the phrase, “in any of your dwellings"? Is it not forbidden to start a fire in any location?
Guidelines for Technology
The control and use of fire is unique to humanity. It is the basis for our advances in science and innovations in technology. Even now, fuel sources for burning, coal and oil, are what power modern societies. In short, fire is a metaphor for our power and control over nature, the fruit of our God-given intelligence.
What is the central message of Shabbat? When we refrain from working on the seventh day, we acknowledge that God is the Creator of the world.
One might think that only the pristine natural world is truly the work of God. Human technology, on the other hand, is artificial and perhaps alien to the true purpose of the universe. Therefore, the Torah specifically prohibits lighting fire on Shabbat, emphasizing that our progress in science and technology is also part of creation. Everything is included in the ultimate design of the universe. Our advances and inventions contribute towards the goal of creation in accordance with God’s sublime wisdom.
Along with the recognition that all of our accomplishments are in essence the work of God, we must also be aware that we have tremendous power to change and improve the world. This change will be for a blessing if we are wise enough to utilize our technology within the guidelines of integrity and holiness.

Fire in the Beit HaMikdash
This caveat leads to the second question we asked: why does the Torah limit the prohibition of lighting fire on the Shabbat to “your dwellings"? The Talmud (Shabbat 20a) explains that lighting fire is only forbidden in private dwellings, but in the Beit HaMikdash, it is permitted to burn offerings on Shabbat. Why should fire be permitted in the Beit HaMikdash?
The holy Beit HaMikdash was a focal point of prophecy and Divine revelation. It was the ultimate source of enlightenment, for both the individual and the nation. The fire used in the Beit HaMikdash is a metaphor for our mission to improve the world through advances in science and technology. We need to internalize the message that it is up to us to develop and advance the world, until the entire universe is renewed with a new heart and soul, with understanding and harmony. Permitting the technological innovation of fire in Beit HaMikdash on Shabbat indicates that God wants us to utilize our intellectual gifts to innovate and improve, in a fashion similar to God’s own creative acts.
We need to be constantly aware of our extraordinary potential when we follow the path that our Maker designated for us. At this spiritual level, we should not think that we are incapable of accomplishing new things. As the Talmud declares, “If they desire, the righteous can create worlds” (Sanhedrin 65b). When humanity attains ethical perfection, justice will then guide all of our actions, and scientific advances and inventions will draw their inspiration from the source of Divine morality, the holy Beit HaMikdash.
(Gold from the Land of Israel, pp. 164-165. Adapted from Ein Eyah vol. III, p. 53 by Rav Chanan Morrison)
More Than the Jews Have Preserved Shabbat...
by Rabbi Dov Berel Wein
Rashi points out that the opening portion of this week’s Torah reading was transmitted by Moshe to the entire Jewish people in public, when they were all gathered. These laws of Shabbat that represent one of the core pillars of Judaism – the observance of the Sabbath day as a day of rest and spirituality – were communicated to everyone in a public venue. No one was obligated to hear it secondhand, and take the word of anyone else, regarding the proper method of observance of Shabbat.
Everyone heard the instructions simultaneously and clearly, publicly, and definitively. The observance of Shabbat has, to a great extent, been counted by other cultures as faith at its essence and remains a uniquely Jewish idea and code of behavior. The idea of a day of rest from the toil of the week has certainly been adapted by most of human civilization. However, the methodology of defining and implementing such an abstract idea as a day of rest into reality remains wholly within the purview of Jewish tradition and Torah observance.
There is, perhaps, no more striking a mark of absolute Jewish identity that exists in our society than that of observing, sanctifying, and enjoying Shabbat. It is a truism said by a Jewish 19th century popular thinker, that more than the Jews guarded and preserved Shabbat, Shabbat guarded and preserved the Jewish people. To emphasize this point, the Torah teaches us that Shabbat not only preserves the sanctity and spirit of the individual Jew, but, since it was given publicly with everyone gathered to hear its message, it is also the guarantor for the preservation of all Jewish society and the people of Israel throughout the ages.
The fact that Shabbat was so publicly explained and detailed, teaches us another important lesson regarding Jewish life in Jewish society. There are commandments in the Torah that can rightfully be described as private and personal. Shabbat, however, has not only a private face to it, but a public one as well. The Jews are commanded to keep the Sabbath in their private homes, but there must also be a public Shabbat, so to speak. It must be apparent on the Jewish Street that Shabbat has arrived and is present.
Public desecration of t Shabbat by individual Jews was a far more damaging sort of behavior than the violation of other precepts in the privacy of one's home. Part of the struggle here in the State of Israel is for the growth and influence of the public Shabbat to be maintained, as part of the Jewish identity for all Jews who live here in our ancient home. Denying the concept of Shabbat to maintain total freedom of each individual is like a person who drills a hole under his or her seat on a ship and claims it will not affect anyone else. It is the public Shabbat as much as the private one that guarantees the survival of Jewish society and the Jewish state as well.
Rashi points out that the opening portion of this week’s Torah reading was transmitted by Moshe to the entire Jewish people in public, when they were all gathered. These laws of Shabbat that represent one of the core pillars of Judaism – the observance of the Sabbath day as a day of rest and spirituality – were communicated to everyone in a public venue. No one was obligated to hear it secondhand, and take the word of anyone else, regarding the proper method of observance of Shabbat.
Everyone heard the instructions simultaneously and clearly, publicly, and definitively. The observance of Shabbat has, to a great extent, been counted by other cultures as faith at its essence and remains a uniquely Jewish idea and code of behavior. The idea of a day of rest from the toil of the week has certainly been adapted by most of human civilization. However, the methodology of defining and implementing such an abstract idea as a day of rest into reality remains wholly within the purview of Jewish tradition and Torah observance.
There is, perhaps, no more striking a mark of absolute Jewish identity that exists in our society than that of observing, sanctifying, and enjoying Shabbat. It is a truism said by a Jewish 19th century popular thinker, that more than the Jews guarded and preserved Shabbat, Shabbat guarded and preserved the Jewish people. To emphasize this point, the Torah teaches us that Shabbat not only preserves the sanctity and spirit of the individual Jew, but, since it was given publicly with everyone gathered to hear its message, it is also the guarantor for the preservation of all Jewish society and the people of Israel throughout the ages.
The fact that Shabbat was so publicly explained and detailed, teaches us another important lesson regarding Jewish life in Jewish society. There are commandments in the Torah that can rightfully be described as private and personal. Shabbat, however, has not only a private face to it, but a public one as well. The Jews are commanded to keep the Sabbath in their private homes, but there must also be a public Shabbat, so to speak. It must be apparent on the Jewish Street that Shabbat has arrived and is present.
Public desecration of t Shabbat by individual Jews was a far more damaging sort of behavior than the violation of other precepts in the privacy of one's home. Part of the struggle here in the State of Israel is for the growth and influence of the public Shabbat to be maintained, as part of the Jewish identity for all Jews who live here in our ancient home. Denying the concept of Shabbat to maintain total freedom of each individual is like a person who drills a hole under his or her seat on a ship and claims it will not affect anyone else. It is the public Shabbat as much as the private one that guarantees the survival of Jewish society and the Jewish state as well.
Friday, March 10, 2023
Igrot Hare’aya–Letters of Rav Kook: Why Moshavot do not appoint Rabbis, part I
#146 – part I
Date and Place: 17 Sivan 5668 (1908), Yafo
Recipient: Rav Yitzchak Isaac Halevi. We have featured letters to him several times before.
Body: The situation in the New Yishuv is not as religiously strong as [standard, even “integrated”] Diaspora communities. In the Diaspora, as soon as the community reaches a few tens of families, they already feel the need to appoint a rabbi who can make rulings on religious matters and so that in general they will have a full Jewish structure. Here we have moshavot that are average-size towns, with populations of more than 100 families, and they have barely even started to look to appoint a rabbi. There is only one big moshava with a rabbi, Petach Tikva, and that was started, in the first place, by Jerusalemites from the Old Yishuv, and they worked on appointing a special rav.
When I started my contact with the moshavot (Rav Kook was a regional rabbi for the moshavot in addition to being the rabbi of Yafo), I found clearly that if we had important rabbis in every moshava, the situation regarding Judaism would be on a higher level. I started to speak about appointing local rabbis, and I found that the factors that have prevented the appointment of rabbis include internal and external ones.
One of the external factors is the challenge of paying his salary, since the financial situation is weak. In some cases, the fact that the moshavot receive financial support gets them in the habit of not paying for their communal needs from their own pockets. However, this by itself would not prevent appointments. The Shomrei Torah organization and the yeshivot in Yerushalayim are always ready to help and pay most of the salary. If some money is missing, every moshava has special individuals who fear and care about Hashem, and they are always willing to give money with all their hearts, for the support of Judaism, so that it would be easy to pick up the missing amount. Thus, the main external problem is easily overcome.
The main thing is thus the internal factors. The basis of it all is that the New Yishuv cannot stand the atmosphere, the style, and the characteristics of those trained in the Old Yishuv. This is not something that applies only to the “lightweights” who despise the Torah and the mitzvot. Rather, a large part of those [who feel this way] are fine people, people who are dedicated to Torah and have fear of Heaven. The vital movement of the New Yishuv, with its love of life and bravery, broadness, and national pride, cannot stand the bowed back, the wrinkled faces, and the sadness which shows fright and weakness of the heart. They are bothered by the wandering eyes that show resignation and hatred of life, and they are turned off by foreign, eastern clothes. When these things join together with the weakness that accompanies poverty, it brings reactions of shock together with mockery to [a member of the New Yishuv] who is used to European life, whether he has a little or a lot of exposure. These matters cannot be accepted in the New Yishuv without consternation.
When this is the standard style among those who were trained in the Old Yishuv, then there is great opposition among the members of the moshavot to the idea of hiring a rabbi. When I looked into the matter, I realized that even if we can overcome this lack of compatibility, and we will force in rabbis, they will not at all bring the desired benefit, as long as the internal lack of compatibility, which is deep in man’s spirit, is not removed.
Recipient: Rav Yitzchak Isaac Halevi. We have featured letters to him several times before.
Body: The situation in the New Yishuv is not as religiously strong as [standard, even “integrated”] Diaspora communities. In the Diaspora, as soon as the community reaches a few tens of families, they already feel the need to appoint a rabbi who can make rulings on religious matters and so that in general they will have a full Jewish structure. Here we have moshavot that are average-size towns, with populations of more than 100 families, and they have barely even started to look to appoint a rabbi. There is only one big moshava with a rabbi, Petach Tikva, and that was started, in the first place, by Jerusalemites from the Old Yishuv, and they worked on appointing a special rav.
When I started my contact with the moshavot (Rav Kook was a regional rabbi for the moshavot in addition to being the rabbi of Yafo), I found clearly that if we had important rabbis in every moshava, the situation regarding Judaism would be on a higher level. I started to speak about appointing local rabbis, and I found that the factors that have prevented the appointment of rabbis include internal and external ones.
One of the external factors is the challenge of paying his salary, since the financial situation is weak. In some cases, the fact that the moshavot receive financial support gets them in the habit of not paying for their communal needs from their own pockets. However, this by itself would not prevent appointments. The Shomrei Torah organization and the yeshivot in Yerushalayim are always ready to help and pay most of the salary. If some money is missing, every moshava has special individuals who fear and care about Hashem, and they are always willing to give money with all their hearts, for the support of Judaism, so that it would be easy to pick up the missing amount. Thus, the main external problem is easily overcome.
The main thing is thus the internal factors. The basis of it all is that the New Yishuv cannot stand the atmosphere, the style, and the characteristics of those trained in the Old Yishuv. This is not something that applies only to the “lightweights” who despise the Torah and the mitzvot. Rather, a large part of those [who feel this way] are fine people, people who are dedicated to Torah and have fear of Heaven. The vital movement of the New Yishuv, with its love of life and bravery, broadness, and national pride, cannot stand the bowed back, the wrinkled faces, and the sadness which shows fright and weakness of the heart. They are bothered by the wandering eyes that show resignation and hatred of life, and they are turned off by foreign, eastern clothes. When these things join together with the weakness that accompanies poverty, it brings reactions of shock together with mockery to [a member of the New Yishuv] who is used to European life, whether he has a little or a lot of exposure. These matters cannot be accepted in the New Yishuv without consternation.
When this is the standard style among those who were trained in the Old Yishuv, then there is great opposition among the members of the moshavot to the idea of hiring a rabbi. When I looked into the matter, I realized that even if we can overcome this lack of compatibility, and we will force in rabbis, they will not at all bring the desired benefit, as long as the internal lack of compatibility, which is deep in man’s spirit, is not removed.
Asking G-d to change his mind
by Rav Binny Freedman
There is an amazing story told about Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi was on a speaking tour across India, part of his non-violent struggle for independence from the British.
At that time, the only affordable mode of travel across the country was by rail. When there were no whites waiting for a train, the British rail company, in an effort to save the expense and time of actually stopping at the station, would have the trains slow down long enough for passengers to run along-side and hop on. (This racist policy was part of what Gandhi was struggling against…)
One day, Gandhi was running to get on a train, and as he jumped up, his shoe slipped off his foot. Though he tried to grab it, he ended up watching helplessly as it fell to the tracks. Quickly, he grabbed the other one off his foot and threw it back down the tracks toward the first rapidly disappearing shoe.
People who saw this thought perhaps Gandhi had taken leave of his senses. His response to their mystified expressions was: “At least now if a poor person finds his way across my shoe he will soon come across its mate and end up with a good pair of shoes. (For most Indians back then a pair of good shoes was equivalent to a month’s salary…)
What does it take for a person to develop his ethical instincts to such a degree? If Gandhi had waited another moment, he would have lost the opportunity; what poor person would continue for miles along the tracks in search of another shoe? To have such an immediate reaction, a person has to reach such a level of ethical behavior that ethics are no longer a thought-out process; they become instinctive. How can the average person aspire to reach such a level of human behavior?
This week’s portion, Ki Tisah, contains one of the most challenging episodes in the entire Torah, the debacle of the Golden Calf. Most often, we focus on how the Jewish people, a few months past the miracles of the Egyptian Exodus, and a few weeks after hearing the Ten Commandments, could be worshipping an idol. But it behooves us as well to take note of Moshe’s behavior at this critical juncture.
Moshe is in the midst of receiving the Torah at Sinai. Forty days after hearing the Ten Commandments, with one day left before his triumphant return to share the oral tradition he has received directly from G-d, Moshe receives stunning news:
” Lech Rayd, Ki Shichet Amchah…”
“Get thee down, for your people have become destructive…” (Shemot 32:7)
Hashem tells Moshe what the people have done, and that he must go down to deal with them. The Meshech Chachmah points out that what G- d is telling Moshe, in commanding him to “Get down”, is that if you are all the way up here, and they are all the way down there, something’s wrong. If you are their teacher and they are all the way down there, you don’t belong here. If you want to make a difference as a teacher, as a parent, end even as a friend, you have to be with others where they are, and understand where they are coming from. You can’t do that on top of the mountain; you have to be with them at the bottom.
The most amazing part of this story, however, is what comes next: Despite the fact that Hashem has told Moshe that he must go down the mountain, Moshe clearly does not comply, instead beginning to argue with G-d! (32: 6-14)
In fact, Hashem tells Moshe (32:10) “Let me be…and I will destroy them…” Clearly, G-d has decided that given the circumstances, the Jewish people have forfeited any right to be here, and, as in Noah’s flood and later with the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah , G-d will just have to start all over again. Yet, Moshe has no interest in G-d’s plan. Rather than acquiescing, and heading down the mountain, he actually begins to argue with G-d! And he offers three cogent arguments for the continued existence of the Jewish people. ‘You can’t destroy the Jewish people’, says Moshe to G-d, ‘for three reasons:’
First, how can You destroy the people You just spent so much trouble taking out of Egypt? After all the plagues, the splitting of the Sea, and the endless discussions, now you want to destroy them? What a waste!
Second, ‘How will the nations of the world perceive your decision to destroy the Jewish people?’ Imagine the Egyptians’ reaction: ‘We kept the Jews under control for over two hundred years; Hashem couldn’t even handle them for three months!’ How would that look? It would be a shandeh‘!
And lastly, says Moshe, ‘remember your promise to Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov: You promised to bring them home to Israel. If You destroy them now, You will totally lose Your credibility…’
Incredible! Moshe is actually arguing with G-d! The entire premise here demands explanation. How can Moshe argue with G-d? The idea is absurd! If everything is a part of G-d’s plan, and G-d, the All- mighty, All-knowing One, says that the Jewish people will be destroyed, then that is what has to happen. So how can Moshe start arguing with G-d?
Essentially, Moshe is actually asking G-d to change his mind. Think about it. Moshe comes before G-d and basically says, ‘Look, I know your plan is to wipe them out, but I really think you should reconsider. In fact, here are three very good reasons why I think You need to change your mind…’
How ridiculous is that? How could any human being, even Moshe, imagine there is anything we can come up with that G-d hasn’t already considered? In fact, it seems that what Moshe is telling G-d, is that He is wrong! But how could G-d ever be wrong?
Even more amazing, however, is G-d’s reaction to Moshe’s preposterous suggestion:
“Va’Yinachem Hashem Al Hara’ah Asher Diber La’Asot Le’Amo”
“Concerning the Evil Hashem had intended to do to His people, G-d ‘Va’Yinachem’s.” (32:14)
So, what does it mean, that Hashem ‘Va’Yinachem’s?
Well, consider the results of Moshe’s discussion with G-d. G-d seems to have decided to destroy the Jewish people. And then Moshe intercedes, and obviously, G- d ultimately does not destroy the Jewish people. (At least, not yet!) So what, in fact, did G-d do? Essentially, it seems, G-d did indeed change his mind! “Va’Yinachem Hashem” essentially means: ” And G-d relented…”. But how could G-d change His mind? After all, that would have to mean that G-d was wrong. How could G-d be wrong?
It is interesting to note, that this section of the Torah is actually the portion that we read on all the Jewish fast days (save Yom Kippur), perhaps alluding to the fact that this is the essential question of every fast day: we fast and pray, and attempt to repent, in an effort to change G-d’s mind. But how can we expec G-d to change His mind?
Indeed, what is Moshe actually doing here, in his conversation with G-d? The word “Va’yechal” is actually a language of prayer. Moshe is praying to G-d. And of course, this is also the essential question of prayer. We come before Hashem every day, asking G- d to change His mind. How do we do this? What, indeed, am I attempting to accomplish with prayer?
As an example, imagine for a moment what these prayers are all about. One of the prayers contained in the Shemoneh Esrei, the nineteen-benediction prayer that forms the mainstay of our Jewish liturgy, is the prayer of Re’faei’nu. In this prayer, we ask G-d to heal us from all our illnesses.
When you have a five-year-old daughter undergoing brain surgery, what else can you do, but pray? And yet, consider the absurdity of this premise: I have to ask G- d to heal our daughter? G-d doesn’t know I want our daughter to live, Please G-d, a long and healthy life?
And if, indeed, Hashem had decided, G-d forbid, that the outcome was meant to be different, then how on earth could I imagine that my prayers should change G-d’s mind? Perhaps what we are really meant to say every morning is: ‘if this is Your plan, then so be it! If someone is sick, there must be a reason, and since You, G-d, obviously know what You are doing, keep up the good work! If they are meant to be sick, then keep them sick as long as necessary! Who are we to imagine that we know what is good, and what is meant to be?
I remember, thirty years ago, on a hill just outside of Tsidon, meeting up with my old unit and actually having a chance to stop and catch my breath. It was the first time in quite a while there were enough guys who wanted to pray, and to actually conduct a service.
We had just finished a patrol, and I remember listening to the person leading the prayers reciting the ‘Sim Shalom’ prayer, a prayer for peace. It was a particularly moving moment. There we were in enemy territory, surrounded by tanks and guns, facing south towards Jerusalem, praying for peace. There is no one who appreciates peace like someone who has seen war.
So, I have to ask G-d for peace? Doesn’t He know that is all we were dreaming about? Imagine if G-d had listened to all the prayers for peace in 1941. Hitler controlled all of Europe, and had thrust a thousand miles deep into Russian territory, and America was months away from even entering the war, not yet beginning to make a difference. How different the world would be if peace had indeed come in 1941! We think we know what is good, and we think we know what we want. But in truth, we have no idea what we really should be asking for. So why not just leave it all to G-d?
Why aren’t we content to let events challenge our faith, and learn to accept them as part of the stream of life, like a twig accepting its fate of floating down a river…?
Indeed, this is one of the major points of divergence Judaism has with Buddhism and many of the eastern disciplines. We Jews believe somehow, that we have the right to challenge G-d. Does this simply mean we are arrogant? Or is there some deeper meaning?
Obviously, we can’t change G-d’s mind. To assume that G-d changes as we do, is to imagine that Hashem can be something today that he was not yesterday, which would mean G-d was limited, or incomplete.
“Ani Hashem lo Shineti”, I, G-d, do not change“, says the verse. (Malachi 3:6)
G-d doesn’t change, we do. In fact, part of the purpose of prayer, or fast days, for that matter, is to help us change, and to help us become better people.
Why do I pray for peace so often? On one level, it is because if a day goes by where I don’t appreciate how lucky I am to have peace, then something is wrong. And if a day goes by where I don’t appreciate what a gift good health is, and where that really comes from, then again, something is wrong. And the act, every day, even three times a day, of appreciating all of this, has to make me into a better person, if I will only take the time to consider the implication of what these words of prayer really mean. But it is also much deeper than that.
We’ll call him Kobi, for the purpose of the story. Kobi and I had studied together in yeshiva before the Lebanon war, but he was in a different unit, that took him up along the Lebanese coast. On the third day of the war they ran into a world of trouble just outside of Rashe’diyeh’, a PLO stronghold about sixty miles south of Beirut. A Sagger anti-tank missile, a nasty little Russian toy that first blows a hole through the tank’s armor, and then shoots a stream of lead at about four thousand degrees in through the hole, hit his tank. Basically, everything it hits explodes into fire. Men in the armored corps are trained to recognize a Sagger, as well as the BMP-1 Syrian Armored Personnel Carrier that launches it from a good distance away. So most of the crew saw it coming, and had a few seconds to jump out of the tank.
But Kobi was the gunner, who sits deep inside the belly of the tank, and cannot get out until the commander is out of the way. So Kobi sustained third degree burns on nearly eighty percent of his body.
Third degree burns are the worst kind of burns, burning through the skin all the way to the bone. Although the nerve endings are usually eaten up so that there is initially less pain, the rehabilitative process is perhaps one of the most difficult in modern medicine. Ultimately, Kobi underwent over six hundred plastic surgeries, skin grafts, and operations, and was in and out of the operating room for nearly a year and a half.
A few of us managed to get up to Rambam Hospital in Haifa to visit him. I had never been in a burn unit before and as this was the center for burn treatment in Israel , and we were in the middle of a war, the place was a madhouse.
A nurse directed us down the hall to the elevators. There was a big sign stating that no one under sixteen was allowed into the burn unit. The procedure for these types of burns is not to bandage them. Eventually, as the nerve endings hopefully are rejuvenated, the bandages can cause infections, not to mention tremendous pain, so the scene that greeted us when we stepped out on to the third floor, was like something out of Dante’s inferno. Charred patients were everywhere, and beds lined the halls. There was simply no room to move.
We didn’t know where Kobi was and we walked over to an orderly adjusting an I.V. for a burn patient. I tried so hard not to stare at the horror that was this man’s face, but I couldn’t help myself. And as one of the guys asked about Kobi’s whereabouts, I thought I saw a tear in the corner of his eye. And then he mouthed the words “Zeh Ani”, “It's me”.
He was so burned we didn’t even recognize him. And one of us was actually his closest friend. Can you imagine? We had no idea what to say. You come to visit someone who is sick, hoping to make him feel a bit better, and you have just told him he is so burned you don’t even recognize him. So what do you say?
If a day goes by where we don’t appreciate how blessed we are to be healthy then something is wrong. But more importantly, if a day goes by where we don’t stop to take the time to think about all the people out there who are sick, then something is really wrong. And the act of taking the time, every day, to think about others and care about their well-being, has to make me a better person.
The Talmud in Berachot actually says: “Halevai Ve’Adam Yesader Tefillotav Kol HaYom Kulo”, “Would that a person would pray all day long…”
Most of us are not on that level, but imagine what a world it would be if we could actually maintain such a perspective of caring for the world around us, all the time.
When we pray, if we really use the opportunity to care about others, to actively decide to consider the well being of the world around us, and to make a conscious decision to hope others will get better, then we, in the process will become better as well. And from a mystical perspective, when I change, the entire world has changed with me, if only in some small way.
Why do I pray for peace? Because if a day can go by when I don’t appreciate the gift of peace then something is wrong. But more, if a day, and even an hour, goes by without my thinking about all the people in the world who are not yet blessed to live in peace, then something is very, very, wrong.
We are not asking G-d to change. We are trying to change ourselves. And when and if we succeed, then in the process we have the right to expect that the world we lived in this morning no longer exists. We have changed and have a right to expect a different recipe in keeping with the idea that when one person changes the entire world changes with him.
This morning, this person was meant to be ill. But now there is a whole new world, and we hope, that as part of the new recipe that a new world implies, it will no longer fit into the plan for this person to be ill. And the war that may have been necessary this morning for reasons we are perhaps not meant to understand, that too, is no longer necessary.
Moshe is not asking G-d to change; Moshe is affecting change, and when Moshe changes, he has the right to say: I demand a new verdict. And if he doesn’t get it, he will keep trying to change the world, one day at a time, until the right verdict comes along!
In fact, maybe this is why G-d actually tells Moshe to go down the mountain. If G-d just wants to destroy the Jewish people, what difference does it make where Moshe is standing? Hashem wants us to be partners with Him in this world. And if a person is all the way up the mountain, and completely out of touch with all the people in the valley far below, then something is very wrong. Hashem actually tells Moshe: “Let me be…” because he is implying that Moshe has the capacity to change everything. If Moshe will not let G-d alone, as it were, then he has the ability to change everything.
That is actually part of the meaning of the Hebrew word for prayer: Tefillah. When Rachel names her son Naftali, she says: “Naftulei Elokim Niftalti”, “I have struggled the struggles of G-d”. Tefillah, the same word, means to struggle. G-d actually does not want us to just blindly accept the world as it is. He wants us to struggle with it, as partners, in the hopes of making it a better place.
Each of us has no idea of the extraordinary power Hashem gives us, every day, to change the world. This is why if something happens to anyone in this world, it really happens to everyone.
And this is also why this story is here, at the pinnacle of the Sinai experience. Sinai was all about creating a relationship with G-d based on love. Love is all about giving. In fact, the Hebrew word for love, Ahava, has as its root the word Hav, to give.
Love is all about giving and caring. It is exactly the opposite of lust, which is all about taking. And that is what the sin of the Golden calf was all about. The people wanted something tangible they could take. They were thinking about themselves and satisfying their own physical and maybe even spiritual desires. Theirs was desire based on lust, on taking. And what the Torah was trying to teach us was how magnificent the world could be if it was based on giving.
We, each of us, sometimes stand on our mountaintops and forget, even if only for a moment, that we have to learn to be together, even in the valley. This week’s portion challenges us to imagine a better world that depends on each of us, and begins every morning, afternoon and evening, one day at a time.
Shabbat Shalom.
At that time, the only affordable mode of travel across the country was by rail. When there were no whites waiting for a train, the British rail company, in an effort to save the expense and time of actually stopping at the station, would have the trains slow down long enough for passengers to run along-side and hop on. (This racist policy was part of what Gandhi was struggling against…)
One day, Gandhi was running to get on a train, and as he jumped up, his shoe slipped off his foot. Though he tried to grab it, he ended up watching helplessly as it fell to the tracks. Quickly, he grabbed the other one off his foot and threw it back down the tracks toward the first rapidly disappearing shoe.
People who saw this thought perhaps Gandhi had taken leave of his senses. His response to their mystified expressions was: “At least now if a poor person finds his way across my shoe he will soon come across its mate and end up with a good pair of shoes. (For most Indians back then a pair of good shoes was equivalent to a month’s salary…)
What does it take for a person to develop his ethical instincts to such a degree? If Gandhi had waited another moment, he would have lost the opportunity; what poor person would continue for miles along the tracks in search of another shoe? To have such an immediate reaction, a person has to reach such a level of ethical behavior that ethics are no longer a thought-out process; they become instinctive. How can the average person aspire to reach such a level of human behavior?
This week’s portion, Ki Tisah, contains one of the most challenging episodes in the entire Torah, the debacle of the Golden Calf. Most often, we focus on how the Jewish people, a few months past the miracles of the Egyptian Exodus, and a few weeks after hearing the Ten Commandments, could be worshipping an idol. But it behooves us as well to take note of Moshe’s behavior at this critical juncture.
Moshe is in the midst of receiving the Torah at Sinai. Forty days after hearing the Ten Commandments, with one day left before his triumphant return to share the oral tradition he has received directly from G-d, Moshe receives stunning news:
” Lech Rayd, Ki Shichet Amchah…”
“Get thee down, for your people have become destructive…” (Shemot 32:7)
Hashem tells Moshe what the people have done, and that he must go down to deal with them. The Meshech Chachmah points out that what G- d is telling Moshe, in commanding him to “Get down”, is that if you are all the way up here, and they are all the way down there, something’s wrong. If you are their teacher and they are all the way down there, you don’t belong here. If you want to make a difference as a teacher, as a parent, end even as a friend, you have to be with others where they are, and understand where they are coming from. You can’t do that on top of the mountain; you have to be with them at the bottom.
The most amazing part of this story, however, is what comes next: Despite the fact that Hashem has told Moshe that he must go down the mountain, Moshe clearly does not comply, instead beginning to argue with G-d! (32: 6-14)
In fact, Hashem tells Moshe (32:10) “Let me be…and I will destroy them…” Clearly, G-d has decided that given the circumstances, the Jewish people have forfeited any right to be here, and, as in Noah’s flood and later with the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah , G-d will just have to start all over again. Yet, Moshe has no interest in G-d’s plan. Rather than acquiescing, and heading down the mountain, he actually begins to argue with G-d! And he offers three cogent arguments for the continued existence of the Jewish people. ‘You can’t destroy the Jewish people’, says Moshe to G-d, ‘for three reasons:’
First, how can You destroy the people You just spent so much trouble taking out of Egypt? After all the plagues, the splitting of the Sea, and the endless discussions, now you want to destroy them? What a waste!
Second, ‘How will the nations of the world perceive your decision to destroy the Jewish people?’ Imagine the Egyptians’ reaction: ‘We kept the Jews under control for over two hundred years; Hashem couldn’t even handle them for three months!’ How would that look? It would be a shandeh‘!
And lastly, says Moshe, ‘remember your promise to Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov: You promised to bring them home to Israel. If You destroy them now, You will totally lose Your credibility…’
Incredible! Moshe is actually arguing with G-d! The entire premise here demands explanation. How can Moshe argue with G-d? The idea is absurd! If everything is a part of G-d’s plan, and G-d, the All- mighty, All-knowing One, says that the Jewish people will be destroyed, then that is what has to happen. So how can Moshe start arguing with G-d?
Essentially, Moshe is actually asking G-d to change his mind. Think about it. Moshe comes before G-d and basically says, ‘Look, I know your plan is to wipe them out, but I really think you should reconsider. In fact, here are three very good reasons why I think You need to change your mind…’
How ridiculous is that? How could any human being, even Moshe, imagine there is anything we can come up with that G-d hasn’t already considered? In fact, it seems that what Moshe is telling G-d, is that He is wrong! But how could G-d ever be wrong?
Even more amazing, however, is G-d’s reaction to Moshe’s preposterous suggestion:
“Va’Yinachem Hashem Al Hara’ah Asher Diber La’Asot Le’Amo”
“Concerning the Evil Hashem had intended to do to His people, G-d ‘Va’Yinachem’s.” (32:14)
So, what does it mean, that Hashem ‘Va’Yinachem’s?
Well, consider the results of Moshe’s discussion with G-d. G-d seems to have decided to destroy the Jewish people. And then Moshe intercedes, and obviously, G- d ultimately does not destroy the Jewish people. (At least, not yet!) So what, in fact, did G-d do? Essentially, it seems, G-d did indeed change his mind! “Va’Yinachem Hashem” essentially means: ” And G-d relented…”. But how could G-d change His mind? After all, that would have to mean that G-d was wrong. How could G-d be wrong?
It is interesting to note, that this section of the Torah is actually the portion that we read on all the Jewish fast days (save Yom Kippur), perhaps alluding to the fact that this is the essential question of every fast day: we fast and pray, and attempt to repent, in an effort to change G-d’s mind. But how can we expec G-d to change His mind?
Indeed, what is Moshe actually doing here, in his conversation with G-d? The word “Va’yechal” is actually a language of prayer. Moshe is praying to G-d. And of course, this is also the essential question of prayer. We come before Hashem every day, asking G- d to change His mind. How do we do this? What, indeed, am I attempting to accomplish with prayer?
As an example, imagine for a moment what these prayers are all about. One of the prayers contained in the Shemoneh Esrei, the nineteen-benediction prayer that forms the mainstay of our Jewish liturgy, is the prayer of Re’faei’nu. In this prayer, we ask G-d to heal us from all our illnesses.
When you have a five-year-old daughter undergoing brain surgery, what else can you do, but pray? And yet, consider the absurdity of this premise: I have to ask G- d to heal our daughter? G-d doesn’t know I want our daughter to live, Please G-d, a long and healthy life?
And if, indeed, Hashem had decided, G-d forbid, that the outcome was meant to be different, then how on earth could I imagine that my prayers should change G-d’s mind? Perhaps what we are really meant to say every morning is: ‘if this is Your plan, then so be it! If someone is sick, there must be a reason, and since You, G-d, obviously know what You are doing, keep up the good work! If they are meant to be sick, then keep them sick as long as necessary! Who are we to imagine that we know what is good, and what is meant to be?
I remember, thirty years ago, on a hill just outside of Tsidon, meeting up with my old unit and actually having a chance to stop and catch my breath. It was the first time in quite a while there were enough guys who wanted to pray, and to actually conduct a service.
We had just finished a patrol, and I remember listening to the person leading the prayers reciting the ‘Sim Shalom’ prayer, a prayer for peace. It was a particularly moving moment. There we were in enemy territory, surrounded by tanks and guns, facing south towards Jerusalem, praying for peace. There is no one who appreciates peace like someone who has seen war.
So, I have to ask G-d for peace? Doesn’t He know that is all we were dreaming about? Imagine if G-d had listened to all the prayers for peace in 1941. Hitler controlled all of Europe, and had thrust a thousand miles deep into Russian territory, and America was months away from even entering the war, not yet beginning to make a difference. How different the world would be if peace had indeed come in 1941! We think we know what is good, and we think we know what we want. But in truth, we have no idea what we really should be asking for. So why not just leave it all to G-d?
Why aren’t we content to let events challenge our faith, and learn to accept them as part of the stream of life, like a twig accepting its fate of floating down a river…?
Indeed, this is one of the major points of divergence Judaism has with Buddhism and many of the eastern disciplines. We Jews believe somehow, that we have the right to challenge G-d. Does this simply mean we are arrogant? Or is there some deeper meaning?
Obviously, we can’t change G-d’s mind. To assume that G-d changes as we do, is to imagine that Hashem can be something today that he was not yesterday, which would mean G-d was limited, or incomplete.
“Ani Hashem lo Shineti”, I, G-d, do not change“, says the verse. (Malachi 3:6)
G-d doesn’t change, we do. In fact, part of the purpose of prayer, or fast days, for that matter, is to help us change, and to help us become better people.
Why do I pray for peace so often? On one level, it is because if a day goes by where I don’t appreciate how lucky I am to have peace, then something is wrong. And if a day goes by where I don’t appreciate what a gift good health is, and where that really comes from, then again, something is wrong. And the act, every day, even three times a day, of appreciating all of this, has to make me into a better person, if I will only take the time to consider the implication of what these words of prayer really mean. But it is also much deeper than that.
We’ll call him Kobi, for the purpose of the story. Kobi and I had studied together in yeshiva before the Lebanon war, but he was in a different unit, that took him up along the Lebanese coast. On the third day of the war they ran into a world of trouble just outside of Rashe’diyeh’, a PLO stronghold about sixty miles south of Beirut. A Sagger anti-tank missile, a nasty little Russian toy that first blows a hole through the tank’s armor, and then shoots a stream of lead at about four thousand degrees in through the hole, hit his tank. Basically, everything it hits explodes into fire. Men in the armored corps are trained to recognize a Sagger, as well as the BMP-1 Syrian Armored Personnel Carrier that launches it from a good distance away. So most of the crew saw it coming, and had a few seconds to jump out of the tank.
But Kobi was the gunner, who sits deep inside the belly of the tank, and cannot get out until the commander is out of the way. So Kobi sustained third degree burns on nearly eighty percent of his body.
Third degree burns are the worst kind of burns, burning through the skin all the way to the bone. Although the nerve endings are usually eaten up so that there is initially less pain, the rehabilitative process is perhaps one of the most difficult in modern medicine. Ultimately, Kobi underwent over six hundred plastic surgeries, skin grafts, and operations, and was in and out of the operating room for nearly a year and a half.
A few of us managed to get up to Rambam Hospital in Haifa to visit him. I had never been in a burn unit before and as this was the center for burn treatment in Israel , and we were in the middle of a war, the place was a madhouse.
A nurse directed us down the hall to the elevators. There was a big sign stating that no one under sixteen was allowed into the burn unit. The procedure for these types of burns is not to bandage them. Eventually, as the nerve endings hopefully are rejuvenated, the bandages can cause infections, not to mention tremendous pain, so the scene that greeted us when we stepped out on to the third floor, was like something out of Dante’s inferno. Charred patients were everywhere, and beds lined the halls. There was simply no room to move.
We didn’t know where Kobi was and we walked over to an orderly adjusting an I.V. for a burn patient. I tried so hard not to stare at the horror that was this man’s face, but I couldn’t help myself. And as one of the guys asked about Kobi’s whereabouts, I thought I saw a tear in the corner of his eye. And then he mouthed the words “Zeh Ani”, “It's me”.
He was so burned we didn’t even recognize him. And one of us was actually his closest friend. Can you imagine? We had no idea what to say. You come to visit someone who is sick, hoping to make him feel a bit better, and you have just told him he is so burned you don’t even recognize him. So what do you say?
If a day goes by where we don’t appreciate how blessed we are to be healthy then something is wrong. But more importantly, if a day goes by where we don’t stop to take the time to think about all the people out there who are sick, then something is really wrong. And the act of taking the time, every day, to think about others and care about their well-being, has to make me a better person.
The Talmud in Berachot actually says: “Halevai Ve’Adam Yesader Tefillotav Kol HaYom Kulo”, “Would that a person would pray all day long…”
Most of us are not on that level, but imagine what a world it would be if we could actually maintain such a perspective of caring for the world around us, all the time.
When we pray, if we really use the opportunity to care about others, to actively decide to consider the well being of the world around us, and to make a conscious decision to hope others will get better, then we, in the process will become better as well. And from a mystical perspective, when I change, the entire world has changed with me, if only in some small way.
Why do I pray for peace? Because if a day can go by when I don’t appreciate the gift of peace then something is wrong. But more, if a day, and even an hour, goes by without my thinking about all the people in the world who are not yet blessed to live in peace, then something is very, very, wrong.
We are not asking G-d to change. We are trying to change ourselves. And when and if we succeed, then in the process we have the right to expect that the world we lived in this morning no longer exists. We have changed and have a right to expect a different recipe in keeping with the idea that when one person changes the entire world changes with him.
This morning, this person was meant to be ill. But now there is a whole new world, and we hope, that as part of the new recipe that a new world implies, it will no longer fit into the plan for this person to be ill. And the war that may have been necessary this morning for reasons we are perhaps not meant to understand, that too, is no longer necessary.
Moshe is not asking G-d to change; Moshe is affecting change, and when Moshe changes, he has the right to say: I demand a new verdict. And if he doesn’t get it, he will keep trying to change the world, one day at a time, until the right verdict comes along!
In fact, maybe this is why G-d actually tells Moshe to go down the mountain. If G-d just wants to destroy the Jewish people, what difference does it make where Moshe is standing? Hashem wants us to be partners with Him in this world. And if a person is all the way up the mountain, and completely out of touch with all the people in the valley far below, then something is very wrong. Hashem actually tells Moshe: “Let me be…” because he is implying that Moshe has the capacity to change everything. If Moshe will not let G-d alone, as it were, then he has the ability to change everything.
That is actually part of the meaning of the Hebrew word for prayer: Tefillah. When Rachel names her son Naftali, she says: “Naftulei Elokim Niftalti”, “I have struggled the struggles of G-d”. Tefillah, the same word, means to struggle. G-d actually does not want us to just blindly accept the world as it is. He wants us to struggle with it, as partners, in the hopes of making it a better place.
Each of us has no idea of the extraordinary power Hashem gives us, every day, to change the world. This is why if something happens to anyone in this world, it really happens to everyone.
And this is also why this story is here, at the pinnacle of the Sinai experience. Sinai was all about creating a relationship with G-d based on love. Love is all about giving. In fact, the Hebrew word for love, Ahava, has as its root the word Hav, to give.
Love is all about giving and caring. It is exactly the opposite of lust, which is all about taking. And that is what the sin of the Golden calf was all about. The people wanted something tangible they could take. They were thinking about themselves and satisfying their own physical and maybe even spiritual desires. Theirs was desire based on lust, on taking. And what the Torah was trying to teach us was how magnificent the world could be if it was based on giving.
We, each of us, sometimes stand on our mountaintops and forget, even if only for a moment, that we have to learn to be together, even in the valley. This week’s portion challenges us to imagine a better world that depends on each of us, and begins every morning, afternoon and evening, one day at a time.
Shabbat Shalom.
Thursday, March 09, 2023
The Yishai Fleisher Israel Podcast: A Time For War, A Time For Peace
SEASON 2023 EPISODE 10: Yishai and Malkah Fleisher get into a heated discussion triggered by Yishai's thought-experiment of how to "win" the battle for judicial reform. Then, Dennis Prager's classic speech at IAC. Finally, Table Torah: Three BIG promises for three pilgrimages.
Playing Chicken with the Jewish State
by Victor Rosenthal
What’s really going on in Israel?
What are the massive demonstrations and disruptions in the streets, the revolt of the reserve pilots and the countless testimonials and petitions in Israel and the U.S. about?
They aren’t just about changing the balance of power between the Israeli Supreme Court and the elected government and Knesset. If they were, the parties could soon reach a compromise that would maintain a degree of judicial review and protect minority rights without prioritizing them over the survival of the Jewish state.
But that’s not what’s really going on. What’s going on is a power struggle between two blocs in Israeli society.
On one side, which I will imprecisely label “the left,” are the legal, judicial, academic, artistic and media establishments, along with much of the upper class, based mostly in the center of the country. This alliance is supported by the Biden administration and liberal American Jewish denominations. Insofar as it has a spokesperson, it is Yair Lapid.
On the other side, which I call with equal imprecision “the right,” are Orthodox Jews, Mizrachim, Russian speakers, the lower classes and residents of Israel’s periphery. The right is larger than the left, but the left’s control of the media and the legal system weighs heavily on the scales. The undisputed champion of the right is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Israel was a one-party state from its founding until 1977, when disgust with the Labor government’s failure to prepare for the Yom Kippur War and the accumulated anger of the Mizrachim at their paternalistic and exclusionary treatment resulted in Menachem Begin’s election as prime minister. When the left returned to power, it foisted the Oslo Accords on a generally unwilling public, which then endured the horrifying terror attacks of the second intifada.
That was virtually the end of left-wing governments in Israel. From then on, successful coalitions would be formed by the center and the right, many of them led by Netanyahu.
The left was shocked by Begin’s victory and depressed by Netanyahu’s continuing success. They realized that, due to demographic trends, they were unlikely to win a Knesset majority again. But they retained control of the legal establishment and used it to “protect” the country against the “excesses” of right-wing governments.
During the late 1980s and 1990s, the legal establishment arrogated more and more power to itself. For example, legal advisors throughout the government were given veto power over any official action. This veto need not be based on whether the action was illegal, but on whether it was unreasonable.
In another historic move, the Supreme Court handed itself the power of judicial review. In 1995, for the first time, it overturned a law passed by the Knesset.
Soon, the judiciary began to interfere in issues that were more political than legal. This gave rise to the demand that limits be set on its power. Were it not for one thing, that might have happened quietly, in a way that would be acceptable to both sides.
That one thing is Netanyahu. More specifically, the left’s hatred of him. As a result of this, what should have been a matter of discussion and compromise has become a conflict between the country’s two major blocs.
This is what lies behind the well-financed campaign against judicial reform. This campaign is dishonest and hysterical. If the reforms pass, opponents say, the justice system will be destroyed and Israel will become a fascist dictatorship. The economy will be wrecked, capital and tech workers will flee, the army will not fight and Israel will become a theocratic state soon to be overrun by her enemies.
This is nonsense. Even if the reforms are enacted in full, the situation would be no different than it was prior to the 1980s. If a compromise version of the reform were to pass, democracy in Israel would be enhanced, not damaged.
None of the reform bills have passed more than the first of three readings, so there is plenty of time to negotiate and compromise, and the government is willing to do so. The opposition, however, refuses to talk unless the process is frozen. The coalition believes that if the process is frozen, it will never be thawed, and insists that there can be negotiations during the normal legislative process.
In the meantime, opponents are ramping up their disruptions to the point that there are real fears of serious violence. The opposition sees blood in the water—Netanyahu’s—and can’t face the prospect of losing their veto power over the actions of any right-wing government. They have decided to keep their foot on the gas in the game of chicken until Netanyahu and his coalition blink.
What should happen is for the grownups in the opposition to work out a compromise with the government that will restore judicial balance without harming either side or the nation. This is perfectly possible.
What might happen is that the left has unleashed forces that cannot be controlled. In that case, the game of chicken could end in a fiery head-on collision.
This post first appeared on the Jewish News Service website.
What are the massive demonstrations and disruptions in the streets, the revolt of the reserve pilots and the countless testimonials and petitions in Israel and the U.S. about?
They aren’t just about changing the balance of power between the Israeli Supreme Court and the elected government and Knesset. If they were, the parties could soon reach a compromise that would maintain a degree of judicial review and protect minority rights without prioritizing them over the survival of the Jewish state.
But that’s not what’s really going on. What’s going on is a power struggle between two blocs in Israeli society.
On one side, which I will imprecisely label “the left,” are the legal, judicial, academic, artistic and media establishments, along with much of the upper class, based mostly in the center of the country. This alliance is supported by the Biden administration and liberal American Jewish denominations. Insofar as it has a spokesperson, it is Yair Lapid.
On the other side, which I call with equal imprecision “the right,” are Orthodox Jews, Mizrachim, Russian speakers, the lower classes and residents of Israel’s periphery. The right is larger than the left, but the left’s control of the media and the legal system weighs heavily on the scales. The undisputed champion of the right is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Israel was a one-party state from its founding until 1977, when disgust with the Labor government’s failure to prepare for the Yom Kippur War and the accumulated anger of the Mizrachim at their paternalistic and exclusionary treatment resulted in Menachem Begin’s election as prime minister. When the left returned to power, it foisted the Oslo Accords on a generally unwilling public, which then endured the horrifying terror attacks of the second intifada.
That was virtually the end of left-wing governments in Israel. From then on, successful coalitions would be formed by the center and the right, many of them led by Netanyahu.
The left was shocked by Begin’s victory and depressed by Netanyahu’s continuing success. They realized that, due to demographic trends, they were unlikely to win a Knesset majority again. But they retained control of the legal establishment and used it to “protect” the country against the “excesses” of right-wing governments.
During the late 1980s and 1990s, the legal establishment arrogated more and more power to itself. For example, legal advisors throughout the government were given veto power over any official action. This veto need not be based on whether the action was illegal, but on whether it was unreasonable.
In another historic move, the Supreme Court handed itself the power of judicial review. In 1995, for the first time, it overturned a law passed by the Knesset.
Soon, the judiciary began to interfere in issues that were more political than legal. This gave rise to the demand that limits be set on its power. Were it not for one thing, that might have happened quietly, in a way that would be acceptable to both sides.
That one thing is Netanyahu. More specifically, the left’s hatred of him. As a result of this, what should have been a matter of discussion and compromise has become a conflict between the country’s two major blocs.
This is what lies behind the well-financed campaign against judicial reform. This campaign is dishonest and hysterical. If the reforms pass, opponents say, the justice system will be destroyed and Israel will become a fascist dictatorship. The economy will be wrecked, capital and tech workers will flee, the army will not fight and Israel will become a theocratic state soon to be overrun by her enemies.
This is nonsense. Even if the reforms are enacted in full, the situation would be no different than it was prior to the 1980s. If a compromise version of the reform were to pass, democracy in Israel would be enhanced, not damaged.
None of the reform bills have passed more than the first of three readings, so there is plenty of time to negotiate and compromise, and the government is willing to do so. The opposition, however, refuses to talk unless the process is frozen. The coalition believes that if the process is frozen, it will never be thawed, and insists that there can be negotiations during the normal legislative process.
In the meantime, opponents are ramping up their disruptions to the point that there are real fears of serious violence. The opposition sees blood in the water—Netanyahu’s—and can’t face the prospect of losing their veto power over the actions of any right-wing government. They have decided to keep their foot on the gas in the game of chicken until Netanyahu and his coalition blink.
What should happen is for the grownups in the opposition to work out a compromise with the government that will restore judicial balance without harming either side or the nation. This is perfectly possible.
What might happen is that the left has unleashed forces that cannot be controlled. In that case, the game of chicken could end in a fiery head-on collision.
This post first appeared on the Jewish News Service website.
Timeless values cannot be measured by polls
by HaRav Dov Begon
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir
“When you take a census of the Israelites to determine their numbers, each one shall be counted by giving an atonement offering for his life. In this manner, they will not be stricken by the plague when they are counted” (Shemot 30:11). Rashi explains that countings fall under the control of the evil eye, inviting plagues, such as occurred in the days of Dovid HaMelech.
The Jewish People possess a magnificent soul. That soul rests within all Jews in all generations, whatever their affiliations. No attempt to count the Jews individually can meet with blessing, for “no blessing rests upon something unless it is hidden from sight.” (Ta’anit 8b). When we count people and turn them into numbers or statistics, their personality is thereby blotted out, and their unique soul, the image of G-d, within, disappears. Indeed the Nazis, in their desire to degrade the Jews and to wipe them out off the face of the earth, engraved numbers on their arms.
Thus when we set out to count the Jewish People, we do not count heads or bodies. Instead, we count the half shekel that each Jew contributes to the general fund. With that money, animals are purchased for communal offerings which will increase the public merit and add holiness, goodness, and light to the world. By such means, the whole Jewish People are exalted, as well as each individual Jew among them.
Currently, we are not careful in avoiding the counting of the Jewish People. Quite the contrary, statistics, public opinion polls, and plebiscites are becoming accepted concepts in Israeli society, and a genuine danger exists that this approach in society and in politics will harm our ethical foundations and our eternal values regarding existential topics affecting the Jewish State and People.
We must learn from the debacle of Dovid HaMelech’s census and we must understand that the Jewish People are not to be counted. Timeless values and our connection to the Jewish People and the Land of Israel cannot be measured by surveys, polls, or plebiscites. “The Eternal One of Israel does not lie [yishaker]” (Shmuel aleph 15:29). Nor can our eternal values be measured by polls [yisaker].
Looking forward to salvation,
With the Love of Israel,
Shabbat Shalom.
Rosh HaYeshiva, Machon Meir
“When you take a census of the Israelites to determine their numbers, each one shall be counted by giving an atonement offering for his life. In this manner, they will not be stricken by the plague when they are counted” (Shemot 30:11). Rashi explains that countings fall under the control of the evil eye, inviting plagues, such as occurred in the days of Dovid HaMelech.
The Jewish People possess a magnificent soul. That soul rests within all Jews in all generations, whatever their affiliations. No attempt to count the Jews individually can meet with blessing, for “no blessing rests upon something unless it is hidden from sight.” (Ta’anit 8b). When we count people and turn them into numbers or statistics, their personality is thereby blotted out, and their unique soul, the image of G-d, within, disappears. Indeed the Nazis, in their desire to degrade the Jews and to wipe them out off the face of the earth, engraved numbers on their arms.
Thus when we set out to count the Jewish People, we do not count heads or bodies. Instead, we count the half shekel that each Jew contributes to the general fund. With that money, animals are purchased for communal offerings which will increase the public merit and add holiness, goodness, and light to the world. By such means, the whole Jewish People are exalted, as well as each individual Jew among them.
Currently, we are not careful in avoiding the counting of the Jewish People. Quite the contrary, statistics, public opinion polls, and plebiscites are becoming accepted concepts in Israeli society, and a genuine danger exists that this approach in society and in politics will harm our ethical foundations and our eternal values regarding existential topics affecting the Jewish State and People.
We must learn from the debacle of Dovid HaMelech’s census and we must understand that the Jewish People are not to be counted. Timeless values and our connection to the Jewish People and the Land of Israel cannot be measured by surveys, polls, or plebiscites. “The Eternal One of Israel does not lie [yishaker]” (Shmuel aleph 15:29). Nor can our eternal values be measured by polls [yisaker].
Looking forward to salvation,
With the Love of Israel,
Shabbat Shalom.
The EU's Lethal Obsession with Israel
by Bassam Tawil

The EU, it seems, has funded literally thousands of illegal Palestinian modular buildings in territory that is legally under Israeli jurisdiction. By doing so, the EU is encouraging the Palestinians to engage in unilateral actions in violation of the agreements signed between the Palestinians and Israel. Pictured: The illegal Palestinian encampment of Khan Al-Ahmar, located within a few meters of the highway connecting Jerusalem with the Dead Sea and the Jordan Valley. (Image source: TrickyH/Wikimedia Commons)
European Union Special Representative for the Middle East Peace Process Sven Koopmans stated on February 17: "The EU wants build stronger ties with Israel, yet relations sadly remain burdened by the construction of illegal settlements on Palestinian land."
What Koopmans forgot to mention that it is the Palestinians who have built literally tens of thousands of illegal structures in the West Bank, especially in Area C, which, according to the Oslo Accords, is under full Israeli security and civilian jurisdiction.
Koopmans also forgot to mention that the EU is helping the Palestinian Authority (PA) with the mass-scale illegal construction, paving the way for the de facto annexation of the territory.
Continue Reading Article
- What [EU] Representative [Sven] Koopmans forgot to mention that it is the Palestinians who have built tens of thousands of illegal structures in the West Bank, especially in Area C, which, according to the Oslo Accords, is under full Israeli security and civilian jurisdiction.
- Koopmans also forgot to mention that the EU is helping the Palestinian Authority (PA) with the mass-scale illegal construction, paving the way for the de facto annexation of the territory.
- The EU does not interfere anyplace else on the planet other than Area C -- not for the Kurds, the Assyrians, the Yazidis, the Uyghurs, the Kashmiris, the Tibetans or the Greek Cypriots. The Palestinians continue to be the only group on the EU's list of people with whom to interfere. This inordinate attention appears to stem not so much from love for the Palestinians as from hatred for Israel.
- The EU, it seems, has funded literally thousands of illegal Palestinian modular buildings in territory that is legally under Israeli jurisdiction.
- Lately, the EU has been concentrating more on agricultural land: one can acquire a much larger area for a much smaller investment.
- By doing so, the EU is encouraging the Palestinians to engage in unilateral actions in violation of the agreements signed between the Palestinians and Israel.
- This is the same EU that continues to warn Israel not to take any "unilateral actions," and that continues to criticize Israel for building and expanding "illegal" settlements in the West Bank.
- As of 2022, the EU has built 81,317 illegal structures in Area C....
- The EU's commitment to the expansion of illegal Palestinian settlement in Area C persists in full disregard of the Oslo Accords, which the EU purports to uphold.
- "The object is to create continuous Palestinian settlement throughout the West Bank and thereby isolate and strangle Israeli communities," wrote Hillel Frisch, professor of Political Science and Middle Eastern History at Bar-Ilan University, in 2019.
- The 2009 "Fayyad Plan" (officially titled "Palestine: Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State") was -- and remains -- a proposal to create facts on the ground that would end up as a Palestinian state if negotiations do not work out, thereby bypassing the need to negotiate with Israel as agreed to in the Oslo Accords.
- The catch is: If the Palestinians believe that they can be handed a state by some external entity, such as the EU, at no cost to themselves, why should they ever bother to negotiate? For years, in fact, they have avoided coming to the negotiating table, presumably in the hope of precisely such a windfall.
- The best interests of the Jahalin Bedouin were not the main concern of the Palestinian Authority. What was important to the PA was the land -- to take possession of it and then make whatever was built on it appear irreversible.
- [T]hese new facts on the ground, of course, encourage the Palestinians not to negotiate. Why should they, if they can get everything they want by just taking it?
- Fayyad's unilateral plan to create facts on the ground is totally in violation of the Oslo Accords, which state that "neither side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the permanent status negotiations."
- At the end of last year, a secret document by the EU's mission in east Jerusalem showed that Brussels is also actively working with, and on behalf of, the Palestinian Authority to take over Area C of the West Bank.
- Koopmans and other senior EU officials apparently know they are acting illicitly: they are doing their utmost to hide the fact that they are actively helping the Palestinians to break the law and violate the agreements signed with Israel.
- Just as Israel does not meddle in the internal affairs of the EU member states, it is time to put an end to the EU's poisonous intrusion into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
- Along the way, the EU might also want to consider the real source of its lethal obsession with Israel.

The EU, it seems, has funded literally thousands of illegal Palestinian modular buildings in territory that is legally under Israeli jurisdiction. By doing so, the EU is encouraging the Palestinians to engage in unilateral actions in violation of the agreements signed between the Palestinians and Israel. Pictured: The illegal Palestinian encampment of Khan Al-Ahmar, located within a few meters of the highway connecting Jerusalem with the Dead Sea and the Jordan Valley. (Image source: TrickyH/Wikimedia Commons)
European Union Special Representative for the Middle East Peace Process Sven Koopmans stated on February 17: "The EU wants build stronger ties with Israel, yet relations sadly remain burdened by the construction of illegal settlements on Palestinian land."
What Koopmans forgot to mention that it is the Palestinians who have built literally tens of thousands of illegal structures in the West Bank, especially in Area C, which, according to the Oslo Accords, is under full Israeli security and civilian jurisdiction.
Koopmans also forgot to mention that the EU is helping the Palestinian Authority (PA) with the mass-scale illegal construction, paving the way for the de facto annexation of the territory.
Continue Reading Article

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













